Fracking

PLEASE ADD INFORMATION SPECIFIC TO THE US TO THE Hydraulic fracturing in the United States ARTICLE, OR THE Environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing in the United States ARTICLE.

Fracking (also known as hydraulic fracturing, fracing, hydrofracturing, or hydrofracking) is a well stimulation technique involving the fracturing of formations in bedrock by a pressurized liquid. The process involves the high-pressure injection of "fracking fluid" (primarily water, containing sand or other proppants suspended with the aid of thickening agents) into a wellbore to create cracks in the deep-rock formations through which natural gas, petroleum, and brine will flow more freely. When the hydraulic pressure is removed from the well, small grains of hydraulic fracturing proppants (either sand or aluminium oxide) hold the fractures open.

Fracking, using either hydraulic pressure or acid, is the most common method for well stimulation. Well stimulation techniques help create pathways for oil, gas or water to flow more easily, ultimately increasing the overall production of the well. Both methods of fracking are classed as unconventional, because they aim to permanently enhance (increase) the permeability of the formation. So the traditional division of hydrocarbon-bearing rocks into source and reservoir no longer holds; the source rock becomes the reservoir after the treatment.

Fracking has many known health and environmental effects. These are caused by pollution and water contamination from the fracking process. These negative externalities then create environmental justice issues, as a majority of the impacted regions are poor or predominantly populated by ethnic minorities.

Hydraulic fracking is more familiar to the general public, and is the predominant method used in hydrocarbon exploitation, but acid fracking has a much longer history. The hydrocarbon industry tends to use fracturing, although the word fracking now dominates in popular media.

Definition

Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) and acidising (acid fracking) are two of the most common methods for well stimulation. The flow chart shows that hydraulic fracking and acid fracking, highlighted in yellow, are two categories of unconventional hydraulic methods. But acidising is complicated by the fact that matrix acidising is considered conventional. Note that it takes place below the fracture gradient of the rock.

In the UK legislative and hydrocarbon permitting context (see Fracking in the United Kingdom), Adriana Zalucka et al. have reviewed the various definitions, as well as the role of key regulators and authorities, in a peer-reviewed article published in 2021. They have proposed a new robust definition for unconventional well treatments:

The above definition focuses on increasing permeability, rather than on any particular extraction process. It is quantitative, using the generally agreed 0.1 md cut-off value, below which rocks are considered impermeable. It exempts borehole cleaning processes like acid squeeze or acid wash from being classed as unconventional, by using the 1 m radius criterion. It avoids a definition based on, for example, the quantity of water injected, which is controversial, or the injection pressure applied (whether the treatment is above or below the fracture gradient, as shown in the flow chart above). It also exempts non-hydrocarbon wells from being classed as unconventional.

The definition takes into account the views of the hydrocarbon industry and the US Geological Survey, in particular. A low permeability (by consensus defined as less than 0.1 millidarcies) implies that the resource is unconventional, meaning that it requires special methods to extract the resource. Above that value, conventional methods suffice. Unconventional resources are also characterised by being widely distributed, with low energy density (i.e. in a low concentration) and ill-defined in volume. There are no discrete boundaries, in contrast to those bounding a conventional hydrocarbon reservoir.

Although the definition above was developed within the UK context, it is universally applicable.

Hydraulic fracking

Hydraulic fracking is the most commonly used well stimulation technique. It involves the fracturing of formations in bedrock by a pressurized liquid. The process involves the high-pressure injection of "fracking fluid" (primarily water, containing sand or other proppants suspended with the aid of thickening agents) into a wellbore to create cracks in the deep rock formations through which natural gas, petroleum, and brine will flow more freely. When the hydraulic pressure is removed from the well, small grains of hydraulic fracturing proppants (either sand or aluminium oxide) hold the fractures open.

Hydraulic fracking began as an experiment in 1947, and the first commercially successful application followed in 1949. As of 2012, 2.5 million "frac jobs" had been performed worldwide on oil and gas wells, over one million of those within the U.S. Such treatment is generally necessary to achieve adequate flow rates in shale gas, tight gas, tight oil, and coal seam gas wells. Some hydraulic fractures can form naturally in certain veins or dikes. Drilling and hydraulic fracking have made the United States a major crude oil exporter as of 2019, but leakage of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, has dramatically increased. Increased oil and gas production from the decade-long fracking boom has led to lower prices for consumers, with near-record lows of the share of household income going to energy expenditures.

Fracking is highly controversial. Its proponents highlight the economic benefits of more extensively accessible hydrocarbons (such as petroleum and natural gas), the benefits of replacing coal with natural gas, which burns more cleanly and emits less carbon dioxide (CO2), and the benefits of energy independence. Opponents of fracking argue that these are outweighed by the environmental impacts, which include groundwater and surface water contamination, noise and air pollution, the triggering of earthquakes, and the resulting hazards to public health and the environment. Research has found adverse health effects in populations living near hydraulic fracturing sites, including confirmation of chemical, physical, and psychosocial hazards such as pregnancy and birth outcomes, migraine headaches, chronic rhinosinusitis, severe fatigue, asthma exacerbations and psychological stress. Adherence to regulation and safety procedures are required to avoid further negative impacts.

The scale of methane leakage associated with hydraulic fracking is uncertain, and there is some evidence that leakage may cancel out any greenhouse gas emissions benefit of natural gas relative to other fossil fuels.

Increases in seismic activity following hydraulic fracking along dormant or previously unknown faults are sometimes caused by the deep-injection disposal of fracking flowback fluid (a byproduct of hydraulically fracked wells), and produced formation brine (a byproduct of both fractured and non-fractured oil and gas wells). For these reasons, hydraulic fracturing is under international scrutiny, restricted in some countries, and banned altogether in others. The European Union is drafting regulations that would permit the controlled application of hydraulic fracturing.

Geology

Main article: Fracture (geology)

Mechanics

Fracturing rocks at great depth frequently become suppressed by pressure due to the weight of the overlying rock strata and the cementation of the formation. This suppression process is particularly significant in "tensile" (Mode 1) fractures which require the walls of the fracture to move against this pressure. Fracturing occurs when effective stress is overcome by the pressure of fluids within the rock. The minimum principal stress becomes tensile and exceeds the tensile strength of the material. Fractures formed in this way are generally oriented in a plane perpendicular to the minimum principal stress, and for this reason, hydraulic fractures in wellbores can be used to determine the orientation of stresses. In natural examples, such as dikes or vein-filled fractures, the orientations can be used to infer past states of stress.

Veins

Most mineral vein systems are a result of repeated natural fracturing during periods of relatively high pore fluid pressure. The effect of high pore fluid pressure on the formation process of mineral vein systems is particularly evident in "crack-seal" veins, where the vein material is part of a series of discrete fracturing events, and extra vein material is deposited on each occasion. One example of long-term repeated natural fracturing is in the effects of seismic activity. Stress levels rise and fall episodically, and earthquakes can cause large volumes of connate water to be expelled from fluid-filled fractures. This process is referred to as "seismic pumping".

Dikes

Minor intrusions in the upper part of the crust, such as dikes, propagate in the form of fluid-filled cracks. In such cases, the fluid is magma. In sedimentary rocks with a significant water content, fluid at fracture tip will be steam.

History

Precursors

Fracking as a method to stimulate shallow, hard rock oil wells dates back to the 1860s, though the general concept of using water pressure to destroy rock was known as early as ancient Rome, in the form of ruina montium. Dynamite or nitroglycerin detonations were used to increase oil and natural gas production from petroleum bearing formations. On 24 April 1865, US Civil War veteran Col. Edward A. L. Roberts received a patent for an "exploding torpedo". It was employed in Pennsylvania, New York, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Texas, and West Virginia using liquid and also, later, solidified nitroglycerin. Companies like Lightning Torpedo Company used this process in Oklahoma and Texas. Later still the same method was applied to water and gas wells. Stimulation of wells with acid, instead of explosive fluids, was introduced in the 1930s. Due to acid etching, fractures would not close completely, resulting in further productivity increase.

20th century applications

Harold Hamm, Aubrey McClendon, Tom Ward and George P. Mitchell are each considered to have pioneered hydraulic fracking innovations toward practical applications.

Oil and gas wells

The relationship between well performance and treatment pressures was studied by Floyd Farris of Stanolind Oil and Gas Corporation. This study was the basis of the first hydraulic fracturing experiment, conducted in 1947 at the Hugoton gas field in Grant County of southwestern Kansas by Stanolind. For the well treatment, 1000 USgal of gelled gasoline (essentially napalm) and sand from the Arkansas River was injected into the gas-producing limestone formation at 2400 ft. The experiment was not very successful as the deliverability of the well did not change appreciably. The process was further described by J.B. Clark of Stanolind in his paper published in 1948. A patent on this process was issued in 1949 and an exclusive license was granted to the Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Company. On 17 March 1949, Halliburton performed the first two commercial hydraulic fracking treatments in Stephens County, Oklahoma, and Archer County, Texas. Since then, hydraulic fracking has been used to stimulate approximately one million oil and gas wells in various geologic regimes with good success.

In contrast with large-scale hydraulic fracturing used in low-permeability formations, small hydraulic fracturing treatments are commonly used in high-permeability formations to remedy "skin damage", a low-permeability zone that sometimes forms at the rock-borehole interface. In such cases the fracturing may extend only a few feet from the borehole.

In the Soviet Union, the first hydraulic proppant fracturing was carried out in 1952. Other countries in Europe and Northern Africa subsequently employed hydraulic fracturing techniques including Norway, Poland, Czechoslovakia (before 1989), Yugoslavia (before 1991), Hungary, Austria, France, Italy, Bulgaria, Romania, Turkey, Tunisia, and Algeria.

