Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/missions-to-the-moon

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Lunar Lander (spacecraft)

Proposed 2018 ESA Moon mission


Proposed 2018 ESA Moon mission

FieldValue
nameLunar Lander
names_list
imageESA lunar lander DLR at ILA - Day 2.jpg
image_captionLunar Lander model
image_alt
image_size
mission_typeTechnology demonstration, Exploration
operatorESA
Harvard_designation
COSPAR_ID
SATCAT
website
mission_durationTransfer: ~2-4 months
Surface operations: several months (proposed)
distance_travelled
orbits_completed
suborbital_range
suborbital_apogee
spacecraft
spacecraft_type
spacecraft_bus
manufacturerAstrium
launch_mass~2000 kg
BOL_mass
landing_mass
dry_mass750 kg
payload_mass
dimensionsheight: 3.44 m
diameter: 5.6 m
power
launch_date2018 (proposed)
launch_rocketSoyuz 2.1b
launch_siteGuiana Space Centre - ELS
launch_contractor
deployment_from
deployment_date
entered_service
disposal_type
deactivated
destroyed
last_contact
recovery_by
recovery_date
decay_date
landing_date
landing_site
{{end dateYYYYMMDDhhmmssTZZ}} (for Zulu/UTC) or (if time unknown)
orbit_reference
orbit_regime
orbit_longitude
orbit_slot
orbit_semimajor
orbit_eccentricity
orbit_periapsis
orbit_apoapsis
orbit_inclination
orbit_period
orbit_RAAN
orbit_arg_periapsis
orbit_mean_anomaly
orbit_mean_motion
orbit_repeat
orbit_velocity
orbit_epoch
orbit_rev_number
apsis
interplanetary
typelander
objectMoon
orbits
component
arrival_date2018 (proposed)
departure_date
locationLunar south pole
distance
trans_band
trans_frequency
trans_bandwidth
trans_capacity
trans_coverage
trans_TWTA
trans_EIRP
trans_HPBW
insignia
insignia_caption
insignia_alt
insignia_size
Note

the uncrewed ESA lunar mission

Include the dates applicable if possible, and separate each name with a linebreak. Omit if the spacecraft has only ever been known by one name. Do not include Harvard, COSPAR/NSSDC or SATCAT/NORAD/NASA designations as alternative names--

Surface operations: several months (proposed)

diameter: 5.6 m

The following template should be used for ONE of the three above fields "end_of_mission", "decay" or "landing" if the spacecraft is no longer operational. If it landed intact, use it for the landing time, otherwise for the date it ceased operations, or the decay date if it was still operational when it re-entered. (for Zulu/UTC) or (if time unknown)

If in doubt, leave it out--

The Lunar Lander was a robotic mission intended to send a lander vehicle to the Moon, led by ESA's Human Spaceflight and Operations directorate. The primary objective of the Lunar Lander mission was to demonstrate Europe's ability to deliver payload safely and accurately to the Moon's surface. More specifically the mission would have demonstrated the technologies required to achieve a soft and precise landing while autonomously avoiding surface hazards that can endanger landing and surface mission safety. These technologies will be an asset for future human and robotic exploration missions. However the project was put on hold at the 2012 ESA Ministerial Council.

Mission scenario

Launch and transfer

Launching from Centre Spatial Guyanais, Kourou in late 2018 on a Soyuz launcher, the Lander is injected into a Highly Elliptical Orbit (HEO) by a Fregat-MT upper stage, through a series of intermediate orbits. Following Fregat separation, the lander uses its own propulsion to enter the final Lunar Transfer Orbit and, after an overall transfer time of several weeks, injects itself into a polar orbit around the Moon. After a series of Apolune and Perilune lowering manoeuvres, the Lander reaches its final Low Lunar Orbit (LLO) at 100 km altitude.

Low lunar orbit

Once in low lunar orbit the Lunar Lander prepares for the final phase of the mission waiting for the correct constellation of orbit, Earth and Sun geometry and performing the checkout and calibration operations of the systems critical for landing. The time spent by the Lander in LLO before the start of the landing operations is expected to last from a number of weeks up to a maximum of 3 months.

