1888 United States presidential election

Nominations

Republican Party nomination

Main article: 1888 Republican National Convention

The Republican candidates were former Senator Benjamin Harrison from Indiana; Senator John Sherman from Ohio; Russell A. Alger, the former governor of Michigan; Walter Q. Gresham from Indiana, the former Secretary of the Treasury; Senator William B. Allison from Iowa; and Chauncey Depew from New York, the president of the New York Central Railroad.

By the time Republicans met in Chicago on June 19–25, 1888, frontrunner James G. Blaine had withdrawn from the race because he believed that only a harmonious convention would produce a Republican candidate strong enough to upset incumbent President Cleveland. Blaine realized that the party was unlikely to choose him without a bitter struggle. After he withdrew, Blaine expressed confidence in both Benjamin Harrison and John Sherman. Harrison was nominated on the eighth ballot.

The Republicans chose Harrison because of his war record, his popularity with veterans, his ability to express the Republican Party's views, and the fact that he lived in the swing state of Indiana. The Republicans hoped to win Indiana's 15 electoral votes, which had gone to Cleveland in the previous presidential election. Levi P. Morton, a former New York City congressman and ambassador, was nominated for vice-president over William Walter Phelps, his nearest rival.

Democratic Party nomination

Main article: 1888 Democratic National Convention

Democratic candidates: File:Grover Cleveland Portrait.jpg|President Grover Cleveland

The Democratic National Convention held in St. Louis, Missouri, on June 5–7, 1888, was harmonious. Incumbent President Cleveland was re-nominated unanimously without a formal ballot. This was the first time an incumbent Democratic president had been re-nominated since Martin Van Buren in 1840.

After Cleveland was re-nominated, Democrats had to choose a replacement for Thomas A. Hendricks. Hendricks ran unsuccessfully as the Democratic nominee for vice-president in 1876, but won the office when he ran again with Cleveland in 1884. Hendricks served as vice-president for only eight months before he died in office on November 25, 1885. Former Senator Allen G. Thurman from Ohio was nominated for vice-president over Isaac P. Gray, his nearest rival, and John C. Black, who trailed behind. Gray lost the nomination to Thurman primarily because his opponents brought up his actions while a Republican.

The Democratic platform largely confined itself to a defense of the Cleveland administration, supporting reduction in the tariff and taxes generally as well as statehood for the western territories.

Prohibition Party nomination

Nominees

The 5th Prohibition Party National Convention assembled in Tomlinson Hall in Indianapolis, Indiana. There were 1,029 delegates from all but three states.

Clinton B. Fisk was nominated for president unanimously. John A. Brooks was nominated for vice-president.

Union Labor Party nomination

Nominees

300 to 600 delegates attended the Industrial Labor Conference in Cincinnati in February 1887, and formed the Union Labor Party. The delegates were generally made up of rural Greenbackers and urban trade unionists. Richard Trevellick, the chair of the conference, was a member of the Knights of Labor and a former member of the Greenback Party.

The convention nominated Alson Streeter for president unanimously. He was so widely popular that no ballot was necessary, instead, he was nominated by acclamation. Samuel Evans was nominated for vice president but declined the nomination. Charles E. Cunningham was later selected as the vice-presidential candidate.

The Union Labor Party garnered nearly 150,000 popular votes, but failed to gain widespread national support. The party did, however, win two counties.

United Labor Party nomination

The United Labor Party convention nominated Robert H. Cowdrey for president on the first ballot. W.H.T. Wakefield of Kansas was nominated for vice-president over Victor H. Wilder from New York by a margin of 50–12.

Greenback Party

The Greenback Party was in decline throughout the entire Cleveland administration. In the election of 1884, the party failed to win any House seats outright, although they did win one seat in conjunction with Plains States Democrats (James B. Weaver) and a handful of other seats by endorsing the Democratic nominee. In the election of 1886, only two dozen Greenback candidates ran for the House, apart from another six who ran on fusion tickets. Again, Weaver was the party's only victor. Much of the Greenback news in early 1888 took place in Michigan, where the party remained active.

In early 1888, it was not clear if the Greenback Party would hold another national convention. The fourth Greenback Party National Convention assembled in Cincinnati on May 16, 1888. So few delegates attended that no actions were taken. On August 16, 1888, George O. Jones, chairman of the national committee, called a second session of the national convention. The second session of the national convention met in Cincinnati on September 12, 1888. Only seven delegates attended. Chairman Jones issued an address criticizing the two major parties, and the delegates made no nominations.

With the failure of the convention, the Greenback Party ceased to exist.