Massive fracturing

Massive hydraulic fracturing (also known as high-volume hydraulic fracturing) is a technique first applied by Pan American Petroleum in Stephens County, Oklahoma, US in 1968. The definition of massive hydraulic fracturing varies, but generally refers to treatments injecting over 150 short tons, or approximately 300,000 pounds (136 metric tonnes), of proppant.

American geologists gradually became aware that there were huge volumes of gas-saturated sandstones with permeability too low (generally less than 0.1 millidarcy) to recover the gas economically. Starting in 1973, massive hydraulic fracturing was used in thousands of gas wells in the San Juan Basin, Denver Basin, the Piceance Basin, and the Green River Basin, and in other hard rock formations of the western US. Other tight sandstone wells in the US made economically viable by massive hydraulic fracturing were in the Clinton-Medina Sandstone (Ohio, Pennsylvania, and New York), and Cotton Valley Sandstone (Texas and Louisiana).

Massive hydraulic fracturing quickly spread in the late 1970s to western Canada, Rotliegend and Carboniferous gas-bearing sandstones in Germany, Netherlands (onshore and offshore gas fields), and the United Kingdom in the North Sea.

Horizontal oil or gas wells were unusual until the late 1980s. Then, operators in Texas began completing thousands of oil wells by drilling horizontally in the Austin Chalk, and giving massive slickwater hydraulic fracturing treatments to the wellbores. Horizontal wells proved much more effective than vertical wells in producing oil from tight chalk; sedimentary beds are usually nearly horizontal, so horizontal wells have much larger contact areas with the target formation.

Hydraulic fracturing operations have grown exponentially since the mid-1990s, when technologic advances and increases in the price of natural gas made this technique economically viable.

Shales

Hydraulic fracturing of shales goes back at least to 1965, when some operators in the Big Sandy gas field of eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia started hydraulically fracturing the Ohio Shale and Cleveland Shale, using relatively small fracs. The frac jobs generally increased production, especially from lower-yielding wells.

In 1976, the United States government started the Eastern Gas Shales Project, which included numerous public-private hydraulic fracturing demonstration projects. During the same period, the Gas Research Institute, a gas industry research consortium, received approval for research and funding from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

In 1997, Nick Steinsberger, an engineer of Mitchell Energy (now part of Devon Energy), applied the slickwater fracturing technique, using more water and higher pump pressure than previous fracturing techniques, which was used in East Texas in the Barnett Shale of north Texas. This new completion technique made gas extraction widely economical in the Barnett Shale, and was later applied to other shales, including the Eagle Ford and Bakken Shale. George P. Mitchell has been called the "father of fracking" because of his role in applying it in shales. The first horizontal well in the Barnett Shale was drilled in 1991, but was not widely done in the Barnett until it was demonstrated that gas could be economically extracted from vertical wells in the Barnett.

As of 2013, massive hydraulic fracturing is being applied on a commercial scale to shales in the United States, Canada, and China. Several additional countries are planning to use hydraulic fracturing.

Process

According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), hydraulic fracturing is a process to stimulate a natural gas, oil, or geothermal well to maximize extraction. The EPA defines the broader process to include acquisition of source water, well construction, well stimulation, and waste disposal.

Method

A hydraulic fracture is formed by pumping fracturing fluid into a wellbore at a rate sufficient to increase pressure at the target depth (determined by the location of the well casing perforations), to exceed that of the fracture gradient (pressure gradient) of the rock. The fracture gradient is defined as pressure increase per unit of depth relative to density, and is usually measured in pounds per square inch, per foot (psi/ft). The rock cracks, and the fracture fluid permeates the rock extending the crack further, and further, and so on. Fractures are localized as pressure drops off with the rate of frictional loss, which is relative to the distance from the well. Operators typically try to maintain "fracture width", or slow its decline following treatment, by introducing a proppant into the injected fluida material such as grains of sand, ceramic, or other particulate, thus preventing the fractures from closing when injection is stopped and pressure removed. Consideration of proppant strength and prevention of proppant failure becomes more important at greater depths where pressure and stresses on fractures are higher. The propped fracture is permeable enough to allow the flow of gas, oil, salt water and hydraulic fracturing fluids to the well.

During the process, fracturing fluid leakoff (loss of fracturing fluid from the fracture channel into the surrounding permeable rock) occurs. If not controlled, it can exceed 70% of the injected volume. This may result in formation matrix damage, adverse formation fluid interaction, and altered fracture geometry, thereby decreasing efficiency.

The location of one or more fractures along the length of the borehole is strictly controlled by various methods that create or seal holes in the side of the wellbore. Hydraulic fracturing is performed in cased wellbores, and the zones to be fractured are accessed by perforating the casing at those locations.

Hydraulic-fracturing equipment used in oil and natural gas fields usually consists of a slurry blender, one or more high-pressure, high-volume fracturing pumps (typically powerful triplex or quintuplex pumps) and a monitoring unit. Associated equipment includes fracturing tanks, one or more units for storage and handling of proppant, high-pressure treating iron, a chemical additive unit (used to accurately monitor chemical addition), fracking hose (low-pressure flexible hoses), and many gauges and meters for flow rate, fluid density, and treating pressure. Chemical additives are typically 0.5% of the total fluid volume. Fracturing equipment operates over a range of pressures and injection rates, and can reach up to 100 MPa and 265 L/s.

Well types

A distinction can be made between conventional, low-volume hydraulic fracturing, used to stimulate high-permeability reservoirs for a single well, and unconventional, high-volume hydraulic fracturing, used in the completion of tight gas and shale gas wells. High-volume hydraulic fracturing usually requires higher pressures than low-volume fracturing; the higher pressures are needed to push out larger volumes of fluid and proppant that extend farther from the borehole.

Horizontal drilling involves wellbores with a terminal drillhole completed as a "lateral" that extends parallel with the rock layer containing the substance to be extracted. For example, laterals extend 1500 to in the Barnett Shale basin in Texas, and up to 10000 ft in the Bakken formation in North Dakota. In contrast, a vertical well only accesses the thickness of the rock layer, typically 50 -. Horizontal drilling reduces surface disruptions as fewer wells are required to access the same volume of rock.

Drilling often plugs up the pore spaces at the wellbore wall, reducing permeability at and near the wellbore. This reduces flow into the borehole from the surrounding rock formation, and partially seals off the borehole from the surrounding rock. Low-volume hydraulic fracturing can be used to restore permeability.

Fracturing fluids

Main article: Hydraulic fracturing proppants, List of additives for hydraulic fracturing

The main purposes of fracturing fluid are to extend fractures, add lubrication, change gel strength, and to carry proppant into the formation. There are two methods of transporting proppant in the fluidhigh-rate and high-viscosity. High-viscosity fracturing tends to cause large dominant fractures, while high-rate (slickwater) fracturing causes small spread-out micro-fractures.

Water-soluble gelling agents (such as guar gum) increase viscosity and efficiently deliver proppant into the formation.

Fluid is typically a slurry of water, proppant, and chemical additives.

When propane is used it is turned into vapor by the high pressure and high temperature. The propane vapor and natural gas both return to the surface and can be collected, making it easier to reuse and/or resale. None of the chemicals used will return to the surface. Only the propane used will return from what was used in the process.

The proppant is a granular material that prevents the created fractures from closing after the fracturing treatment. Types of proppant include silica sand, resin-coated sand, bauxite, and man-made ceramics. The choice of proppant depends on the type of permeability or grain strength needed. In some formations, where the pressure is great enough to crush grains of natural silica sand, higher-strength proppants such as bauxite or ceramics may be used. The most commonly used proppant is silica sand, though proppants of uniform size and shape, such as a ceramic proppant, are believed to be more effective.

The fracturing fluid varies depending on fracturing type desired, and the conditions of specific wells being fractured, and water characteristics. The fluid can be gel, foam, or slickwater-based. Fluid choices are tradeoffs: more viscous fluids, such as gels, are better at keeping proppant in suspension; while less-viscous and lower-friction fluids, such as slickwater, allow fluid to be pumped at higher rates, to create fractures farther out from the wellbore. Important material properties of the fluid include viscosity, pH, various rheological factors, and others.

Water is mixed with sand and chemicals to create hydraulic fracturing fluid. Approximately 40,000 gallons of chemicals are used per fracturing. A typical fracture treatment uses between 3 and 12 additive chemicals. Although there may be unconventional fracturing fluids, typical chemical additives can include one or more of the following:

• Acids—hydrochloric acid or acetic acid is used in the pre-fracturing stage for cleaning the perforations and initiating fissure in the near-wellbore rock.
• Sodium chloride (salt)—delays breakdown of gel polymer chains.
• Polyacrylamide and other friction reducers decrease turbulence in fluid flow and pipe friction, thus allowing the pumps to pump at a higher rate without having greater pressure on the surface.
• Ethylene glycol—prevents formation of scale deposits in the pipe.
• Borate salts—used for maintaining fluid viscosity during the temperature increase.
• Sodium and potassium carbonates—used for maintaining effectiveness of crosslinkers.
• Glutaraldehyde- a biocide that prevents pipe corrosion from microbial activity.
• Guar gum and other water-soluble gelling agents—increases viscosity of the fracturing fluid to deliver proppant into the formation more efficiently.
• Citric acid—used for corrosion prevention.
• Isopropanol—used to winterize the chemicals to ensure it doesn't freeze.

