From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Medicines and Related Substances Control Amendment Act, 1997
Law in South Africa to fight the HIV/AIDS epidemic
Law in South Africa to fight the HIV/AIDS epidemic
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| short_title | Medicines and Related Substance 1997 |
| legislature | |
| enacted_by | Government of South Africa |
| date_enacted | 1997 |
| date_assented | |
| royal_assent | |
| date_signed | |
| signed_by | |
| date_commenced | |
| date_effective | |
| amends | |
| repeals | |
| amended_by | |
| repealed_by | |
| related_legislation | |
| status | Current |
South Africa's Medicines and Related Substance 1997 is a law enacted a compulsory license in order to fight HIV/AIDS epidemic. The intent of the Act was to reduce drug prices by allowing generic substitution of off-patent drugs, the parallel importation of on-patent drugs as well as price transparency. TOC
Enactment
In an effort to combat the growing HIV/AIDS epidemic, the Government of South Africa enacted the Medicines and Related Substances Control Amendment Act in 1997. The Act aimed to both reduce the cost of drugs and increase their availability.
Challenge to the Law
In February 1998, the South African Pharmaceutical Manufactures Association and forty Multinational Corporations (MNC) brought a suit against the government of South Africa for its passage of the Medicines and Related Substances Control Amendment Act No. 90 of 1997, arguing that it violated the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. The intent of the Act was to reduce drug prices by allowing generic substitution of off-patent drugs, the parallel importation of on-patent drugs as well as price transparency.
In agreement with the suit, the United States (US) and European Communities (EC) threatened economic sanctions. However, HIV/AIDS activists successfully contested this, demonstrators alleging that then United States presidential-candidate Al Gore was killing babies in Africa—and forced the US and EC to back off the South African government. As a result of immense international pressure, including from NGOs such as Oxfam, the pharmaceutical companies dropped their case in April 2001.
References
References
- "MEDICINES AND RELATED SUBSTANCES CONTROL ACT 101 OF 1965".
- Duane Nash, “South Africa's Medicines and Related Substances Control Amendment Act of 1997,” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 15 (2002): 485-504
- (24 February 2001). "Drug companies sue South African government over generics". BMJ: British Medical Journal.
- (2002). "TRIPS, pharmaceutical patents, and access to essential medicines: a long way from Seattle to Doha". Chicago Journal of International Law.
- (1 February 2001). "South Africa vs. the Drug Giants: A challenge to affordable medicines".
- (28 April 2001). "Drug companies withdraw law suit against South Africa". BMJ: British Medical Journal.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Medicines and Related Substances Control Amendment Act, 1997 — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report