Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
politics

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

1980 United States Senate election in Idaho

none


none

FieldValue
election_name1980 United States Senate election in Idaho
countryIdaho
typepresidential
ongoingno
previous_election1974 United States Senate election in Idaho
previous_year1974
next_election1986 United States Senate election in Idaho
next_year1986
election_dateNovember 4, 1980
image_size150x150px
image1Stevesymms.jpg
nominee1**Steve Symms**
party1Republican Party (United States)
popular_vote1**218,701**
percentage1**49.74%**
image2FrankChurch.jpg
nominee2Frank Church
party2Democratic Party (United States)
popular_vote2214,439
percentage248.78%
titleU.S. Senator
before_electionFrank Church
before_partyDemocratic Party (United States)
after_electionSteve Symms
after_partyRepublican Party (United States)
map_image1980 United States Senate election in Idaho results map by county.svg
map_size180px
map_captionCounty results
**Symms:**
**Church:**

Symms:
Church:
The 1980 United States Senate election in Idaho took place on November 4, 1980, alongside other elections to the United States Senate in other states as well as elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections. Incumbent Democrat Frank Church ran for a fifth term and narrowly lost to Republican Steve Symms.

This is the last time that a Senator from Idaho lost re-election. Since Symms took office in 1981, Republicans have held both of Idaho's U.S. Senate seats, which they had not done since 1957.

General election

Candidates

  • Frank Church, incumbent U.S. Senator (Democratic)
  • Larry Fullmer (Libertarian)
  • Steve Symms, U.S. Representative from Caldwell (Republican)

Campaign

Entering the election, Church was seen as vulnerable because he was a liberal Senator representing one of the most conservative states. Nevertheless, Church was considered by many to be the favorite, with even prominent Republicans in the state not giving his opponent, 1st congressional district Representative Steve Symms much of a chance to unseat Church.

However, due to a variety of factors, the dynamic of the race would soon shift. For one, the race was affected by the concurrent Presidential Election, in which Ronald Reagan's coattails were anticipated to have an effect. Another factor was an influx of out-of-state money affecting the campaigns. Church and Symms both raised considerable sums from out of state donors from states such as Texas and Florida, and by the campaigns end, both had spent close to $3.5 million, a state record.

Moreover, groups such as the ABC (Anybody But Church), which was affiliated with the NCPAC (National Conservative Political Action Committee), spent big on advertisements and mailers to damage Church's standing. Church criticized these efforts as using the big lie. These factors, plus criticism over his stance on the Panama Canal Treaties, made this a difficult campaign for the Senator.

Polling

Polls throughout the election showed Church up by small margins, highlighting the race's closeness. Even in the final days, it had been believed that a large number of voters remained undecided.

Results

In the end, Church lost by a margin of 4,262 votes or 0.96%. Many reasons were attributed to Church's defeat. One reason was that Ronald Reagan's landslide victory caused a coattail effect that Church couldn't overcome. Another one was Jimmy Carter's early concession. Because Carter had conceded before polls closed in the Panhandle (which is in Pacific Time as opposed to the rest of the state, which is in Mountain Time), this was believed to have depressed voters in one of Church's strongest regions. There was also the factor of shifts among Mormon voters, who due to a focus on moral issues such as abortion, turned away from Church in the Eastern part of the state.

References

References

  1. AP. (August 14, 1979). "Sen. Church Termed Vulnerable". Spokane Daily Chronicle.
  2. MIller, Judith. (November 6, 1980). "TimesMachine: Thursday November 6, 1980 - NYTimes.com". The New York Times.
  3. AP. (April 22, 1979). "GOP Leaders Doubt Symms Could Beat Church". Lewiston Morning Tribune.
  4. (July 19, 1980). "Church/Can Conservative Tide Wash Him Out?". The Bulletin.
  5. AP. (April 16, 1980). "Symms, Church get 'big' $". Lewiston Morning Tribune.
  6. AP. (January 31, 1981). "Church won the spending battle". The Spokesman-Review.
  7. Riordan, Patrick. (May 18, 1980). "Frank Church: A Man Under Fire". Boca Raton News.
  8. (August 15, 1979). "Church: They're using the big lie". Lewiston Morning Tribune.
  9. Sinclair, Ward. (1979-10-12). "Church Perceived as Apostate Fearful of Election Disaster". Washington Post.
  10. "It's 'Frank' vs. 'Steve' as Idaho's Church seeks re-election to Senate". Christian Science Monitor.
  11. Wilson, Marc. (October 28, 1980). "How many undecided in Idaho?". The Spokesman-Review.
  12. (February 1987). "Why Church Lost: A Preliminary Analysis of the Church-Symms Election of 1980". Pacific Historical Review.
  13. Leahy, Patrick. (2022). "The Road Taken: A Memoir". Simon & Schuster.
  14. Hatzenbuehler, Ronald L.. (January 2020). "Dissent among Mormons in the 1980 Senatorial Election in Idaho". International Journal of Religion.
  15. "Statistics of the Congressional Election of November 4, 1980".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 1980 United States Senate election in Idaho — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report