Face-ism

Origin and evidence

The term "face-ism" or "facial prominence" was initially defined in a 1983 study in which facial prominence was measured by a "Face-ism index", which is the ratio of two linear measurements, with the distance (in millimeters or any other unit) from the top of the head to the lowest visible point of the chin being the numerator and the distance from the top of the head to the lowest visible part of the subject's body the denominator. It was found that across societies and time, facial prominence of men has been much higher than that of women.

Subsequent studies have generated consistent findings and thus helped confirm the pervasive presence of face-ism. For instance, a prevalent face-ism phenomenon was observed in news magazines and women's magazines of the 1970s and 1980s. Face-ism has been documented in prime-time television programs. Evidence has been shown that face-ism is still present in mainstream printed media from as recently as 2004, and showed that men in intellectually focused occupations tend to have higher face-to-body ratios than women in similar professions, while women in physical occupations tend to have higher face-to-body ratios than men in similar professions. A cross-cultural study on face-ism found that face-ism in photographs of politicians is more pronounced in gender-egalitarian societies compared to gender-unequal societies.

There is no relation between face-ism and the perception of intellect.

Implications

It was found that regardless of gender difference, news photographs featuring high face prominence tend to generate more positive ratings with regard to intelligence, ambition and physical appearance than those with low face prominence.

Similarly, another study argued that as a series of mental life dimensions including intelligence, personality, and character, are closely associated with the face and head; higher face-ism of men may convey impressions of greater intelligence, dominance, and control. In contrast, the greater body-ism of women (analyzed in television beer commercials) serves to reinforce the stereotypical images of women as trophies or sex objects without personalities.

Face-ism may not be merely restricted to gender difference but can apply to racial difference as well. For instance, the study revealed that Caucasians have higher face-ism than blacks across different media types.

Notes

References

References

1. Powell, Gary N., and Laura M. Graves (3rd Edition, SAGE 2003) ''Women and Men in Management'' (page 59)
2. Archer, Dane. (1983). "Face-ism: Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
3. Nigro, Georgia N.. (1 June 1988). "Changes in the Facial Prominence of Women and Men Over the Last Decade". Psychology of Women Quarterly.
4. Copeland, Gary A.. (1989). "Face-ism and primetime television". Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
5. Matthews, Justin L.. (17 August 2007). "Hidden Sexism: Facial Prominence and Its Connections to Gender and Occupational Status in Popular Print Media". Sex Roles.
6. Konrath, Sara. (8 August 2012). "Cultural Differences in Face-ism: Male Politicians Have Bigger Heads in More Gender-Equal Cultures". Psychology of Women Quarterly.
7. Zuckerman, Miron. (1 December 1986). "On the meaning and implications of facial prominence". Journal of Nonverbal Behavior.
8. Hall, Christine C. Iijima. (1 September 1994). "Women and "body-isms" in television beer commercials". Sex Roles.
9. Zuckerman, Miron. (1994). "Race differences in face-ism: Does facial prominence imply dominance?". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.