From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1551

Field	Value
number	1551
organ	SC
date	9 July
year	2004
meeting	5,001
code	S/RES/1551
document	https://undocs.org/S/RES/1551(2004)
for	15
abstention	0
against	0
subject	The situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina
result	Adopted
image	German CH-53 Helicopter assigned to the Stabilization Force and Portuguese Army Soldiers.jpg
caption	SFOR helicopter

United Nations Security Council resolution 1551, adopted unanimously on 9 July 2004, after recalling previous resolutions on the conflicts in the former Yugoslavia, including resolutions 1031 (1995), 1088 (1996), 1423 (2002) and 1491 (2003), the council extended the mandate of the Stabilisation Force (SFOR) in Bosnia and Herzegovina for a further period of six months and welcomed the deployment of EUFOR Althea at the end of the SFOR's mandate.

Resolution

Observations

The Security Council emphasised the importance of the implementation of the Dayton Agreement (General Framework Agreement) and welcomed contributions from SFOR, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and other international organisations. The situation continued to constitute a threat to peace and security and the council was determined to promote a peaceful resolution of the conflict. Furthermore, it noted that the European Union was intending to launch a follow-on mission with a military component from December 2004.

Acts

Acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, the council reminded the parties to the Dayton Agreement of their responsibility to implement the agreement. It emphasised the role of the High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina to monitor its implementation. It also attached importance to co-operation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia.

The Security Council commended the countries participating in SFOR and authorised them to continue their operations for an additional six months; while it welcomed the establishment of a follow-on mission from December 2004 by the European Union. It also authorised the use of necessary measures, including that of the use of force and self-defense, to ensure compliance with the agreements and the safety and freedom of movement of SFOR personnel. All agreements would apply to the follow-on mission.

The resolution further welcomed the deployment of the European Union's Police Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina since 1 January 2003, which had replaced the United Nations Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Finally, it requested the Secretary-General Kofi Annan to report on progress the parties had made towards the implementation of their peace agreements.

References

(9 July 2004). "Security Council authorises NATO force in Bosnia and Herzegovina for further six months, welcomes European Union follow on mission". United Nations.
(9 July 2004). "Security Council authorizes 6-month extension of NATO force in Bosnia".
(2006). "The EU–NATO relationship: a legal and political perspective". Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Blokker, Niels. (2005). "The Security Council and the use of force: theory and reality—a need for change?". Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

2004-united-nations-security-council-resolutions united-nations-security-council-resolutions-concerning-the-yugoslav-wars 2004-in-bosnia-and-herzegovina united-nations-security-council-resolutions-concerning-bosnia-and-herzegovina july-2004

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about United Nations Security Council Resolution 1551 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report