Nymphaeales

Description

Vegetative characteristics

Nymphaeales are rhizomatous or tuberous, aquatic or sub-aquatic, annual or perennial herbs. The leaves are submerged, floating, or emerged. The floating leaves are 1 mm to 3.2 m wide.

Generative characteristics

The plants are bisexual, monoecious or dioecious.

Fossils

The fossil record consists especially of seeds, but also pollen, stems, leaves, and flowers. It extends back to the Cretaceous. The crown group of the Nymphaeales has been estimated to be about 112 million years old. Some have suggested that this age might be too old.

A basal member of Nymphaeales, Monetianthus, is known from Early Cretaceous Portugal. A fossil member of the Nympheaceae is Jaguariba from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil. Several Cretaceous-age Cabombaceae genera are also known, including Scutifolium from Jordan, Pluricarpellatia from Brazil, and Brasenites from Kansas. The fossil genus Notonuphar, thought to be a close relative of the modern Nuphar, is known from Eocene-aged sediments from Seymour Island, Antarctica. The genus Brasipelta Krassilov has been described from the late Cretaceous of Israel. The aquatic plant fossil Archaefructus from the Early Cretaceous of Liaoning, China possibly also belongs to this group.

Classification

The Nymphaeales currently include three families and about 70 to 90 species.

This order was not part of the APG II system's 2003 plant classification (unchanged from the APG system of 1998), which instead had a broadly circumscribed family Nymphaeaceae (including Cabombaceae) unplaced in any order. The APG III system did separate the Cabombaceae from the Nymphaeaceae and placed them in the order Nymphaeales together with the Hydatellaceae. The family Hydatellaceae was placed among the monocots in previous systems, but a 2007 study found that the family belongs to the Nymphaeales. In the APG IV system, Hydatellaceae, Cabombaceae and Nymphaeaceae are the three families included in the Nymphaeales.

Some earlier systems, such as Cronquist's system of 1981, often included the Ceratophyllaceae and Nelumbonaceae in the Nymphaeales. Although, the Takhtajan system of 1980 separated the Nelumbonales, the new order was retained alongside the Nymphaeales in the superorder Nymphaeanae.

The Cronquist system placed the Nymphaeales in subclass Magnoliidae, in class Magnoliopsida =[dicotyledons]. In addition, Cronquist included the Ceratophyllaceae and split the family Barclayaceae from the Nymphaeaceae. Under the APG II system, the family Cabombaceae was included within the Nymphaeaceae, but could optionally be recognized separately. As of APG III, the two families are recognized separately.

The Dahlgren system placed the Nymphaeales with the Piperales in superorder Nymphaeanae, within subclass Magnoliideae (dicotyledons). Thorne's 1992 system (and 2000 revision) placed the Nymphaeales as the sole order in the superorder Nymphaeanae within subclass Magnoliideae (=dicotyledons).

References

References

1. Xiong, X., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Su, Q., Zhao, Y., ... & Chen, F. (2023). [https://www.maxapress.com/article/id/63bf5f03fa6c5801fb5dc2cd "Water lily research: Past, present, and future."] Tropical Plants, 2(1), 1-8.
2. Peter F. Stevens. 2001 onwards. [[Angiosperm Phylogeny Website]] At: [[Missouri Botanical Garden]] Website. (see ''External links'' below).
3. [https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.18.881573v1.full Water lily ( Nymphaea thermarum) genome reveals variable genomic signatures of ancient vascular cambium losses. bioRxiv]
4. The Plant List (website). 2010. (See ''External links'' below.)
5. (2011). "Towards a complete species tree of Nymphaea: shedding further light on subg. Brachyceras and its relationships to the Australian water-lilies". [[Telopea (journal).
6. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research. (n.d.-b). Nymphaeales Salisb. ex Bercht. & J.Presl. Flora of New Zealand. Retrieved February 25, 2025, from https://www.nzflora.info/factsheet/taxon/Nymphaeales.html
7. Berry, P. E. (n.d.). Nymphaeales. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved February 25, 2025, from https://www.britannica.com/plant/Nymphaeales
8. Johansson, J. T. (n.d.). Nymphaeales Salisb. ex Bercht. et J. Presl. The Phylogeny of Angiosperms. Retrieved February 25, 2025, from http://angio.bergianska.se/Nymphaeales/Nymphaeales.html
9. Ørgaard, M. (1991). [https://nsojournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1991.tb01819.x The genus ''Cabomba'' (Cabombaceae)–a taxonomic study.] Nordic Journal of Botany, 11(2), 179-203.
10. Smith, L. T., Magdalena, C., Przelomska, N. A., Pérez-Escobar, O. A., Melgar-Gómez, D. G., Beck, S., ... & Monro, A. K. (2022). [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.883151/full Revised species delimitation in the giant water lily genus ''Victoria'' (Nymphaeaceae) confirms a new species and has implications for its conservation.] Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 883151.
11. "Nymphaeales: Fossil Record". [[University of California Museum of Paleontology]].
12. [[Else Marie Friis]], Kaj Raunsgaard Pedersen and Peter R. Crane. (15 March 2001). "Fossil evidence of water lilies (Nymphaeales) in the Early Cretaceous". [[Nature (journal).
13. (2009). "Angiosperm diversification through time". [[American Journal of Botany]].
14. (2010). "The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited". American Journal of Botany.
15. (May 2009). "Monetianthus mirus gen. et sp. nov., a Nymphaealean Flower from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal". International Journal of Plant Sciences.
16. (1 October 2014). "Phylogenetic Analysis of Fossil Water Lilies Based on Leaf Architecture and Vegetative Characters: Testing Phylogenetic Hypotheses from Molecular Studies". Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History.
17. (2017-08-01). "Notonuphar antarctica, an extinct water lily (Nymphaeales) from the Eocene of Antarctica". Plant Systematics and Evolution.
18. ''Brasipelta gregaria'' Krassilov. (n.d.). The International Fossil Plant Names Index (IFPNI). Retrieved November 14, 2024, from https://ifpni.org/species.htm?id=3CD513C8-3746-4D2C-08A8-D0153805A9EC
19. ''Brasipelta'' Krassilov. (n.d.). The International Fossil Plant Names Index (IFPNI). Retrieved November 14, 2024, from https://ifpni.org/genus.htm?id=4530BA8A-59B8-BEF9-F963-99080BD0449A
20. Krassilov V. A., Lewy Z., Nevo E., & Silantieva N. (2005) Late Cretaceous (Turonian) flora of southern Negev, Israel.
21. (June 2008). "The Year in Evolutionary Biology 2008". [[Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences]].
22. (2007). "Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree". Nature.
23. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. (2016). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV". [[Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society]].
24. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. (2009). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III". [[Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society]].
25. Takhtajan, Armen L.. (1980). "Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta)". The Botanical Review.
26. Cronquist, Arthur. (1981). "An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants". Columbia University Press.
27. Dahlgren, R.M.T.. (1980). "A revised system of classification of angiosperms". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.
28. Thorne, R. F.. (1992). "Classification and geography of the flowering plants". Botanical Review.
29. Thorne, R. F.. (2000). "The classification and geography of the flowering plants: Dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae". Botanical Review.