The most common chemical used for hydraulic fracturing in the United States in 2005–2009 was methanol, while some other most widely used chemicals were isopropyl alcohol, 2-butoxyethanol, and ethylene glycol.

Typical fluid types are:

• Conventional linear gels. These gels are cellulose derivative (carboxymethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, carboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose), guar or its derivatives (hydroxypropyl guar, carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl guar), mixed with other chemicals.
• Borate-crosslinked fluids. These are guar-based fluids cross-linked with boron ions (from aqueous borax/boric acid solution). These gels have higher viscosity at pH 9 onwards and are used to carry proppant. After the fracturing job, the pH is reduced to 3–4 so that the cross-links are broken, and the gel is less viscous and can be pumped out.
• Organometallic-crosslinked fluids – zirconium, chromium, antimony, titanium salts – are known to crosslink guar-based gels. The crosslinking mechanism is not reversible, so once the proppant is pumped down along with cross-linked gel, the fracturing part is done. The gels are broken down with appropriate breakers.
• Aluminium phosphate-ester oil gels. Aluminium phosphate and ester oils are slurried to form cross-linked gel. These are one of the first known gelling systems.

For slickwater fluids the use of sweeps is common. Sweeps are temporary reductions in the proppant concentration, which help ensure that the well is not overwhelmed with proppant. As the fracturing process proceeds, viscosity-reducing agents such as oxidizers and enzyme breakers are sometimes added to the fracturing fluid to deactivate the gelling agents and encourage flowback. Such oxidizers react with and break down the gel, reducing the fluid's viscosity and ensuring that no proppant is pulled from the formation. An enzyme acts as a catalyst for breaking down the gel. Sometimes pH modifiers are used to break down the crosslink at the end of a hydraulic fracturing job, since many require a pH buffer system to stay viscous. At the end of the job, the well is commonly flushed with water under pressure (sometimes blended with a friction reducing chemical.) Some (but not all) injected fluid is recovered. This fluid is managed by several methods, including underground injection control, treatment, discharge, recycling, and temporary storage in pits or containers. New technology is continually developing to better handle waste water and improve re-usability.

Fracture monitoring

Measurements of the pressure and rate during the growth of a hydraulic fracture, with knowledge of fluid properties and proppant being injected into the well, provides the most common and simplest method of monitoring a hydraulic fracture treatment. This data along with knowledge of the underground geology can be used to model information such as length, width and conductivity of a propped fracture.

Radionuclide monitoring

Main article: Hydraulic fracturing and radionuclides

Injection of radioactive tracers along with the fracturing fluid is sometimes used to determine the injection profile and location of created fractures. Radiotracers are selected to have the readily detectable radiation, appropriate chemical properties, and a half-life and toxicity level that will minimize initial and residual contamination. Radioactive isotopes chemically bonded to glass (sand) and/or resin beads may also be injected to track fractures. For example, plastic pellets coated with 10 GBq of Ag-110mm may be added to the proppant, or sand may be labelled with Ir-192, so that the proppant's progress can be monitored. Radiotracers such as Tc-99m and I-131 are also used to measure flow rates. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission publishes guidelines which list a wide range of radioactive materials in solid, liquid and gaseous forms that may be used as tracers and limit the amount that may be used per injection and per well of each radionuclide.

A new technique in well-monitoring involves fiber-optic cables outside the casing. Using the fiber optics, temperatures can be measured every foot along the well – even while the wells are being fracked and pumped. By monitoring the temperature of the well, engineers can determine how much hydraulic fracturing fluid different parts of the well use as well as how much natural gas or oil they collect, during hydraulic fracturing operation and when the well is producing.

Microseismic monitoring

For more advanced applications, microseismic monitoring is sometimes used to estimate the size and orientation of induced fractures. Microseismic activity is measured by placing an array of geophones in a nearby wellbore. By mapping the location of any small seismic events associated with the growing fracture, the approximate geometry of the fracture is inferred. Tiltmeter arrays deployed on the surface or down a well provide another technology for monitoring strain

Microseismic mapping is very similar geophysically to seismology. In earthquake seismology, seismometers scattered on or near the surface of the earth record S-waves and P-waves that are released during an earthquake event. This allows for motion along the fault plane to be estimated and its location in the Earth's subsurface mapped. Hydraulic fracturing, an increase in formation stress proportional to the net fracturing pressure, as well as an increase in pore pressure due to leakoff. Tensile stresses are generated ahead of the fracture's tip, generating large amounts of shear stress. The increases in pore water pressure and in formation stress combine and affect weaknesses near the hydraulic fracture, like natural fractures, joints, and bedding planes.

Different methods have different location errors and advantages. Accuracy of microseismic event mapping is dependent on the signal-to-noise ratio and the distribution of sensors. Accuracy of events located by seismic inversion is improved by sensors placed in multiple azimuths from the monitored borehole. In a downhole array location, accuracy of events is improved by being close to the monitored borehole (high signal-to-noise ratio).

Monitoring of microseismic events induced by reservoir stimulation has become a key aspect in evaluation of hydraulic fractures, and their optimization. The main goal of hydraulic fracture monitoring is to completely characterize the induced fracture structure, and distribution of conductivity within a formation. Geomechanical analysis, such as understanding a formations material properties, in-situ conditions, and geometries, helps monitoring by providing a better definition of the environment in which the fracture network propagates. The next task is to know the location of proppant within the fracture and the distribution of fracture conductivity. This can be monitored using multiple types of techniques to finally develop a reservoir model that accurately predicts well performance.

Horizontal completions

Since the early 2000s, advances in drilling and completion technology have made horizontal wellbores much more economical. Horizontal wellbores allow far greater exposure to a formation than conventional vertical wellbores. This is particularly useful in shale formations which do not have sufficient permeability to produce economically with a vertical well. Such wells, when drilled onshore, are now usually hydraulically fractured in a number of stages, especially in North America. The type of wellbore completion is used to determine how many times a formation is fractured, and at what locations along the horizontal section.

In North America, shale reservoirs such as the Bakken, Barnett, Montney, Haynesville, Marcellus, and most recently the Eagle Ford, Niobrara and Utica shales are drilled horizontally through the producing intervals, completed and fractured. The method by which the fractures are placed along the wellbore is most commonly achieved by one of two methods, known as "plug and perf" and "sliding sleeve".

The wellbore for a plug-and-perf job is generally composed of standard steel casing, cemented or uncemented, set in the drilled hole. Once the drilling rig has been removed, a wireline truck is used to perforate near the bottom of the well, and then fracturing fluid is pumped. Then the wireline truck sets a plug in the well to temporarily seal off that section so the next section of the wellbore can be treated. Another stage is pumped, and the process is repeated along the horizontal length of the wellbore.

The wellbore for the sliding sleeve technique is different in that the sliding sleeves are included at set spacings in the steel casing at the time it is set in place. The sliding sleeves are usually all closed at this time. When the well is due to be fractured, the bottom sliding sleeve is opened using one of several activation techniques and the first stage gets pumped. Once finished, the next sleeve is opened, concurrently isolating the previous stage, and the process repeats. For the sliding sleeve method, wireline is usually not required.

These completion techniques may allow for more than 30 stages to be pumped into the horizontal section of a single well if required, which is far more than would typically be pumped into a vertical well that had far fewer feet of producing zone exposed.

Uses

Hydraulic fracturing is used to increase the rate at which substances such as petroleum or natural gas can be recovered from subterranean natural reservoirs. Reservoirs are typically porous sandstones, limestones or dolomite rocks, but also include "unconventional reservoirs" such as shale rock or coal beds. Hydraulic fracturing enables the extraction of natural gas and oil from rock formations deep below the earth's surface (generally 5000 –), which is greatly below typical groundwater reservoir levels. At such depth, there may be insufficient permeability or reservoir pressure to allow natural gas and oil to flow from the rock into the wellbore at high economic return. Thus, creating conductive fractures in the rock is instrumental in extraction from naturally impermeable shale reservoirs. Permeability is measured in the microdarcy to nanodarcy range. Fractures are a conductive path connecting a larger volume of reservoir to the well. So-called "super fracking" creates cracks deeper in the rock formation to release more oil and gas, and increases efficiency. The yield for typical shale bores generally falls off after the first year or two, but the peak producing life of a well can be extended to several decades.

Non-oil/gas uses

While the main industrial use of hydraulic fracturing is in stimulating production from oil and gas wells, hydraulic fracturing is also applied:

• To stimulate groundwater wells
• To precondition or induce rock cave-ins mining
• As a means of enhancing waste remediation, usually hydrocarbon waste or spills
• To dispose waste by injection deep into rock
• To measure stress in the Earth
• For electricity generation in enhanced geothermal systems
• To increase injection rates for geologic sequestration of
• To store electrical energy, pumped storage hydroelectricity

Since the late 1970s, hydraulic fracturing has been used, in some cases, to increase the yield of drinking water from wells in a number of countries, including the United States, Australia, and South Africa.

Economic effects

Hydraulic fracturing has been seen as one of the key methods of extracting unconventional oil and unconventional gas resources. According to the International Energy Agency, the remaining technically recoverable resources of shale gas are estimated to amount to 208 e12m3, tight gas to 76 e12m3, and coalbed methane to 47 e12m3. As a rule, formations of these resources have lower permeability than conventional gas formations. Therefore, depending on the geological characteristics of the formation, specific technologies such as hydraulic fracturing are required. Although there are also other methods to extract these resources, such as conventional drilling or horizontal drilling, hydraulic fracturing is one of the key methods making their extraction economically viable. The multi-stage fracturing technique has facilitated the development of shale gas and light tight oil production in the United States and is believed to do so in the other countries with unconventional hydrocarbon resources.

