From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Papal apocrisiarius
Pope's legate to the patriach of Constantinople (452–743)
Pope's legate to the patriach of Constantinople (452–743)
The apocrisiarius or apocrisiary was the legate from the pope to the patriarch of Constantinople, circa 452–743, equivalent to the modern nunciature.
Nomenclature
The term apocrisiarius comes from the Greek word apokrisis, "response". The Latin language name for the office would have been responsalis, from the word responsum. The term was also used by other ecclesiastical envoys, either between bishops or between a bishop and a royal court, although this specific office was one of the first and most notable examples.
History and functions
In part, the role of the apocrisiarius was to represent the interests of the Roman church at the imperial court in Constantinople. Relations between the pope and the Byzantine Empire were also managed at the court of the Exarchate of Ravenna—where the pope had another permanent apocrisiarius—and between the archbishop of Ravenna and the papacy. The later had a special role as responsalis at the papal court during the papacy of Gregory I. According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, "in view of the great importance attaching to the relations between the popes and the imperial court of Constantinople, especially after the fall of the Western Empire (476), and during the great dogmatic controversies in the Greek Church, these papal representatives at Constantinople took on gradually the character of permanent legates and were accounted the most important and responsible among the papal envoys."
Most were deacons, as they were the most educated and potentially skilled in diplomatic negotiations. The apocrisiarius held "considerable influence as a conduit for both public and covert communications" between pope and Byzantine emperor. During the Byzantine Papacy, seven apocrisiarii went on to be selected as pope. According to one commentator, "to be sent as apocrisiarius to Constantinople was to graduate for the papacy." When in Constantinople, the apocrisiarius resided in the Placidia Palace, as early as the end of the Acacian schism in 519.
End of the office
The popes continued to have a permanent apocrisiary in Constantinople until the time of the Byzantine Iconoclasm edict of 726. Thereafter, popes Gregory II, Gregory III, Zacharias, and Stephen II are known to have sent non-permanent apocrisiaries to Constantinople.
The office ceased having any religious role in the 8th century, although it continued to be regularly occupied well into the 10th century. Circa 900, the office began being referred to as syncellus. A permanent envoy may have been re-established after the reconciliation of 886. A syncellus, unlike an apocrisiarius, was a representative to the emperor, not the patriarch. These ambassadors continued into the 11th century, even after the East–West Schism.
Later use of the title
According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, "from the reign of Charlemagne (d. 814) we find apocrisiarii at the court of the Frankish kings, but they are only royal arch-chaplains decorated with the title of the ancient papal envoys."
List of ''apocrisiarii''
| *Apocrisiarius* | Term of office | Appointing pope | Emperor | Patriarch | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julianus, Bishop of Cos | Circa 450–457 | Pope Leo I (440–461) | Marcian (450–457) | First *apocrisiarius*; circa the Monophysitism dispute | |
| Vigilius | ?-536 | Pope Agapetus I (535–536) | Justinian I (527–565) | Menas (536–552) | Future Pope Vigilius |
| Pelagius | 536-? | Pope Agapetus I (535-536) | Future Pope Pelagius I | ||
| Stephen | ? | Pope Vigilius (537-555) | Menas (536-552) | Excommunicated Menas | |
| Deacon Gregory | 579–585 | Pope Pelagius II (579–590) | Tiberius II Constantine (578–582) | ||
| Maurice (582–602) | Eutychius (577–582) | ||||
| John IV Nesteutes (582–595) | Future Pope Gregory I | ||||
| Archdeacon Laurence | 585-*ante* September 591 | Pope Pelagius II (579-590) | |||
| Deacon Honoratus | ? | Pope Gregory I (590–604) | |||
| Deacon Sabinianus | c. July 593–*ante* November 597 | Pope Gregory I (590–604) | Maurice (582–602) | Cyriacus II (596–606) | Future Pope Sabinian |
| Anatolius | c. June 597-*post* February 601/*ante* January 602 | ||||
| Boniface | *post* July 603-*post* November 603 | ||||
| Deacon Cataadioce | 603–606 | Pope Gregory I (590–604) | Phocas (602–610) | Cyriacus II (596–606) | Future Pope Boniface III |
| Deacon Theodore | Future Pope Theodore I | ||||
| Deacon Martin | Future Pope Martin I |
References
Sources
- Ekonomou, Andrew J. 2007. Byzantine Rome and the Greek Popes: Eastern influences on Rome and the papacy from Gregory the Great to Zacharias, A.D. 590-752. Lexington: Lexington Books.
- Henry Hoyle Howorth. 1913. Saint Augustine of Canterbury. Google Books.
References
- {{Cite CE1913
- Ekonomou, 2007, p. 8.
- Howorth, 1913, p. xxvi.
- Herrin, 1989, p. 152.
- Ekonomou, 2007, p. 9.
- Silas McBee, "[https://books.google.com/books/download/The_Constructive_quarterly__a_journal_of.pdf?id=YYAPAQAAIAAJ&output=pdf&sig=ACfU3U0r19jkR7bZo_z6ZHT_QCPKbNSUUw&source=gbs_v2_summary_r&cad=0 Normal Relations]," p. 651-53 (PDF).
- Howorth, 1913, p. 408.
- Robert Browning, 1971, ''Justinian and Theodora'', p. 221.
- Howorth, 1913, p. 416.
- Philip Schaff and Henry Wace (eds.), ''A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church'', p. 76.
- Howorth, 1913, pp. 416-419.
- Howorth, 1913, p. 421.
- Howorth, 1913, pp. 421, 425-26.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Papal apocrisiarius — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report