Ladder operator

Terminology

Main article: Creation and annihilation operators

There is a relationship between the raising and lowering ladder operators and the creation and annihilation operators commonly used in quantum field theory which lies in representation theory. The creation operator a**i† increments the number of particles in state i, while the corresponding annihilation operator ai decrements the number of particles in state i. This clearly satisfies the requirements of the above definition of a ladder operator: the incrementing or decrementing of the eigenvalue of another operator (in this case the particle number operator).

Confusion arises because the term ladder operator is typically used to describe an operator that acts to increment or decrement a quantum number describing the state of a system. To change the state of a particle with the creation/annihilation operators of QFT requires the use of both annihilation and creation operators. An annihilation operator is used to remove a particle from the initial state and a creation operator is used to add a particle to the final state.

The term "ladder operator" or "raising and lowering operators" is also sometimes used in mathematics, in the context of the theory of Lie algebras and in particular the affine Lie algebras. For example to describe the su(2) subalgebras, the root system and the highest weight modules can be constructed by means of the ladder operators. In particular, the highest weight is annihilated by the raising operators; the rest of the positive root space is obtained by repeatedly applying the lowering operators (one set of ladder operators per subalgebra).

Motivation from mathematics

From a representation theory standpoint a linear representation of a semi-simple Lie group in continuous real parameters induces a set of generators for the Lie algebra. A complex linear combination of those are the ladder operators. For each parameter there is a set of ladder operators; these are then a standardized way to navigate one dimension of the root system and root lattice. The ladder operators of the quantum harmonic oscillator or the "number representation" of second quantization are just special cases of this fact. Ladder operators then become ubiquitous in quantum mechanics from the angular momentum operator, to coherent states and to discrete magnetic translation operators.

General formulation

Suppose that two operators X and N have the commutation relation [N,X] = cX for some scalar c. If {|n\rangle} is an eigenstate of N with eigenvalue equation N|n\rangle = n|n\rangle, then the operator X acts on |n\rangle in such a way as to shift the eigenvalue by c: \begin{align} NX|n\rangle &= (XN+[N,X])|n\rangle\ &= XN|n\rangle + [N,X]|n\rangle\ &= Xn|n\rangle + cX|n\rangle\ &= (n+c)X|n\rangle. \end{align}

In other words, if |n\rangle is an eigenstate of N with eigenvalue n, then X|n\rangle is an eigenstate of N with eigenvalue n + c or is zero. The operator X is a raising operator for N if c is real and positive, and a lowering operator for N if c is real and negative.

If N is a Hermitian operator, then c must be real, and the Hermitian adjoint of X obeys the commutation relation [N,X^\dagger] = -cX^\dagger.

In particular, if X is a lowering operator for N, then X† is a raising operator for N and conversely.

Angular momentum

Main article: Angular momentum operator

A particular application of the ladder operator concept is found in the quantum-mechanical treatment of angular momentum. For a general angular momentum vector J with components Jx, Jy and Jz one defines the two ladder operators \begin{align} J_+ &= J_x + iJ_y, \ J_- &= J_x - iJ_y, \end{align} where i is the imaginary unit.

The commutation relation between the cartesian components of any angular momentum operator is given by [J_i,J_j] = i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}J_k, where εijk is the Levi-Civita symbol, and each of i, j and k can take any of the values x, y and z.

From this, the commutation relations among the ladder operators and Jz are obtained: \begin{align} {}[J_z, J_\pm] &= \pm\hbar J_\pm, \ {}[J_+, J_-] &= 2\hbar J_z \end{align} (technically, this is the Lie algebra of {\mathfrak sl}(2,\R)).

The properties of the ladder operators can be determined by observing how they modify the action of the Jz operator on a given state: \begin{align} J_zJ_\pm|j,m\rangle &= \big(J_\pm J_z + [J_z, J_\pm] \big) |j,m\rangle\ &= (J_\pm J_z \pm \hbar J_\pm)|j,m\rangle\ &= \hbar(m \pm 1)J_\pm|j,m\rangle. \end{align}

Compare this result with J_z|j,(m\pm 1)\rangle = \hbar(m\pm 1)|j,(m\pm 1)\rangle.

Thus, one concludes that {J_\pm|j,m\rangle} is some scalar multiplied by {|j,(m\pm 1)\rangle}: \begin{align} J_+ |j,m\rangle &= \alpha |j,(m+1)\rangle, \ J_- |j,m\rangle &= \beta |j,(m-1)\rangle. \end{align}

This illustrates the defining feature of ladder operators in quantum mechanics: the incrementing (or decrementing) of a quantum number, thus mapping one quantum state onto another. This is the reason that they are often known as raising and lowering operators.

