Perfluorooctanoic acid

History

3M (then the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) began producing PFOA by electrochemical fluorination in 1947. Starting in 1951, DuPont purchased PFOA from 3M for use in the manufacturing of specific fluoropolymers—commercially branded as Teflon—but DuPont internally referred to PFOA as C8.

In 1968, organofluorine content was detected in the blood serum of consumers, and in 1976 it was suggested to be PFOA or a related compound such as PFOS.

In 1999, EPA ordered companies to examine the effects of perfluorinated chemicals after receiving data on the global distribution and toxicity of PFOS. For these reasons, and EPA pressure, in May 2000, 3M announced the phaseout of the production of PFOA, PFOS, and PFOS-related products—the company's best-selling repellent. 3M stated that they would have made the same decision regardless of EPA pressure.

Because of the 3M phaseout, in 2002, DuPont built its own plant in Fayetteville, North Carolina, to manufacture the chemical. The chemical has received attention due to litigation from the PFOA-contaminated community around DuPont's Washington Works facility in Washington, West Virginia, along with EPA focus. In 2004, ChemRisk—an "industry risk assessor" that had been contracted by Dupont, reported that over 1.7 million pounds of C8 had been "dumped, poured and released" into the environment from Dupont's Parkersburg, West Virginia-based Washington Works plant between 1951 and 2003.

Research on PFOA has demonstrated ubiquity, animal-based toxicity, and some associations with human health parameters and potential health effects. Additionally, advances in analytical chemistry in recent years have allowed the routine detection of low- and sub-parts per billion levels of PFOA in a variety of substances. Major companies producing PFOA signed with the Global PFOA Stewardship Program with the goal of elimination of PFOA by 2015. Since then it has been eliminated from the production of non-stick materials used in cookware. GenX has been introduced as a replacement for PFOA, but in a 2015 study which tested the effects on rats, GenX caused many of the same health problems as PFOA, but required much higher concentrations. This is because GenX (C3) is a short chain alternative to PFOA. GenX also has a significantly shorter half-life than PFOA so it is not as bio-persistent as PFOA or other long chain perfluorinated chemicals.

Robert Bilott investigation

In the Autumn of 2000, lawyer Robert Bilott, a partner at Taft Stettinius & Hollister, won a court order forcing DuPont to share all documentation related to PFOA. This included 110,000 files, consisting of confidential studies and reports conducted by DuPont scientists over decades. By 1993, DuPont understood that "PFOA caused cancerous testicular, pancreatic and liver tumors in lab animals" and the company began to investigate alternatives. However, because products manufactured with PFOA were such an integral part of DuPont's earnings, $1 billion in annual profit, they chose to continue using PFOA. Bilott learned that both "3M and DuPont had been conducting secret medical studies on PFOA for more than four decades", and by 1961 DuPont was aware of hepatomegaly in mice fed with PFOA.

Bilott exposed how DuPont had been knowingly polluting water with PFOAs in Parkersburg, West Virginia, since the 1980s. In the 1980s and 1990s, researchers investigated the toxicity of PFOA. Regarding a secret agreement between 3M and the government of Jersey (UK) to not perform group testing of residents and to help 3M avoid a class action, Billott told The Guardian: "I've not seen something like this where there's an agreement to try to help the company against claims by others, Particularly if it's something affecting public health and safety or research."

For his work in the exposure of the contamination, Bilott received several awards including The Right Livelihood Award in 2017. In film, this battle with DuPont has been depicted in the documentary The Devil We Know and the legal thriller Dark Waters.

Synthesis

PFOA has two main synthesis routes, electrochemical fluorination (ECF) and telomerization. Multiple products are formed by ECF with the target acid fluoride F(CF2)7COF being produced as only 10–15% of the yield, while the main products are perfluorinated cyclic ether isomers, including FC-75. 3M synthesized ECF PFOA at their Cottage Grove, Minnesota facility from 1947 to 2002 and was the world's largest producer. ECF production continues on a smaller scale in Europe and Asia.

PFOA is also synthesized by the telomerization represented below, where the telogen is the organoiodine compound and the taxogen is the tetrafluoroethylene. Each step is an addition reaction where the carbon-iodine bond of the telogen is added across the carbon-carbon double bond of the unsaturated taxogen, resulting in the formation of a new telogen.

:CF3CF2I + F2C=CF2 → CF3CF2CF2CF2I

:CF3(CF2)3I + F2C=CF2 → CF3(CF2)5I

:CF3(CF2)5I + F2C=CF2 → CF3(CF2)7I

The product is oxidized by SO3 to form PFOA. Since each addition produces a new teleomer, fluorotelomers like these form with varying length chains containing an even number of carbon atoms, depending on reaction conditions. Typically, most products within will contain between two and six taxogens (that is, from CF3(CF2)5I to CF3(CF2)13I). After oxidation, distillation is used to separate PFOA from the other perfluorinated carboxylic acids. The telomerization synthesis of PFOA was pioneered by DuPont, and is not well suited to the laboratory. PFOA formed by telomerization is completely linear, in contrast to the mixture of structures formed by ECF.

Applications

PFOA has widespread applications. In 1976, PFOA was reported as a water and oil repellent "in fabrics and leather and in the production of floor waxes and waxed papers"; however, it is believed that paper is no longer treated with perfluorinated compounds, but with fluorotelomers with less than 0.1% PFOA. The compound is also used in "insulators for electric wires, planar etching of fused silica", and outdoor clothing. As a protonated species, the acid form of PFOA was the most widely used perfluorocarboxylic acid used as a reactive intermediate in the production of fluoroacrylic esters.

As a salt, its dominant use is as an emulsifier for the emulsion polymerization of fluoropolymers such as PTFE, polyvinylidene fluoride, and fluoroelastomers. For this use, 3M subsidiary Dyneon has a replacement emulsifer despite DuPont stating PFOA is an "essential processing aid". In the past PFOA was used in the production of Gore-Tex as it is PTFE-based. In PTFE processing, PFOA is in aqueous solution and forms micelles that contain tetrafluoroethylene and the growing polymer. PFOA can be used to stabilize fluoropolymer and fluoroelastomer suspensions before further industrial processing and in ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography it can act as an extraction agent. PFOA also finds uses in electronic products and as an industrial fluorosurfactant.

In a 2009 EPA study of 116 products, purchased between March 2007 and May 2008 and found to contain at least 0.01% fluorine by weight, the concentrations of PFOA were determined. Concentrations shown below range from not detected, or ND, (with the detection limit in parentheses) to 6750 with concentrations in nanograms of PFOA per gram of sample (parts per billion) unless stated otherwise.