A large majority of studies indicate that hydraulic fracturing in the United States has had a strong positive economic benefit so far. The Brookings Institution estimates that the benefits of Shale Gas alone has led to a net economic benefit of $48 billion per year. Most of this benefit is within the consumer and industrial sectors due to the significantly reduced prices for natural gas. Other studies have suggested that the economic benefits are outweighed by the externalities and that the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) from less carbon- and water-intensive sources is lower.

The primary benefit of hydraulic fracturing is to offset imports of natural gas and oil, where the cost paid to producers otherwise exits the domestic economy. However, shale oil and gas is highly subsidised in the US, and has not yet covered production costs – meaning that the cost of hydraulic fracturing is paid for in income taxes, and in many cases is up to double the cost paid at the pump.

Research suggests that hydraulic fracturing wells have an adverse effect on agricultural productivity in the vicinity of the wells. One paper found "that productivity of an irrigated crop decreases by 5.7% when a well is drilled during the agriculturally active months within 11–20 km radius of a producing township. This effect becomes smaller and weaker as the distance between township and wells increases." The findings imply that the introduction of hydraulic fracturing wells to Alberta cost the province $14.8 million in 2014 due to the decline in the crop productivity,

The Energy Information Administration of the US Department of Energy estimates that 45% of US gas supply will come from shale gas by 2035 (with the vast majority of this replacing conventional gas, which has a lower greenhouse-gas footprint).

Public debate

Politics and public policy

Popular movement and civil society organizations

An anti-fracking movement has emerged both internationally with involvement of international environmental organizations and nations such as France and locally in affected areas such as Balcombe in Sussex where the Balcombe drilling protest was in progress during mid-2013. The considerable opposition against hydraulic fracturing activities in local townships in the United States has led companies to adopt a variety of public relations measures to reassure the public, including the employment of former military personnel with training in psychological warfare operations. According to Matt Pitzarella, the communications director at Range Resources, employees trained in the Middle East have been valuable to Range Resources in Pennsylvania, when dealing with emotionally charged township meetings and advising townships on zoning and local ordinances dealing with hydraulic fracturing.

There have been many protests directed at hydraulic fracturing. For example, ten people were arrested in 2013 during an anti-fracking protest near New Matamoras, Ohio, after they illegally entered a development zone and latched themselves to drilling equipment. In northwest Pennsylvania, there was a drive-by shooting at a well site, in which someone shot two rounds of a small-caliber rifle in the direction of a drilling rig. In Washington County, Pennsylvania, a contractor working on a gas pipeline found a pipe bomb that had been placed where a pipeline was to be constructed, which local authorities said would have caused a "catastrophe" had they not discovered and detonated it.

U.S. government and corporate lobbying

The United States Department of State established the Global Shale Gas Initiative to persuade governments around the world to give concessions to the major oil and gas companies to set up fracking operations. A document from the United States diplomatic cables leak show that, as part of this project, U.S. officials convened conferences for foreign government officials that featured presentations by major oil and gas company representatives and by public relations professionals with expertise on how to assuage populations of target countries whose citizens were often quite hostile to fracking on their lands. The US government project succeeded as many countries on several continents acceded to the idea of granting concessions for fracking; Poland, for example, agreed to permit fracking by the major oil and gas corporations on nearly a third of its territory. The US Export-Import Bank, an agency of the US government, provided $4.7 billion in financing for fracking operations set up since 2010 in Queensland, Australia.

Alleged Russian state advocacy

In 2014 a number of European officials suggested that several major European protests against hydraulic fracturing (with mixed success in Lithuania and Ukraine) may be partially sponsored by Gazprom, Russia's state-controlled gas company. The New York Times suggested that Russia saw its natural gas exports to Europe as a key element of its geopolitical influence, and that this market would diminish if hydraulic fracturing is adopted in Eastern Europe, as it opens up significant shale gas reserves in the region. Russian officials have on numerous occasions made public statements to the effect that hydraulic fracturing "poses a huge environmental problem".

Current fracking operations

Hydraulic fracturing is currently taking place in the United States in Arkansas, California, Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming. As of 2024,  there are currently seven major fracking operations active in the United States. These are the Bakken operation in North Dakota and Montane, Niobrara operation in Wyoming and Colorado, Anandarko in Northern Texas and Oklahoma, Permian and Eagle Ford in Texas, Haynesville in Texas and Louisiana, and the large Appalachia site. California has had a longtime moratorium on fracking and Vermont, New York, Maryland, Washington, and Oregon all have statewide fracking bans.

Although a hydraulic fracturing moratorium was recently lifted in the United Kingdom, the government is proceeding cautiously because of concerns about earthquakes and the environmental effect of drilling. Hydraulic fracturing is currently banned in France and Bulgaria.

Documentary films

Josh Fox's 2010 Academy Award nominated film Gasland became a center of opposition to hydraulic fracturing of shale. The movie presented problems with groundwater contamination near well sites in Pennsylvania, Wyoming and Colorado. Energy in Depth, an oil and gas industry lobbying group, called the film's facts into question. In response, a rebuttal of *Energy in Depth'*s claims of inaccuracy was posted on Gasland's website. The Director of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) offered to be interviewed as part of the film if he could review what was included from the interview in the final film but Fox declined the offer. ExxonMobil, Chevron Corporation and ConocoPhillips aired advertisements during 2011 and 2012 that claimed to describe the economic and environmental benefits of natural gas and argue that hydraulic fracturing was safe.

The 2012 film Promised Land, starring Matt Damon, takes on hydraulic fracturing. The gas industry countered the film's criticisms of hydraulic fracturing with flyers, and Twitter and Facebook posts.

In January 2013, Northern Irish journalist and filmmaker Phelim McAleer released a crowdfunded documentary called FrackNation as a response to the statements made by Fox in Gasland, claiming it "tells the truth about fracking for natural gas". FrackNation premiered on Mark Cuban's AXS TV. The premiere corresponded with the release of Promised Land.

In April 2013, Josh Fox released Gasland 2, his "international odyssey uncovering a trail of secrets, lies and contamination related to hydraulic fracking". It challenges the gas industry's portrayal of natural gas as a clean and safe alternative to oil as a myth, and that hydraulically fractured wells inevitably leak over time, contaminating water and air, hurting families, and endangering the Earth's climate with the potent greenhouse gas methane.

In 2014, Scott Cannon of Video Innovations released the documentary The Ethics of Fracking. The film covers the politics, spiritual, scientific, medical and professional points of view on hydraulic fracturing. It also digs into the way the gas industry portrays hydraulic fracturing in their advertising.

In 2015, the Canadian documentary film Fractured Land had its world premiere at the Hot Docs Canadian International Documentary Festival.

Research issues

Typically the funding source of the research studies is a focal point of controversy. Concerns have been raised about research funded by foundations and corporations, or by environmental groups, which can at times lead to at least the appearance of unreliable studies. Several organizations, researchers, and media outlets have reported difficulty in conducting and reporting the results of studies on hydraulic fracturing due to industry and governmental pressure, and expressed concern over possible censoring of environmental reports. Some have argued there is a need for more research into the environmental and health effects of the technique.

Health risks

There is concern over the possible adverse public health implications of hydraulic fracturing activity. A 2011 hazard assessment recommended full disclosure of chemicals used for hydraulic fracturing and drilling as many have immediate health effects, and many may have long-term health effects.

In June 2014 Public Health England published a review of the potential public health impacts of exposures to chemical and radioactive pollutants as a result of shale gas extraction in the UK, based on the examination of literature and data from countries where hydraulic fracturing already occurs. The executive summary of the report stated: "An assessment of the currently available evidence indicates that the potential risks to public health from exposure to the emissions associated with shale gas extraction will be low if the operations are properly run and regulated. Most evidence suggests that contamination of groundwater, if it occurs, is most likely to be caused by leakage through the vertical borehole. Contamination of groundwater from the underground hydraulic fracturing process itself (i.e. the fracturing of the shale) is unlikely. However, surface spills of hydraulic fracturing fluids or wastewater may affect groundwater, and emissions to air also have the potential to impact on health. Where potential risks have been identified in the literature, the reported problems are typically a result of operational failure and a poor regulatory environment."

A 2012 report prepared for the European Union Directorate-General for the Environment identified potential risks to humans from air pollution and ground water contamination posed by hydraulic fracturing. A 2012 guidance for pediatric nurses in the US said that hydraulic fracturing had a potential negative impact on public health and that pediatric nurses should be prepared to gather information on such topics so as to advocate for improved community health.

A 2017 study in The American Economic Review found that "additional well pads drilled within 1 kilometer of a community water system intake increases shale gas-related contaminants in drinking water."

A 2022 study conduced by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and published in Nature Energy found that elderly people living near or downwind of unconventional oil and gas development (UOGD) -- which involves extraction methods including fracking—are at greater risk of experiencing early death compared with elderly persons who don't live near such operations.

Statistics collected by the U.S. Department of Labor and analyzed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention show a correlation between drilling activity and the number of occupational injuries related to drilling and motor vehicle accidents, explosions, falls, and fires. Extraction workers are also at risk for developing pulmonary diseases, including lung cancer and silicosis (the latter because of exposure to silica dust generated from rock drilling and the handling of sand). The U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) identified exposure to airborne silica as a health hazard to workers conducting some hydraulic fracturing operations. NIOSH and OSHA issued a joint hazard alert on this topic in June 2012.

