Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/google-search

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Google Trends

Popularity analysis of search queries

Google Trends

Popularity analysis of search queries

FieldValue
nameGoogle Trends
logoGoogle Trends.png
logo_size250px
captionGoogle Trends screenshot (color coded searching and comparing)
typeSearch analysis
languageEnglish, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, French, and more
ownerGoogle
authorGoogle
launch_date
current_statusActive
url

Google Trends is a website by Google that provides users the ability to analyze the popularity of top search queries in Google Search as well as Youtube across various regions, time ranges, and categories. The website uses timeline and average graphs to compare the relative search interest of compared queries over a certain period of time.

On August 5, 2008, Google launched Google Insights for Search, a more sophisticated and advanced service displaying search trends data. On September 27, 2012, Google merged Google Insights for Search into Google Trends.

History

2000s

Originally, Google neglected updating Google Trends on a regular basis. In March 2007, internet bloggers noticed that Google had not added new data since November 2006, and Trends was updated within a week. Google did not update Trends from March until July 30, and only after it was blogged about, again. Google now claims to be "updating the information provided by Google Trends daily; Hot Trends is updated hourly." As of April 2025, data on the Google Trends website shows updates every minute, with a 4 minute delay, when the timeline parameter is set to "Past hour."

On August 6, 2008, Google launched a free service called Insights for Search. Insights for Search is an extension of Google Trends and although the tool is meant for marketers, it can be utilized by any user. The tool allows for the tracking of various words and phrases that are typed into Google's search-box. The tracking device provided a more in-depth analysis of results. It also has the ability to categorize and organize the data, with special attention given to the breakdown of information by geographical areas. In 2012, Google Insights for Search was merged into Google Trends with a new interface.

Google Trends does not provide absolute values for the number of search queries, but instead shows relative search volumes (RSV). The relative search volumes are normalised to the highest value, which is set to 100. Seeing absolute search volumes requires a separate browser extension that overlays absolute numbers onto Google Trends' y-axis. The popularity of up to 5 search terms or search topics can be compared directly. Additional comparisons require a comparison term or topic. In contrast to search terms, search topics are "a group of terms that have the same concept in any language".

In 2009, Yossi Matias et al. published research on the predictability of search trends.

2010s

In a series of articles in The New York Times, Seth Stephens-Davidowitz used Google Trends to measure a variety of behaviors. For example, in June 2012, he argued that search volume for the word "nigger(s)" could be used to measure racism in different parts of the United States. Correlating this measure with Obama's vote share, he calculated that Obama lost about 4 percentage points due to racial animus in the 2008 presidential election. He also used Google data, along with other sources, to estimate the size of the gay population. This article noted that the most popular search beginning "is my husband" is "is my husband gay?" In addition, he found that American parents were more likely to search "is my son gifted?" than "is my daughter gifted?" But they were more likely to search "is my daughter overweight?" than "is my son overweight?" He also examined cultural differences in attitudes around pregnancy.

Google Trends has also been used to forecast economic indicators, and financial markets, and analysis of Google Trends data has detected regional flu outbreaks before conventional monitoring systems. Google Trends is increasingly used in ecological and conservation studies, with the number of research articles growing over 50% per year. Google Trends data has been used to examine trends in public interest and awareness on biodiversity and conservation issues, species bias in conservation project, and identify cultural aspects of environmental issues. The data obtained from Google Trends has also been used to track changes in the timing biological processes as well as the geographic patterns of biological invasion.

A 2011 study found that an indicator for private consumption based on search query time series provided by Google Trends found that in almost all conducted forecasting experiments, the Google indicator outperformed survey-based indicators. Evidence is provided by Jeremy Ginsberg et al. that Google Trends data can be used to track influenza-like illness in a population. Because the relative frequency of certain queries is highly correlated with the percentage of physician visits in which a patient presents with influenza-like symptoms, an estimate of weekly influenza activity can be reported. A more sophisticated model for inferring influenza rates from Google Trends, capable of overcoming the mistakes of its predecessors has been proposed by Lampos et al.

The use of Google Trends to study a wide range of medical topics is becoming more widespread. Studies have been performed examining such diverse topics as use of tobacco substitutes, suicide occurrence, asthma, and parasitic diseases. In an analogous concept of using health queries to predict the flu, Google Flu Trends was created. Further research should extend the utility of Google Trends in healthcare.

url-status=live}}</ref>

Furthermore, it was shown by Tobias Preis et al. that there is a correlation between Google Trends data of company names and transaction volumes of the corresponding stocks on a weekly time scale.

