Dutch Defence

History

Elias Stein (1748–1812), an Alsatian who settled in The Hague, recommended the defence as the best reply to 1.d4 in his 1789 book Nouvel essai sur le Jeu des échecs, avec des réflexions militaires relatives à ce jeu.

Siegbert Tarrasch rejected the opening as in his 1931 work The Game of Chess, arguing that White should reply with the Staunton Gambit, with White being better after 2.e4 fxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 c6 5.f3 exf3.

Practitioners

The Stonewall Dutch enjoyed a resurgence of interest in the 1980s and 1990s, when leading grandmasters (GMs) Artur Yusupov, Sergey Dolmatov, Nigel Short, and Simen Agdestein helped develop the system where Black plays an earlier ...d5 and places his dark-squared bishop on d6. This setup, termed the Modern Stonewall, has remained more popular than the traditional early ...Be7.

Magnus Carlsen has used the Stonewall to score wins against Viswanathan Anand and Fabiano Caruana.

Simon Williams is one of the leading practitioners of the classical Dutch and wrote more than one book on the opening.

• {{cite book
• {{cite book
• {{cite book
• {{cite book

Theory

White most often fianchettoes the king's bishop with g3 and Bg2. Black also sometimes fianchettoes the king's bishop with ...g6 and ...Bg7 (the Leningrad Dutch), but may instead the bishop to e7, d6 (after ...d5), or b4 (the latter is most often seen if White plays c4 before castling). Play often runs 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 e6 4.Nf3 (4.Nh3 is also possible, intending Nf4–d3 to control the e5-square) 4...Be7 5.0-0 0-0 6.c4 and now Black chooses between 6...d5 (the characteristic move of the Stonewall), 6...d6, the Ilyin–Zhenevsky Variation (less popular today), or Alekhine's move 6...Ne4!? retaining the option of moving the d-pawn either one or two squares.

The opening's attacking potential is shown in the Polish Immortal, in which Miguel Najdorf, using the Stonewall Variation, sacrificed all of his to win by checkmate.

Main variations

There are many variations and lines, but the following three are considered part of the main theory of the Dutch Defence.

Leningrad Variation

| tright | |rd|nd|bd|qd|kd| | |rd |pd|pd|pd|pd|pd| |bd|pd | | | | | |nd|pd| | | | | | |pd| | | | |pl|pl| | | | | | | | | |nl|pl| |pl|pl| | |pl|pl|bl|pl |rl|nl|bl|ql|kl| | |rl | Leningrad Variation after: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3}} In the Leningrad Variation of the Dutch Defence, Black fianchettos the dark-squared bishop. From g7, this bishop will not only be a good defender of the king, but also an active piece on the .

The game may proceed 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nc3 0-0 6.Nf3 d6 7.0-0 Qe8. The g2-bishop helps protect White's king against Black's possible kingside aggression, and this bishop would possibly be blunted by the f5-pawn if it were instead to develop to d3.

The opening code for the Leningrad Variation in the Dutch Defence is A87 to A89 in the Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings (ECO) classification system:

• A87: Leningrad System
• A88: Leningrad System with ...d6 and ...c6
• A89: Leningrad System with ...d6 and ...Nc6

Stonewall Variation

| tright | |rd|nd|bd|qd|kd|bd| |rd |pd|pd| | | | |pd|pd | | |pd| |pd|nd| | | | | |pd| |pd| | | | |pl|pl| | | | | | | | | |nl|pl| |pl|pl| | |pl|pl|bl|pl |rl|nl|bl|ql|kl| | |rl | Stonewall Variation after: 1.d4 f5 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 e6 4.Nf3 d5 5.c4 c6}} In the Stonewall Dutch, Black plays ...d5 in the opening and secures a tight grip of the e4-square. A possible example is 1.d4 f5 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 e6 4.Nf3 d5 5.c4 c6.

The ECO codes for the Stonewall Variation of the Dutch Defence are A90 to A92:

• A90: Stonewall Variation
• A91: Stonewall Variation with Nc3
• A92: Stonewall Variation with c4 and Nc3

Staunton Gambit

Main article: Staunton Gambit

An aggressive attempt by White to sacrifice a pawn with 2.e4 in exchange for rapid development and attacking chances against Black's Dutch setup. Named after Howard Staunton, who introduced it in his match against Bernhard Horwitz.{{cite web |access-date=2008-07-01 |orig-date=First pub. 1992 | author-link=Reuben Fine | url-access=registration | author-link=I.A. Horowitz | author-link=Larry Christiansen | author-link=Eric Schiller | author-link=Richard Griffith (chess player) | author-link=Reuben Fine | author-link=Nick de Firmian | author-link=Larry Christiansen

The ECO code for the Staunton Gambit in the Dutch Defence is A83.