Additionally, the extraction workforce is at increased risk for radiation exposure. Fracking activities often require drilling into rock that contains naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM), such as radon, thorium, and uranium.

Another report done by the Canadian Medical Journal reported that after researching they identified 55 factors that may cause cancer, including 20 that have been shown to increase the risk of leukemia and lymphoma. The Yale Public Health analysis warns that millions of people living within a mile of fracking wells may have been exposed to these chemicals.

Despite these health concerns and efforts to institute a moratorium on fracking until its environmental and health effects are better understood, the United States continues to rely heavily on fossil fuel energy. In 2017, 37% of annual U.S. energy consumption is derived from petroleum, 29% from natural gas, 14% from coal, and 9% from nuclear sources, with only 11% supplied by renewable energy, such as wind and solar power.

Environmental justice

Fracking can cause many different environmental justice issues. One of the main justice issues associated with fracking is the effect the wells have on the communities they are placed in. A majority of the fracking sites in the United States are located in poor, rural areas. The locations of the wells result in the poor, people of color, and native peoples being disproportionately affected by the negative externalities of fracking operations.

Many fracking companies claim their sites will result in more job opportunities for the communities they are located in. However, in an article interviewing the author of a report on Ohio fracking sites, the report author, Sean O'Leary stated "Completed wells don't need many permanent employees. And many people who work in drilling and fracking come outside the local area." This becomes an issue because many of these fracking sites are built in poor, rural communities, where people need employment. There have been many cases where there has been an observed decline in employment following fracking implementation. Since the Appalachian fracking boom in 2008, thirty large gas companies in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia have logged a large economic output, but jobs in the area fell by 1% while nationally job opportunities rose 14%, employment grew 4% in the fracking regions while the nation employment rate grew by 10%, and income had grown three quarters the rate of the national average.  According to Sean O'Leary,  a senior researcher at Ohio River Valley Institute, makes the point that "While some studies have found that economic conditions improve in areas where fracking is introduced, these studies fail to negate the fact that the negative externalities from fracking are centralized in these regions (poor rural regions)  and that they often burden those who do not receive economic benefits from fracking." Though many regions are promised economic benefits, typically in poor rural areas where this is needed, these benefits never come to fruition. One such case is prevalent in North Jackson Ohio, where a local, Mel Cadle allowed the construction of wells on his farm with the promise of lucrative royalties, but, as Cadle stated, "I don't have any income from these wells. I lost five acres for nothing," as a result of the oil companies making false promises and not providing him any sort of financial gain for the use of his land. Native peoples also face a disproportionate amount of fracking in their communities, as companies and the government often take their land and destroy it for mineral resources such as gas and oil. According to the Classic Journal, legislation has been created in the United States to allow this to occur, specifically federal acts such as the Mineral Leasing Act of 1938 and the Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975 that both restrict Natives' rights to resources on their lands. A major issue associated with fracking that oftentimes falls onto Native Tribes' is chemical filled wastewater from fracking sites. A study was conducted by Shelley Palmer and other University of Georgia faculty members exploring the negative impacts of fracking policies on Native American lands and communities states that "regulatory loopholes allow untreated wastewater from fracking to be disposed of onto Native American lands, resulting in pollution issues and human health hazards".

Some of the major environmental and health consequences associated with fracking result in rural communities where the wells are located to be disproportionately affected by water contamination, air contamination, and land contamination. Research conducted by law scholar Matthew Castell found that neither federal status nor common law provide affected communities and landowners with access to solutions or help for harms caused by fracking. Social science and environmental health researcher Vivian Underhill and Professor of sociology and environment and sustainability "found that from 2014 through 2024, 62% to 73% of reported fracks each year used at least one chemical that the Safe Drinking Water Act recognizes as detrimental to human health and the environment. If not for the Halliburton Loophole, these projects would have been subject to permitting and monitoring requirements, providing information for local communities about potential risks.

Environmental impacts

Main article: Environmental impact of fracking

PLEASE ADD NEW INFORMATION TO THE BODY OF THE MAIN Environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing ARTICLE. IF, IN THAT ARTICLE, IT IS IMPORTANT ENOUGH TO ADD TO THE LEAD OF THAT ARTICLE, PLEASE ADD IT TO THE LEAD OF THAT ARTICLE. ONLY IN THAT CASE, INCLUDE IT HERE. THE SECTION BELOW IS TAKEN FROM THE LEAD OF THAT ARTICLE PER WP:SUMMARY

The potential environmental effects of hydraulic fracturing include air pollution and contribution climate change, high water consumption, groundwater contamination, land use, induced earthquakes, noise pollution, and various health effects on humans.

Air contamination

Air emissions are primarily methane that escapes from wells, along with industrial emissions from equipment used in the extraction process. Modern UK and EU regulation requires zero emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Escape of methane is a bigger problem in older wells than in ones built under more recent EU legislation.

Water use and contamination

In December 2016 the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the "Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas: Impacts from the Hydraulic Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water Resources in the United States (Final Report)." The EPA found scientific evidence that hydraulic fracturing activities can impact drinking water resources. A few of the main reasons why drinking water can be contaminated according to the EPA are:

• Water removal to be used for fracking in times or areas of low water availability
• Spills while handling fracking fluids and chemicals that result in large volumes or high concentrations of chemicals reaching groundwater resources
• Injection of fracking fluids into wells when mishandling machinery, allowing gases or liquids to move to groundwater resources
• Injection of fracking fluids directly into groundwater resources
• Leak of defective hydraulic fracturing wastewater to surface water
• Disposal or storage of fracking wastewater in unlined pits resulting in contamination of groundwater resources.

The lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale oil are 21%-47% higher than those of conventional oil, while emissions from unconventional gas are from 6% lower to 43% higher than the emissions of conventional gas.

Hydraulic fracturing uses between 1.2 and of water per well, with large projects using up to 5 e6USgal. Additional water is used when wells are refractured. An average well requires 3 to of water over its lifetime. According to the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, greater volumes of fracturing fluids are required in Europe, where the shale depths average 1.5 times greater than in the U.S. Surface water may be contaminated through spillage and improperly built and maintained waste pits, and ground water can be contaminated if the fluid is able to escape the formation being fractured (through, for example, abandoned wells, fractures, and faults) or by produced water (the returning fluids, which also contain dissolved constituents such as minerals and brine waters). The possibility of groundwater contamination from brine and fracturing fluid leakage through old abandoned wells is low. Produced water is managed by underground injection, municipal and commercial wastewater treatment and discharge, self-contained systems at well sites or fields, and recycling to fracture future wells. Typically less than half of the produced water used to fracture the formation is recovered.

Fracking causes many different types of pollution, including water pollution. After the well is fracked and produces oil and gas, fracking fluids often remain underground, where it may contaminate groundwater and connect to aquifer systems. The wastewater produced from the operations is also toxic and must be stored correctly, treated, and then discharged, but it is often stored in holding ponds that can leak into the surrounding ground and impact wildlife. Federal and state responses to the impacted water resources have been mixed at best, "regulation is insufficient due to certain explicit exemptions from the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and the Clean Water Act granted by the Energy Policy Act of 2005.”

People obtain drinking water from either surface water, which includes rivers and reservoirs, or groundwater aquifers, accessed by public or private wells. There are a host of documented instances in which nearby groundwater has been contaminated by fracking activities, requiring residents with private wells to obtain outside sources of water for drinking and everyday use.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances also known as "PFAS" or "forever chemicals" have been linked to cancer and birth defects. The chemicals used in fracking stay in the environment. Once there those chemicals will eventually break down into PFAS. These chemicals can escape from drilling sites and into the groundwater. PFAS are able to leak into underground wells that store million gallons of wastewater.

In addition to water contamination, fracking uses a substantial amount of water. One well can use anywhere from 1.5 million to 16 million gallons of water. There is concern about the impact of fracking on local water resources, especially in the drier regions of the United States. These fracking sites are consuming millions of gallons of water from aquifers that are already dwindling. According to the New York Times, "Nationwide, fracking has used up nearly 1.5 trillion gallons of water since 2011. That's how much tap water the entire state of Texas uses in a year."

Land use

In the United States over 12 million acres are being used for fossil fuels. This is equivalent of six Yellowstone National Parks. About 3.6 ha of land is needed per each drill pad for surface installations. Well pad and supporting structure construction significantly fragments landscapes which likely has negative effects on wildlife. These sites need to be remediated after wells are exhausted. Each well pad (in average 10 wells per pad) needs during preparatory and hydraulic fracturing process about 800 to 2,500 days of noisy activity, which affect both residents and local wildlife. In addition, noise is created by continuous truck traffic (sand, etc.) needed in hydraulic fracturing. Research is underway to determine if human health has been affected by air and water pollution, and rigorous following of safety procedures and regulation is required to avoid harm and to manage the risk of accidents that could cause harm.

In July 2013, the US Federal Railroad Administration listed oil contamination by hydraulic fracturing chemicals as "a possible cause" of corrosion in oil tank cars.

Induced seismic activity

Hydraulic fracturing has been tied to induced seismicity or earthquakes in regions where little or no earthquakes were previously recorded. Fracking has been the major catalyst for at least 2% of earthquakes in the United States according to the United States Geological Survey, but could be higher. Geologists have known since the 1960s that pushing fluids into the ground, as done during fracking, can set off earthquakes, but the USGS has argued that this was ignored by many fossil-fuel companies. The connection was first recognized when a well was drilled outside a plant in Denver, and more than 700 small to modest size earthquakes ensued, corresponding with the volume and pressure of the injections into the well. Behind a large increase in these earthquakes are wastewater injection wells, in which wells are drilled horizontally and is used in many fracking operations. A U.S. Geological Survey reported that up to 7.9 million people in several states have a similar earthquake risk to that of California, with hydraulic fracturing and similar practices being a prime contributing factor.

