From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Venera 2
Soviet Venus spacecraft
Soviet Venus spacecraft
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| name | Venera 2 |
| image | Zond 2.jpg |
| mission_type | Venus flyby |
| operator | OKB-1 |
| COSPAR_ID | 1965-091A |
| SATCAT | 1730 |
| mission_duration | |
| spacecraft | [3MV-4](3mv-4) No.4 |
| manufacturer | OKB-1 |
| launch_mass | 1037 kg |
| launch_date | UTC |
| launch_rocket | Molniya-M |
| launch_site | Baikonur 31/6 |
| disposal_type | Spacecraft failure |
| last_contact | 27 February 1966 |
| Shortly before flyby | |
| declared | 4 March 1966 |
| orbit_reference | Geocentric |
| orbit_regime | Low Earth |
| orbit_periapsis | 205 km |
| orbit_apoapsis | 315 km |
| orbit_inclination | 51.8° |
| orbit_period | 89.71 minutes |
| apsis | gee |
| type | flyby |
| object | Venus |
| arrival_date | 27 February 1966, 02:52 UTC |
| distance | 23810 km |
| programme | **Venera** |
| previous_mission | Kosmos 27 |
| next_mission | Venera 3 |
Shortly before flyby
Venera 2 ( meaning Venus 2), also known as 3MV-4 No.4 was a Soviet spacecraft intended to explore Venus. A 3MV-4 spacecraft launched as part of the Venera programme, it failed to return data after flying past Venus.
Mission
Venera 2 was launched by a Molniya carrier rocket, flying from Site 31/6 at the Baikonur Cosmodrome. The launch occurred at 05:02 UTC on 12 November 1965, with the first three stages placing the spacecraft and Blok-L upper stage into a low Earth parking orbit before the Blok-L fired to propel Venera 2 into heliocentric orbit bound for Venus, with perihelion of 0.716 AU, aphelion of 1.197 AU, eccentricity of 0.252, inclination of 4.29 degrees and orbital period of 341 days.
The Venera 2 spacecraft was equipped with cameras, as well as a magnetometer, solar and cosmic x-ray detectors, piezoelectric detectors, ion traps, a Geiger counter and receivers to measure cosmic radio emissions. The spacecraft made its closest approach to Venus at 02:52 UTC on 27 February 1966, at a distance of 23810 km.
During the flyby, all of Venera 2's instruments were activated, requiring that radio contact with the spacecraft be suspended. The probe was to have stored data using onboard recorders, and then transmitted it to Earth once contact was restored. Following the flyby the spacecraft failed to reestablish communications with the ground. It was declared lost on 4 March 1966. An investigation into the failure determined that the spacecraft had overheated due to a radiator malfunction.
Misidentification
In March 2025, Abraham Loeb published a paper where he claimed that the asteroid is the same object as Venera 2, arguing that the asteroid made its closest approach to Earth in November 1965 (around the same time that Venera 2 launched). However, this was quickly disproven by Federico Spada and Jonathan McDowell, where reconstructions of Venera 2's orbital trajectory does not match with that of , adding that the asteroid itself did not even made a close encounter with Venus in early 1966.
References
| doi-access= free }}
| access-date= 18 August 2019 | archive-date= 18 August 2019 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190818143640/https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/missions/venera-2/in-depth/ | url-status= dead }}
| access-date= 11 April 2013 | archive-date= 16 December 2016 | archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20161216231450/http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraftDisplay.do?id=1965-091A | url-status= dead
| access-date= 11 April 2013 }}
| access-date= 31 July 2025 }}
| doi-access= free }}
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Venera 2 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report