From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Dynamic lot-size model
Mathematical model in economics
Mathematical model in economics
The dynamic lot-size model in inventory theory, is a generalization of the economic order quantity model that takes into account that demand for the product varies over time. The model was introduced by Harvey M. Wagner and Thomson M. Whitin in 1958.
Problem setup
We have available a forecast of product demand dt over a relevant time horizon t=1,2,...,N (for example we might know how many widgets will be needed each week for the next 52 weeks). There is a setup cost st incurred for each order and there is an inventory holding cost it per item per period (st and it can also vary with time if desired). The problem is how many units xt to order now to minimize the sum of setup cost and inventory cost. Let us denote inventory:
I=I_{0}+\sum_{j=1}^{t-1}x_{j}-\sum_{j=1}^{t-1}d_{j}\geq0
The functional equation representing minimal cost policy is:
f_{t}(I)=\underset{x_{t}\geq 0 \atop I+x_{t}\geq d_{t}}{\min}\left[ i_{t-1}I+H(x_{t})s_{t}+f_{t+1}\left( I+x_{t}-d_{t} \right) \right]
Where H() is the Heaviside step function. Wagner and Whitin proved the following four theorems:
- There exists an optimal program such that Ixt=0; ∀t
- There exists an optimal program such that ∀t: either xt=0 or x_{t}=\textstyle \sum_{j=t}^{k} d_{j} for some k (t≤k≤N)
- There exists an optimal program such that if dt* is satisfied by some xt**, tdt}}, t=t+1,...,t*-1, is also satisfied by xt**
- Given that I = 0 for period t, it is optimal to consider periods 1 through t - 1 by themselves
Planning Horizon Theorem
The precedent theorems are used in the proof of the Planning Horizon Theorem. Let
F(t)= \min\left {\underset{1\leq j
denote the minimal cost program for periods 1 to t. If at period t* the minimum in F(t) occurs for j = t** ≤ t*, then in periods t t* it is sufficient to consider only t** ≤ j ≤ t. In particular, if t* = t**, then it is sufficient to consider programs such that xt* 0.
The algorithm
Wagner and Whitin gave an [algorithm for finding the optimal solution by dynamic programming. Start with t*=1:
- Consider the policies of ordering at period t**, t** = 1, 2, ... , t*, and filling demands dt , t = t**, t** + 1, ... , t*, by this order
- Add H(xt**)st**+itIt to the costs of acting optimally for periods 1 to t**-1 determined in the previous iteration of the algorithm
- From these t* alternatives, select the minimum cost policy for periods 1 through t*
- Proceed to period t*+1 (or stop if t*=N)
Because this method was perceived by some as too complex, a number of authors also developed approximate heuristics (e.g., the Silver-Meal heuristic) for the problem.
References
References
- [[Harvey M. Wagner]] and [[Thomson M. Whitin]], "Dynamic version of the economic lot size model," Management Science, Vol. 5, pp. 89–96, 1958
- [[Albert Wagelmans. Wagelmans, Albert]], [[Stan Van Hoesel]], and [[Antoon Kolen]]. "[http://repub.eur.nl/res/pub/2310/eur_wagelmans_22.pdf Economic lot sizing: an O (n log n) algorithm that runs in linear time in the Wagner-Whitin case]." Operations Research 40.1-Supplement - 1 (1992): S145-S156.
- EA Silver, HC Meal, A heuristic for selecting lot size quantities for the case of a deterministic time-varying demand rate and discrete opportunities for replenishment, Production and inventory management, 1973
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Dynamic lot-size model — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report