American Party nomination

The American Party held its third and last National Convention in Grand Army Hall in Washington, DC. This was an Anti-Masonic party that ran under various party labels in the northern states.

When the convention assembled, there were 126 delegates; among them were 65 from New York and 15 from California. Delegates from the other states bolted the convention when it appeared that New York and California intended to vote together on all matters and control the convention. By the time the presidential balloting began, there were only 64 delegates present.

The convention nominated James L. Curtis from New York for president and James R. Greer from Tennessee for vice-president. Greer declined to run, so Peter D. Wigginton of California was chosen as his replacement.

Equal Rights Party nomination

The second Equal Rights Party National Convention assembled in Des Moines, Iowa. At the convention, mail-in ballots were counted. The delegates cast 310 of their 350 ballots for the following ticket: Belva A. Lockwood for president and Alfred H. Love for vice-president. Love declined the nomination, and was replaced with Charles S. Welles of New York.

Industrial Reform Party nomination

The Industrial Reform Party National Convention assembled in Grand Army Hall, Washington, DC. There were 49 delegates present. Albert Redstone won the endorsement of some leaders of the disintegrating Greenback Party. He told the Montgomery Advertiser that he hoped to carry several states, including Alabama, New York, North Carolina, Arkansas, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri.

General election campaign

Main article: Grover Cleveland 1888 presidential campaign

Issues

Cleveland set the main issue of the campaign when he proposed a dramatic reduction in tariffs in his annual message to Congress in December 1887. Cleveland contended that the tariff was unnecessarily high and that unnecessary taxation was unjust taxation. The Republicans responded that the high tariff would protect American industry from foreign competition and guarantee high wages, high profits, and high economic growth.

The argument between protectionists and free traders over the size of the tariff was an old one, stretching back to the Tariff of 1816. In practice, the tariff was practically meaningless on industrial products, since the United States was the low-cost producer in most areas (except woolens), and could not be undersold by the less efficient Europeans. Nevertheless, the tariff issue motivated both sides to a remarkable extent.

Besides the obvious economic dimensions, the tariff argument also possessed an ethnic dimension. At the time, the policy of free trade was most strongly promoted by the British Empire, and so any political candidate who ran on free trade instantly was under threat of being labelled pro-British and antagonistic to the Irish-American voting bloc. Cleveland neatly neutralized this threat by pursuing punitive action against Canada (which, although autonomous, was still part of the British Empire) in a fishing rights dispute.

Harrison was well-funded by party activists and mounted an energetic campaign by the standards of the day, giving many speeches from his front porch in Indianapolis that were covered by the newspapers. Cleveland adhered to the tradition of presidential candidates not campaigning, and forbade his cabinet from campaigning as well, leaving his 75-year-old vice-presidential candidate Thurman as the spearhead of his campaign.

Blocks of Five

William Wade Dudley (1842–1909), an Indianapolis lawyer, was a tireless campaigner and prosecutor of Democratic election frauds. In 1888, Benjamin Harrison made Dudley Treasurer of the Republican National Committee. The campaign was the most intense in decades, with Indiana dead even. Although the National Committee had no business meddling in state politics, Dudley wrote a circular letter to Indiana's county chairmen, telling them to "divide the floaters into Blocks of Five, and put a trusted man with the necessary funds in charge of these five, and make them responsible that none get away and that all vote our ticket." Dudley promised adequate funding. His pre-emptive strike backfired when Democrats obtained the letter and distributed hundreds of thousands of copies nationwide in the last days of the campaign. Given Dudley's unsavory reputation, few people believed his denials. A few thousand "floaters" did exist in Indiana—men who would sell their vote for $2. They always divided 50–50 (or perhaps, $5,000–$5,000) and had no visible impact on the vote. The attack on "blocks of five" with the suggestion that pious General Harrison was trying to buy the election did enliven the Democratic campaign, and it stimulated the nationwide movement to replace ballots printed and distributed by the parties with secret ballots.

Murchison letter

A California Republican named George Osgoodby wrote a letter to Sir Lionel Sackville-West, the British ambassador to the United States, under the assumed name of "Charles F. Murchison," describing himself as a former Englishman who was now a California citizen and asked how he should vote in the upcoming presidential election. Sir Lionel wrote back and in the "Murchison letter" indiscreetly suggested that Cleveland was probably the best man from the British point of view.

The Republicans published this letter just two weeks before the election, where it had an effect on Irish-American voters exactly comparable to the "Rum, Romanism, and Rebellion" blunder of the previous election: Cleveland lost New York and Indiana (and as a result, the presidency). Sackville-West was removed as British ambassador.