Texas and Oklahoma have been two of the regions impacted most by fracking induced seismic activity. Prior to 2008, not a single earthquake had been recorded in the Dallas- Fort Worth region of Texas, but since then the region has been experiencing a sixfold increase in earthquakes. The rise in earthquakes in the area directly coincides with the increase in oil drilling activity. After aggressive drilling began in 2008 in Texas and Oklahoma regions, residents began feeling earthquakes, with more than 180 being recorded in Texas between October 30 of that year and May 31 of 2009. The largest recorded earthquake in Texas, ultimately resulting from fracking and drilling, was a 4.0 magnitude that occurred in 2018. A better understanding of the geology of the area being fracked and used for injection wells can be helpful in mitigating the potential for significant seismic events.

Regulations

Countries using or considering use of hydraulic fracturing have implemented different regulations, including developing federal and regional legislation, and local zoning limitations. The ban was upheld by an October 2013 ruling of the Constitutional Council. Some other countries such as Scotland have placed a temporary moratorium on the practice due to public health concerns and strong public opposition. Germany has announced draft regulations that would allow using hydraulic fracturing for the exploitation of shale gas deposits with the exception of wetland areas. Many states in Australia have either permanently or temporarily banned fracturing for hydrocarbons. In 2019, hydraulic fracturing was banned in UK.

The European Union has adopted a recommendation for minimum principles for using high-volume hydraulic fracturing.

In 2012, Vermont became the first state in the United States to ban hydraulic fracturing. On 17 December 2014, New York became the second state to issue a complete ban on any hydraulic fracturing due to potential risks to human health and the environment.