In April 2012, Tobias Preis, Helen Susannah Moat, H. Eugene Stanley and Steven R. Bishop used Google Trends data to demonstrate that Internet users from countries with a higher per capita gross domestic product (GDP) are more likely to search for information about the future than information about the past. The findings, published in the journal Scientific Reports, suggest there may be a link between online behaviour and real-world economic indicators. The authors of the study examined Google search queries made by Internet users in 45 countries in 2010 and calculated the ratio of the volume of searches for the coming year ('2011') to the volume of searches for the previous year ('2009'), which they call the 'future orientation index'. They compared the future orientation index to the per capita GDP of each country and found a strong tendency for countries in which Google users enquire more about the future to exhibit a higher GDP. The results hint that there may potentially be a relationship between the economic success of a country and the information-seeking behaviour of its citizens online. In April 2013, Tobias Preis and his colleagues Helen Susannah Moat and H. Eugene Stanley introduced a method to identify online precursors for stock market moves, using trading strategies based on search volume data provided by Google Trends. Their analysis of Google search volume for 98 terms of varying financial relevance, published in Scientific Reports, suggests that increases in search volume for financially relevant search terms tend to precede large losses in financial markets. The analysis of Tobias Preis was later found to be misleading and the results are most likely to be overfitted. The group of Damien Challet tested the same methodology with unrelated to financial markets search words, such as terms for diseases, car brands or computer games. They have found that all these classes provide equally good "predictability" of the financial markets as the original set. For example, the search terms like "bone cancer", "Shelby GT 500" (car brand), "Moon Patrol" (computer game) provide even better performance as those selected in original work.

In 2019, Tom Cochran, from public relations firm 720 Strategies, conducted a study comparing Google Trends to political polling. The study was in response to Pete Buttigieg's surge in a poll of Iowa's likely Democratic caucusgoers conducted between November 8 to 13 by the Des Moines Register. Using Google Trends, he looked into the relationship between polling numbers and Google searches. His findings concluded that, while polling consists of far smaller sample sizes, the primary difference with Google Trends is that it only demonstrates intent to seek information. Google search volume was higher for candidates having higher polling numbers, but the correlation did not mean increased candidate favorability.

2020s

The early years of the 2020s were marked by the emergence of the novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) that would eventually become known as the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Consequently, research based on accessible data in the context of infodemiological studies has become increasingly prevalent, with Google Trends data proving to be a suitable tool for such surveys. Corresponding studies on the COVID-19 pandemic were set up to investigate and possibly predict the waves and spread.

After a basic framework for using Google Trends had already been developed by 2019, this work was continued in the 2020s and existing limitations and possible solutions for scientific use were published. Eysenbach further defined the field of infodemiology and, in connection with the pandemic, also addressed the mass dissemination of information, the infodemic.

Characteristics

Research also shows that Google Trends can be used to forecast stock returns and volatility over a short horizon. Other research has shown that Google Trends has strong predictive power for macroeconomic series. For example, a paper published in 2020 shows that a large panel of Google Trends predictors can forecast employment growth in the United States at both the national and state level with a relatively high degree of accuracy even a year in advance.

Google Trends uses representative sub-samples for analysis, which means that the data can vary depending on the time of the survey and is associated with background noise. Therefore, repeating analyses at different points in time can increase the reliability of the analysis. It was shown that Google Trends data can exhibit a high variability when queried at different points in time, indicating that it may not be reliable except for very high-volume search terms due to sampling, and relying on this data for prediction is risky. In 2020, this research made it to major headlines in Germany.

Search quotas

Google has incorporated quota limits for Trends searches. This limits the number of search attempts available per user/IP/device. Details of quota limits have not yet been provided, but it may depend on geographical location or browser privacy settings. It has been reported in some cases that this quota is reached very quickly if one is not logged into a Google account before trying to access the Trends service.

Implications of data

A group of researchers at Wellesley College examined data from Google Trends and analyzed how effective a tool it could be in predicting U.S. Congress elections in 2008 and 2010. In highly contested races where data for both candidates were available, the data successfully predicted the outcome in 33.3% of cases in 2008 and 39% in 2010. The authors conclude that, compared to the traditional methods of election forecasting, incumbency and New York Times polls, and even in comparison with random chance, Google Trends did not prove to be a good predictor of either the 2008 or 2010 elections. Another group has also explored possible implications for financial markets and suggested possible ways to combine insights from Google Trends with other concepts in technical analysis.

In 2020, the OECD announced it had used Google Trends data to create a real-time tracker of economic activity and GDP growth, through online search patterns for topics like unemployment, housing, and consumption. In May 2026, What We Ask Google will be published by Google's data editor Simon Rogers, exploring the connections between everyday searches.

