Sphere of influence (astrodynamics)

Models

The most common base models to calculate the sphere of influence are the Hill sphere and the Laplace sphere, but updated and other models, as by Gleb Chebotaryov or particularly more dynamic ones, like the patched conic approximation, have been described. The general equation describing the radius of the sphere r_\text{SOI} of a planet: r_\text{SOI} \approx a\left(\frac{m}{M}\right)^{2/5} where

• a is the semimajor axis of the smaller object's (usually a planet's) orbit around the larger body (usually the Sun).
• m and M are the masses of the smaller and the larger object (usually a planet and the Sun), respectively.

In the patched conic approximation, once an object leaves the planet's SOI, the primary/only gravitational influence is the Sun (until the object enters another body's SOI). Because the definition of rSOI relies on the presence of the Sun and a planet, the term is only applicable in a three-body or greater system and requires the mass of the primary body to be much greater than the mass of the secondary body. This changes the three-body problem into a restricted two-body problem.

Table of selected SOI radii

The table shows the values of the sphere of gravity of the bodies of the solar system in relation to the Sun (with the exception of the Moon which is reported relative to Earth):

An important understanding to be drawn from this table is that "Sphere of Influence" here is "Primary". For example, though Jupiter is much larger in mass than say, Neptune, its Primary SOI is much smaller due to Jupiter's much closer proximity to the Sun.

Increased accuracy on the SOI

The Sphere of influence is, in fact, not quite a sphere. The distance to the SOI depends on the angular distance \theta from the massive body. A more accurate formula is given by r_\text{SOI}(\theta) \approx a\left(\frac{m}{M}\right)^{2/5}\frac{1}{\sqrt[10]{1+3\cos^2(\theta)}}

Averaging over all possible directions we get: \overline{r_\text{SOI}} = 0.9431 a\left(\frac{m}{M}\right)^{2/5}

Derivation

Consider two point masses A and B at locations r_A and r_B, with mass m_A and m_B respectively. The distance R=|r_B-r_A| separates the two objects. Given a massless third point C at location r_C , one can ask whether to use a frame centered on A or on B to analyse the dynamics of C .

Consider a frame centered on A . The gravity of B is denoted as g_B and will be treated as a perturbation to the dynamics of C due to the gravity g_A of body A . Due to their gravitational interactions, point A is attracted to point B with acceleration a_A = \frac{Gm_B}{R^3} (r_B-r_A) , this frame is therefore non-inertial. To quantify the effects of the perturbations in this frame, one should consider the ratio of the perturbations to the main body gravity i.e. \chi_A = \frac{|g_B-a_A|}{|g_A|} . The perturbation g_B-a_A is also known as the tidal forces due to body B . It is possible to construct the perturbation ratio \chi_B for the frame centered on B by interchanging A \leftrightarrow B .

As C gets close to A , \chi_A \rightarrow 0 and \chi_B \rightarrow \infty , and vice versa. The frame to choose is the one that has the smallest perturbation ratio. The surface for which \chi_A = \chi_B separates the two regions of influence. In general this region is rather complicated but in the case that one mass dominates the other, say m_A \ll m_B , it is possible to approximate the separating surface. In such a case this surface must be close to the mass A , denote r as the distance from A to the separating surface.

The distance to the sphere of influence must thus satisfy \frac{m_B}{m_A} \frac{r^3}{R^3} = \frac{m_A}{m_B} \frac{R^2}{r^2} and so r = R\left(\frac{m_A}{m_B}\right)^{2/5} is the radius of the sphere of influence of body A

Gravity well

Gravity well (or funnel) is a metaphorical concept for a gravitational field of a mass, with the field being curved in a funnel-shaped well around the mass, illustrating the steep gravitational potential and its energy that needs to be accounted for in order to escape or enter the main part of a sphere of influence.

An example for this is the strong gravitational field of the Sun and Mercury being deep within it. At perihelion Mercury goes even deeper into the Sun's gravity well, causing an anomalistic or perihelion apsidal precession which is more recognizable than with other planets due to Mercury being deep in the gravity well. This characteristic of Mercury's orbit was famously calculated by Albert Einstein through his formulation of gravity with the speed of light, and the corresponding general relativity theory, eventually being one of the first cases proving the theory.

References

General references

References

1. (21 August 2020). "On the local and global properties of gravitational spheres of influence". [[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]].
2. (May 2023). "A dynamical definition of the sphere of influence of the Earth". [[Elsevier BV]].
3. (December 2008). "Sphere of influence and gravitational capture radius: a dynamical approach". [[Oxford University Press]] (OUP).
4. Seefelder, Wolfgang. (2002). "Lunar Transfer Orbits Utilizing Solar Perturbations and Ballistic Capture". Herbert Utz Verlag.
5. Vereen, Shaneequa. (23 November 2022). "Artemis I – Flight Day Eight: Orion Exits the Lunar Sphere Of Influence". NASA Blogs.
6. (23 May 2013). "The Size of Planets".
7. (4 June 2012). "How Big Is the Moon?".
8. (9 May 2012). "The Mass of Planets".
9. "Moon Fact Sheet".
10. (5 March 2021). "Planet Distance to Sun, How Far Are The Planets From The Sun?".
11. May, Andrew. (2023). "How Space Physics Really Works: Lessons from Well-Constructed Science Fiction". Springer Nature Switzerland.
12. Mann, Adam. (2011-03-08). "NASA mission set to orbit Mercury". Nature.
13. Wheeler, John Archibald. (1999). "A journey into gravity and spacetime". Scientific American Library.