From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
Cropping (animal)
Removal of portions of an animal's ears
Removal of portions of an animal's ears
the partial removal of the ears of animals
Cropping is the removal of part or all of the external flaps of an animal's ear. The procedure sometimes involves bracing and taping the remainder of the ears to train them to point upright. Almost exclusively performed on dogs, it is an old practice that was once done for perceived health, practical or cosmetic reasons. Veterinary science states there is no medical or physical advantage to the animal from the procedure, leading to concerns of animal cruelty over performing unnecessary surgery on animals. In modern times, cropping is banned in many nations, but is still legal in a limited number of countries. Where permitted, it is seen only in certain breeds of dog, such as pit bull and bull terrier type breeds, the Doberman Pinscher, Schnauzer, Great Dane, Boxer and Cane Corso.
History and purposes
Historically, cropping was performed on working dogs as it was believed it would decrease the risk of health complications, such as ear infections or hematomas. Crops were also performed on dogs that might need to fight, either while hunting animals that might fight back or while defending livestock herds from predators, or because they were used for pit-fighting sports such as dog fighting or bear-baiting. : possible duplicate page
: possibly an equivalent page, and better-documented topic-authority
:
Early history
Roman practices were to crop dogs' ears to avoid damage and injury in fighting and hunting, with tail docking practiced to avoid the transmission of rabies.
Guardian breeds
Cropping the ears of livestock guardian dogs was, and may still be, traditional in some pastoral cultures. The ears of these guardian dogs—such as the Caucasian Shepherd Dog |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120426221530/http://www.fci.be/uploaded_files/328g02-en.doc |archive-date=2012-04-26 |access-date=15 September 2011 and the Maremmano-Abruzzese Sheepdog—were traditionally cropped to reduce the possibility of wolves or opponent-dogs getting a grip on them. |trans-title = The Maremmano-Abruzzese Shepherd Dogs
According to one description, cropping was carried out when puppies were weaned, at about six weeks. It was performed by an older or expert shepherd, using the ordinary blade shears used for shearing, well sharpened. The ears were cut either to a point like those of a fox, or rounded like those of a bear. The removed auricles were first grilled, then given to the puppy to eat, in the belief that it would make him more "sour". An alternative method was to remove the ears from newborn puppies by twisting them off; however, this left almost no external ear on the dog. Both ear-cropping and the use of spiked collars were described more than three hundred years ago, as a defense against wolves. |translator-last=Wright |translator-first=Elizur |orig-date=1678 |year=1862
Fighting
Similar to guardian breeds, in sport fighting, cropping is used to minimize the risk of ears being bitten and held. The ears were an easy target for an opposing animal to grab or tear. Dogs may have their ears cropped, legally or not, for participation in dogfights, themselves illegal in many jurisdictions.
Modern practices
In 2000, veterinarian Bruce Fogle wrote:
The procedure
The veterinary procedure is known as "cosmetic otoplasty", and involves the removal of a portion of the pinnae, the external flap of the ear. Cropping is usually performed on puppies at 7 to 12 weeks of age. After 16 weeks, the procedure is more painful and the animal has greater pain memory.
American veterinary schools do not generally teach cropping (or docking), and thus veterinarians who perform the practice have to learn on the job. There are also problems with amateurs performing ear-cropping, particularly at puppy mills.
In the last 100 years or so, ear cropping has been performed more often for cosmetic purposes. In the US, although tail-docking, dewclaw removal, and neutering procedures remain common, ear-cropping is declining, except within the dog show industry.
Examples of cropping styles
| File:Tête Utanalussa.JPG | Long ear crop on a Great Dane | File:Dobermann Black and Tan "Vito".jpg | Long ear crop on a Doberman | File:01 American Staffordshire terrier.jpg | Medium crop on an American Staffordshire Terrier | | Short crop on an American Bully | File:Mastino2.jpg | Short crop on a Neapolitan Mastiff | File:Ch Impolha da Casa da Praia.jpg | Rounded crop on a Saint Miguel Cattle Dog
Animal welfare and law
The practice is illegal across most of Europe, including all countries that have ratified the European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals, and most member countries of the Fédération Cynologique Internationale. It is illegal in regions of Spain and in some Canadian provinces.
Ear-cropping is still widely practiced in the United States and parts of Canada, with approximately 130,000 puppies in the United States thought to have their ears cropped each year. The American Kennel Club (AKC) and Canadian Kennel Club both permit the practice. The AKC position is that ear cropping and tail docking are "acceptable practices integral to defining and preserving breed character and/or enhancing good health." While some individual states have attempted to ban ear-cropping, there is strong opposition from some dog breed organizations, who cite health concerns and tradition.