Notes

References

  1. Matias, Yossi. (September 27, 2012). "Insights into what the world is searching for -- the new Google Trends".
  2. (July 30, 2007). "Success! Google Trends Updated". InsideGoogle.
  3. "weather - Google Trends".
  4. Helft, Miguel. (2008-08-06). "Google's New Tool Is Meant for Marketers". The New York Times.
  5. (2014-10-22). "The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research: A Systematic Review". PLOS ONE.
  6. "How to See Absolute Number of Searches in Google Trends".
  7. "Compare Trends search terms - Trends Help".
  8. "On the predictability of Search Trends".
  9. Stephens-Davidowitz, Seth. (2012-06-09). "How Racist Are We? Ask Google".
  10. Stephens-Davidowitz, Seth. (2013-12-07). "Opinion {{!}} How Many American Men Are Gay?". The New York Times.
  11. Stephens-Davidowitz, Seth. (2014-01-18). "Opinion {{!}} Google, Tell Me. Is My Son a Genius?". The New York Times.
  12. (May 17, 2014). "What Do Pregnant Women Want". The New York Times.
  13. (June 2012). "Predicting the Present with Google Trends". Economic Record.
  14. (October–December 2017). "The predictive power of Google searches in forecasting US unemployment". International Journal of Forecasting.
  15. (July–September 2020). "Nowcasting in Real Time Using Popularity Priors". International Journal of Forecasting.
  16. (April 25, 2013). "Quantifying Trading Behavior in Financial Markets Using Google Trends". Scientific Reports.
  17. (November 15, 2009). "Google Trends: A Web-Based Tool for Real-Time Surveillance of Disease Outbreaks". Clinical Infectious Diseases.
  18. Troumbis, Andreas Y.. "Declining Google Trends of public interest in biodiversity: semantics, statistics or traceability of changing priorities?".
  19. (October 9, 2018). "Analyzing Google search data to debunk myths about the public's interest in conservation". Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.
  20. (March 30, 2013). "Google search patterns suggest declining interest in the environment". Biodiversity and Conservation.
  21. (March 30, 2016). "Analysis of the Capacity of Google Trends to Measure Interest in Conservation Topics and the Role of Online News". PLOS ONE.
  22. Troumbis, Andreas Y.. (December 2017). "Google Trends and cycles of public interest in biodiversity: the animal spirits effect". Biodiversity and Conservation.
  23. (February 2017). "Internet-based monitoring of public perception of conservation". Biological Conservation.
  24. (September 26, 2018). "Popular interest in vertebrates does not reflect extinction risk and is associated with bias in conservation investment". PLOS ONE.
  25. (August 15, 2014). "The importance of cultural knowledge and scale for analysing internet search data as a proxy for public interest toward the environment". Biodiversity and Conservation.
  26. (August 23, 2013). "Googling Trends in Conservation Biology". Conservation Biology.
  27. (January 13, 2011). "Forecasting private consumption: survey-based indicators vs. Google Trends". Journal of Forecasting.
  28. (2009). "Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data". Nature.
  29. (August 3, 2015). "Advances in nowcasting influenza-like illness rates using search query logs". Scientific Reports.
  30. Cavazos-Rehg, Patricia A., Melissa J. Krauss, Edward L. Spitznagel, Ashley Lowery, Richard A. Grucza, Frank J. Chaloupka, and Laura Jean Bierut. "Monitoring of non-cigarette tobacco use using Google Trends". ''[[Tobacco Control (journal). Tobacco Control]]'' 24, no. 3 (2015): 249-255.
  31. Kristoufek, L., Moat, H.S. and Preis, T., 2016. Estimating suicide occurrence statistics using Google Trends. EPJ data science, 5(1), p.32.
  32. Bousquet, Jean, Robyn E. O'Hehir, Josep M. Anto, Gennaro D'Amato, Ralph Mösges, Peter W. Hellings, Michiel Van Eerd, and Aziz Sheikh. "Assessment of thunderstorm-induced asthma using Google Trends". ''[[The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology]]''. 140, no. 3 (2017): 891-893.
  33. Walker, M.D., 2018. Can Google be used to study parasitic disease? Internet searching on tick-borne encephalitis in Germany. Journal of vector borne diseases, 55(4), p. 327.
  34. (2014-03-14). "The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis". Science.
  35. (2023-11-01). "Maximum generable interest: A universal standard for Google Trends search queries". Healthcare Analytics.
  36. (December 18, 2017). "Review: ''An Inconvenient Sequel''".
  37. "History of Climate Emergency Action by Councils". Council Action in the Climate Emergency.
  38. (2010). "Complex dynamics of our economic life on different scales: insights from search engine query data". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.