Sources

References

1. (January 2026). "What Are The Three Primary Methods Of Well Stimulation?". Infinity Energy Solutions }}{{self-published inline.
2. (2019). "Handbook of Fire and Explosion Protection Engineering Principles for Oil, Gas, Chemical, and Related Facilities".
3. Van Dyke JW. 1896. Increasing the flow of oil-wells. Patent No. US 556,651.
4. Grebe JJ and Stoesser SM 1935, Treatment of deep wells. Patent no. US 1,998,756,
5. (2010). "Hydraulic Fracturing: History of an Enduring Technology". Journal of Petroleum Technology.
6. (2016). "Complex Fluids and Hydraulic Fracturing". Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering.
7. (2021). "Acid stimulation: Fracking by stealth continues despite the moratorium in England". Energy Policy.
8. (2017). "Could fracking creep under the radar?". Nature.
9. (15 May 2012). "Kansas Geological Survey, Public Information Circular (PIC) 32". Kansas Geological Survey.
10. King, George E. (2012). "Hydraulic fracturing 101". Society of Petroleum Engineers.
11. (2005). "9: Processes of tectonism, magmatism and mineralization: Lessons from Europe". Ore Geology Reviews.
12. (3 February 2019). "The 'Monster' Texas Oil Field That Made the U.S. a Star in the World Market". [[The New York Times]].
13. (13 September 2019). "The best case for and against a fracking ban". [[Vox (website).
14. (24 February 2017). "Fracking fluid is leaking more often than we thought possible".
15. (17 December 2019). "A Decade in Which Fracking Rocked the Oil World". [[The Wall Street Journal]].
16. "2019 Sustainable Energy in America Factbook".
17. Urbina, Ian. "Drilling Down". The New York Times.
18. Hillard Huntington et al. [http://emf.stanford.edu/publications/emf_26_changing_the_game_emissions_and_market_implications_of_new_natural_gas_supplies/ EMF 26: Changing the Game? Emissions and Market Implications of New Natural Gas Supplies] {{Webarchive. link. (30 November 2020 Report. Stanford University. Energy Modeling Forum, 2013.)
19. (15 October 2018). "What is fracking and why is it controversial?". [[BBC News]].
20. (November 2010). "Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants, Volume 1: Bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity". National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), [[United States Department of Energy]].
21. (5 July 2017). "The Fracking Industry Deserves Our Gratitude".
22. Fischetti, Mark. (20 August 2013). "Groundwater Contamination May End the Gas-Fracking Boom". Scientific American.
23. (15 June 2019). "A Systematic Review of the Epidemiologic Literature Assessing Health Outcomes in Populations Living near Oil and Natural Gas Operations: Study Quality and Future Recommendations.". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
24. (2018). "High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing and Human Health Outcomes". Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine.
25. (2019). "Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health".
26. (June 2017). "Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).". Environmental Science and Pollution Research International.
27. Storrow, Benjamin. (2020-05-05). "Methane Leaks Erase Some of the Climate Benefits of Natural Gas".
28. (2020-04-23). "Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil producing basin in the U.S. from space - Methane Emissions from the Permian Basin". [[Science Advances]].
29. US Geological Survey, [https://energy.usgs.gov/EnvironmentalAspects/EnvironmentalAspectsofEnergyProductionandUse/ProducedWaters.aspx#3822110-overview Produced water, overview], accessed 8 November 2014.
30. [https://mises.org/library/government-roads-subsidies-and-costs-fracking Khan, Salmaan A.] "Government Roads, Subsidies, and the Costs of Fracking", Mises Institute, 19 June 2014. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
31. [https://marcellusdrilling.com/2016/07/fracking-legend-harold-hamm-next-secretary-of-energy/ ''Marcellus''] "Fracking Legend Harold Hamm – Next Secretary of Energy?", Marcellus Drilling News, 22 June 2016. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
32. (2000). "Analysis of Hydraulic Fracturing of High Permeability Gas Wells to Reduce Non-Darcy Skin Effects". Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology.
33. Ben E. Law and Charles W. Spencer, 1993, "Gas in tight reservoirs-an emerging major source of energy", ''in'' David G. Howell (ed.), ''The Future of Energy Gasses'', US Geological Survey, Professional Paper 1570, pp. 233–252.
34. C.R. Fast, G.B. Holman, and R. J. Covlin, "The application of massive hydraulic fracturing to the tight Muddy 'J' Formation, Wattenberg Field, Colorado", ''in'' Harry K. Veal, (ed.), ''Exploration Frontiers of the Central and Southern Rockies'' (Denver: [[Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists]], 1977) 293–300.
35. Robert Chancellor, "Mesaverde hydraulic fracture stimulation, northern Piceance Basin – progress report", ''in'' Harry K. Veal, (ed.), ''Exploration Frontiers of the Central and Southern Rockies'' (Denver: [[Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists]], 1977) 285–291.
36. (1993). "SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition".
37. (June 2013). "Fracking, the Environment, and Health". American Journal of Nursing.
38. E. O. Ray, [http://www.netl.doe.gov/kmd/cds/disk7/disk1/EGS%5CDevonian%20Shale%20Development%20in%20Eastern%20Kentucky.pdf Shale development in eastern Kentucky] {{Webarchive. link. (24 March 2018 , US Energy Research and Development Administration, 1976.)
39. US Dept. of Energy, [http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/04/f0/how_is_shale_gas_produced.pdf How is shale gas produced?], April 2013.
40. Gold, Russell. (2014). "The Boom: How Fracking Ignited the American Energy Revolution and Changed the World". Simon & Schuster.
41. Zukerman, Gregory. (6 November 2013). "Breakthrough: The Accidental Discovery That Revolutionized American Energy". The Atlantis.
42. Zuckerman, Gregory. (15 November 2013). "How fracking billionaires built their empires". [[The Atlantic Media Company]].
43. (2013). "Awakening the Slumbering Giant: How Horizontal Drilling Technology Brought the Endangered Species Act to Bear on Hydraulic Fracturing". Case Western Reserve L. Rev..
44. (2016). "Alternative Energy Sources and Technologies".
45. Brainard, Curtis. (June 2013). "The Future of Energy". Popular Science Magazine.
46. (6 November 2011). "New Waterless Fracking Method Avoids Pollution Problems, But Drillers Slow to Embrace It".
47. "Hydraulic fracturing water use, 2011–2014". USGS.
48. Central, Bobby. "Water Use Rises as Fracking Expands".
49. "What goes in and out of Hydraulic Fracturing".
50. (1 June 2016). "Hydraulic fracturing chemical spills on agricultural land need scrutiny, say CSU researchers". Colorado State University.
51. Fehler, Michael C.. (1989). "Stress Control of seismicity patterns observed during hydraulic fracturing experiments at the Fenton Hill hot dry rock geothermal energy site, New Mexico". International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts.
52. (2007). "SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference".
53. (2010). "SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition".
54. (21 September 2021). "Fracking Has a Bad Rep, but Its Tech Is Powering a Clean Energy Shift Texas start-ups are harnessing know-how born of the shale boom in pursuit of a greener future.". Texas Monthly.
55. (1981). "Hydro-fracturing offers many benefits". Johnson Driller's Journal.
56. Williamson, WH. (1982). "Groundwater in Fractured Rock". Australian Water Resources Council.
57. (Feb 1994). "Hydrofracture: state of the art in South Africa". Applied Hydrogeology.
58. Dews, Fred. "The economic benefits of fracking". Brookings.
59. Phillips. K. (2012). What is the True Cost of Hydraulic Fracturing? Incorporating Negative Externalities into the Cost of America's Latest Energy Alternative. ''Journal of Environmental Sciences Program''. 2,1st Edition, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC
60. (2017). "The Impact of the Fracking Boom on Arab Oil Producers". The Energy Journal.
61. (13 December 2017). "Wall Street Tells Frackers to Stop Counting Barrels, Start Making Profits". The Wall Street Journal.
62. "Shale Gas Is Not A Revolution". Forbes.
63. Naima Farah. (September 2016). "Fracking and Land Productivity: Effects of Hydraulic Fracturing on Agriculture".
64. (2011). "Should fracking stop?". Nature.
65. Jan Goodey. (1 August 2013). "The UK's anti fracking movement is growing". The Ecologist.
66. "How Hillary Clinton's State Department sold fracking to the world". Mother Jones.
67. (1 December 2016). "Obama's dirty secret: the fossil fuel projects the US littered around the world". The Guardian.
68. Andrew Higgins. (30 November 2014). "Russian Money Suspected Behind Fracking Protests". The New York Times.
69. (28 May 2023). "He Said I Was a Fracking Heiress. I Went to West Virginia to Find Out.".
70. "Drilling Productivity Report - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)".
71. Staff, Climate XChange. (2024-08-09). "Policy Explainer: Fracking Bans".
72. {{IMDb title. tt1558250. GasLand
73. Kickstarter, FrackNation by Ann and Phelim Media LLC, 6 April 2012
74. (17 December 2012). "Mark Cuban's AXS TV Picks Up Pro-Fracking Documentary 'FrackNation'". The Hollywood Reporter.
75. "The Ethics of Fracking".
76. (9 September 2015). "'Fractured Land' Doc Coming to VIFF". The Tyee.
77. (October 2013). "The implications of unconventional drilling for natural gas: a global public health concern". Public Health.
78. (September 2013). "Oversight of shale gas production in the United States and the disclosure of toxic substances". Resources Policy.
79. (2011). "Natural Gas Operations from a Public Health Perspective". Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal.
80. (8 February 2014). "EU Commission minimum principles for the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high-volume hydraulic fracturing".
81. (16 June 2023). "Energy and environment".
82. (August 2012). "Environmental health advocacy: an overview of natural gas drilling in northeast Pennsylvania and implications for pediatric nursing". J Pediatr Nurs.
83. (2017). "Shale Gas Development and Drinking Water Quality". American Economic Review.
84. (2022). "Exposure to unconventional oil and gas development and all-cause mortality in Medicare beneficiaries". Nature Energy.
85. (2008). "Fatalities among oil and gas extraction workers – United States, 2003–2006".
86. (22 February 2005). "Mortality from Lung and Kidney Disease in a Cohort of North American Industrial Sand Workers: An Update". The Annals of Occupational Hygiene.
87. (June 2012). "OSHA/NIOSH Hazard Alert: Worker Exposure to Silica During Hydraulic Fracturing".
88. (1 June 1993). "Office of radiation and indoor air: Program description".
89. (2017). "Fracking tied to cancer-causing chemicals". CMAJ.
90. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (16 May 2018). "U.S. Energy Facts Explained".
91. (2018). "Environmental justice and fracking: A review". Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health.
92. Castelli, Matthew. (2015-05-08). "Fracking and the Rural Poor: Negative Externalities, Failing Remedies, and Federal Legislation". Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality.
93. Media, Kathiann M. Kowalski, Canary. (2025-08-19). "In Appalachia, fracking is not the job creator the industry claims • Ohio Capital Journal".
94. (6 May 2015). "Poor Communities Bear Greatest Burden from Fracking". Scientific American.
95. O'Brien, Dan. (2021-08-31). "Utica Shale Pumped Up Promises to Valley Landowners".
96. "Exploring the Negative Impacts of Fracking Policies on Native American Lands and Communities". The Classic Journal.
97. (2023-04-03). "Companies that frack for oil and gas can keep a lot of information secret – but what they disclose shows widespread use of hazardous chemicals".
98. (2021). "Mapping fine-scale human disturbances in a working landscape with Landsat time series on Google Earth Engine". ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing.
99. (2018). "Conceptual model development using a generic Features, Events, and Processes (FEP) database for assessing the potential impact of hydraulic fracturing on groundwater aquifers". Advances in Geosciences.
100. "EPA's Report on Fracking and Water Quality".
101. "Unconventional Fossil Fuels Factsheet". University of Michigan.
102. (2020). "Regulating Water Security in Unconventional Oil and Gas".
103. (September 2017). "Numerical investigations of upward migration of fracking fluid along a fault zone during and after stimulation". Energy Procedia.
104. (February 2019). "Modeling fate and transport of hydraulic fracturing fluid in the presence of abandoned wells". Journal of Contaminant Hydrology.
105. (5 February 2013). "What is Shale Gas? How Does Fracking Work?".
106. "Hydraulic Fracturing and its Impact on Water Resources".
107. (2011-05-17). "Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
108. (2008). "Who's Who".
109. Tabuchi, Hiroko. (13 July 2021). "E.P.A. Allowed Fracking Chemicals Despite Worries". The New York Times.
110. "Hydraulic Fracturing Water Usage {{!}} Ground Water Protection Council".
111. (2021-09-23). "How much water does the typical hydraulically fractured well require? {{!}} U.S. Geological Survey".