To obtain the values of α and β, first take the norm of each operator, recognizing that J+ and J− are a Hermitian conjugate pair (J_\pm = J_\mp^\dagger): \begin{align} &\langle j,m|J_+^\dagger J_+|j,m\rangle = \langle j,m|J_-J_+|j,m\rangle = \langle j,(m+1)|\alpha^\alpha | j,(m+1)\rangle = |\alpha|^2, \ &\langle j,m|J_-^\dagger J_-|j,m\rangle = \langle j,m|J_+J_-|j,m\rangle = \langle j,(m-1)|\beta^\beta | j,(m-1)\rangle = |\beta|^2. \end{align}

The product of the ladder operators can be expressed in terms of the commuting pair J2 and Jz: \begin{align} J_-J_+ &= (J_x - iJ_y)(J_x + iJ_y) = J_x^2 + J_y^2 + i[J_x,J_y] = J^2 - J_z^2 - \hbar J_z, \ J_+J_- &= (J_x + iJ_y)(J_x - iJ_y) = J_x^2 + J_y^2 - i[J_x,J_y] = J^2 - J_z^2 + \hbar J_z. \end{align}

Thus, one may express the values of |α|2 and |β|2 in terms of the eigenvalues of J2 and Jz: \begin{align} |\alpha|^2 &= \hbar^2j(j+1) - \hbar^2m^2 - \hbar^2m = \hbar^2(j-m)(j+m+1), \ |\beta|^2 &= \hbar^2j(j+1) - \hbar^2m^2 + \hbar^2m = \hbar^2(j+m)(j-m+1). \end{align}

The phases of α and β are not physically significant, thus they can be chosen to be positive and real (Condon–Shortley phase convention). We then have \begin{align} J_+|j,m\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{(j-m)(j+m+1)}|j,m+1\rangle = \hbar\sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m+1)}|j,m+1\rangle, \ J_-|j,m\rangle &= \hbar\sqrt{(j+m)(j-m+1)}|j,m-1\rangle = \hbar\sqrt{j(j+1)-m(m-1)}|j,m-1\rangle. \end{align}

Confirming that m is bounded by the value of j (-j\leq m\leq j), one has \begin{align} J_+|j,,+j\rangle &= 0, \ J_-|j,,-j\rangle &= 0. \end{align}

The above demonstration is effectively the construction of the Clebsch–Gordan coefficients.

Applications in atomic and molecular physics

Many terms in the Hamiltonians of atomic or molecular systems involve the scalar product of angular momentum operators. An example is the magnetic dipole term in the hyperfine Hamiltonian: \hat{H}_\text{D} = \hat{A}\mathbf{I}\cdot\mathbf{J}, where I is the nuclear spin.

The angular momentum algebra can often be simplified by recasting it in the spherical basis. Using the notation of spherical tensor operators, the "−1", "0" and "+1" components of J(1) ≡ J are given by \begin{align} J_{-1}^{(1)} &= \dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(J_x - iJ_y) = \dfrac{J_-}{\sqrt{2}},\ J_0^{(1)} &= J_z,\ J_{+1}^{(1)} &= -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(J_x + iJ_y) = -\frac{J_+}{\sqrt{2}}. \end{align}

From these definitions, it can be shown that the above scalar product can be expanded as \mathbf{I}^{(1)}\cdot\mathbf{J}^{(1)} = \sum_{n=-1}^{+1}(-1)^nI_{n}^{(1)}J_{-n}^{(1)} = I_0^{(1)}J_0^{(1)} - I_{-1}^{(1)}J_{+1}^{(1)} - I_{+1}^{(1)}J_{-1}^{(1)}.

The significance of this expansion is that it clearly indicates which states are coupled by this term in the Hamiltonian, that is those with quantum numbers differing by mi = ±1 and mj = ∓1 only.

Harmonic oscillator

Main article: Quantum harmonic oscillator

Another application of the ladder operator concept is found in the quantum-mechanical treatment of the harmonic oscillator. We can define the lowering and raising operators as \begin{align} \hat a &=\sqrt{m\omega \over 2\hbar} \left(\hat x + {i \over m \omega} \hat p \right), \ \hat a^{\dagger} &=\sqrt{m \omega \over 2\hbar} \left(\hat x - {i \over m \omega} \hat p \right). \end{align}

They provide a convenient means to extract energy eigenvalues without directly solving the system's differential equation.

Ladder operator applying to harmonic oscillator's energy levels: \begin{align} \hat{a}^\dagger |n\rangle &= \sqrt{n+1}|n+1\rangle, \ \hat{a} |n\rangle &= \sqrt{n}|n-1\rangle. \end{align}

Hydrogen-like atom

Main article: Hydrogen-like atom

There are two main approaches given in the literature using ladder operators, one using the Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector, another using factorization of the Hamiltonian.

Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector

Another application of the ladder operator concept is found in the quantum mechanical treatment of the electronic energy of hydrogen-like atoms and ions. The Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector commutes with the Hamiltonian for an inverse square spherically symmetric potential and can be used to determine ladder operators for this potential. We can define the lowering and raising operators (based on the classical Laplace–Runge–Lenz vector) \vec{A} = \left( \frac{1}{Ze^2\mu} \right) \left{ \vec{L} \times \vec{p} - \boldsymbol{i} \hbar \vec{p} \right} + \frac{\vec r}{r}, where \vec{L} is the angular momentum, \vec{p} is the linear momentum, \mu is the reduced mass of the system, e is the electronic charge, and Z is the atomic number of the nucleus. Analogous to the angular momentum ladder operators, one has A_+ = A_x + i A_y and A_- = A_x - i A_y.

The commutators needed to proceed are [A_\pm , L_z ] = \mp \boldsymbol{i} \hbar A_\mp and [A_\pm , L^2 ] = \mp 2 \hbar^2 A_\pm - 2 \hbar A_\pm L_z \pm 2 \hbar A_z L_\pm. Therefore, A_+ |?, \ell , m_\ell \rangle \rightarrow |?, \ell , m_\ell+1 \rangle and -L^2\left ( A_+ |?,\ell,\ell\rangle\right ) = -\hbar^2 (\ell+1)((\ell+1)+1)\left ( A_+ |?,\ell,\ell\rangle\right), so A_+ |?,\ell,\ell\rangle \rightarrow |?,\ell+1,\ell+1\rangle, where the "?" indicates a nascent quantum number which emerges from the discussion.

Given the Pauli equations IV: 1 - A \cdot A = - \left ( \frac {2 E}{\mu Z^2e^4} \right ) ( L^2 + \hbar^2 ) and III: \left ( A \times A \right )j = - \left ( \frac{2 \boldsymbol{i} \hbar E}{\mu Z^2e^4} \right ) L_j, and starting with the equation A-A_+|\ell^,\ell^\rangle = 0 and expanding, one obtains (assuming \ell^* is the maximum value of the angular momentum quantum number consonant with all other conditions) \left ( 1 + \frac{2E}{\mu Z^2e^4} (L^2+\hbar^2) -i \frac{2i\hbar E}{\mu Z^2e^4}L_z \right )|?,\ell^,\ell^\rangle = 0, which leads to the Rydberg formula E_n = - \frac{\mu Z^2 e^4}{2 \hbar^2 (\ell^+1)^2}, implying that \ell^+1 = n = ?, where n is the traditional quantum number.

Factorization of the Hamiltonian

The Hamiltonian for a hydrogen-like potential can be written in spherical coordinates as H = \frac 1{2\mu} \left[p_r^2 + \frac 1 {r^2} L^2 \right] + V(r), where V(r) = -Ze^2/r, and the radial momentum p_r = \frac x r p_x + \frac y r p_y + \frac z r p_z, which is real and self-conjugate.

Suppose |nl\rangle is an eigenvector of the Hamiltonian, where l is the angular momentum, and n represents the energy, so L^2|nl\rangle = l(l+1)\hbar^2|nl\rangle, and we may label the Hamiltonian as H_l: H_l = \frac 1 {2\mu} \left[p_r^2 + \frac 1 {r^2} l(l+1)\hbar^2\right] + V(r).

The factorization method was developed by Infeld and Hull | doi-access = free applied it to spherically symmetric potentials using operator notation.

Suppose we can find a factorization of the Hamiltonian by operators C_l as and C_lC_l^* = 2\mu H_{l+1} + G_l for scalars F_l and G_l. The vector C_lC_l^*C_l|nl\rangle may be evaluated in two different ways as \begin{align} C_lC_l^*C_l|nl\rangle & = (2\mu E^n_l + F_l)C_l|nl\rangle \ & = (2\mu H_{l+1} + G_l)C_l|nl\rangle, \end{align} which can be re-arranged as H_{l+1}(C_l|nl\rangle) = E^n_l + (F_l - G_l)/(2\mu), showing that C_l|nl\rangle is an eigenstate of H_{l+1} with eigenvalue E^{n'}_{l+1} = E^n_l + (F_l - G_l)/(2\mu). If F_l = G_l, then n' = n, and the states |nl\rangle and C_l|nl\rangle have the same energy.

For the hydrogenic atom, setting V(r) = -\frac{B\hbar}{\mu r} with B = \frac{Z\mu e^2}{\hbar}, a suitable equation for C_l is C_l = p_r +\frac{i\hbar(l+1)}{r} - \frac{iB}{l+1} with F_l = G_l = \frac{B^2}{(l+1)^2}. There is an upper bound to the ladder operator if the energy is negative (so C_l|nl_\text{max}\rangle = 0 for some l_\text{max}), then if follows from equation () that E^n_l = -F_l/{2\mu} = -\frac{B^2}{2\mu(l_\text{max}+1)^2} = -\frac{\mu Z^2 e^4}{2 \hbar^2 (l_\text{max}+1)^2}, and n can be identified with l_\text{max}+1.

