Monoceros Ring

Dispute

In 2006, a study using 2MASS data cast doubts on the nature of the "Ring", arguing that the data suggests that the ring is actually part of the warped galactic disc of the Milky Way. However, observations using the Anglo-Australian Telescope published in 2007 suggest that a warped disc cannot create the observed structure, which must therefore be formed either by a flare of the galactic disc or have an extra-galactic origin.

Several members of the scientific community restated their position in 2012, affirming the Monoceros structure is nothing more than an over-density produced by the flared and warped thick disk of the Milky Way.

In 2015, building on the 2002 studies which revealed the Monoceros Ring, M.L. Martialay and colleagues sorted through galactic data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey suggested that the Milky Way is actually 50 percent larger than previously thought, showing that disk of the Milky Way is not just a disk of stars in a flat plane, but is instead corrugated. As it radiates outward from the Sun, there appear to be at least four ripples in the disk of the Milky Way. Scientists assume that this pattern is going to be found throughout the disk. However, a more recent 2018 paper later somewhat ruled out this hypothesis, and supported a conclusion that the Monoceros Ring, A13 and TriAnd Ring were stellar overdensities rather kicked out from the main stellar disk, with the velocity dispersion of their constituent RR Lyrae variable stars found to be higher and consistent with halo membership.

Using the distance of the Monoceros Ring, the diameter of the Milky Way has been claimed to extend as much as 150,000 to 180,000 light years across. In this revised paradigm, the Solar System lies about halfway between the core and the edge. However, it is more common in the astronomical literature to define the sizes of galaxies using other methods, notably by the D25 isophote and variations of the half-light radius. An earlier study in 1998 using the D25 isophote gave a diameter for the Milky Way at 26.8 +/-.

N-body simulations have been used to investigate the possible location of the progenitor of this structure and these calculations show that, if the Ring has a dwarf galaxy progenitor, it might be found in the background of one out of eight specific areas in the sky. A subsequent analysis, that used Gaia DR2 data, found a bimodal Gaussian distribution towards Galactic coordinates (271, +2) degrees in Vela, which is one of the locations of the progenitor proposed in the previous study.{{cite journal |doi-access=free

References

References

1. Newberg. (1 April 2002). "The Ghost of Sagittarius and Lumps in the Halo of the Milky Way". The Astrophysical Journal.
2. (2006). "Outer structure of the Galactic warp and flare: explaining the Canis Major over-density". [[Astronomy and Astrophysics]].
3. (April 1, 2007). "The AAT/WFI survey of the Monoceros Ring and Canis Major dwarf galaxy". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
4. Lopez-Corredoira, M.. (July 2012). "Comments on the "Monoceros" affair". [[Astrophysics Data System]].
5. Mary L. Martialay. (March 11, 2015). "The Corrugated Galaxy—Milky Way May Be Much Larger Than Previously Estimated". [[Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute]].
6. Scott Sutherland. (March 16, 2015). "This 'corrugated' view of the Milky Way just made our home galaxy a LOT bigger.". [[The Weather Network]].
7. (2018). "A Disk Origin for the Monoceros Ring and A13 Stellar Overdensities". The Astrophysical Journal.
8. Yan Xu. (March 1, 2015). "Rings and Radial Waves in the Disk of the Milky Way". [[The Astrophysical Journal]].
9. (22 April 1997). "The Milky Way is just an average spiral".
10. (August 1998). "The relative size of the Milky Way". The Observatory.
11. (2002). "Warps and correlations with intrinsic parameters of galaxies in the visible and radio". Astronomy & Astrophysics.
12. Magda Guglielmo. (March 11, 2018). "On the origin of the Monoceros Ring - I. Kinematics, proper motions, and the nature of the progenitor". [[Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society]].