Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/baryons

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Lambda baryon

Baryon made of specific quark combinations


Baryon made of specific quark combinations

FieldValue
nameLambda baryon
num_types3
composition{{plainlist
statisticsFermionic
groupBaryons
interactionStrong, weak, electromagnetic, and gravity
imageQuark structure lambda baryon.svg
mass{{plainlist
* : {{val1115.6830.006ulMeV/c2}}}}
* : {{val2286.460.14uMeV/c2}}}}
* : {{val5619.600.17uMeV/c2}}}}}}
spin*ħ*
isospin0
captionQuark structure of the lambda baryon.
  • :
  • :
  • : }}
  • }} | B-L =

The lambda baryons (Λ) are a family of subatomic hadron particles containing one up quark, one down quark, and a third quark from a higher flavour generation, in a combination where the quantum wave function changes sign upon the flavour of any two quarks being swapped (thus slightly different from a neutral sigma baryon, ). They are thus baryons, with total isospin of 0, and have either neutral electric charge or the elementary charge +1.

Overview

The lambda baryon was first discovered in October 1950, by V. D. Hopper and S. Biswas of the University of Melbourne, as a neutral V particle with a proton as a decay product, thus correctly distinguishing it as a baryon, rather than a meson, i.e. different in kind from the K meson discovered in 1947 by George Rochester and Clifford Charles Butler; they were produced by cosmic rays and detected in photographic emulsions flown in a balloon at 70000 ft. Though the particle was expected to live for , it actually survived for . The property that caused it to live so long was dubbed strangeness and led to the discovery of the strange quark. Furthermore, these discoveries led to a principle known as the conservation of strangeness, wherein lightweight particles do not decay as quickly if they exhibit strangeness (because non-weak methods of particle decay must preserve the strangeness of the decaying baryon). The with its uds quark decays via weak force to a nucleon and a pion − either or .

In 1974 and 1975, an international team at the Fermilab that included scientists from Fermilab and seven European laboratories under the leadership of Eric Burhop carried out a search for a new particle, the existence of which Burhop had predicted in 1963. He had suggested that neutrino interactions could create short-lived (perhaps as low as 10−14 s) particles that could be detected with the use of nuclear emulsion. Experiment E247 at Fermilab successfully detected particles with a lifetime of the order of 10−13 s. A follow-up experiment, WA17, which made use of the SPS accelerator at CERN confirmed the existence of the (charmed lambda baryon), with a lifetime of .

In 2011, the international team at JLab used high-resolution spectrometer measurements of the reaction H(e, e′K+)X at small Q2 (E-05-009) to extract the pole position in the complex-energy plane (primary signature of a resonance) for the Λ(1520) with mass and width , which seem to be smaller than their Breit–Wigner values. This was the first determination of the pole position for a hyperon.

The lambda baryon has also been observed in atomic nuclei called hypernuclei. These nuclei contain the same number of protons and neutrons as a known nucleus, but also contains one or in rare cases two lambda particles. In such a scenario, the lambda slides into the center of the nucleus (it is not a proton or a neutron, and thus is not affected by the Pauli exclusion principle), and it binds the nucleus more tightly together due to its interaction via the strong force. In a lithium isotope (), it made the nucleus 19% smaller.

Types

Lambda baryons are usually represented by the symbols , , , and . In this notation, the superscript character indicates whether the particle is electrically neutral (0) or carries a positive charge (+). The subscript character, or its absence, indicates whether the third quark is a strange quark (no subscript), a charm quark a bottom quark or a top quark Physicists expect to not observe a lambda baryon with a top quark, because the Standard Model of particle physics predicts that the mean lifetime of top quarks is roughly seconds;

The symbols encountered in this list are: I (isospin), J (total angular momentum quantum number), P (parity), Q (charge), S (strangeness), C (charmness), B′ (bottomness), T (topness), u (up quark), d (down quark), s (strange quark), c (charm quark), b (bottom quark), t (top quark), as well as other subatomic particles.

Antiparticles are not listed in the table; however, they simply would have all quarks changed to antiquarks, and Q, B, S, C, B′, T, would be of opposite signs. I, J, and P values in red have not been firmly established by experiments, but are predicted by the quark model and are consistent with the measurements. The top lambda () is listed for comparison, but is expected to never be observed, because top quarks decay before they have time to form hadrons.

Particle nameSymbolQuark
contentRest massIJPQSC*B*′TMean lifetimeCommonly decays to
Lambdalast1=Amslercollaboration=Particle Data Groupdisplay-authors=etalyear=2008series=Particle listingsLambda}}publisher=Lawrence Berkeley Laboratoryurl=http://pdg.lbl.gov/2008/listings/s018.pdf0
charmed lambdalast1=Amslercollaboration=Particle Data Groupdisplay-authors=etalyear=2008Charmed Lambda}}series=Particle listingspublisher=Lawrence Berkeley Laboratoryurl=http://pdg.lbl.gov/2008/listings/s033.pdf0
bottom lambdalast1=Amslercollaboration=Particle Data Groupdisplay-authors=etalyear=2008Bottom Lambda}}series=Particle listingspublisher=Lawrence Berkeley Laboratoryurl=http://pdg.lbl.gov/2008/listings/s040.pdf0
top lambda0+}}+1000+1

‡ Particle unobserved, because the top-quark decays before it has sufficient time to bind into a hadron ("hadronizes").

The following table compares the nearly-identical Lambda and neutral Sigma baryons:

Particle nameSymbolQuark
contentRest massIJPQSC*B*′TMean lifetimeCommonly decays to
Lambda0+0−1000
Sigmafirst1=P.A.last2=Barnettfirst2=R.M.first3=J.last4=Dahlfirst4=O.first5=D.A.last6=Groomfirst6=D.E.first7=C.-J.last8=Lugovskyfirst8=K.S.first9=E.last10=Robinsonfirst10=D.J.collaboration=Particle Data Groupdisplay-authors=1date=2020-08-14title=Review of Particle Physicsjournal=Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physicsissue=8pages=083C01doi-access=free

References

References

  1. (2020). "Review of Particle Physics". Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics.
  2. (1950). "Evidence Concerning the Existence of the New Unstable Elementary Neutral Particle". Phys. Rev..
  3. (1947). "Evidence for the Existence of New Unstable Elementary Particles". Nature.
  4. Pais, Abraham. (1986). "Inward Bound". Oxford University Press.
  5. [http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/Particles/quark.html#c4 The Strange Quark]
  6. (November 1981). "Eric Henry Stoneley Burhop 31 January 1911 – 22 January 1980". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society.
  7. Burhop, Eric. (1933). "The Band Spectra of Diatomic Molecules". University of Melbourne.
  8. Qiang, Y.. (2010). "Properties of the Lambda(1520) resonance from high-precision electroproduction data". Physics Letters B.
  9. "Media Advisory: The Heaviest Known Antimatter". bnl.gov.
  10. Brumfiel, Geoff. (1 March 2001). "The Incredible Shrinking Nucleus".
  11. (2008). "Baryons". [[Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory]].
  12. (1994). "Heavy Baryons". Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics.
  13. (1998). "Elementary Particles and their Interactions: Concepts and phenomena". Springer-Verlag.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Lambda baryon — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report