Global occurrence and sources

PFOA contaminates every continent. Two of the most common types of PFAS (more precisely, PFOS and PFOA) were phased out of production in the United States (US) in 2002 and 2015 respectively, but are still present in some imported products. PFOA and PFOS are found in every American person's blood stream in the parts per billion range, though those concentrations have decreased by 70% for PFOA and 84% for PFOS between 1999 and 2014, which coincides with the end of the production and phase out of PFOA and PFOS in the US. PFOA has been detected in the central Pacific Ocean at low parts per quadrillion ranges, and at low parts per trillion (ppt) levels in coastal waters. Due to the surfactant nature of PFOA, it has been found to concentrate in the top layers of ocean water. PFOA is detected widely in surface waters, and is present in numerous mammals, fish, and bird species.

However, wildlife has much less PFOA than humans, unlike PFOS and other longer perfluorinated carboxylic acids; in wildlife, PFOA is not as bioaccumulative as longer perfluorinated carboxylic acids. Municipal wastewater and landfill leachates are considered as important sources of PFOA to the environment.

Most industrialized nations have average PFOA blood serum levels ranging from 2 to 8 parts per billion;{{cite journal |vauthors=Vestergren R, Cousins IT |title =Tracking the pathways of human exposure to perfluorocarboxylates |journal=Environ. Sci. Technol. |volume=43 |issue=15 |pages=5565–75 |date=August 2009

Industrial sources

PFOA is released directly from industrial sites. For example, the estimate for the DuPont Washington Works facility is a total PFOA emissions of 80,000 pounds (lbs) in 2000 and 1,700 pounds in 2004. paper and electronics industries. The most important emission sources are carpet and textile protection products, as well as fire-fighting foams.

Precursors

PFOA can form as a breakdown product from a variety of precursor molecules. In fact, the main products of the fluorotelomer industry, fluorotelomer-based polymers, have been shown to degrade to form PFOA and related compounds, with half-lives of decades, both biotically and by simple abiotic reaction with water. It has been argued that fluorotelomer-based polymers already produced might be major sources of PFOA globally for decades to come. Other precursors that degrade to PFOA include 8:2 fluorotelomer alcohol (F(CF2)8CH2CH2OH), polyfluoroalkyl phosphate surfactants (PAPS), and possibly N-EtFOSE alcohol (F(CF2)8SO2N(Et)CH2CH2OH).{{cite journal

A majority of waste water treatment plants (WWTPs) that have been tested output more PFOA than is input, and this increased output has been attributed to the biodegradation of fluorotelomer alcohols.{{cite journal

Sources to people

Food, drinking water, outdoor air, indoor air, dust, and food packagings are all implicated as sources of PFOA to people. because of data gaps. When water is a source, blood levels are approximately 100 times higher than drinking water levels.

People who lived in the PFOA-contaminated area around DuPont's Washington Works facility were found to have higher levels of PFOA in their blood from drinking water. The highest PFOA levels in drinking water were found in the Little Hocking water system, with an average concentration of 3.55 parts per billion during 2002–2005. Individuals who drank more tap water, ate locally grown fruits and vegetables, or ate local meat, were all associated with having higher PFOA levels. Residents who used water carbon filter systems had lower PFOA levels.

In Jersey, UK, 18% of residents of an area were found to have elevated levels of PFOA, downstream from 3M fire retardant tests in weekly fire-service practice from the 1960s to the mid 1990s. Bloodletting is used for these residents at a cost of $4500 per patient. The potatoes of the island were found to contain 10x the EU limit of PFOS.

Food contact surfaces

PFOA is also formed as an unintended byproduct in the production of fluorotelomers and is present in finished goods treated with fluorotelomers, including those intended for food contact. Fluorotelomers are applied to food contact papers because they are lipophobic: they prevent oil from soaking into the paper from fatty foods. Also, fluorotelomers can be metabolized into PFOA. In a U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) study, lipophobic fluorotelomer-based paper coatings (which can be applied to food contact paper in the concentration range of 0.4%) were found to contain 88,000–160,000 parts per billion PFOA before application, while the oil from microwave popcorn bags contained 6–290 parts per billion PFOA after heating. Toxicologists estimate that microwave popcorn could account for about 20% of the PFOA levels measured in an individual consuming 10 bags a year if 1% of the fluorotelomers are metabolized to PFOA.

In 2008 as news stories began to raise concerns about PFOA in microwaved popcorn, Dan Turner, DuPont's global public relations chief, said, "I serve microwave popcorn to my three-year-old." Five years later, journalist Peter Laufer wrote to Turner to ask if his child was still eating microwave popcorn. "I am not going to comment on such a personal inquiry", Turner replied.

Fluorotelomer coatings are used in fast food wrappers, candy wrappers, and pizza box liners. PAPS, a type of paper fluorotelomer coating, and PFOA precursor, is also used in food contact papers.

Despite DuPont's assertion that "cookware coated with DuPont Teflon non-stick coatings does not contain PFOA", residual PFOA was also detected in finished PTFE products including PTFE cookware (4–75 parts per billion). Also, non-stick cookware is heated—which should volatilize PFOA; PTFE products that are not heated, such as PTFE sealant tape, had higher (1800 parts per billion) levels detected. Overall, PTFE cookware is considered an insignificant exposure pathway to PFOA.

Potential path: sludge to food

PFOA and PFOS were detected in "very high" (low parts per million) levels in agricultural fields for grazing beef cattle around Decatur, Alabama. The approximately 5000 acres of land were fertilized with "treated municipal sewage sludge, or biosolids". and the blood of the cattle feeding on this grass. The water treatment plant received process wastewater from a nearby perfluorochemical manufacturing plant. 3M says they managed their own wastes, but Daikin America "discharged process wastewater to the municipal waste treatment plant".

Household dust

PFOA is frequently found in household dust, making it an important exposure route for adults, but more substantially, children. Children have higher exposures to PFOA through dust compared to adults. Hand-to-mouth contact and proximity to high concentrations of dust make them more susceptible to ingestion, and increases PFOA exposure. One study showed significant positive associations were recognized between dust ingestion and PFOA serum concentrations. However, an alternate study found exposure due to dust ingestion was associated with minimal risk.

Menstrual pads

In 2024 it was reported that a brand of menstrual pad was found to contain PFOA.

