From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1534

Field	Value
number	1534
organ	SC
date	26 March
year	2004
meeting	4,935
code	S/RES/1534
document	https://undocs.org/S/RES/1534(2004)
for	15
abstention	0
against	0
subject	The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
result	Adopted
image	Evstafiev-ratko-mladic-1993-w.jpg
caption	Ratko Mladić who was indicted by the ICTY

United Nations Security Council resolution 1534, adopted unanimously on 26 March 2004, after recalling resolutions 827 (1993), 955 (1994), 978 (1995), 1165 (1998), 1166 (1998), 1329 (2000), 1411 (2002), 1431 (2002) and 1481 (2003), the Council called on the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) to complete all trial activities by the end of 2008.

Resolution

Observations

The Security Council commended the progress both tribunals had made in contributing to peace and security in the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. It envisaged, in accordance with Resolution 1503 (2004), the completion of ICTY and ICTR investigations by 2004, trials by the end of 2008 and all work in 2010. There was concern that the completion strategies for both tribunals could not be implemented.

Acts

Acting under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, the Council called on all states, particularly Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Serbia and Montenegro and the Republic Srpska within Bosnia and Herzegovina to co-operate with the ICTY with regard to Radovan Karadžić, Ratko Mladić and Ante Gotovina. Meanwhile, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Rwanda and the Republic of the Congo, among other states, were requested to co-operate with the ICTR with regard to Félicien Kabuga and the Rwandan Patriotic Army. The council, emphasising the importance of implementing the completion strategies, asked the prosecutors to review their caseloads and determine which cases to proceed with and those to defer to national jurisdictions, while prioritising the trials of senior leaders. Both tribunals were asked to report every six months on progress towards implementing the completion strategies.

The resolution praised countries that had concluded agreements for enforcing the sentences of persons convicted by the ICTR and ICTY and encouraged others to do so. It noted that strengthening national judicial systems was crucial to the implementation of the completion strategies. Finally, the Council welcomed efforts to establish a war crimes chamber in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina and to ensure the success of domestic prosecutions in the country.

References

(26 March 2004). "Security Council calls on tribunals for Yugoslavia, Rwanda to review caseloads, take other steps to complete trial activities by 2008". United Nations.
Schabas, William. (2006). "The UN international criminal tribunals: the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone". Cambridge University Press.
Bohlander, Michael. (2007). "International criminal justice: a critical analysis of institutions and procedures". Cameron May.

Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

2004-united-nations-security-council-resolutions united-nations-security-council-resolutions-concerning-the-international-criminal-tribunal-for-the-former-yugoslavia united-nations-security-council-resolutions-concerning-the-international-criminal-tribunal-for-rwanda march-2004

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about United Nations Security Council Resolution 1534 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report