Shark repellent

Types

Natural repellents

It has traditionally been believed that sharks are repelled by the smell of a dead shark. However, modern research has had mixed results. Semiochemicals have shown some efficacy at getting sharks to leave a feeding area for a few minutes. In 2014, SharkDefense partnered with SharkTec LLC to manufacture the semiochemical in a canister. SharkDefense has been used in commercial fishing to reduce shark by-catch by 71%.

In 2017, the US Navy announced that it was developing a synthetic analog of hagfish slime with potential application as a shark repellent.

Chillax Wax, which is a combination of essential oils intended to mask the scent of a human, showed no measurable effect on reducing shark interactions in one study.

The Pardachirus marmoratus fish (finless sole, Red Sea Moses sole) repels sharks through its secretions. The best-understood factor is pardaxin, acting as an irritant to the sharks' gills, but other chemicals have been identified as contributing to the repellent effect.{{cite journal|title=Pavoninins: Shark-Repelling Ichthyotoxins from the Defense Secretion of the Pacific Sole

Electric repellents

Electric repellents create an electromagnetic field to deter shark attacks and are used by surfers, scuba divers, snorkelers, spearfishers, ocean kayak fishers, swimming areas off boats and for ocean fishing.

The Ocean Guardian devices, marketed with the Shark Shield brand name, are one of the few electrical devices on the market that has performed independent trials to estimate the effectiveness at deterring about half of shark attacks. Whilst the Shark Shield technology does not work in all situations and divers have been attacked whilst wearing Shark Shield, modelling research suggests that personal electronic deterrents could be an effective way to prevent some future deaths and injuries.

Independent testing of Rpela's electrical repellent technology showed limited efficacy against great white sharks.

Magnetic repellents

Magnetic repellents rely on magnets, which produce a magnetic field that sharks can detect if they are close enough. For many personal-sized products, a great white shark cannot detect the magnetic field until it is within a few feet (one meter) of the repellent, and is not likely to be deterred until it is within inches. In one study, SharkBanz bracelet & SharkBanz surf leash (magnetic shark repellent technology) showed no measurable effect on reducing shark attacks.

History

Some of the earliest research on shark repellents took place during the Second World War, when military services sought to minimize the risk to stranded aviators and sailors in the water. Research has continued to the present, with notable researchers including Americans Eugenie Clark, and later Samuel H. Gruber, who has conducted tests at the Bimini Sharklab on the Caribbean island of Bimini, and the Japanese scientist Kazuo Tachibana. The future celebrity chef Julia Child developed shark repellent while working for the Office of Strategic Services.

Initial work, which was based on historical research and studies at the time, focused on using the odor of another dead shark. Efforts were made to isolate the active components in dead shark bodies that repelled other sharks. Eventually, it was determined that certain copper compounds like copper acetate, in combination with other ingredients, could mimic a dead shark and drive live sharks away from human beings in the water. Building on this work, Stewart Springer and others patented a "shark repellent" consisting of a combination of copper acetate and a dark-colored dye to obscure the user. This shark repellent, known as "Shark Chaser", was long supplied to sailors and aviators of the United States Navy, initially packaged in cake form using a water-soluble wax binder and rigged to life vests. The Navy employed Shark Chaser extensively between 1943 and 1973. It is believed that the composition does repel sharks in some situations, but not in all, with about a 70% effectiveness rating.

On the other hand, Albert Tester questioned the idea that dead shark bodies or chemicals based on them could work as shark repellent. In 1959, he prepared and tested extracts of decaying shark flesh on tiger sharks in Hawaii and blacktip sharks at Enewetak Atoll. Tester found that not only did the dead shark extracts fail to repel any sharks, but several sharks had a "weak or strong attraction" to them. Tester reported a similar failure to repel sharks by a 1959 test at Enewetak of "an alleged shark repellent, supplied by a fisherman, which contained extract of decayed shark flesh as the principal component."{{cite journal|last = Tester| first = Albert L.| title = The role of olfaction in shark predation| date = April 1963| journal = Pacific Science| issn = 0030-8870| volume = 17| issue = 2| pages = 145–170| hdl = 10125/4935

Since the 1970s, there have been studies of how the Moses sole repels sharks, with Clark and Gruber both studying it. it has not found practical use, however, as the chemicals are perishable,{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1981/01/20/science/natural-shark-repellent-is-alluring-to-scientists.html|title=Natural Shark Repellent is Alluring to Scientists|author=Walter Sullivan|work=The New York Times

Since the 1980s,{{cite journal|journal=Archives of Toxicology|year=1984|volume=56|issue=1|pages=55–58|title=Synthetic surfactants: A new approach to the development of shark repellents|first1=Eliahu |last1=Zlotkin|first2=Samuel H.|last2=Gruber|author-link2=Samuel H. Gruber

In popular culture

The 1947 Robb White book Secret Sea mentions a copper acetate shark repellent developed by the U.S. Navy.

