Semi-presidential system

Definition

Maurice Duverger's original definition of semi-presidentialism stated that the president had to be elected, possess significant power, and serve for a fixed term. Modern definitions merely declare that the head of state has to be elected and that a separate prime minister that is dependent on parliamentary confidence has to lead the legislature.

Subtypes

There are two distinct subtypes of semi-presidentialism: premier-presidentialism and president-parliamentarism.

Under the premier-presidential system, the prime minister and cabinet are exclusively accountable to parliament. The president may choose the prime minister and cabinet, but only the parliament may approve them and remove them from office with a vote of no confidence. This system is much closer to pure parliamentarism. This subtype is used in: Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, East Timor, France, Lithuania, Madagascar, Mali, Mongolia, Niger, Georgia, Poland, Portugal, Romania, São Tomé and Príncipe, Sri Lanka, Turkey, and Ukraine.

Under the president-parliamentary system, the prime minister and cabinet are dually accountable to the president and the parliament. The president chooses the prime minister and the cabinet but must have the support of a parliamentary majority for his choice. To remove a prime minister, or the whole cabinet, from power, the president can either dismiss them, or the parliament can remove them through a vote of no confidence. This form of semi-presidentialism is much closer to pure presidentialism. It is used in: Azerbaijan, Guinea-Bissau, Kazakhstan, Mozambique, Russia, and Taiwan. It was also used in Ukraine, Georgia, South Korea under the Fourth and Fifth republics, and in Germany during the Weimar Republic.

Cohabitation

In a semi-presidential system, the president and the prime minister may sometimes be from different political parties. This is called "cohabitation", a term which originated in France after the situation first arose in the 1980s. Cohabitation can create either an effective system of checks and balances, or a period of bitter and tense stonewalling, depending on the attitudes of the two leaders, the ideologies of themselves/their parties, and the demands of their supporters.

Division of powers

The distribution of power between the president and the prime minister can vary greatly between countries.

In France, for example, in the case of cohabitation, the president oversees foreign policy and defence policy (these are generally called les prérogatives présidentielles, presidential prerogatives) and the prime minister is in charge of domestic policy and economic policy. In this case, the division of responsibilities between the prime minister and the president is not explicitly stated in the constitution, but has evolved as a political convention based on the constitutional principle that the prime minister is appointed (with the subsequent approval of a parliament majority) and dismissed by the president. On the other hand, whenever the president and the prime minister represent the same political party, which leads the cabinet, they tend to exercise de facto control over all fields of policy via the prime minister. However, it is up to the president to decide how much autonomy is left to said prime minister.

In most cases, cohabitation results from a system in which the two executives are not elected at the same time or for the same term. For example, in 1981, France elected both a Socialist president and legislature, which yielded a Socialist premier. But while the president's term of office was for seven years, the National Assembly only served for five. When, in the 1986 legislative election, the French people elected a right-of-centre assembly, Socialist president François Mitterrand was forced into cohabitation with right-wing premier Jacques Chirac.

However, in 2000, amendments to the French constitution reduced the length of the French president's term to five years. This has significantly lowered the chances of cohabitation occurring, as parliamentary and presidential elections may now be conducted within a shorter span of each other.

Advantages and disadvantages

The incorporation of elements from both presidential and parliamentary systems can bring certain advantageous elements; however, it also creates disadvantages, often related to the confusion produced by mixed authority patterns. It can be argued that a semi-presidential system is more likely to engage in democratic backsliding and power struggles, especially ones with a president-parliamentary system.

Advantages

• Parliament can remove an unpopular prime minister, therefore maintaining stability throughout the president's fixed term.
• In most semi-presidential systems, important segments of bureaucracy are taken away from the president, creating additional checks and balances where the running of the day-to-day government and its issues are separate from the head of state, and as such, its issues tend to be looked at on their own merits, with their ebbs and flows and not necessarily tied to who the head of state is.
• Having a separate head of government who needs to command the confidence of the parliament is seen as being more in tune to the political and economic development of the country. Because the head of government is elected from the parliament, there is little potential for political gridlock to occur, since the parliament has the power to remove the head of government if needed.

Disadvantages

• The system provides cover for the president, as unpopular policies could be blamed on the prime minister, who runs the day-to-day operations of the government.
• It creates a sense of confusion towards accountability, as there is no relatively clear sense of who is responsible for policy successes and failures.
• It creates both confusion and inefficiency in the legislative process, since the capacity of votes of confidence makes the prime minister respond to the parliament.