  39. Catherine Mayer. (November 15, 2010). "Study: Are Google Searches Affecting the Stock Market?".
  40. (2012). "Quantifying the Advantage of Looking Forward". Scientific Reports.
  41. Paul Marks. (April 5, 2012). "Online searches for future linked to economic success". New Scientist.
  42. Casey Johnston. (April 6, 2012). "Google Trends reveals clues about the mentality of richer nations". Ars Technica.
  43. Philip Ball. (April 26, 2013). "Counting Google searches predicts market movements". Nature.
  44. (2013). "Quantifying Trading Behavior in Financial Markets Using Google Trends". [[Scientific Reports]].
  45. Nick Bilton. (April 26, 2013). "Google Search Terms Can Predict Stock Market, Study Finds". The New York Times.
  46. Christopher Matthews. (April 26, 2013). "Trouble With Your Investment Portfolio? Google It!".
  47. Philip Ball. (April 26, 2013). "Counting Google searches predicts market movements". [[Nature (journal).
  48. Bernhard Warner. (April 25, 2013). "'Big Data' Researchers Turn to Google to Beat the Markets". [[Bloomberg Businessweek]].
  49. Hamish McRae. (April 28, 2013). "Giải thích trend là gì là ai". wowhay.com.
  50. Richard Waters. (April 25, 2013). "Google search proves to be new word in stock market prediction". [[Financial Times]].
  51. David Leinweber. (April 26, 2013). "Big Data Gets Bigger: Now Google Trends Can Predict The Market". [[Forbes]].
  52. Jason Palmer. (April 25, 2013). "Google searches predict market moves". [[BBC]].
  53. (July 17, 2013). "Predicting financial markets with Google Trends and not so random keywords".
  54. Pfannenstiel, Brianne. "Iowa Poll: Pete Buttigieg rockets to the top of the 2020 field as a clear front-runner".
  55. Cochran, Tom. (November 20, 2019). "Is Google Trends Better Than Polling? {{!}} 720 Strategies".
  56. (2021-12-01). "The rise of infodemiology and infoveillance during COVID-19 crisis". One Health.
  57. (2022-09-29). "Forecasting and Surveillance of COVID-19 Spread Using Google Trends: Literature Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
  58. (2019-05-29). "Google Trends in Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Methodology Framework". JMIR Public Health and Surveillance.
  59. (2024-05-01). "Addressing Google Trends inconsistencies". Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
  60. Rovetta, Alessandro. (2024-10-01). "Google trends in infodemiology: Methodological steps to avoid irreproducible results and invalid conclusions". International Journal of Medical Informatics.
  61. (2025-10-13). "Setting trends with google: limits and perspectives when utilising search engine data". Quality & Quantity.
  62. Eysenbach, Gunther. (2020-06-26). "How to Fight an Infodemic: The Four Pillars of Infodemic Management". Journal of Medical Internet Research.
  63. Da, Engerlberg, Geo. (2015). "The Sum of All Fears: Investor Sentiment and Asset Prices". [[The Review of Financial Studies]].
  64. Borup, Schütte. (2020). "In search of a job: Forecasting employment growth using Google Trends". [[Journal of Business & Economic Statistics]].
  65. Dietzel, Marian Alexander. (2016-01-01). "Sentiment-based predictions of housing market turning points with Google trends". International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis.
  66. (April 2022). "Obtaining consistent time series from Google Trends". Economic Inquiry.
  67. (2020). "ECML PKDD 2020 Workshops". Springer International Publishing.
  68. (June 5, 2020). "'Google Trends': Daten nicht aussagekräftig". [[Tagesschau (German TV series).
  69. "Bug in Google Trends - Too Many Request Error - Google Search Help".
  70. Worzel, Yonit Halperin. (14 August 2024). "3 Trending Now updates to help you keep up with the latest trends".
  71. "Explore the searches that are Trending now - Trends Help".
  72. "About Google Trends – Google Trends".
  73. "Insights into what the world is searching for -- the new Google Trends".
  74. Elinor Mills. (December 4, 2007). "Google Trends API coming soon".
  75. "Introducing the Google Trends API (alpha): a new way to access Search Trends data {{!}} Google Search Central Blog".
  76. Wihbey, John. (2011-04-05). "Predicting U.S. elections through search volume in Google Trends".
  77. Lim, Shawn, Stridsberg, Douglas. (2014). "Feeling the Market's Pulse with Google Trends". [[International Federation of Technical Analysts Journal 2015 Edition]].
  78. Woloszko, Nicolas. (2020-11-30). "Tracking activity in real time with Google Trends". OECD Economics Department Working Papers.
  79. "What We Ask Google by Simon Rogers: 9798217176984 {{!}} PenguinRandomHouse.com: Books".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Google Trends — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report