Regulatory status

Drinking water and products

In April 2024 EPA issued a final drinking water rule for PFOA, PFOS, GenX, PFBS, PFNA, and PFHxS. Public water systems must remove these six PFAS to near-zero levels by 2027. Grant funding is available from EPA to assist utilities in water testing and development of treatment systems.

The State of New Jersey published drinking water standards for PFOA and PFOS in 2020. A standard for PFNA was published in 2018. This was the first state to publish PFAS standards in the absence of federal regulations. See U.S. state government actions.

In 2018 the State of New York adopted drinking water standards of 10 ppt for PFOA and 10 ppt for PFOS, the most stringent such standards in the United States. The standards apply to public water systems and took effect in 2019 after a public comment period.

Using information gained through a Freedom of Information Act request, in May 2018 it was learned that January 2018 emails between the EPA, the Office of Management and Budget, the Department of Defense, and the Department of Health and Human Services showed an effort to suppress the release of a draft report on the toxicology of PFOS and PFOA done by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. The report found that these chemicals endanger human health at a far lower level than EPA has previously called safe. After media accounts of the effort surfaced, the regional EPA administrator for Colorado denied that EPA had anything to do with suppressing the report. The report was released on June 21, 2018.

The new ATSDR analysis derives provisional Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) of 3x10−6 mg/kg/day for PFOA and 2x10−6 mg/kg/day for PFOS during intermediate exposure. The European Food Safety Authority opinion sets a provisional tolerable weekly intake (TWI) of 6 x10−6 mg/kg body weight per week for PFOA.

California and food packaging

An attempt to regulate PFOA in food packaging occurred in the US state of California in 2008. A bill, sponsored by State Senator Ellen Corbett and the Environmental Working Group, was passed in the house and senate that would have banned PFOA, PFOS, and seven or more related fluorinated carbon compounds in food packaging starting in 2010, but the bill was vetoed by Governor Schwarzenegger. The bill would have affected fluorochemical manufacturers outside of the state. Schwarzenegger said the compound should be reviewed by the newly established, and more comprehensive, state program.

Fluorotelomers

Main article: Fluorotelomer

Fluorotelomer-based products have been shown to degrade to PFOA over periods of decades; these studies could lead EPA to require DuPont and others to reformulate products with a value over $1 billion.{{cite journal |author=Stokstad E |title=Environmental research—DuPont settlement to fund test of potential toxics

Health effects

Toxicology

PFOA is a possible carcinogen, a possible liver toxicant, a possible developmental toxicant, and a possible immune system toxicant, and also exerts hormonal effects including alteration of thyroid hormone levels at very high concentrations. PFOA alters lipid metabolism.

In 2008, PFOA has been described as a member of a group of "classic non-genotoxic carcinogens". However, a provisional German assessment notes that a 2005 study found PFOA to be genotoxic via a peroxisome proliferation pathway that produced oxygen radicals in HepG2 cells, and a 2006 study demonstrated the induction and suppression of a broad range of genes; therefore, it states that the indirect genotoxic (and thus carcinogenic) potential of PFOA cannot be dismissed. As of November 2023, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has classified PFOA as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) based on "sufficient" evidence for cancer in animals and "strong" mechanistic evidence in exposed humans.

An additional study has shown PFOA to be developmentally toxic, hepatotoxic, immunotoxic, and to have negative effects of thyroid hormone production.

Human data

PFOA is resistant to degradation by natural processes such as metabolism, hydrolysis, photolysis, or biodegradation and has been found to persist in the environment. PFOA is found in environmental and biological fluids as the anion perfluorooctanoate. PFOA can be absorbed from ingestion and can penetrate skin. The acid headgroup of PFOA enables binding to proteins with fatty acid or hormone substrates such as serum albumin, liver fatty acid-binding protein, and the nuclear receptors PPARα and possibly CAR.

In animals, PFOA is mainly present in the liver, blood, and kidneys. PFOA does not accumulate in fat tissue, unlike traditional organohalogen persistent organic pollutants. In humans, PFOA has an average elimination half-life of about three years. Because of this long half-life, PFOA has the potential to bioaccumulate.

The levels of PFOA exposure in humans vary widely. While an average American might have 3 or 4 parts per billion of PFOA present in their blood serum, individuals occupationally exposed to PFOA have had blood serum levels over 100,000 parts per billion (100 parts per million or 0.01%) recorded.{{cite journal

Consumers

Single cross-sectional studies on consumers have been published noting multiple associations. Blood serum levels of PFOA were associated with an increased time to pregnancy—or "infertility"—in a 2009 study. PFOA exposure was associated with decreased semen quality, increased serum alanine aminotransferase levels, and increased occurrence of thyroid disease. In a study of 2003–2004 US samples, a higher (9.8 milligram per deciliter) total cholesterol level was observed when the highest quartile was compared to the lowest. Along with other related compounds, PFOA exposure was associated with an increased risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a study of US children aged 12–15. In a paper presented at the 2009 annual meeting of the International Society of Environmental Epidemiology, PFOA appeared to act as an endocrine disruptor by a potential mechanism on breast maturation in young girls. A C8 Science Panel status report noted an association between exposure in girls and a later onset of puberty.

;Other impacts on exposure in utero PFOA exposure on thyroid function has also been a topic of concern, and has found to negatively impact thyroid stimulating hormone even at low levels when exposed during fetal development. PFOA is also shown to have obesogenic effects, and an experimental study found a positive correlation to low-dose prenatal exposure of PFOA and prevalence of overweight and high waist circumference in females at age 20. A correlation between in utero PFOA exposure and mental performance has yet to be established, as many studies have resulted in insignificant results. For example, a study conducted near Parkersburg, West Virginia did not find a significant association between in utero PFOA exposure and performance of math skills or reading performance in children ages 6 to 12 living in the PFOA-contaminated water district. Based on a cohort study conducted in the Mid-Ohio Valley, no clear association was found between prenatal exposure to PFOA and birth defects, although a possible association with brain defects was observed and requires further research and assessment.

Extrapolated epidemiological data suggests a slight association between PFOA exposure and low birth weight. This was consistent based on blood levels of PFOA metabolites regardless of the geographic residence of subjects. Generally, the findings among human fetuses exposed to the chemical were considerably less drastic than what was seen in mice studies. Because of this, studies linking exposure to low birth weight can be considered inconclusive. PFOA exposure in the Danish general population was not associated with an increased risk of prostate, bladder, pancreatic, or liver cancer. Maternal PFOA levels were not associated with an offspring's increased risk of hospitalization due to infectious diseases, behavioral and motor coordination problems, or delays in reaching developmental milestones.