Results

36.3% of the voting age population and 80.5% of eligible voters participated in the election.

The election focused on the swing states of New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, and Harrison's home state of Indiana. Harrison and Cleveland split these four states, with Harrison winning by means of notoriously fraudulent balloting in New York and Indiana. Meanwhile, Cleveland won every state in the south via the disenfranchisement of much of the Southern black voter base. The Republicans won in twenty-six of the forty-four largest cities outside of the Southern United States.

Had Cleveland won his home state, he would have won the electoral vote by an electoral count of 204–197 (201 electoral votes were needed for victory in 1888). Instead, Cleveland became the third of only five candidates—all Democrats—to obtain a plurality or majority of the popular vote but lose their respective presidential elections (Andrew Jackson in 1824, Samuel J. Tilden in 1876, Al Gore in 2000, and Hillary Clinton in 2016). However, Tilden was the only one of these to win of a majority of the popular vote.

Cleveland bested Harrison in the popular vote by slightly more than ninety thousand votes (0.8%), though that margin was only made possible by massive disenfranchisement and voter suppression of hundreds of thousands of Republican blacks in the South, as was noted by Republican politicians at the time.

Harrison won the Electoral College by a 233–168 margin, largely by virtue of his 1.09% win in Cleveland's home state of New York.

14.18% of Harrison's votes came from the eleven states of the former Confederacy, with him taking 36.67% of the vote in that region. This was the only time Florida voted for a Democratic nominee who won the popular vote but lost the electoral vote. In 1876, 2000, and 2016, Florida voted for a Republican nominee who won the electoral vote but lost the popular vote. (Florida became a state in 1845, and thus did not vote in 1824.)

Four states returned results where the winner won by less than 1 percent of the popular vote. Cleveland earned 24 of his electoral votes from states he won by less than one percent: Connecticut, Virginia, and West Virginia. Harrison earned fifteen of his electoral votes from a state he won by less than 1 percent: Indiana. Harrison won New York (36 electoral votes) by a margin of 1.09%. Despite the narrow margins in several states, only two states switched sides in comparison to Cleveland's first presidential election (New York and Indiana).

Of the 2,450 counties/independent cities making returns, Cleveland led in 1,290 (52.65%) while Harrison led in 1,157 (47.22%). Two counties (0.08%) recorded a plurality for Union Labor candidate Alson Streeter, while one county (0.04%) in California split evenly between Cleveland and Harrison.

Upon leaving the White House at the end of her husband's first term, First Lady Frances Cleveland is reported to have told the White House staff to take care of the building since the Clevelands would be returning in four years. She proved correct, becoming the first First Lady to preside at two nonconsecutive administrations.

This was the last election in which the Republicans won Colorado and Nevada until 1904. It was also the last election until 1968 when bellwether Coös County, New Hampshire, did not support the winning candidate.

Source (Popular Vote): Source (Electoral Vote):

Geography of results

File:1888 United States presidential election results map by county.svg|Results by county, shaded according to winning candidate's percentage of the vote

Cartographic gallery

File:PresidentialCounty1888Colorbrewer.gif|Map of presidential election results by county File:DemocraticPresidentialCounty1888Colorbrewer.gif|Map of Democratic presidential election results by county File:RepublicanPresidentialCounty1888Colorbrewer.gif|Map of Republican presidential election results by county File:OtherPresidentialCounty1888Colorbrewer.gif|Map of "other" presidential election results by county File:CartogramPresidentialCounty1888Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of presidential election results by county File:CartogramDemocraticPresidentialCounty1888Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of Democratic presidential election results by county File:CartogramRepublicanPresidentialCounty1888Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of Republican presidential election results by county File:CartogramOtherPresidentialCounty1888Colorbrewer.gif|Cartogram of "other" presidential election results by county

Results by state

Source: Data from Walter Dean Burnham, Presidential ballots, 1836–1892 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1955) pp 247–57.

States that flipped from Democratic to Republican

• Indiana
• New York

Close states

Margin of victory less than 1% (39 electoral votes):

1. Connecticut, 0.22% (336 votes)
2. West Virginia, 0.32% (506 votes)
3. Indiana, 0.44% (2,348 votes)
4. Virginia, 0.53% (1,605 votes)

Margin of victory between 1% and 5% (150 electoral votes):

1. New York, 1.09% (14,373 votes) (tipping point state)
2. Ohio, 2.33% (19,599 votes)
3. New Jersey, 2.35% (7,148 votes)
4. New Hampshire, 2.50% (2,272 votes)
5. California, 2.82% (7,087 votes)
6. Maryland, 2.94% (6,202 votes)
7. Illinois, 2.96% (22,124 votes)
8. North Carolina, 4.59% (13,118 votes)
9. Michigan, 4.82% (22,918 votes)
10. Missouri, 4.93% (25,691 votes)