112. (1 March 2024). "Fracking Is Draining US Groundwater at an Alarming Rate". IDEXX.
113. (2023-09-25). "'Monster Fracks' Are Getting Far Bigger. And Far Thirstier.". The New York Times.
114. (January 2026). "7 ways oil and gas drilling is bad for the environment". The Wilderness Society }}{{rs.
115. (8 January 2015). "Habitat Loss and Modification Due to Gas Development in the Fayetteville Shale". Environmental Management.
116. Frederick J. Herrmann, Federal Railroad Administration, [https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/letter-american-petroleum-institute letter to American Petroleum Institute], 17 July 2013, p.4.
117. (2018-05-31). "Does fracking cause earthquakes? {{!}} U.S. Geological Survey".
118. (2016-03-28). "Drilling-induced earthquakes may endanger millions in 2016, USGS says".
119. (2019). "IAEG/AEG Annual Meeting Proceedings, San Francisco, California, 2018 - Volume 5".
120. (2016-03-28). "Drilling-induced earthquakes may endanger millions in 2016, USGS says".
121. (1985). "Managing Vegetation on Peat-Sand Filter Beds for Wastewater Disposal".
122. "LOI n° 2011-835 du 13 juillet 2011 visant à interdire l'exploration et l'exploitation des mines d'hydrocarbures liquides ou gazeux par fracturation hydraulique et à abroger les permis exclusifs de recherches comportant des projets ayant recours à cette technique (1) - Légifrance".
123. "Article L110-1 - Code de l'environnement - Légifrance".
124. (11 October 2013). "Fracking ban upheld by French court". BBC.
125. Hweshe, Francis. (17 September 2012). "South Africa: International Groups Rally Against Fracking, TKAG Claims". West Cape News.
126. (2015). "Regolazione e prospettive del mercato dello shale gas in Cina: tra diritto del commercio internazionale, diritto dell'energia, accordi di produzione, protezione ambientale e sviluppo sostenibile: un confronto con l'esperienza statunitense". Diritto Comunitario e degli Scambi Internazionali.
127. (2017-09-05). "Western Australia halts hydraulic fracturing, to probe risks". [[Reuters]].
128. Ambrose, Jillian. (2 November 2019). "Fracking banned in UK as government makes major U-turn". The Guardian.
129. "Regulation of Hydraulic Fracturing Under the Safe Drinking Water Act". Environmental Protection Agency.
130. (17 December 2014). "Gov. Cuomo Makes Sense on Fracking". The New York Times.
131. Nearing, Brian. (18 December 2014). "Citing perils, state bans fracking". [[Times Union (Albany).
132. (18 December 2014). "Citing Health, Environment Concerns, New York Moves To Ban Fracking". [[NPR]].
133. (1983). "Hydraulic fracturing stress measurements". [[National Academy of Sciences.
134. Broomfield, Mark. (10 August 2012). "Support to the identification of potential risks for the environment and human health arising from hydrocarbons operations involving hydraulic fracturing in Europe". [[European Commission]].
135. (2008). "Hydraulic Fracturing Considerations for Natural Gas Wells of the Fayetteville Shale". ALL Consulting.
136. "US Government Role in Shale Gas Fracking History: An Overview". The Breakthrough Institute.
137. "A Material Difference".
138. Seale, Rocky. (July–August 2007). "Open hole completion systems enables multi-stage fracturing and stimulation along horizontal wellbores". Drilling Contractor.
139. (2011). "Energy from Shale".
140. "The Barnett Shale". North Keller Neighbors Together.
141. (2010). "Gasland".
142. (July 2010). "Affirming Gasland".
143. Gidley, John L.. (1989). "Recent Advances in Hydraulic Fracturing". [[Society of Petroleum Engineers.
144. Phillips, Susan. (9 November 2011). "'We're Dealing with an Insurgency,' says Energy Company Exec of Fracking Foes". [[National Public Radio]].
145. Ching H. Yew. (1997). "Mechanics of Hydraulic Fracturing". [[Gulf Professional Publishing]].
146. Banks, David. (May 1996). "Permeability and stress in crystalline rocks". Terra Nova.
147. Brown, Edwin Thomas. (2007). "Block Caving Geomechanics". [[University of Queensland.
148. (16 February 2011). "Geothermal Technologies Program: How an Enhanced Geothermal System Works". eere.energy.gov.
149. "Interview with Dan Steward, Former Mitchell Energy Vice President". The Breakthrough Institute.
150. Bell, Frederic Gladstone. (2004). "Engineering Geology and Construction". [[Taylor & Francis]].
151. (26 February 2013). "Germany agrees on regulations to allow fracking for shale gas".
152. Drajem, Mark. (11 January 2012). "Fracking Political Support Unshaken by Doctors' Call for Ban".
153. V. J. Brown. (February 2014). "Radionuclides in Fracking Wastewater: Managing a Toxic Blend". [[Environmental Health Perspectives]].
154. "Hydraulic Fracturing". [[University of Colorado Law School]].
155. Alex Wayne. (4 January 2012). "Health Effects of Fracking Need Study, Says CDC Scientist". Bloomberg Businessweek.
156. David Wethe. (19 January 2012). "Like Fracking? You'll Love 'Super Fracking'". Businessweek.
157. Patel, Tara. (4 October 2011). "France to Keep Fracking Ban to Protect Environment, Sarkozy Says". [[Bloomberg Businessweek]].
158. Patel, Tara. (31 March 2011). "The French Public Says No to {{'}}''Le Fracking''{{'}}". [[Bloomberg Businessweek]].
159. ALL Consulting. (June 2012). "The Modern Practices of Hydraulic Fracturing: A Focus on Canadian Resources". Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.
160. Charlez, Philippe A.. (1997). "Rock Mechanics: Petroleum Applications". Editions Technip.
161. (1989). "Surface Operations in Petroleum Production". [[Elsevier]].
162. [http://cogcc.state.co.us/library/GASLAND%20DOC.pdf COGCC Gasland Correction Document] {{webarchive. link. (5 September 2013 ''[[Colorado Department of Natural Resources]]'' 29 October 2010)
163. Andrews, Anthony. (30 October 2009). "Unconventional Gas Shales: Development, Technology, and Policy Issues". Congressional Research Service.
164. (2012). "Mining and Community Economic Growth". The Review of Regional Studies.
165. Detrow, Scott. (15 August 2012). "Pipe Bomb Found Near Allegheny County Pipeline". NPR.
166. (April 2009). "Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer". [[Assistant Secretary for Fossil Energy.
167. (2000). "Reservoir stimulation". [[J. Wiley]].
168. (2015). "An overview of hydraulic fracturing and other formation stimulation technologies for shale gas production: Update 2015". Publications Office.
169. (June 2010). "Hydraulic fracturing research study". [[United States Environmental Protection Agency.
170. Healy, Dave. (July 2012). "Hydraulic Fracturing or 'Fracking': A Short Summary of Current Knowledge and Potential Environmental Impacts". [[Environmental Protection Agency (Ireland).
171. Fjaer, E.. (2008). "Petroleum related rock mechanics". [[Elsevier]].
172. . ["State by state maps of hydraulic fracturing in US."](http://www.fractracker.org/maps/). *Fractracker.org*.
173. (19 July 2010). "Freeing Up Energy. Hydraulic Fracturing: Unlocking America's Natural Gas Resources".
174. (3 January 2012). "Production Decline of a Natural Gas Well Over Time". The Geology Society of America.
175. Gill, R.. (2010). "Igneous rocks and processes: a practical guide". [[John Wiley and Sons]].
176. Hass, Benjamin. (14 August 2012). "Fracking Hazards Obscured in Failure to Disclose Wells".
177. (1989). "A review of the management of the Gas Research Institute". National Academies.
178. Wasley, Andrew (1 March 2013) [https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/mar/01/frontline-poland-fracking-frontier On the frontline of Poland's fracking rush] The Guardian, Retrieved 3 March 2013
179. Hartnett-White, K.. (2011). "The Fracas About Fracking- Low Risk, High Reward, but the EPA is Against it".
180. (February 1995). "Remediation of low permeability subsurface formations by fracturing enhancement of soil vapor extraction". Journal of Hazardous Materials.
181. Brown, Valerie J.. (February 2007). "Industry Issues: Putting the Heat on Gas". Environmental Health Perspectives.
182. (18 April 2011). "Chemicals Used in Hydraulic Fracturing". Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives.
183. (2003). "Radiation Protection and the Management of Radioactive Waste in the Oil and Gas Industry". International Atomic Energy Agency.
184. "Gasland Debunked". Energy in Depth.
185. Jared Metzker. (7 August 2013). "Govt, Energy Industry Accused of Suppressing Fracking Dangers". [[Inter Press Service]].
186. (2013). "Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection into a deep well in Youngstown, Ohio". Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.
187. (2004). "Coevolution of crack-seal texture and fracture porosity in sedimentary rocks: Cathodoluminescence observations of regional fractures". Journal of Structural Geology.
188. Logan, Jeffrey. (2012). "Natural Gas and the Transformation of the U.S. Energy Sector: Electricity". Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis.
189. (December 2005). "Fracking: The Controversy Over its Safety for the Environment". Johnson Wright, Inc..
190. Mader, Detlef. (1989). "Hydraulic Proppant Fracturing and Gravel Packing". [[Elsevier]].
191. (2003). "Geotechnical Measurements and Modelling". CRC Press.
192. (2005). "Coal Energy Systems". [[Academic Press]].
193. (2010). "Hydraulic Fracturing: History of an Enduring Technology". Journal of Petroleum Technology.
194. (18 October 2011). "The Truth about Fracking". Scientific American.
195. Moore, Robbie. "Fracking, PR, and the Greening of Gas". The International.
196. Negro, Sorrell E.. (February 2012). "Fracking Wars: Federal, State, and Local Conflicts over the Regulation of Natural Gas Activities". Zoning and Planning Law Report.
197. (7 August 2012) [http://www.naturalgaseurope.com/jkx-awards-fracking-contract-for-ukrainian-prospect JKX Awards Fracking Contract for Ukrainian Prospect] Natural Gas Europe, Retrieved 3 March 2013
198. (2012). "Hydrofracking: Disturbances Both Geological and Political: Who Decides?". The Urban Lawyer.
199. Jack E. Whitten. (June 2000). "Consolidated Guidance About Materials Licenses: Program-Specific Guidance About Well Logging, Tracer, and Field Flood Study Licenses (NUREG-1556, Volume 14)". US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
200. (27 February 2011). "Natural Gas Documents". The New York Times.
201. (3 March 2011). "The Debate Over the Hydrofracking Study's Scope". The New York Times.
202. Bennet, Les. "The Source for Hydraulic Fracture Characterization". Oilfield Review.
203. Palmer, Mike. (27 March 2013). "Oil-gas boom spawns Harrison safety talks". Times Leader.
204. (2010). "Water Withdrawals for Development of Marcellus Shale Gas in Pennsylvania. Introduction to Pennsylvania's Water Resources". [[The Pennsylvania State University]].
205. (June 1985). "Control and Modeling of Fluid Leakoff During Hydraulic Fracturing". Journal of Petroleum Technology.
206. "Acid fracturing". [[Society of Petroleum Engineers]].
207. (12 March 2013). "Shots fired at W. Pa. gas drilling site". [[The Philadelphia Inquirer]].
208. (1990). "Analysis of geological structures". [[Cambridge University Press]].
209. Gilbert, Daniel. (7 October 2012). "Matt Damon Fracking Film Lights Up Petroleum Lobby". The Wall Street Journal.
210. Gerhardt, Tina. (31 December 2012). "Matt Damon Exposes Fracking in Promised Land". [[The Progressive]].
211. Javers, Eamon. (8 November 2011). "Oil Executive: Military-Style 'Psy Ops' Experience Applied". [[CNBC]].
212. (22 January 2014). "Commission recommendation on minimum principles for the exploration and production of hydrocarbons (such as shale gas) using high-volume hydraulic fracturing (2014/70/EU)". [[Official Journal of the European Union]].
213. Reis, John C. (1976). ''Environmental Control in Petroleum Engineering.'' Gulf Professional Publishers.
214. Wan Renpu. (2011). "Advanced Well Completion Engineering". [[Gulf Professional Publishing]].
215. (18 February 2013) [https://www.reuters.com/article/turkey-shale-idUSL6N0BI8CQ20130218 Turkey's shale gas hopes draw growing interest] Reuters, Retrieved 3 March 2013
216. Faucon, Benoît. (17 September 2012). "Shale-Gas Boom Hits Eastern Europe". [[WSJ.com]].
217. "Shooters – A "Fracking" History". American Oil & Gas Historical Society.
218. (1975). "Seismic pumping—a hydrothermal fluid transport mechanism". Journal of the Geological Society.
219. Soraghan, Mike. (12 March 2012). "Quiet foundation funds the 'anti-fracking' fight". E&E News.
220. Soraghan, Mike. (13 December 2013). "White House official backs FracFocus as preferred disclosure method". E&E News.
221. (2005). "SPE production & operations". [[Society of Petroleum Engineers]].
222. (2013). "New Research of Surface Spills in Fracking Industry". Professional Safety.
223. "Completion Technologies". [[Energy and Environmental Research Center.
224. Urbina, Ian. (3 March 2011). "Pressure Limits Efforts to Police Drilling for Gas". The New York Times.
225. Ram Narayan. (8 August 2012). "From Food to Fracking: Guar Gum and International Regulation". [[University of Pennsylvania Law School]].
226. Energy Institute. (February 2012). "Fact-Based Regulation for Environmental Protection in Shale Gas Development". [[University of Texas at Austin]].
227. IEA. (29 May 2012). "Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas. World Energy Outlook Special Report on Unconventional Gas". [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
228. Zoback, M.D.. (2007). "Reservoir geomechanics". Cambridge University Press.