Employees and DuPont exposed community

In 2010, the three members of the C8 Science Panel published a review of the epidemiological evidence on PFOA exposure in Environmental Health Perspectives. Insufficient evidence exists to conclude PFOA causes adverse health effects in humans, but consistent evidence exists on associations with higher cholesterol and uric acid. Whether or not these potential effects result in an increase in cardiovascular disease is unknown.{{cite journal |vauthors=Steenland K, Tinker S, Frisbee S, Ducatman A, Vaccarino V |title=Association of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctane sulfonate with serum lipids among adults living near a chemical plant |journal=Am. J. Epidemiol. |volume=170 |issue=10 |pages=1268–78 |date=November 2009

Facial birth defects, an effect observed in rat offspring, occurred with the children of two out of seven female DuPont employees from the Washington Works facility from 1979 to 1981. Bucky Bailey is one of the affected individuals; DuPont, however, does not accept any liability from the toxicity of PFOA. While 3M sent DuPont results from a study that showed birth defects to rats administered PFOA and DuPont moved the women out of the Teflon production unit, However, data released in March 2009 on the community around DuPont's Washington Works plant showed "a modest, imprecise indication of an elevation in risk ... above the 90th percentile ... based on 12 cases in the uppermost category", which was deemed "suggestive of a possible relationship" between PFOA exposure and birth defects.

Legal actions

International action: Stockholm Convention

PFOA was proposed for listing under the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants in 2015, and on May 10, 2019, PFOA, its salts, and PFOA-related compounds were added to Annex A of the Stockholm Convention by the Conference of the Parties. Several hundred salts and precursors of PFOA fall within the scope of the restriction. A few specific exemptions remained. Among them is a time-bound exemption for PFOA in fire-fighting foam.

Industry and legal actions

DuPont has used PFOA for over 50 years at its Washington Works plant. Area residents sued DuPont in August 2001 and claimed DuPont released PFOA in excess of their community guideline of 1 part per billion resulting in lower property values and increased risk of illness. As part of the settlement, DuPont has paid for blood tests and health surveys of residents believed to be affected. Participants numbered 69,030 in the study, which was reviewed by three epidemiologists—the C8 Science Panel—to determine if any health effects are the likely result of exposure.

On December 13, 2005, DuPont announced a settlement with the EPA in which DuPont would pay US$10.25 million in fines and an additional US$6.25 million for two supplemental environmental projects without any admission of liability.

On September 30, 2008, Chief Judge Joseph R. Goodwin of the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia denied the certification of a class of Parkersburg residents exposed to PFOA from DuPont's facility because they did not "show the common individual injuries needed to certify a class action". On September 28, 2009, Judge Goodwin dismissed the claims of those residents except for medical monitoring. By 2015, more than three thousand plaintiffs have filed personal-injury lawsuits against DuPont. In 2017, DuPont reached a $670.7 million cash settlement related to 3,550 personal injury lawsuits tied to PFOA contamination of drinking water in the Parkersburg area. Chemours, which was spun off from DuPont in 2015, agreed to pay half the settlement. Both companies denied any wrongdoing.

;Jersey The government of Jersey signed a confidential agreement with 3M in 2005, agreeing to not pursue legal claims for £2.6m. Jersey must assist 3M in the defense of future claims.

A source told the Guardian that Jersey needed 3M's permission to proceed with blood tests to avoid 3M punitive measures. "The state got an agreement to do individual blood tests, but not screening, as that could be the first step towards a possible class action lawsuit."

U.S. federal government actions

In 2002, a panel of toxicologists, including several from EPA, proposed a level of 150 ppb for drinking water in the PFOA contaminated area around DuPont's Washington Works plant. This initially proposed level was much higher than any known environmental concentration and was over 2,000 times the level EPA eventually settled on for the drinking water health advisory.

In July 2004, EPA filed a suit against DuPont alleging "widespread contamination" of PFOA near the Parkersburg, West Virginia plant "at levels exceeding the company's community exposure guidelines;" the suit also alleged that "DuPont had—over a 20 year period—repeatedly failed to submit information on adverse effects (in particular, information on liver enzyme alterations and birth defects in offspring of female Parkersburg workers)."

In October 2005, a USFDA study was published revealing PFOA and PFOA precursor chemicals in food contact and PTFE products.

On January 25, 2006, EPA announced a voluntary program with several chemical companies to reduce PFOA and PFOA precursor emissions by the year 2015.

On February 15, 2005, EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB) voted to recommended that PFOA should be considered a "likely human carcinogen".

On May 26, 2006, EPA's SAB addressed a letter to Administrator Stephen L. Johnson. Three-quarters of advisers thought the stronger "likely to be carcinogenic" descriptor was warranted, in opposition to EPA's own PFOA hazard descriptor of "suggestive evidence of carcinogenicity, but not sufficient to assess human carcinogenic potential".

On November 21, 2006, EPA ordered DuPont to offer alternative drinking water or treatment for public or private water users living near DuPont's Washington Works plant in West Virginia (and in Ohio), if the level of PFOA detected in drinking water is equal to or greater than 0.5 parts per billion. This measure sharply lowered the previous action level of 150 parts per billion that was established in March 2002.

According to a May 23, 2007, Environmental Science & Technology Online article, U.S. Food and Drug Administration research regarding food contact papers as a potential source of PFOA to humans is ongoing.

In November 2007, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published data on PFOA concentrations comparing 1999–2000 vs. 2003–2004 NHANES samples.

In October 2021 the EPA proposed to designate PFOA and PFOS as hazardous substances in its PFAS Strategic Roadmap. In September 2022 the EPA proposed to designate as hazardous substances under the Superfund Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA).

In 2024 EPA published drinking water regulations for PFOA and five other PFAS.

U.S. state government actions

New Jersey

In 2007 the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) announced that it found PFOA at "elevated levels in the system's drinking water near DuPont's massive Chambers Works chemical plant".

In 2018 the state published a drinking water standard for PFNA. Public water systems in New Jersey are required to meet a maximum contaminant level (MCL) standard of 13 ppt.

In 2019 New Jersey filed lawsuits against the owners of two plants that had manufactured PFASs (the Chambers Works and the Parlin plant in Sayreville), and two plants that were cited for water pollution from other chemicals. The companies cited are DuPont, Chemours and 3M.

In 2020 the NJDEP set a PFOA standard at 14 ppt and a PFOS standard at 13 ppt.

