From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Degressive proportionality
Apportionment approach
Apportionment approach
Degressive or progressive proportionality is an approach to the allocation of seats in a legislative body among administrative divisions of varying population sizes. It aims for fair representation of each division while also taking into account the number of voters in each one. Under systems using degressive proportionality, smaller divisions therefore have a higher seats-to-votes ratio. It is used in the European Parliament and the Bundesrat of Germany, among others.
Degressive proportionality is an alternative to, for instance, each subdivision electing the same number of members, or electing a number of members strictly proportional to its population. Degressive proportionality is intermediate between those two approaches. Political and philosophical justifications of degressive proportionality have been proposed.. Degressive proportionality can be achieved through various methods, and the term does not describe any one particular formula. Any system that reserves a minimum number of seats for a sub-body is to some extent degressively proportional.
By region
European Parliament
Main article: Apportionment in the European Parliament
Under the Treaty of Lisbon, the European Parliament uses a system of degressive proportionality to allocate its 704 seats among the member states of the European Union. Treaty negotiations, rather than a specific formula, determine the apportionment between member states.

Germany
Each German state has three to six seats in the Bundesrat of Germany depending on its population. This means the least populous state, Bremen (with 663,000 inhabitants), has three seats while the most populous one, North Rhine-Westphalia (with 18,058,000 inhabitants), has only six seats.
Spain
Spain's Congress of Deputies adds two extra seats to the otherwise proportional number allocated to each province.
United States
Advantages
Degressive proportionality can reduce concerns that the largest electoral divisions will dominate the legislature. It also increases representation for the smallest divisions, which may have significantly different interests from the majority, especially those on the periphery of the territory. It may also thereby decrease the potential for unrest in those divisions due to perceived lack of representation.
Disadvantages
Certain smaller areas are not recognised as separate subdivisions for electoral purposes, and are thereby not accorded the same treatment as areas that are recognised. Sometimes this can be done intentionally in the form of gerrymandering.
References
Sources
References
- "The Allocation between the EU Member States of the Seats in the European Parliament - Cambridge Compromise - Think Tank".
- (2013). "Optimal apportionnment". Journal of Political Economy.
- Dniestrzański, Piotr. (2014-01-24). "Proposal for Measure of Degressive Proportionality". Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Degressive proportionality — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report