Ogden hyperelastic model

Ogden material model

In the Ogden material model, the strain energy density is expressed in terms of the principal stretches ,!\lambda_j, ,!j=1,2,3 as: : W\left( \lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3 \right) = \sum_{p=1}^N \frac{\mu_p}{\alpha_p}\left( \lambda_1^{\alpha_p} + \lambda_2^{\alpha_p} + \lambda_3^{\alpha_p} -3 \right)

where N, ,!\mu_p and ,!\alpha_p are material constants. Under the assumption of incompressibility one can rewrite as

W\left( \lambda_1,\lambda_2 \right) = \sum_{p=1}^N \frac{\mu_p}{\alpha_p}\left( \lambda_1^{\alpha_p} + \lambda_2^{\alpha_p} + \lambda_1^{-\alpha_p}\lambda_2^{-\alpha_p} -3 \right)

In general the shear modulus results from

2\mu = \sum_{p=1}^{N} \mu_p \alpha_{p}.

With N=3 and by fitting the material parameters, the material behaviour of rubbers can be described very accurately. For particular values of material constants the Ogden model will reduce to either the Neo-Hookean solid (N=1, \alpha = 2) or the Mooney-Rivlin material (N=2, \alpha_1=2, \alpha_2=-2, with the constraint condition \lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3=1).

Using the Ogden material model, the three principal values of the Cauchy stresses can now be computed as

\sigma_{j} = -p + \lambda_{j}\frac{\partial W}{\partial \lambda_{j}} = -p + \sum_{p=1}^N \mu_{p} \lambda_{j}^{\alpha_p} .

Uniaxial tension

We now consider an incompressible material under uniaxial tension, with the stretch ratio given as \lambda=\frac{l}{l_0}, where l is the stretched length and {l_0} is the original unstretched length. The pressure p is determined from incompressibility and boundary condition \sigma_2=\sigma_3=0, yielding:

\sigma_{1} = \sum_{p=1}^N\mu_{p} \left(\lambda^{\alpha_p} - \lambda^{-\frac{1}{2}\alpha_p} \right) .

Equi-biaxial tension

Considering an incompressible material under eqi-biaxial tension, with \lambda_1 = \lambda_2 =\frac{l}{l_0}. The pressure p is determined from incompressibility, and boundary condition \sigma_3=0, gives:

\sigma_{1} = \sigma_{2} = \sum_{p=1}^N\mu_{p} \left(\lambda^{\alpha_p} - \lambda^{-2\alpha_p} \right) .

Other hyperelastic models

For rubber and biological materials, more sophisticated models are necessary. Such materials may exhibit a non-linear stress–strain behaviour at modest strains, or are elastic up to huge strains. These complex non-linear stress–strain behaviours need to be accommodated by specifically tailored strain-energy density functions.

The simplest of these hyperelastic models, is the Neo-Hookean solid.

W(\mathbf{C})=\frac{\mu}{2}(I_1^C-3)

where \mu is the shear modulus, which can be determined by experiments. From experiments it is known that for rubbery materials under moderate straining up to 30–70%, the Neo-Hookean model usually fits the material behaviour with sufficient accuracy. To model rubber at high strains, the one-parametric Neo-Hookean model is replaced by more general models, such as the Mooney-Rivlin solid where the strain energy W is a linear combination of two invariants

W(\mathbf{C})=\frac{\mu_1}{2}\left(I_1^C -3 \right) -\frac{\mu_2}{2}\left(I_2^C - 3\right)

The Mooney-Rivlin material was originally also developed for rubber, but is today often applied to model (incompressible) biological tissue. For modeling rubbery and biological materials at even higher strains, the more sophisticated Ogden material model has been developed.

References

• F. Cirak: Lecture Notes for 5R14: Non-linear solid mechanics, University of Cambridge.
• R.W. Ogden: Non-Linear Elastic Deformations,

References

1. Ogden, R. W., (1972). ''Large Deformation Isotropic Elasticity – On the Correlation of Theory and Experiment for Incompressible Rubberlike Solids'', Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol. 326, No. 1567 (1 February 1972), pp. 565–584.