New York

In 2018 the New York State Department of Health adopted drinking water standards of 10 ppt for PFOA and 10 ppt for PFOS, effective in 2019 after a public comment period.

Michigan

In November 2017, the Michigan PFAS Action Response Team (MPART) was created to address growing pollution concerns after multiple sites contaminated by PFAS were identified. MPART is a multi-agency team tasked with investigating PFAS contamination sites and sources in the state, protecting drinking water, enhancing interagency communication and keeping the public informed.

In January 2018, Michigan established a legally enforceable groundwater cleanup level of 70 ppt for both PFOA and PFOS. Two science advisory committees were also created and joined MPART to "coordinate and review medical and environmental health, PFAS science and develop evidence-based recommendations".

In August 2020, the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy adopted stricter drinking water standards in the form of MCLs, lowering acceptable levels from the 2018 enforceable groundwater cleanup levels of 70 ppt to 8 ppt for PFOA and 16 ppt for PFOS and adding MCLs for 5 previously unregulated PFAS compounds PFNA, PFHxA, PFHxS, PFBS, and HFPO-DA.

Minnesota

In 2007, the Minnesota Department of Health lowered its Health Based Value for PFOA in drinking water from 1.0 ppb to 0.5 ppb, where "the sources are landfilled industrial wastes from a 3M manufacturing plant".

European action

PFOA contaminated waste was incorporated into soil improver and spread on agricultural land in Germany, leading to PFOA drinking water contamination of up to 0.519 parts per billion.{{cite journal |title =Perfluorinated surfactants contaminate German waters—Mislabeled waste in fertilizer leads to a water scandal |journal =Environ. Sci. Technol. |date =2006-12-01

In the Netherlands, after questions by members of Parliament, the minister of Environment ordered a study into the potential exposure to PFOA of people living in the vicinity of the DuPont factory in Dordrecht. The report was published in March 2016 and concluded that "prior to 2002 residents were exposed to levels of PFOA at which health effects could not be ruled out". As a result of this, the government commissioned several further studies, including blood tests and measurements in drinking water.

PFOA was identified as a PBT substance in the EU in 2013. It was then included in the candidate list of substances of very high concern. In 2017, PFOA, its salts and PFOA-related substances were added to annex XVII (restriction) of the REACH Regulation.

The EU adopted the listing of PFOA in Annex A of the Stockholm Convention with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/784 of 8 April 2020 and introduced a limit value of 0,025 mg/kg for PFOA including its salts, and at 1 mg/kg for the individual PFOA-related compounds or a combination of those compounds. They also included some specific exemptions. Among them is a time-bound exemption for PFOA in fire-fighting foam.

Australian action

On August 10, 2016, Australian litigation funder IMF Bentham announced an agreement to fund a class action led by the law firm Gadens against the Australian Department of Defence for economic losses to homeowners, fishers, and farmers resulting from the use of aqueous film forming foam (containing PFOA) at RAAF Base Williamtown.

