Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
people/1330s

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Ibn al-Furat

Egyptian historian


Egyptian historian

FieldValue
nameIbn al-Furat
birth_date1334 CE
birth_placeCairo, Egypt
death_date1405 CE
occupationHistorian, Notary Public
notable_works*Taʾrīkh al-duwal wa ’l-mulūk* (*History of the Dynasties and Kingdoms*)
eraMedieval Islamic period
main_interestsUniversal history, Islamic history
influencesYusuf ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Mizzi, Al-Dhahabi

Nāṣir al-Dīn Muḥammad b. ʿAbd al-Raḥīm b. ʿAlī al-Miṣrī al-Ḥanafī () (1334–1405 CE), better known as Ibn al-Furāt, was an Egyptian historian, best known for his universal history, generally known as Taʾrīkh al-duwal wa ’l-mulūk ("History of the Dynasties and Kingdoms"), though the manuscripts themselves call it al-Ṭaʾrīq al-wāḍiḥ al-maslūk ilā tarājim al-khulafā’ wa ’l-mulūk. Ibn al-Furat's work is of particular importance for modern scholars due to its high level of detail and the mostly verbatim use of a wide variety of sources, including Christian and Shia authors suspect to mainstream orthodox Sunni historiography. Some of these works survive only through Ibn al-Furat's reuse of them.

Life

The earliest and fullest account of Ibn al-Furat's life is provided by Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani. He records that Ibn al-Furat was born to a well-known and learned family, in Cairo in 807/1334. Lacking independent means, Ibn al-Furat made a living partly through undertaking bureaucratic tasks such as working as a notary public and issuing marriage contracts. However, he also attained expertise in hadith, gaining hadith licenses from Yusuf ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Mizzi and Al-Dhahabi, both based in Damascus. He taught and preached at the Muʿizziyya school in Fustat. Little more is known about his life.

Work

Al-Furat's history survives, incomplete, in only a single set of volumes. Those covering the period before 1107 CE seem to have been drafts, and those covering 1107 CE onwards to have been fair copies. All include verbatim quotations of other sources, and make careful use of rubrication, catchwords, spaces for extra information, and annotations; consequently, Fozia Bora has argued that the collection should be seen not simply as a narrative history but rather an archive of sources. The surviving volumes and their contents are as follows:

years coveredmanuscriptnotes(CE)(AH)
'Patriarchs from Seth to Isaac' (vol. 3)London, British Library Or. 3007draft
'Sassanian kings to Jahili poets' (vol. 8)Paris, MS Blochet 5990draft
'early period' (vols 9–11)Bursa, Inebey Library, Huseyin Çelebi MSS, 782-84draft
early Islamic historyParis, MS de Slane 1595A scribal copy, annotated by Ibn al-Furat.
1107-27501-21Vienna, Austrian National Library, Cod. A. F. 117fair copy
1128-48522-43Vienna, Austrian National Library, Cod. A. F. 118fair copy
1149-66544-62Vienna, Austrian National Library, Cod. A. F. 119fair copy
1167-71563-67Vienna, Austrian National Library, Cod. A. F. 120 (incomplete)fair copy
1203-26600-24Vienna, Austrian National Library, Cod. A. F. 121fair copy
1227-40625-38Rabat, no classmarkfair copy
1241-59639-58Vatican Library, MS Arab 720fair copy
1260659lacuna
1261-72660-71Vienna, Austrian National Library, Cod. A. F. 122fair copy
1273-83672-82Vienna, Austrian National Library, Cod. A. F. 123fair copy
1284-96683-96Vienna, Austrian National Library, Cod. A. F. 124fair copy
1297-1386697-788lacuna
1387-96789-99Vienna, Austrian National Library, Cod. A. F. 125fair copy

Ibn al-Furat's history seems never to have been copied wholesale, but was sold by his son and was used by scholars based in Cairo and Damascus over the next couple of centuries, proving influential as both a narrative and a repository of sources. How it came into its present libraries is not known.

In Morton's summary of Bora's assessment of Ibn al-Furat's historiographical technique,

his prime ambition was not to advance a monolithic discourse or to make any claim to religious superiority, but rather to collate and present sources from the period itself, giving priority to eyewitnesses or especially well-informed authors. For this reason, he was fully prepared to include extracts from texts written by Ismāʿīlī authors and [...] it seems that he did not attempt to manipulate these texts (i.e. by reworking them or editing them to achieve a specific political/religious/cultural goal). Thus, they were generally left in their original condition, complete with a full attribution to their provenance. Nor, it seems, did he attempt to gather only those extracts that were consistent with a single overarching discourse. [...] Ibn al-Furāt’s work should be viewed as that of an archivist; a representative of a “bookish” Mamlūk culture closely concerned with the textual traditions that it had inherited.

References

Sources

References

  1. Fozia Bora, ''Writing History in the Medieval Islamic World: The Value of Chronicles as Archives'', The Early and Medieval Islamic World (London: I. B. Tauris, 2019), {{ISBN. 978-1-7845-3730-2.
  2. Nicholas Morton, book review of: Fozia Bora, ''Writing History in the Medieval Islamic World: The Value of Chronicles as Archives'' (London: I. B. Tauris, 2019), ''Al-Masāq: Journal of the Medieval Mediterranean'', 31 (2019), 367-69, {{doi. 10.1080/09503110.2019.1662598.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Ibn al-Furat — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report