Order (group theory)

Example

The symmetric group S3 has the following multiplication table. :{| class="wikitable" |- ! • ! e || s || t || u || v || w |- ! e | e || s || t || u || v || w |- ! s | s || e || v || w || t || u |- ! t | t || u || e || s || w || v |- ! u | u || t || w || v || e || s |- ! v | v || w || s || e || u || t |- ! w | w || v || u || t || s || e |}

This group has six elements, so . By definition, the order of the identity, e, is one, since . Each of s, t, and w squares to e, so these group elements have order two: . Finally, u and v have order 3, since , and .

Order and structure

The order of a group G and the orders of its elements give much information about the structure of the group. Roughly speaking, the more complicated the factorization of |G|, the more complicated the structure of G.

For |G| = 1, the group is trivial. In any group, only the identity element a = e has ord(a) = 1. If every non-identity element in G is equal to its inverse (so that a2 = e), then ord(a) = 2; this implies G is abelian since ab=(ab)^{-1}=b^{-1}a^{-1}=ba. The converse is not true; for example, the (additive) cyclic group Z6 of integers modulo 6 is abelian, but the number 2 has order 3:

:2+2+2=6 \equiv 0 \pmod {6}.

The relationship between the two concepts of order is the following: if we write :\langle a \rangle = { a^{k}\colon k \in \mathbb{Z} } for the subgroup generated by a, then :\operatorname{ord} (a) = \operatorname{ord}(\langle a \rangle).

For any integer k, we have :ak = e if and only if ord(a) divides k.

In general, the order of any subgroup of G divides the order of G. More precisely: if H is a subgroup of G, then :ord(G) / ord(H) = [G : H], where [G : H] is called the index of H in G, an integer. This is Lagrange's theorem. (This is, however, only true when G has finite order. If ord(G) = ∞, the quotient ord(G) / ord(H) does not make sense.)

As an immediate consequence of the above, we see that the order of every element of a group divides the order of the group. For example, in the symmetric group shown above, where ord(S3) = 6, the possible orders of the elements are 1, 2, 3 or 6.

The following partial converse is true for finite groups: if d divides the order of a group G and d is a prime number, then there exists an element of order d in G (this is sometimes called Cauchy's theorem). The statement does not hold for composite orders, e.g. the Klein four-group does not have an element of order four. This can be shown by inductive proof. The consequences of the theorem include: the order of a group G is a power of a prime p if and only if ord(a) is some power of p for every a in G.

If a has infinite order, then all non-zero powers of a have infinite order as well. If a has finite order, we have the following formula for the order of the powers of a: :ord(ak) = ord(a) / gcd(ord(a), k) for every integer k. In particular, a and its inverse a−1 have the same order.

In any group, : \operatorname{ord}(ab) = \operatorname{ord}(ba)

There is no general formula relating the order of a product ab to the orders of a and b. In fact, it is possible that both a and b have finite order while ab has infinite order, or that both a and b have infinite order while ab has finite order. An example of the former is a(x) = 2−x, b(x) = 1−x with ab(x) = x−1 in the group Sym(\mathbb{Z}). An example of the latter is a(x) = x+1, b(x) = x−1 with ab(x) = x. If ab = ba, we can at least say that ord(ab) divides lcm(ord(a), ord(b)). As a consequence, one can prove that in a finite abelian group, if m denotes the maximum of all the orders of the group's elements, then every element's order divides m.

Counting by order of elements

Suppose G is a finite group of order n, and d is a divisor of n. The number of order d elements in G is a multiple of φ(d) (possibly zero), where φ is Euler's totient function, giving the number of positive integers no larger than d and coprime to it. For example, in the case of S3, φ(3) = 2, and we have exactly two elements of order 3. The theorem provides no useful information about elements of order 2, because φ(2) = 1, and is only of limited utility for composite d such as d = 6, since φ(6) = 2, and there are zero elements of order 6 in S3.

In relation to homomorphisms

Group homomorphisms tend to reduce the orders of elements: if f: G → H is a homomorphism, and a is an element of G of finite order, then ord(f(a)) divides ord(a). If f is injective, then ord(f(a)) = ord(a). This can often be used to prove that there are no homomorphisms or no injective homomorphisms, between two explicitly given groups. (For example, there can be no nontrivial homomorphism h: S3 → Z5, because every number except zero in Z5 has order 5, which does not divide the orders 1, 2, and 3 of elements in S3.) A further consequence is that conjugate elements have the same order.

Class equation

An important result about orders is the class equation; it relates the order of a finite group G to the order of its center Z(G) and the sizes of its non-trivial conjugacy classes: :|G| = |Z(G)| + \sum_{i}d_i; where the di are the sizes of the non-trivial conjugacy classes; these are proper divisors of |G| bigger than one, and they are also equal to the indices of the centralizers in G of the representatives of the non-trivial conjugacy classes. For example, the center of S3 is just the trivial group with the single element e, and the equation reads |S3| = 1+2+3.

Notes

References

• Dummit, David; Foote, Richard. Abstract Algebra, , pp. 20, 54–59, 90
• Artin, Michael. Algebra, , pp. 46–47

References

1. Conrad, Keith. "Proof of Cauchy's Theorem".
2. Conrad, Keith. "Consequences of Cauchy's Theorem".
3. Dummit, David; Foote, Richard. ''Abstract Algebra'', {{isbn. 978-0471433347, pp. 57