References

References

1. {{GESTIS
2. Goss K. U.. (July 2008). "The pKa values of PFOA and other highly fluorinated carboxylic acids". Environ. Sci. Technol..
3. (July 2009). "Acid dissociation versus molecular association of perfluoroalkyl oxoacids: Environmental implications". J. Phys. Chem. A.
4. (June 2010). "Theoretical studies on the pKa values of perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids". J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem).
5. Lemal DM. (January 2004). "Perspective on fluorocarbon chemistry". J. Org. Chem..
6. (November 2023). "Carcinogenicity of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid". The Lancet. Oncology.
7. (2022-05-03). "Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances (PFAS) Factsheet {{!}} National Biomonitoring Program {{!}} CDC".
8. (16 December 2019). "Emerging chemical risks in Europe — 'PFAS' — European Environment Agency".
9. (2011-08-25). "Polyfluorinated Compounds: Past, Present, and Future". Environ. Sci. Technol..
10. (March 2014). "Emerging Contaminants Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS) and Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)". EPA.
11. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington, D.C. (April 26, 2024). "PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation." ''Federal Register,'' {{USFR. 89. 32532
12. (January 2006). "Sources, fate and transport of perfluorocarboxylates". Environ. Sci. Technol..
13. (August 2006). "Community exposure to perfluorooctanoate: relationships between serum concentrations and exposure sources". J. Occup. Environ. Med..
14. "Perfluorooctanoic acid". [[National Center for Biotechnology Information]].
15. (2004). "The toxicology of perfluorooctanoate". Crit. Rev. Toxicol..
16. (April 2002). "Perfluorochemical surfactants in the environment". Environ. Sci. Technol..
17. (July 2004). "The developmental toxicity of perfluoroalkyl acids and their derivatives". Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol..
18. Ullah, Aziz. (October 2006). "The Fluorochemical Dilemma: What the PFOS/PFOA fuss is all about". Cleaning & Restoration.
19. Lee, Jennifer 8.. (15 April 2003). "E.P.A. Orders Companies to Examine Effects of Chemicals". The New York Times.
20. "3M United States: PFOS PFOA: What is 3M Doing?". 3M Company.
21. Weber, Joseph. (2000-06-05). "3M's Big Cleanup – Why it decided to pull the plug on its best-selling stain repellent". Business Week.
22. Ward, Ken Jr.. (7 November 2008). "DuPont finds high C8 in Chinese workers". The Charleston Gazette.
23. Mordock, Jeff. (April 1, 2016). "Taking on DuPont: Illnesses, deaths blamed on pollution from W. Va. plant". Delaware Online.
24. "GORE completes elimination of PFOA from raw material of its functional fabrics: GORE-TEX Products Newsroom". Gore Fabrics.
25. US EPA, OCSPP. (2016-05-10). "Fact Sheet: 2010/2015 PFOA Stewardship Program".
26. (2015). "Evaluation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of ammonium 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoro-2-(heptafluoropropoxy)-propanoate in Sprague–Dawley rats". Toxicology Reports.
27. Rich, Nathaniel. (6 January 2016). "The Lawyer Who Became DuPont's Worst Nightmare". New York Times.
28. Arneson, Gerald J.. (November 1961). "Toxicity of Teflon Dispersing Agents". DuPont, Polychemicals Department, Research & Development Division, Experimental Station.
29. Clapp, Richard. "Case Studies in Science Policy: Perfluorooctanoic Acid". Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy (SKAPP).
30. "Robert Bilott, The Right Livelihood Award". The Right Livelihood Award.
31. "DuPont vs. the World: Chemical Giant Covered Up Health Risks of Teflon Contamination Across Globe". Democracy Now!.
32. (2000). "Fluorinated Higher Carboxylic Acids".
33. Goeden, Helen. (June 2008). "Issues and Needs for PFAA Exposure and Health Research: A State Perspective".
34. (November 1985). "Quantitative gas chromatographic determination of perfluorooctanoic acid as the benzyl ester in plasma and urine". Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol..
35. (2007). "PFOA in Norway TA-2354/2007". [[Norwegian Pollution Control Authority]].
36. "Information on PFOA". DuPont.
37. Siegle, Lucy. (11 October 2009). "Do environmentally friendly outdoor jackets exist?". [[The Observer]].
38. (May 2003). "Toxicity and toxicokinetics of perfluorooctanoic acid in humans and animals". J. Toxicol. Sci..
39. (September 2006). "Responses of the liver to perfluorinated fatty acids with different carbon chain length in male and female mice:in relation to induction of hepatomegaly, peroxisomal beta-oxidation and microsomal 1-acylglycerophosphocholine acyltransferase". Biol. Pharm. Bull..
40. Gordon S. C.. (September 2010). "Toxicological evaluation of ammonium 4,8-dioxa-3H-perfluorononanoate, a new emulsifier to replace ammonium perfluorooctanoate in fluoropolymer manufacturing". Regul Toxicol Pharmacol.
41. Sandy, Martha. "Petition for Expedited CIC Consideration of Perfluorooctanic Acid (PFOA)". State of California, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Cancer Toxicology and Epidemiology Section, Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Branch.
42. (October 2007). "Perfluoroalkyl acids: a review of monitoring and toxicological findings". Toxicol. Sci..
43. Michael McCoy. (November 2008). "Dyneon Phasing Out Perfluorooctanoate". Chemical & Engineering News.
44. "Learn More About DuPont Teflon". DuPont.
45. Renner, Rebecca. (June 2003). "Concerns over common perfluorinated surfactant". Environ. Sci. Technol..
46. (2005). "Fluorine Compounds, Organic". Wiley-VCH.
47. EPA. (7 March 2006). "Premanufacture Notification Exemption for Polymers; Amendment of Polymer Exemption Rule to Exclude Certain Perfluorinated Polymers; Proposed Rule". [[Federal Register]].
48. Salager, Jean-Louis. (2002). "FIRP Booklet # 300-A: Surfactants-Types and Uses". Universidad de los Andes Laboratory of Formulation, Interfaces Rheology, and Processes.
49. Betts KS. (May 2007). "Perfluoroalkyl acids: what is the evidence telling us?". Environ. Health Perspect..
50. "PFAS Fact Sheet".
51. (2005). "A global survey of perfluorinated acids in oceans". Mar. Pollut. Bull..
52. Renner, Rebecca. (June 2008). "Aerosols complicate PFOA picture". Environ. Sci. Technol..
53. "PFAS FACTSHEET".
54. (June 2006). "Biological monitoring of polyfluoroalkyl substances: A review". Environ. Sci. Technol..
55. (May 2010). "Levels and trends of poly- and perfluorinated compounds in the arctic environment". Sci Total Environ.
56. (February 2008). "Are PFCAs bioaccumulative? A critical review and comparison with regulatory criteria and persistent lipophilic compounds". Environ. Sci. Technol..
57. Arvaniti O.S., Stasinakis A.S.. (2015). "Review on the occurrence, fate and removal of perfluorinated compounds during wastewater treatment". Science of the Total Environment.
58. Nika M.C., Ntaiou K., Elytis K., Thomaidi V.S., Gatidou G., Kalantzi O.I., Thomaidis N.S., Stasinakis A.S.. (2020). "Wide-scope target analysis of emerging contaminants in landfill leachates and risk assessment using RQ methodology". Journal of Hazardous Materials.
59. (April 2010). "Levels of perfluorooctane sulfonate and perfluorooctanoic acid in female serum samples from Japan in 2008, Korea in 1994–2008 and Vietnam in 2007–2008". Chemosphere.
60. (July 2010). "Low serum levels of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS) in children and adults from Afghanistan". Sci. Total Environ..
61. (November 2007). "Polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in the U.S. population: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2004 and comparisons with NHANES 1999–2000". Environ. Health Perspect..