White continuations

| tright | |rd|nd|bd|qd| |rd|kd| |pd|pd|pd| |pd| |bd|pd | | | |pd| |nd|pd| | | | | | |pd| | | | |pl|pl| | | | | | | | | |nl|pl| |pl|pl| | |pl|pl|bl|pl |rl|nl|bl|ql| |rl|kl| | Position after 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.0-0 0-0 6.c4 d6 The traditional involves White playing 2.c4. More commonly, White will start with 2.g3. Some common variations are: c4 is played after g3 and Bg2; c4 is played after Nf3; and c4 is played after 0-0.

Examples:

• traditional: 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d6
• common: 2.g3 Nf6 3.Bg2 g6 4.Nf3 Bg7 5.0-0 0-0 6.c4 d6 (diagram)

Other second moves

White has various more aggressive alternatives to the standard moves, including:

• 2.Nc3 Nf6 (or 2...d5) 3.Bg5, the Raphael Variation
• 2.Bg5, the Hopton Attack; e.g. 2...Nf6 (2...g6 is the most popular move) 3.Bxf6 exf6 4.e3 or e4
• 2.Bf4 or 2.Nf3 and 3.Bf4, the London System
• 2.g4, the Krejcik Gambit
• 2.e4!?, the Staunton Gambit
• 2.h3 followed by 3.g4, Carl Mayet introduced this completely different gambit approach to the Dutch in 1839 against von der Lasa.{{cite book | author-link=Tassilo von Heydebrand und der Lasa | author-link=Paul Rudolf von Bilguer | author-link=Larry Christiansen
• 2.Qd3, the Alapin Variation

Black sometimes starts with the move order 1...e6 to avoid these lines, although Black must then be ready to play the French Defence if White continues 2.e4, rendering the Dutch no longer an option. The Staunton Gambit remains a good choice of opening for White in blitz tournaments where Black has little time to ponder the most accurate defence.

''ECO''

The Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings has twenty codes for the Dutch Defence, A80 through A99.

• A80: 1.d4 f5
• A81: 1.d4 f5 2.g3 (Fianchetto Attack)
• A82: 1.d4 f5 2.e4 (Staunton Gambit)
• A83: 1.d4 f5 2.e4 fxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bg5 (Staunton Gambit)
• A84: 1.d4 f5 2.c4
• A85: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 (Rubinstein Variation)
• A86: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 (Fianchetto Variation)
• A87: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 (Leningrad Dutch)
• A88: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d6 7.Nc3 c6 (Leningrad Dutch, Warsaw Variation)
• A89: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d6 7.Nc3 Nc6 (Leningrad Dutch, Matulovich)
• A90: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 (Classical Variation)
• A91: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7
• A92: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nf3 0-0
• A93: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d5 7.b3 (Botvinnik Variation)
• A94: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d5 7.b3 c6 8.Ba3 (Stonewall)
• A95: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d5 7.Nc3 c6 (Stonewall)
• A96: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d6
• A97: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d6 7.Nc3 Qe8 (Ilyin-Genevsky Variation)
• A98: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d6 7.Nc3 Qe8 8.Qc2 (Ilyin-Genevsky Variation)
• A99: 1.d4 f5 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 e6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.Nf3 0-0 6.0-0 d6 7.Nc3 Qe8 8.b3 (Ilyin-Genevsky Variation)

References

References

1. See [[Fool's mate#Teed vs. Delmar. this trap]] for a dramatic example.
2. "Chess Opening Explorer".
3. "Hikaru Nakamura playing the Dutch Defense as Black".
4. (1789). "Nouvel Essai sur le Jeu des Échecs: avec des Reflexions Militaires Relatives à ce Jeu". (Self-published).
5. Tarrasch, Siegbert. (1987). "The Game of Chess". Courier Dover Publications.
6. (2010). "Win with the Stonewall Dutch". Gambit.
7. "Anand Hits The Wall".
8. "Shamkir R3: Carlsen shows who's boss".
9. "Viktor Korchnoi vs. Hansjuerg Kaenel, Biel 1979".