Margin of victory between 5% and 10% (93 electoral votes):

1. Wisconsin, 6.01% (21,321 votes)
2. Tennessee, 6.49% (19,721 votes)
3. Iowa, 7.85% (31,726 votes)
4. Pennsylvania, 7.97% (79,458 votes)
5. Kentucky, 8.32% (28,692 votes)
6. Massachusetts, 9.38% (32,302 votes)

In popular culture

In 1968 the Michael P. Antoine Company produced the Walt Disney Company musical film The One and Only, Genuine, Original Family Band which centers on the election of 1888 and the annexing and subdividing of the Dakota Territory into states (which was a major issue of the election).

Notes

References

Works cited

References

1. "National General Election VEP Turnout Rates, 1789–Present". [[CQ Press]].
2. Beatty, Bess (1987). ''A revolution gone backward: the Black response to national politics, 1876-1896''. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, Inc., [https://books.google.com/books?id=z7TOEAAAQBAJ p. 104].
3. [[Jacob Piatt Dunn]], George William Harrison Kemper, ''Indiana and Indianans'' (p. 724).
4. Case, George. (1889). "The Prohibition Party: Its Origin, Purpose and Growth". Magazine of Western History. V.9 1888/1889.
5. Haynes, Stan M.. (November 24, 2015). "President-Making in the Gilded Age: The Nominating Conventions of 1876–1900". McFarland.
6. Newcombe, Alfred W.. (March 1946). "Alson J. Streeter: An Agrarian Liberal". Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society.
7. (May 17, 1888). "Setting Up a Candidate". The Topeka State Journal.
8. (August 17, 1888). "The Greenback Party: Mr. George O. Jones Calls a National Convention For Sept. 12". [[New York Times]].
9. (September 13, 1888). "Seven Greenbackers Proclaim". [[New York Times]].
10. (August 16, 1888). "Who is James L. Curtis?". [[New York Times]].
11. (May 16, 1888). "Bound to Have Belva". Sioux City Journal.
12. (1890). "The Daily News Almanac and Political Register". The Chicago Daily News.
13. (February 23, 1888). "First in the Field". The York Dispatch.
14. (March 4, 1888). "Alabama's electoral vote has already been captured". [[The Montgomery Advertiser]].
15. Cleveland, Grover. (6 December 1887). "Third Annual Message (first term)". Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley for [[the American Presidency Project]].
16. (19 June 1888). "Republican Party Platform of 1888". Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley for [[the American Presidency Project]].
17. Paul F. Boller Jr., ''Presidential Campaigns'' (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 157-59.
18. Reitano, Joanne. ''The Tariff Question in the Gilded Age: The Great Debate of 1888.'' University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.
19. Cleveland, Grover. (20 February 1888). "Special Message". Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley for [[the American Presidency Project]].
20. (7 June 2014). "United States president scolds Pictou in 1886 correspondence". PNI Atlantic News.
21. "HarpWeek | Elections | 1888 Overview". Elections.harpweek.com.
22. Jensen, ''Winning of the Midwest'' (1971) ch 1
23. "The Vote That Failed".
24. The Murchison Letter, as printed in the ''New York Herald'', October 23, 1888. Reprinted in ''Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, Volume 2'', transmitted to Congress by the [[United States Department of State]]. [[Washington, D.C.. Washington]]: [[Government Printing Office]], 1889. Page 1707.
25. Charles S. Campbell, Jr. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1886600 "The Dismissal of Lord Sackville."] ''The Mississippi Valley Historical Review'' '''44''':''4'' (March 1958), pp. 635–648.
26. Murphy, Paul. (1974). "Political Parties In American History, Volume 3, 1890-present". [[G. P. Putnam's Sons]].
27. Geruso, Michael. (2022). "Inversions in US Presidential Elections: 1836–2016". Am Econ J Appl Econ.
28. Gorman, Joseph (1979). "The Election of 1888: Electoral College 'Misfire' or Reflection of the Popular Will?: An Analysis of Grover Cleveland's Popular Vote Pluralities in Selected Southern States." (For the Library of Congress.) ''Congressional Record'': Volume 125, Part 12 (June 13, 1979), [http://books.google.com/books?id=UIow7xssVpgC&pg=PA14627 pp. 14627–14638].
29. The Political Graveyard; [http://politicalgraveyard.com/geo/NH/CO-votes.html Coös County Votes for President]
30. "1888 Presidential General Election Data – National".