62. Renner, Rebecca. (2008). "PFOS phaseout pays off". Environ. Sci. Technol..
63. (10 February 2008). "Study finds high levels of stain-resistance ingredient in Conasauga River". Chattanooga Times Free Press.
64. (2008). "Emissions of perfluorinated alkylated substances (PFAS) from point sources—identification of relevant branches". Water Sci. Technol..
65. (April 2009). "The impact of semiconductor, electronics and optoelectronic industries on downstream perfluorinated chemical contamination in Taiwanese rivers". Environ. Pollut..
66. (2009). "Substance flow analysis for Switzerland: Perfluorinated surfactants perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)". The Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN).
67. (2015). "Decades-Scale Degradation of Commercial, Side-Chain, Fluorotelomer-based Polymers in Soils & Water". Environ. Sci. Technol..
68. (2015). "Abiotic hydrolysis of fluorotelomer polymers as a source of perfluorocarboxylates at the global scale". Environ. Sci. Technol..
69. Renner, Rebecca. (2007). "PFOA in people". Environ. Sci. Technol..
70. (July 2001). "Thermolysis of fluoropolymers as a potential source of halogenated organic acids in the environment". Nature.
71. (June 2003). "The use of 19F NMR and mass spectrometry for the elucidation of novel fluorinated acids and atmospheric fluoroacid precursors evolved in the thermolysis of fluoropolymers". Analyst.
72. (2007-08-21). "Lists of PFOS, PFAS, PFOA, PFCA, related compounds and chemicals that may degrade to PFCA".
73. Renner, Rebecca. (2008). "Do perfluoropolymers biodegrade into PFOA?". Environ. Sci. Technol..
74. (2010). "Perfluorinated Compounds, Polychlorinated Biphenyl, and Organochlorine Pesticide Contamination in Composite Food Samples from Dallas, Texas". Environ. Health Perspect..
75. (November 2010). "Polyfluorinated compounds in residential and nonresidential indoor air". Environ. Sci. Technol..
76. (2010). "Exploring Indirect Sources of Human Exposure to Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylates (PFCAs): Evaluating Uptake, Elimination and Biotransformation of Polyfluoroalkyl Phosphate Esters (PAPs) in the Rat". Environ Health Perspect.
77. Renner R. (December 2008). "EPA finds record PFOS, PFOA levels in Alabama grazing fields". Environ. Sci. Technol..
78. Post, Gloria. "Guidance for PFOA in Drinking Water at Pennsgrove Water Supply Company". New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection; Division of Science, Research and Technology.
79. Johnson, Mark. "Evaluation of Methodologies for Deriving Health-Based Values for PFCs in Drinking Water". Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
80. (2025-01-16). "Bloodletting recommended for Jersey residents after PFAS contamination". The Guardian.
81. "Information on PFOA". DuPont.
82. Renner, Rebecca. (January 2006). "It's in the microwave popcorn, not the Teflon pan". Environ. Sci. Technol..
83. (October 2005). "Perfluorochemicals: potential sources of and migration from food packaging". Food Addit. Contam..
84. Laufer, Peter. (2014). "Organic: A Journalist's Quest to Discover the Truth behind Food Labeling". Lyons Press.
85. [https://www.linkedin.com/pub/dan-turner/0/741/100 Dan Turner, LinkedIn]{{dead link. (October 2017, retrieved 9/26/15.)
86. Weise, Elizabeth. (16 November 2005). "Engineer: DuPont hid facts about paper coating". USA Today.
87. (19 July 2005). "Teflon firm faces fresh lawsuit". BBC News.
88. (March 2009). "Perfluorocarboxylic Acid Content in 116 Articles of Commerce". EPA.
89. (2007). "PFOA in Norway TA-2354/2007". Norwegian Pollution Control Authority.
90. (April 2008). "Estimating consumer exposure to PFOS and PFOA". Risk Anal..
91. "Nonstick pans: Nonstick coating risks". Consumer Reports.
92. Ward, Ken Jr.. (17 January 2009). "EPA's C8 advisory does not address long-term risks". The Charleston Gazette.
93. (2010). "Concentrations, distribution and persistence of perfluoroalkylates in sludge-applied soils near Decatur, Alabama, USA". Environ. Sci. Technol..
94. Finn, Scott. (15 January 2009). "Bush EPA sets so-called safe level of C8 in drinking water". West Virginia Public Broadcasting.
95. (May 2011). "Characterisation of human exposure pathways to perfluorinated compounds — Comparing exposure estimates with biomarkers of exposure". Environment International.
96. (April 2019). "Perfluorohexanoic acid toxicity, part II: Application of human health toxicity value for risk characterization". Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology.
97. (June 2005). "Exposure Assessment and Risk Characterization for Perfluorooctanoate in Selected Consumer Articles". Environmental Science & Technology.
98. (2 November 2024). "Toxic PFAS in menstrual pads harm reproductive health, advocates says". The Guardian.
99. Friedman, Lisa. (April 10, 2024). "E.P.A. Says 'Forever Chemicals' Must Be Removed From Tap Water". The New York Times.
100. Bendix, Aria. (April 10, 2024). "EPA imposes first national limits on 'forever chemicals' in drinking water". NBC News.
101. (April 10, 2024). "Biden-Harris Administration Finalizes First-Ever National Drinking Water Standard to Protect 100M People from PFAS Pollution". EPA.
102. (2020-06-01). "Adoption of ground water quality standards and maximum contaminant levels for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS)". New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP).
103. Fallon, Scott. (2018-09-06). "New Jersey becomes first state to regulate dangerous chemical PFNA in drinking water". North Jersey Record.
104. (2018-12-18). "Drinking Water Quality Council Recommends Nation's Most Protective Maximum Contaminant Levels for Three Unregulated Contaminants in Drinking Water". New York State Department of Health.
105. (14 May 2018). "White House, EPA headed off chemical pollution study".
106. (22 June 2018). "Response to PFAS contamination is coordinated and effective". [[The Denver Post]].
107. (22 June 2018). "Availability of Draft Toxicological Profile: Perfluoroalkyls".
108. (21 June 2018). "Toxicological profile for Perfluoroalkyls. (Draft for Public Comment)". [[U.S. Department of Health and Human Services]], [[Public Health Service]].
109. (2018). "Risk to human health related to the presence of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and perfluorooctanoic acid in food". EFSA Journal.
110. (13 May 2008). "Chemical Used to Make Non-Stick Coatings Harmful to Health". Environment News Service.
111. Hogue, Cheryl. (September 2008). "California Chemical Legislation: State's new laws on chemicals could presage federal action". Chemical & Engineering News.
112. (29 September 2008). "Calif. law establishes chemical review". San Francisco Chronicle.
113. Betts K. (November 2007). "PFOS and PFOA in humans: new study links prenatal exposure to lower birth weight". Environ. Health Perspect..
114. (April 2009). "Structure-activity-dependent regulation of cell communication by perfluorinated fatty acids using in vivo and in vitro model systems". Environ. Health Perspect..
115. "Assessment of PFOA in the drinking water of the German Hochsauerlandkreis". Drinking Water Commission (Trinkwasserkommission) of the German Ministry of Health at the Federal Environment Agency.
116. (2009). "Acid Dissociation versus Molecular Association of Perfluoroalkyl Oxoacids: Environmental Implications". J. Phys. Chem. A.
117. (November 2008). "Perfluorocarboxylic acids induce cytochrome P450 enzymes in mouse liver through activation of PPAR-alpha and CAR transcription factors". Toxicol. Sci..
118. (February 2010). "Rate of decline in serum PFOA concentrations after granular activated carbon filtration at two public water systems in Ohio and West Virginia". Environ. Health Perspect..