Descent and landing

The descent and landing phase of the mission starts when the Lander performs a de-orbit burn close to the lunar north pole. This burn decreases the orbit's perilune to about 15 km, some 500 km ahead of the lunar south pole, half an orbit later. During the coasting period, automatic visual recognition of landmarks on the lunar surface is used to determine the lander's precise location and to ensure correct positioning at the beginning of the final descent. Heading towards the south pole, the lander enters the final powered descent phase. Using its cluster of thrusters, the lander decelerates and descends. During this phase, a varying thrust needs to be applied as the lander approaches its landing site. Finer thrust levels are achieved using the ATV engines in pulse modulation, as shown in this . At an altitude of a few kilometres, the Hazard Detection and Avoidance system (HDA) is able to see the primary landing site and evaluate it. If the primary site is deemed unsafe, due to the presence of surface hazards (like steep slopes, craters, boulders, shadows, etc.), the HDA has the opportunity to command re-targetings to a secondary landing site. When a safe landing site is found, the lander performs a soft touch down using its legs.

Surface operations

Once landed on the surface, the lander carries out critical operations such as deployment of its antenna and camera mast, and relays the complete package of data relating to the descend and landing sequence back to Earth. The lander relies on direct line-of-sight communication with Earth as no relay satellite is planned for the mission. This configuration implies periods where no communication with Earth is possible because of Earth moving outside the lander's field of view. Similarly to the Sun, Earth will be below the horizon following a monthly cycle due to the Moon's tilted axis of rotation with respect to its orbital plane.

Nominal surface operations are then initiated which include the deployment of specific payloads onto the lunar surface via a robotic arm, the activation of other static monitoring payloads on board the lander, and ultimately the acquisition of surface samples using the robotic arm for analysis by instruments on the lander.

Landing site

The south polar region of the Moon has been identified as an important destination for future exploration missions due to the unique surface conditions found at certain sites in terms of solar illumination, the proximity of scientifically interesting locations such as permanently shadowed craters and the potential existence of resources which might be utilized. These factors combine to make this region a strong candidate for future human exploration and potentially even a long-term presence in the form of a lunar base. Recent orbital missions have provided strong evidence suggesting the south polar region's potential as an important exploration destination.

The extended periods of continuous Sun illumination are unique to Moon's polar regions and allow the lander to be operated by solar power. However, favourably illuminated locations are expected to be limited in size (few hundreds of metres across) and may present patches of hazardous terrain with steep slopes, boulders, craters or extended shadow. These surface conditions require the employment of dedicated autonomous, safe and precision landing technology.

System

Configuration

The main body of the Lander is cylindrical, with four landing legs extending from the sides. The circumference of the main body is covered with solar cells. The bottom side is dominated by the nozzles of the main thrusters while the top offers space for sensors and payload.

The lander will employ a robotic arm to retrieve soil samples for on-board analysis.

Precision landing and hazard detection and avoidance

Polar landing sites offering long periods of continuous illumination have been found to be limited in extent, by analyses of the data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter and Kaguya. Therefore, a landing precision of a few hundred metres is required to the Lunar Lander. Compared to previous robotic lander missions (for example Surveyor), the technologies required to the Lunar Lander mission have the potential to increase the achievable landing precision by one or two orders of magnitude, reaching the performances only achieved by crewed vehicles (Apollo 12 LM landed only ~150 m from the Surveyor 3 probe.)

Potential landing sites in the polar regions are also likely to be partly covered by shadow, and may present areas of steep slopes or large rocks. In order to avoid landing on unsafe terrain, an autonomous Hazard Detection and Avoidance (HDA) system is employed. The system is composed of a LIDAR and a camera, which generate 2D and 3D images of the surface, and by the on-board computer, which uses these images to characterise the landscape underneath the lander during the final descend. If the area is deemed unsafe, the system orders a retargeting to a safe landing area, compatibly with the propellant left.

Power

Planetary exploration missions have often turned to Radio-Isotope devices, whether RHUs or RTGs, to support thermal control and power generation in what are often extreme temperature and energy poor environments. However, for Europe, where these technologies are currently unavailable, employing such devices have important technical and programmatic impacts. While activities investigating the development of RHUs and ultimately RTGs are proceeding within Europe, it is not expected that European devices would be available in the 2018 timeframe of the Lunar Lander mission. Instead, the Lunar Lander is powered by solar arrays which are wrapped around the body tube. Once landed, the vehicles axis of symmetry will be almost perpendicular to the direction of the Sun ensuring continuously good illumination of the solar cells as the lander rotates with respect to the Sun (due to the rotation of the Moon).