Countries with a semi-presidential system of government

Former semi-presidential countries

• All-Palestine (1948–1959)
• Armenia (1991–2018)
• (1975–1991)
• Croatia (1990–2000)
• Cuba (1940–1976)
• Finland (1919–2000)
• Georgia (1991–1995, 2004–2019)
• Germany (1919–1933)
• Greece (1973–1974)
• Kyrgyzstan (1993–2021)
• Mali (1991–2023)
• Moldova (1990–2001)
• North Macedonia (1991–2001)
• North Vietnam (1945–1959)
• Pakistan (1985-1997, 2003-2010)
• Philippines (1978–1986)
• Russian SFSR (July–November 1991)
• Somalia (1960–1969)
• Soviet Union (1990–1991)
• South Korea (1972–1988){{efn|All South Korean constitutions since 1963 provided for a strong executive presidency; in addition, the formally authoritarian Yushin Constitution of the [[Fourth Republic of Korea|Fourth Republic]] established a presidential power to dissolve the National Assembly, nominally counterbalanced by a binding vote of no confidence. Both of these provisions were retained during the Fifth Republic but repealed upon the transition to democracy and the establishment of the presidential Sixth Republic.}}

Notes

References

Citations

Sources

• Elgie, Robert (2011). Semi-Presidentialism: Sub-Types And Democratic Performance. Comparative Politics. (Oxford Scholarship Online Politics), Oxford University Press

References

1. Duverger. (1980). "A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government". [[European Journal of Political Research]].
2. Veser, Ernst. (1997). "Semi-Presidentialism-Duverger's concept: A New Political System Model". Journal for Humanities and Social Sciences.
3. Duverger, Maurice. (September 1996). "Les monarchies républicaines". Éditions du Seuil.
4. (October 1998). "Duverger's concept: Semi-presidential government revisited". [[European Journal of Political Research]].
5. ''Le Monde'', 8 January 1959.
6. Duverger, Maurice. (1978). "Échec au roi". A. Michel.
7. (2 January 2013). "Presidentialism, Parliamentarism and Semi-Presidentialism: Bringing Parties Back In". Government and Opposition.
8. (2010). "Between Constitutional Diffusion and Local Politics: Semi-Presidentialism in Portuguese-Speaking Countries". APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper.
9. Beuman, Lydia M.. (2016). "Political Institutions in East Timor: Semi-Presidentialism and Democratisation". [[Routledge]].
10. McMenamin, Iain. "Semi-Presidentialism and Democratisation in Poland". School of Law and Government, [[Dublin City University]].
11. "Poland 1997 (rev. 2009) Constitution".
12. (22 September 2021). "Poland". CIA.
13. Shugart, Matthew Søberg. (September 2005). "Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive and Mixed Authority Patterns". [[University of California, San Diego]].
14. Shugart, Matthew Søberg. (December 2005). "Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Patterns". French Politics.
15. Poulard, Jean V.. (Summer 1990). "The French Double Executive and the Experience of Cohabitation". [[Political Science Quarterly]].
16. See article 5, title II, of the [[French Constitution of 1958]]. Jean Massot, [http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/francais/documentation-publications/dossiers-thematiques/2008-cinquantenaire-la-constitution-en-20-questions/la-constitution-en-20-questions-question-n-6.17355.html Quelle place la Constitution de 1958 accorde-t-elle au Président de la République?], [[Constitutional Council of France]] website (in French).
17. Le Petit Larousse 2013 p. 880
18. Barrington, Lowell. (1 January 2012). "Comparative Politics: Structures and Choices". Cengage Learning.
19. (2012). "Comparative Politics: Structures and Choices". [[Cengage Learning.
20. (2023-05-18). "Semi-Presidentialism: A Pathway to Democratic Backslide". Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs.
21. Elgie, Robert. (2011). "Semi-presidentialism: sub-types and democratic performance". Oxford University Press.
22. (2008-12-01). "Semi-presidentialism and Democratic Performance". Japanese Journal of Political Science.
23. (17 December 2014). "The Foreign Policies of Post-Yugoslav States: From Yugoslavia to Europe". Springer.
24. Shugart, Matthew Søberg. (December 2005). "Semi-Presidential Systems: Dual Executive And Mixed Authority Patterns". French Politics.
25. (5 July 2009). "Constitutional anomalies".