119. (2010). "Epidemiologic Evidence on the Health Effects of Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)". Environ. Health Perspect..
120. (June 2010). "Two-year follow-up biomonitoring pilot study of residents' and controls' PFC plasma levels after PFOA reduction in public water system in Arnsberg, Germany". Int J Hyg Environ Health.
121. (July 2008). "Decline in perfluorooctanesulfonate and other polyfluoroalkyl chemicals in American Red Cross adult blood donors, 2000–2006". Environ. Sci. Technol..
122. (January 2009). "Maternal levels of perfluorinated chemicals and subfecundity". Hum. Reprod..
123. (June 2009). "Do perfluoroalkyl compounds impair human semen quality?". Environ. Health Perspect..
124. (December 2009). "Investigation of the Associations Between Low-Dose Serum Perfluorinated Chemicals and Liver Enzymes in US Adults". Am. J. Gastroenterol..
125. (2010). "Association Between Serum Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Thyroid Disease in the NHANES Study". Environ. Health Perspect..
126. (2009). "Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals and Cholesterol, Body Weight, and Insulin Resistance in the General U.S. Population". [[Environ. Health Perspect.]].
127. (2010). "Exposure to Polyfluoroalkyl Chemicals and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in U.S. Children Aged 12–15 Years". Environ. Health Perspect..
128. Ken Ward Jr.. "PFOA linked to ADHD and hormone disruption in kids". Blogs @ The Charleston Gazette.
129. (2009). "Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and Pubertal Maturation in Young Girls". Epidemiology.
130. "Patterns of age of puberty among children in the Mid-Ohio Valley in relation to Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)". C8 Science Panel.
131. (September 2016). "Association of perfluorinated chemical exposure in utero with maternal and infant thyroid hormone levels in the Sapporo cohort of Hokkaido Study on the Environment and Children's Health". Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine.
132. (May 2012). "Prenatal Exposure to Perfluorooctanoate and Risk of Overweight at 20 Years of Age: A Prospective Cohort Study". Environmental Health Perspectives.
133. (July 2013). "Perfluorooctanoate and neuropsychological outcomes in children". Epidemiology.
134. (August 2014). "Perfluorooctanoate exposure and major birth defects". Reproductive Toxicology.
135. (2017-02-15). "Exposure to PFOA and PFOS and fetal growth: a critical merging of toxicological and epidemiological data". Critical Reviews in Toxicology.
136. (April 2009). "Perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctanesulfonate plasma levels and risk of cancer in the general Danish population". J. Natl. Cancer Inst..
137. (November 2010). "Prenatal exposure to PFOA and PFOS and risk of hospitalization for infectious diseases in early childhood". Environ. Res..
138. (2010). "Prenatal Exposure to Perfluorinated Chemicals and Behavioral or Coordination Problems at Age 7". Environ. Health Perspect..
139. (October 2008). "Prenatal exposure to perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and maternally reported developmental milestones in infancy". Environ. Health Perspect..
140. "C8 Science Panel Website".
141. (December 2009). "The C8 health project: design, methods, and participants". Environ. Health Perspect..
142. "Timeline". C8 Science Panel.
143. "C8 Science Panel Website". C8sciencepanel.org.
144. Cortese, Amy. (8 August 2004). "DuPont, Now in the Frying Pan". The New York Times.
145. Summers, Chris. (7 October 2004). "Teflon's sticky situation". BBC News.
146. "Relationship of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) with pregnancy outcome among women with elevated community exposure to PFOA". C8 Science Panel.
147. "C8 Study Results – Status Reports". C8 Science Panel.
148. "Stockholm Convention COP.9 – Meeting documents".
149. (2022). "Updated indicative list of substances covered by the listing of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), its salts and PFOA-related compounds".
150. "PFAS and Fluorinated Compounds in PubChem Tree". [[National Center for Biotechnology Information.
151. (March 6, 2024). "Science & Democracy | Union of Concerned Scientists".
152. Janofsky, Michael. (2005-12-15). "DuPont to Pay $16.5 Million for Unreported Risks". The New York Times.
153. Goodwin, C.J. [http://www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/district/opinions/pdf/RhodesvDuPontMemOp.pdf "''Rhodes, et al. v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company''"] {{Webarchive. link. (2010-05-27 [[United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia]]. Case Number, 6:06-cv-530 (30 September 2008). Retrieved 12 October 2008.)
154. [http://www.wvsd.uscourts.gov/district/opinions/pdf/606cv00530ORDsummj.pdf] {{webarchive. link. (May 27, 2010)
155. Gensler, Lauren. "DuPont Puts Toxic Exposure Lawsuits Behind It With $671 Million Settlement".
156. "2010/15 PFOA Stewardship Program; PFOA and Fluorinated Telomers". EPA.
157. Renner R. (2006). "Scientists hail PFOA reduction plan". Environ. Sci. Technol..
158. (2006-05-30). "SAB Review of EPA's Draft Risk Assessment of Potential Human Health Effects Associated with PFOA and Its Salts". EPA Science Advisory Board.
159. Mid-Atlantic Enforcement. (10 May 2007). "Fact Sheet: EPA, DuPont Agree on Measures to Protect Drinking Water Near the DuPont Washington Works". EPA.
160. link. (2022-09-26)
161. EPA. "Addressing PFOA and PFOS in the Environment: Potential Future Regulation Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act." Rulemaking Docket [https://www.regulations.gov/docket/EPA-HQ-OLEM-2019-0341 EPA-HQ-OLEM-2019-0341] {{Webarchive. link. (2022-09-26)
162. (May 2007). "New Jersey dives into PFOA water guidance". Environ. Sci. Technol..
163. (2018-09-04). "Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) for Perfluorononanoic Acid and 1,2,3-Trichloropropane; Private Well Testing for Arsenic, Gross Alpha Particle Activity, and Certain Synthetic Organic Compounds". NJDEP.
164. (2019-03-27). "AG Grewal, DEP Commissioner Announce 4 New Environmental Lawsuits Focused on Contamination Allegedly Linked to DuPont, Chemours, 3M". New Jersey Office of the Attorney General.
165. Ellison, Garret. (2017-11-13). "Michigan creates multi-agency PFAS pollution response team".
166. (2018-01-10). "Michigan abruptly sets PFAS cleanup rules".
167. (3 August 2020). "New state drinking water standards pave way for expansion of Michigan's PFAS clean-up efforts".
168. Matheny, Keith. (3 August 2020). "Michigan's drinking water standards for these chemicals now among toughest in nation".
169. . (2007-03-01). ["Health officials issue new health guidelines for PFOA, PFOS"](http://www.health.state.mn.us/news/pressrel/pfc030107.html). *Minnesota Department of Health*.
170. (September 2006). "Perfluorinated surfactants in surface and drinking waters". Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int..
171. (January 2008). "Perfluorinated compounds (PFC) hit the headlines: meeting report on a satellite symposium of the annual meeting of the German Society of Toxicology". Arch. Toxicol..
172. "Risicoschatting emissie PFOA voor omwonenden: Locatie: DuPont/Chemours, Dordrecht, Nederland".
173. link. (2018-08-23 , 14 June 2017.)
174. (2020-06-15). "Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/784 of 8 April 2020 amending Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2019/1021 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the listing of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), its salts and PFOA-related compounds (Text with EEA relevance)".
175. (2016-08-10). "Press Release: Williamtown Contamination Class Action". IMF Bentham.