From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
National Defense Industrial Association
American trade association founded 1919
American trade association founded 1919
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| name | National Defense Industrial Association |
| image | NDIA2017logo.svg |
| abbreviation | NDIA |
| formation | 1919 |
| type | Voluntary Association |
| headquarters | Arlington, Virginia |
| location | United States |
| membership | Corporate, Individual, Small Business, and Life |
| leader_title | President and CEO |
| leader_name | David Norquist |
| affiliations | Association For Enterprise Integration (AFEI) |
| National Training and Simulation Association (NTSA) | |
| Precision Strike Association (PSA) | |
| Women in Defense (WID) | |
| num_staff | 75 |
| website | [NDIA.org](http://NDIA.org) |
National Training and Simulation Association (NTSA) Precision Strike Association (PSA) Women in Defense (WID)
The National Defense Industrial Association (NDIA) is a trade association for the United States government and defense industrial base. It is an 501(c)(3) educational organization. Its headquarters are in Arlington, Virginia. NDIA was established in 1919 as a result of the inability of the defense industry to scale up the war effort during World War I.
Founding
In 1917, Brigadier General Benedict Crowell was called to active duty and served on the General Munitions Board. As a board member, he established a relationship with the steel industry and was almost immediately appointed Assistant Secretary of War and Director of Munitions. As Director of Munitions, Crowell was a significant catalyst in improving the country's capability to produce arms and ammunition. However, he recognized the nation's need for an association that fostered cooperation between civilian industry and government in support of industrial preparedness. He founded the Army Ordnance Association (AOA) in 1919 and served as president for its first 25 years. Over the ensuing decades, AOA became the American Defense Preparedness Association (ADPA), which then merged with the 1944 National Security Industrial Association (NSIA) in 1997, creating NDIA.
Advocacy
Opposition to military right-to-repair legislation
In July 2024, NDIA signed a letter to members of both the House Committee on Armed Services and the Senate Committee on Armed Services opposing Section 828 of S. 4628, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2025, entitled "Requirement for Contractors to Provide Reasonable Access to Repair Materials". The proposed Section 828 raised concerns for NDIA that include "no carve-outs or limitations to protect sensitive trade secret information" and impacts on "the economics of a dealer distribution model by effectively eliminating dealer margins ... [impacting] ... small and medium-sized businesses",
Publications
NDIA currently publishes National Defense, Weekly Policy Digest, Weekly Defense Insider, and Monthly Defense Watch.
''National Defense'' magazine
National Defense has been published under a series of different titles since 1940:
- 2005–Present - National Defense
- 1947–1954 - The Common Defense
- 1947–1970 - Ordnance
- 1945–1947 - Logistics
- 1920–1945 - Army Ordnance Additional variations during the above periods:
- 1946 - Industrial Preparedness Bulletin
- 1943–1945 - Army Ordnance Report
- 1940–1946 - Army Ordnance Bulletin
Chapters
.jpeg)
NDIA has 29 chapters located throughout the United States.
| NDIA Chapters |
|---|
| Aberdeen Proving Ground |
| First Coast |
| Greater Hampton Roads |
| Greater Tampa Bay |
| Michigan |
| Picatinny |
| Southern Nevada |
| Wright Brothers Regional |
Divisions
NDIA consists of subject-specific divisions that aim to promote defense and national security through access, influence, and education.
| NDIA Divisions |
|---|
| Agile Delivery for Agencies, Programs, and Teams (ADAPT) |
| Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) Defense |
| Cybersecurity |
| Health Affairs |
| International |
| Missile Defense |
| Robotics |
| Small Business |
| Strike, Land Attack, and Air Defense (SLAAD) |
| Technical Information |
Committees and working groups
NDIA has 5 industrial committees and working groups that bring government and industry personnel together on important topics.
| NDIA Industrial Committees and Working Groups |
|---|
| Chemical Biological Defense Acquisition Initiatives Forum |
| Cybersecurity for Advanced Manufacturing Working Group |
Affiliate associations
NDIA affiliates include the Association for Enterprise Information (AFEI), the Emerging Technologies Institute (ETI), the National Training & Simulation Association (NTSA), the Precision Strike Association (PSA), and Women in Defense (WID).
References
References
- Dao, James. (2001-09-02). "Dogfight for Dollars On Capitol Hill". [[The New York Times]].
- Appelbaum, Richard P. (2005). "Critical globalization studies". [[Routledge]].
- "NDIA at 100: Building on a Strong Foundation".
- (2024-07-30). "Dear Chairman Reed, Ranking Member Wicker, Chairman Rogers, and Ranking Member Smith". [[National Defense Industrial Association]].
- Koebler, Jason. (2024-08-28). "Appliance and Tractor Companies Lobby Against Giving the Military the Right to Repair".
- (December 2021). "National Defense {{!}} Title History". [[JSTOR]].
- "NDIA Chapter Presidents". National Defense Industrial Association.
- "Divisions". National Defense Industrial Association.
- "National Defense Industrial Association {{!}} Supporting the Defense and National Security Community".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about National Defense Industrial Association — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report