Relation to group theory

Whenever there is degeneracy in a system, there is usually a related symmetry property and group. The degeneracy of the energy levels for the same value of n but different angular momenta has been identified as the SO(4) symmetry of the spherically symmetric Coulomb potential.

3D isotropic harmonic oscillator

The 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator has a potential given by V(r) = \tfrac 1 2 \mu \omega^2 r^2.

It can similarly be managed using the factorization method.

Factorization method

A suitable factorization is given by C_l = p_r + \frac{i\hbar(l+1)}{r} - i\mu \omega r with F_l = -(2l+3)\mu \omega \hbar and G_l = -(2l+1)\mu \omega \hbar. Then E_{l+1}^{n^'} = E_l^n + \frac{F_l - G_l}{2\mu} = E_l^n - \omega \hbar, and continuing this, \begin{align} E_{l+2}^{n^'} &= E_l^n - 2\omega \hbar \ E_{l+3}^{n^'} &= E_l^n - 3\omega \hbar \ &;; \vdots \end{align} Now the Hamiltonian only has positive energy levels as can be seen from \begin{align} \langle \psi|2\mu H_l|\psi\rangle & = \langle \psi|C_l^*C_l|\psi\rangle + \langle \psi|(2l+3)\mu \omega \hbar|\psi\rangle \ & = \langle C_l\psi|C_l\psi\rangle + (2l+3)\mu \omega \hbar\langle \psi|\psi\rangle \ & \geq 0. \end{align} This means that for some value of l the series must terminate with C_{l_\text{max}} |nl_\text{max}\rangle = 0, and then E^n_{l_\text{max}} = -\frac{F_{l_\text{max}}}{2 \mu} = \left(l_\text{max} + \frac 3 2\right) \omega\hbar. This is decreasing in energy by \omega\hbar unless C_l|n,l\rangle = 0 for some value of l. Identifying this value as n gives E_l^n = -F_l = \left(n + \tfrac 3 2\right) \omega \hbar.

It then follows the n' = n - 1 so that C_l|nl\rangle = \lambda^n_l |n - 1 , , l + 1\rangle, giving a recursion relation on \lambda with solution \lambda^n_l = - \mu \omega \hbar \sqrt{2(n-l)}.

There is degeneracy caused from angular momentum; there is additional degeneracy caused by the oscillator potential. Consider the states |n ,, n\rangle, |n-1 ,, n-1\rangle, |n-2 ,, n-2\rangle, \dots and apply the lowering operators C^: C^{n-2}|n-1 ,, n-1\rangle, C^*{n-4} C^*_{n-3} |n-2 ,, n-2\rangle, \dots giving the sequence |n , n\rangle, |n ,, n-2\rangle, |n ,, n-4\rangle, \dots with the same energy but with l decreasing by 2. In addition to the angular momentum degeneracy, this gives a total degeneracy of (n+1)(n+2) / 2

Relation to group theory

The degeneracies of the 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator are related to the special unitary group SU(3)

History

Many sources credit Paul Dirac with the invention of ladder operators. Dirac's use of the ladder operators shows that the total angular momentum quantum number j needs to be a non-negative half-integer multiple of ħ.

References

de:Erzeugungs- und Vernichtungsoperator

References

1. Fuchs, Jurgen. (1992). "Affine Lie Algebras and Quantum Groups". Cambridge University Press.
2. Harris, Fulton. "Representation Theory".
3. de Lange, O. L.. (1986). "Ladder operators for orbital angular momentum". [[American Journal of Physics]].
4. Sakurai, Jun J.. (1994). "Modern Quantum Mechanics". Pearson Education, Inc..
5. Woodgate, Gordon K.. (1983-10-06). "Elementary Atomic Structure". Oxford University Press, USA.
6. "Angular Momentum Operators". [[University of Virginia]].
7. David, C. W.. (1966). "Ladder Operator Solution for the Hydrogen Atom Electronic Energy Levels". American Journal of Physics.
8. (2004). "Lenz vector operations on spherical hydrogen atom eigenfunctions". American Journal of Physics.
9. (1926). "Über das Wasserstoffspektrum vom Standpunkt der neuen Quantenmechanik". Z. Phys..
10. B. L. Van der Waerden, Sources of Quantum Mechanics, Dover, New York, 1968.
11. Weinberg, S. J.. (2011). "The SO(4) Symmetry of the Hydrogen Atom".
12. Kirson, M. W.. (2013). "Introductory Algebra for Physicists: Isotropic harmonic oscillator". Weizmann Institute of Science.
13. Webb, Stephen. "The Quantum Harmonic Oscillator".