The Sharkfighters is a 1956 film with a fictional storyline based on work by the U.S. Navy during World War II to develop a shark repellent.

In a scene in the 1966 film Batman, an exploding shark jumps from the water and grabs Batman's leg while he is hanging onto the ladder of a helicopter. Batman tries to punch the shark back to the ocean, but it does not affect the shark. He is handed a canister of Oceanic Bat-Spray, making the shark open its jaw and explode.

In a 2015 a MythBusters episode, the hosts Adam Savage and Jamie Hyneman used an extract of dead sharks, and were able to drive away 10-20 Caribbean reef sharks and nurse sharks in only a few seconds on two occasions. The repellent used consisted of extracts from other species of shark bodies, and sharks did not return for over five minutes on both occasions.{{cite web| last1 = Hyneman| first1 = James F.| author1-link = Jamie Hyneman| last2 = Savage | first2 = Adam W.|author2-link = Adam Savage| title = Dead Shark Repellent MiniMyth| website = Discovery.com| publisher = Discovery Communications

References

References

1. (2024-07-15). "Personal electric deterrents can reduce shark bites from the three species responsible for the most fatal interactions". Scientific Reports.
2. (2018). "Effectiveness of five personal shark-bite deterrents for surfers". PeerJ.
3. (2021-03-31). "Predicting potential future reduction in shark bites on people". Royal Society Open Science.
4. "Do shark repellents work?".
5. (21 October 2020). "Variable response to electric shark deterrents in bull sharks, Carcharhinus leucas". Nature.
6. (2020-02-27). "Response of blacktip reef sharks Carcharhinus melanopterus to shark bite mitigation products". Scientific Reports.
7. [https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna5560773 Researchers tout shark repellent], 2004 Associated Press, "Fisherman and scientists have long noted sharks stay away if they smell a dead shark"
8. (24 June 2023). "Shark deterrents are flooding the market. Here's what you should know about the science".
9. (August 2014). "Chemical shark repellent: Myth or fact? The effect of a shark necromone on shark feeding behavior". Ocean & Coastal Management.
10. "Anti-Shark 100 Product Overview".
11. Rice, Patrick Rice; DeSanti, Brian; Stroud, Eric. (October 2014). "Performance of a long-lasting shark repellent bait for elasmobranch bycatch reduction during commercial pelagic longline fishing". [[National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration]].
12. (2017-07-10). "The US Navy Is Synthesizing Hagfish Slime to Defend Against Torpedoes and Sharks".
13. (1988). "Shark repellent lipophilic constituents in the defense secretion of the Moses sole (Pardachirus marmoratus).". Toxicon.
14. (1 June 2016). "How Close is too Close? The Effect of a Non-Lethal Electric Shark Deterrent on White Shark Behaviour". PLOS ONE.
15. Huveneers, C.. (June 2012). "Effects of the Shark Shield electric deterrent on the behaviour of white sharks Carcharodon carcharias". SARDI.
16. (2016-10-03). "Do shark repellents work?".
17. (20 June 2012). "SA researchers trial effectiveness of electronic shark deterrent devices on Great Whites". ABC News.
18. (3 July 2013). "Clarkson was wearing shark shield". Port Lincoln Times.
19. (31 March 2021). "Technology can save Australians from shark bites".
20. (2021-06-16). "Technology might save us from shark bites".
21. (2026-01-03). "Swimmer who vanished at Lovers Point was wearing a shark deterrent. What science says about what they do — and don't do".
22. "Bimini Sharklab - Shark Research & Marine Biology Internships - Understand, Educate, Conserve".
23. "1944: JULIA CHILD".
24. Thomas B. Allen. ''Shadows in the Sea: The Sharks, Skates and Rays''
25. "Shark repellent".
26. (June 1979). "Toxic soles, Pardachirus marmoratus from the Red Sea and P. pavoninus from Japan, with notes on other species". Environmental Biology of Fishes.
27. (1991). "The effectiveness of sodium lauryl sulphate as a shark repellent in a laboratory test situation". Journal of Fish Biology.
28. (2001). "Surfactants as Chemical Shark Repellents: Past, Present, and Future". Environmental Biology of Fishes.
29. White, Robb, ''Secret Sea'' (New York: Scholastic Book Services, 1968 reprint edition), p. 182.