Product (business)

Product classification

A product can be classified as tangible or intangible. A tangible product is an actual physical object that can be perceived by touch such as a building, vehicle, gadget, or clothing. An intangible product is a product that can only be perceived indirectly such as an insurance policy. These services can be broadly classified under intangible products, which can be durable or nondurable.

By use

In its online product catalog, retailer Sears, Roebuck and Company divides its products into "departments", then presents products to potential shoppers according to (1) function or (2) brand. Each product has a Sears item number and a manufacturer's model number. Sears uses the departments and product groupings with the intention of helping customers browse products by function or brand within a traditional department-store structure.

By association

A product line is "a group of products which are closely related, either because they function in a similar manner, are sold to the same customer groups, are marketed through the same types of outlets, or fall within given price ranges". Many businesses offer a range of product lines (their "product mix") which may be unique to a single organisation or may be common across the business's industry. Within the insurance industry, product lines are indicated by the type of risk coverage, such as auto insurance, commercial insurance and life insurance. Companies such as Pepsi and Coca-Cola are considered to have a very large and diverse product mix. Some companies use a large product mix to reach a number of market segments.

In 2002 the US Census compiled revenue figures for the finance and insurance industry by various product lines such as "accident, health and medical insurance premiums" and "income from secured consumer loans".

National and international product classifications

Various classification systems for products have been developed for economic statistical purposes. The NAFTA signatories are working on a system that classifies products called NAPCS as a companion to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). The European Union uses a "Classification of Products by Activity" among other product classifications. The United Nations also classifies products for international economic activity reporting.

The Aspinwall Classification System classifies and rates products based on five variables:

1. Replacement rate (How frequently is the product repurchased?)
2. Gross margin (How much profit is obtained from each product?)
3. Buyer goal adjustment (How flexible are the buyers' purchasing habits with regard to this product?)
4. Duration of product satisfaction (How long will the product produce benefits for the user?)
5. Duration of buyer search behavior (How long will consumers shop for the product?)

The National Institute of Governmental Purchasing (NIGP) developed a commodity and services classification system for use by state and local governments, the NIGP Code. The NIGP Code is used by 33 states within the United States as well as thousands of cities, counties and political subdivisions. The NIGP Code is a hierarchical schema consisting of a 3 digit class, 5 digit class-item, 7 digit class-item-group, and an 11 digit class-item-group-detail. Applications of the NIGP Code include vendor registration, inventory item identification, contract item management, spend analysis, and strategic sourcing.

Product model

A manufacturer usually provides an identifier for each particular design of product they make, known as a model, model variant, or model number (often abbreviated as MN, M/N or model no., and sometimes as M- or Mk). For example, Dyson Ltd, a manufacturer of appliances (mainly vacuum cleaners), requires customers to identify their model in the support section of the website. Brand and model can be used together to identify products in the market. The model number is not necessarily the same as the manufacturer part number (MPN).

Because of the huge amount of similar products in the automotive industry, there is a special kind of defining a car with options (marks, attributes) that represent the characteristics features of the vehicle. A model of a car is defined by some basic options like body, engine, gearbox, and axles. The variants of a model (often called the trim levels) are built by some additional options like color, seats, wheels, mirrors, other trims, entertainment and assistant systems, etc. Options, that exclude each other (pairwise) build an option family. That means that you can choose only one option for each family and you have to choose exactly one option.

In addition, a specific unit of a product is often (and in some contexts must be) identified by a serial number, which is necessary to distinguish products with the same product definition. In the case of automotive products, it is called the vehicle identification number (VIN), an internationally standardised format.

Product information

Product information, beyond currency price information, can include:

• Product description – typically on a label on or packaging of the product or in an online shopping website for it
• Certificates – including related to sustainability and for unobservable quality attributes
• Various types of ratings, comparisons, third-party information, and customer reviews – including user reviews
• Labels – such as energy rating labels
• Information about ingredients
• Visual content
• Place/region and company of origin
• Estimated expiration date
• Safety information
• Nutrition information, mainly contained macronutrients Many of these types of product information are regulated to some degree, such as to some degree prohibiting false or misleading product information or requiring sellers or manufacturers to specify various information such as ingredients of food-, pharmaceutical- and hygiene-products. There also is standardization. Marketing to entice the shopper is often prioritized over accurate, high-quality or extensive and relevant information.

Product information is often a key element in the buyer decision process. Relevant factors include trust in the accuracy of the information and social normative pressure. Easily accessible and up-to-date medicinal product information can contribute to the health literacy. Online shopping is usually more informationally rich than shopping at physical stores traveled to and usually has higher comparability and customizability.

