From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Skytrax
UK-based consultancy, running an airline and airport review and ranking site
UK-based consultancy, running an airline and airport review and ranking site
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| name | Skytrax |
| logo | Skytrax.svg |
| founded | |
| former_name | Inflight Research Services |
| type | Private |
| area_served | Worldwide |
| key_people | Edward Plaisted (CEO) |
| hq_location_city | London |
| hq_location_country | United Kingdom |
| website |
Skytrax (originally known as Inflight Research Services) is a United Kingdom-based consultancy headquartered in London that runs an airline and airport review website.
Services
Skytrax conducts research for commercial airlines, as well as taking surveys from international travellers, to rate cabin staff, airports, airlines, airline lounges, in-flight entertainment, on-board catering, and several other elements of air travel. Apart from these evaluations, Skytrax has an airline forum where passengers give potential passengers insights and opinions about airlines. The website also hosts flight reviews, flight checks, and satisfaction surveys. Skytrax holds an annual World Airline Awards and World Airport Awards, as well as ranking airlines and airports.
Skytrax rates individual airlines between one and five stars; they describe a five-star rating as recognising "airlines providing very high standards of Airport and Onboard Product" and "consistent and high standards of staff service across both the airport and onboard service environments". The ten airlines they deem to be five-star rated are:
- Japan All Nippon Airways
- South Korea Asiana Airlines
- Hong Kong Cathay Pacific*
- Taiwan EVA Air
- China Hainan Airlines
- Japan Japan Airlines*
- South Korea Korean Air*
- Qatar Qatar Airways*
- Singapore Singapore Airlines*
- Taiwan Starlux Airlines
Airlines with an asterisk ()* denote flag carriers.
Investigations
In 2012, the online investigations company KwikChex filed five complaints with the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) related to statements on the Skytrax website describing the volume and reliability of their reviews as well as the official status and update frequency of their ratings. The ASA ruled that there was no evidence that Skytrax had followed the robust procedures it claimed it had in place to check that all reviews were genuine. Although Skytrax argued that every review underwent a four-stage authentication process, it said it was unable to provide proof it had followed its own procedures, since customer emails were deleted 24 hours after a review was submitted. In 2012, the authority upheld all five complaints and Skytrax agreed to modify some promotional wording.
References
References
- "SKYTRAX AVIATION LIMITED overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK".
- "Careers with us {{!}} Skytrax".
- "AirlineQuality.com WHOIS, DNS, & Domain Info - DomainTools".
- Mario Kossmann. (2006). "Delivering Excellent Service Quality in Aviation". Ashgate Publishing.
- "Skytrax rates the world's best".
- [http://www.worldairlineawards.com/ World Airline Awards]
- [http://www.worldairportawards.com/ World Airport Awards]
- "The World's 5-Star Airlines".
- (8 November 2012). "Skytrax airline quality claims under scrutiny". Travelmole.
- "ASA Ruling on Skytrax Research". asa.org.uk.
- Engel Schmidl. (13 November 2012). "Advertising Standards Authority calls out Tripadvisor and Skytrax for fake user reviews". SmartCompany.com.au.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Skytrax — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report