Batteries are used to bridge short periods without solar power. Solar power is unavailable in LLO when the lander goes into lunar eclipse and on the ground, when mountain peaks at the horizon cover the Sun. Landing operations will also be conducted relying solely on battery power.

Propulsion

The spacecraft employs three types of engines:

  1. Six 220N ATV thrusters operated in pulsed mode to deliver a variable impulse along the descent, as the engine itself has a fixed thrust level, unlike the Descent Propulsion System used on Apollo for example.
  2. Five 500N European Apogee Motors.
  3. Sixteen small attitude control thrusters All of the 500 and 220 N engines will be needed to deliver sufficient thrust to decelerate the lander from low lunar orbital velocity for controlled final descent.

The vehicle uses traditional means of navigation during its transfer trajectory to the Moon. This includes employment of an IMU (combined unit of accelerometer and gyroscope), star trackers and Sun sensors. Furthermore, range and Doppler measurements from Earth will help to determine the spacecraft's position and velocity, respectively.

In LLO and during descend, other means of navigation need to be considered. Early study phases identified the need to use high altitude vision-based absolute navigation, along with relative visual navigation. These advanced techniques allow an improvement of the navigation performances, as compared to traditional techniques, such as inertial navigation and Earth-ground-based orbit determination. Furthermore, in order to guarantee soft landing and to reach the start of the approach phase within a tight corridor, an on-board long-range altitude estimate is required, which will be available through a combination of visual navigation and altimeter measurements.

Science

Lunar Lander science objectives have been established in a framework of human exploration preparation. These include detailed investigation of surface parameters of strong significance for future operations on the surface, be they human and/or robotic.

A model payload has been identified addressing the following specific topics:

  • microscopic properties of dust, including shape and size distribution, and its composition
  • plasma and electric field environment on the lunar surface, and the behaviour of dust within that environment
  • feasibility of making radio astronomy measurements from the lunar surface
  • potential volatile content of regolith (e.g. OH)
  • camera package for visual data from the south pole environment All payloads are either statically accommodated on the lander body, held at a distance from the lander by dedicated booms, or deployed in close proximity to the lander (1–2m) by a robotic arm. Payloads which analyze samples of regolith close-up will receive small amounts of material gathered from the vicinity of the lander by an acquisition device on the end of the robotic arm.

Mission status

In August 2010, Astrium was selected as prime contractor for the Lunar Lander Phase B1, which includes breadboard activities in the area of propulsion and navigation. Phase B1 follows three feasibility studies conducted in parallel by EADS Astrium, OHB and Thales Alenia Space, which concluded in 2010.

At ESA's Ministerial Council in November 2012, no further funding was allotted for the Lunar Lander project. Germany, being the main contributor, was unable to find sufficient financial support for the program from other member states. The German delegation at the council was led by Peter Hintze, who stated that Germany was willing to contribute 45% of the mission's total cost but was unable to secure financial backing for the remaining 55% from other member states.

References

References

  1. Carpenter, J.. (2012). "Scientific Preparations for Lunar Exploration with the European Lunar Lander". Planetary and Space Science.
  2. De Rosa, D.. (5–10 June 2011). "ESA Lunar Lander Mission". 8th International ESA Conference on Guidance, Navigation & Control Systems.
  3. Fisackerly, R.. (2010). "The ESA Lunar Lander Mission". [[AIAA]].
  4. "ESA Space Exploration Strategy".
  5. "ESA lunar lander shelved ahead of budget conference".
  6. Fisackerly, R.. "The European Lunar Lander: Robotics Operations in a Harsh Environment". ESA.
  7. De Rosa, D.. (2012). "Characterisation of Potential Landing Sites for the European Space Agency's Lunar Lander Project".
  8. Ribarich, J.J.. (1978). "Surveyor spacecraft landing accuracy". Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets.
  9. (3 April 2019). "Apollo 12 and Surveyor landing sites imaged by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera".
  10. "200 N Bipropellant Thrusters for ESA's ATV". [[Astrium]].
  11. "Lunar lander firing up for touchdown". ESA.
  12. "500 N Bipropellant European Apogee Motor (EAM)". [[Astrium]].
  13. "Astrium investigates automatic landing at the Moon's south pole".
  14. "Overview of aerospace project mission phases".
  15. Christoph Seidler. (16 November 2012). ""Lunar Lander" Europas Mondmission fällt aus". Spiegel online.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Lunar Lander (spacecraft) — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report