Production information-related developments can be useful for enabling, facilitating, or shifting towards sustainable consumption and support more sustainable products. Environmental life-cycle assessment (LCA) has been widely used for to assess environmental impacts across the life cycle of products. There are LCA datasets that assess all products in some supermarkets in a standardized way. Consumers may seek reliable information to evaluate relevant characteristics of products such as durability and reliability. Development of 'transparency by design' scenarios have been suggested to "complement the physical product with layers of digital information", improving transparency and traceability (T&T). The app CodeCheck gives some smartphone users some capability to scan products for assessed ingredients. Many labels are considered to be flawed and few have the time to "study the true environmental impact of every purchase". Full product transparency is a concept of making the full life-cycle impacts public. An important element that is required for various product information is supply chain transparency, which relates to human rights and supply chain sustainability.

Produce traceability

Product passports

In the EU, under the renewed Sustainable Product Policy Initiative, the inclusion of a Digital Product Passport has been proposed. A material passport is a document consisting of all the materials that are included in a product or construction. It consists of a set of data describing defined characteristics of materials in products, useful for recovery, recycling, re-use and various evaluations. They may contribute to a more circular economy.

Product information management

References

References

1. Kotler, P., Armstrong, G., Brown, L., and Adam, S. (2006) ''Marketing'', 7th Ed. Pearson Education Australia/Prentice Hall.
2. [http://www.sears.com Sears online] {{webarchive. link. (2007-02-17 , sears.com.)
3. When an online Sears customer goes to the "Parts and accessories" section of the website to find parts for a particular Sears item, the "model number" field actually requires a Sears item number, not a manufacturer's model number. This is a typical problem with product codes or item codes that are internally assigned by a company but do not conform to an external standard.
4. Kotler, Philip. (1989). "Principles of Marketing, fourth edition". Prentice-Hall, Inc..
5. "PepsiCo Marketing Mix (4Ps) Analysis".
6. "Product Mix of Coca-Cola {{!}} PDF {{!}} The Coca Cola Company {{!}} Coca Cola".
7. "Product Mix Strategy".
8. US Census Bureau (2002), [https://www.census.gov/prod/ec02/ec0252slls.pdf "2002 Economic Census, Finance and Insurance"], p.14
9. [https://www.census.gov/eos/www/napcs/index.html North American Product Classification System], U.S. Census Bureau
10. link. (2007-10-12 , ec.europa.eu.)
11. link. (2007-07-03 , unstats.un.org.)
12. [http://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/17341697/social-marketing Leo Aspinwall, 1958] {{webarchive. link. (2013-08-29 , Social Marketing AED Resource p. 45)
13. [http://www.sagepub.com/clow/study/articles/PDFs/01_Shaw.pdf A history of schools of marketing thought, Eric H. Shaw, D.G. Brian Jones] {{webarchive. link. (2010-12-05 , Marketing theory Volume 5(3): 239–281, 2005 SAGE, p. 249)
14. [http://www.nigp.org National Institute of Governmental Purchasing] {{webarchive. link. (2008-10-26 , nigp.org)
15. [http://www.nigp.com NIGP Code] {{webarchive. link. (2008-12-09)
16. [http://www.nigp.com/nigp-code-sample-01.jsp NIGP Code sample] {{webarchive. link. (2008-10-17)
17. link. (2011-08-27)
18. link. (2011-09-27 . ''Google Merchant Center: Help forum''. August 31, 2009, accessed September 6, 2011.)
19. (26 August 2016). "Missed Information: Better Information for Building a Wealthier, More Sustainable Future". MIT Press.
20. (1 March 2005). "The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool". Journal of Consumer Policy.
21. (March 2009). "Limits to labels: The role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption". International Journal of Consumer Studies.
22. (29 September 2017). "The Future of Eco-labelling: Making Environmental Product Information Systems Effective". Routledge.
23. (8 September 2011). "The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy". OUP Oxford.
24. (January 2018). "Understanding the Intention to Trust Product Information and Certifications to Promote Sustainable Consumption: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior". University of Hawaii at Manoa.
25. (1 March 2020). "Trust me? Consumer trust in expert information on food product labels". Food and Chemical Toxicology.
26. "Electronic product information: From principles to actions".
27. (1 June 2021). "Bridging barriers in sustainability research: Α review from sustainability science to life cycle sustainability assessment". Ecological Economics.
28. "These are the UK supermarket items with the worst environmental impact". New Scientist.
29. (16 August 2022). "Estimating the environmental impacts of 57,000 food products". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
30. (25 July 2003). "Improving Product Reliability: Strategies and Implementation". John Wiley & Sons.
31. (1 February 2021). "Augmented product information: crafting physical-digital transparency strategies in the materials supply chain". The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.
32. (21 April 2022). "Apps for Earth Day: 5 options to keep your green goals".
33. "How tech is helping to change the way people think about the food on their plate". CNBC.
34. (18 December 2012). "Full product transparency gives consumers more informed choices". The Guardian.
35. (June 2022). "Supply chain transparency: Consumer reactions to incongruent signals". Journal of Operations Management.
36. (20 February 2020). "Supply chain transparency, explained".
37. "Leading the way in the global circular economy".
38. "Digitalisation for a circular economy".