Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/casco-class-monitors

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

USS Shiloh (1865)

FieldValue
section1{{Infobox ship/image
section2{{Infobox ship/career
countryUnited States
flag
nameUSS *Shiloh*
ordered24 June 1863
builderCharles W. McCordat, St. Louis, Missouri
launched14 July 1865
commissioned17 September 1874
decommissioned5 October 1874
fateSold, 1874
section3{{Infobox ship/characteristics
class
displacement1175 LT
length225 ft
beam45 ft
draft9 ft
propulsionScrew steamer
speed9 kn
complement60 officers and enlisted
armament2 × 11 in smoothbore Dahlgren guns
armor*Turret: 8 in
*Pilothouse: {{convert10inmmabbron}}
*Hull: {{convert3inmmabbron}}
*Deck: {{convert3inmmabbron}}
  • Pilothouse: 10 in
  • Hull: 3 in
  • Deck: 3 in '*USS Shiloh''' was a single-turreted, twin-screw monitor that was slated to enter service with the United States Navy. The contract for her construction was awarded on 24 June 1863 to George C. Bestor of Peoria, Illinois. Her keel was laid down later that year at the yard of Charles W. McCordat of St. Louis, Missouri. However, while Shiloh was still under construction, , one of the first of the *Casco''-class monitors to be launched, was found to be unseaworthy.

Design revisions

Though the original designs for the Casco-class monitors were drawn by John Ericsson, the final revision was created by Chief Engineer Alban C. Stimers following Rear Admiral Samuel F. Du Pont's failed bombardment of Fort Sumter in 1863. By the time that the plans were put before the Monitor Board in New York City, Ericsson and Stimers had a poor relationship, and Chief of the Bureau of Construction and Repair John Lenthall had little connection to the board. This resulted in the plans being approved and 20 vessels ordered without serious scrutiny of the new design. US$14 million was allocated for the construction of these vessels. It was discovered that Stimers had failed to compensate for the armor his revisions added to the original plan and this resulted in excessive stress on the wooden hull frames and a freeboard of only 3 in. Stimers was removed from the control of the project and Ericsson was called in to undo the damage. He was forced to raise the hulls of the monitors under construction by 22 in to make them seaworthy.

On 25 June 1864, the Navy Department ordered Shiloh's builder to raise her deck to give her sufficient freeboard, then on 17 June 1865, after the end of the Civil War had prompted an American naval retrenchment, work on Shiloh was ordered suspended. Nevertheless, it was decided to proceed with her launching; and an unsuccessful attempt to get her off the ways was made on 3 July 1865. After much labor, the ship finally entered the water 11 days later.

Fate

Shiloh saw no service before being laid up in 1866 at Mound City, Illinois. On 15 June 1869, she was renamed . In the same year, she was moved to New Orleans and laid up there. On 17 September 1874, the monitor was commissioned; but she saw no significant service before she was decommissioned on 5 October 1874 and again laid up at New Orleans on 15 October 1874. She was sold later that year.

References

Bibliography

  • Roberts, William H. (2002): Civil War Ironclads: Industrial Mobilization for the US Navy 1861–1865, Johns Hopkins University Press,

References

  1. "Shiloh". History.navy.mil.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

casco-class-monitors ships-built-in-mound-city,-illinois 1865-ships
Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about USS Shiloh (1865) — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report