The American Veterinary Medical Association "opposes ear cropping and tail docking of dogs when done solely for cosmetic purposes" and "encourages the elimination of ear cropping and tail docking from breed standards".
In 2009, veterinary chain Banfield Pet Hospital announced they would no longer do tail docking, ear cropping or devocalization on dogs.
It has been suggested the cropping may interfere with a dog's ability to communicate using ear signals, however there has been no scientific comparative study of ear communication in cropped and uncropped dogs.
Legal status by country
| Country | Status | Ban/restriction date (if applicable) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australia | url=http://cfhs.ca/athome/ear_cropping_and_tail_docking | title=Ear cropping and tail docking | publisher=Canadian Federation of Humane Societies | access-date=2011-09-13 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110909124714/http://cfhs.ca/athome/ear_cropping_and_tail_docking/ | archive-date=2011-09-09}} | ||
| Austria | url=http://www.opengov.gr/ypaat/?c=2188 | title=Υπουργείο Αγροτικής Ανάπτυξης και Τροφίμων Δικτυακός Τόπος Διαβουλεύσεων | website=Ministry of Rural Development and Food, Athens, Greece | language=el | trans-title=Website consultation | date=April 2011}} | 1 January 2005 | |
| Belgium | Banned | 1 January 2006 | ||||||
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | Banned | |||||||
| Brazil | Banned for cosmetic purposes | |||||||
| Bulgaria | Banned | 1 February 2005 | ||||||
| Canada | Canada has no federal law banning pet cosmetic surgery. The Canadian Veterinary Medical Association opposes all cosmetic alterations. Two provinces have provincial legislation prohibiting ear cropping, tail docking, and most cosmetic surgeries: Prince Edward Island (☨1) and Newfoundland and Labrador (☨2). | |||||||
| Colombia | Banned | |||||||
| Croatia | Banned | 2007 | ||||||
| Cyprus | Banned | 1993 | ||||||
| Czech Republic | Banned | 1 April 1999 | ||||||
| Denmark | Banned | 1 June 1996 | ||||||
| England | date=8 November 2006 | title=Animal Welfare Act 2006 | url=https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/45/contents | website=legislation.gov.uk}} | 1899 | |||
| Estonia | Banned | 2001 | ||||||
| Finland | last=Oy | first=Edita Publishing | title=FINLEX - Säädökset alkuperäisinä: Eläinsuojelulaki 91/1971 (Finnish Animal Protection Law) | url=https://www.finlex.fi/fi/lainsaadanto/saadoskokoelma/1971/91 | website=finlex.fi | language=fi}} | 15 February 1971 | |
| France | url=https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGIARTI000021647477/2010-01-01/ | title=Sous-section 2: Dispositions relatives aux animaux de compagnie (Articles R214-19-1 à R214-34) - Légifrance | website=www.legifrance.gouv.fr | language=fr}} | 1 January 2010 | |||
| Germany | Banned | 1 May 1992 | ||||||
| Guatemala | Banned for cosmetic purposes | 2017 | ||||||
| Greece | Banned | 27 February 1992 | ||||||
| Hungary | Banned | |||||||
| Iceland | Banned | 2001 | ||||||
| India | author=Ajay Sura | date=Apr 14, 2013 | url=http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-04-14/chandigarh/38529054_1_tail-ears-kennel-club | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130515093634/http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2013-04-14/chandigarh/38529054_1_tail-ears-kennel-club | archive-date=2013-05-15 | title=Now, you can dock dogs' tail | work=The Times of India}} | |
| Ireland | Banned | |||||||
| Israel | url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfare/domestic/awbillconsulttaildocking.pdf | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070626075746/http://www.defra.gov.uk/animalh/welfare/domestic/awbillconsulttaildocking.pdf | title=A review of the scientific aspects and veterinary opinions relating to tail docking in dogs | archive-date=June 26, 2007 | date=2005 | website=defra.gov.uk}} | 2000 | |
| Italy | Banned | 1 November 2011 | ||||||
| Latvia | Banned | |||||||
| Lithuania | Banned | |||||||
| Luxembourg | Banned | 1 May 1992 | ||||||
| Netherlands | Banned | 1 September 2001 | ||||||
| New Zealand | Banned | 2004 | ||||||
| Northern Ireland | Banned | 2011 | ||||||
| Norway | Banned | 1954 | ||||||
| Poland | Banned | 1997 | ||||||
| Portugal | Banned | 1 January 1994 | ||||||
| Romania | Banned | 2008 | ||||||
| Russia | Restricted | |||||||
| Scotland | Banned | 1899 | ||||||
| Serbia | Banned | 2019 | ||||||
| Slovakia | Banned | 1 January 2003 | ||||||
| Slovenia | url=http://zakonodaja.gov.si/rpsi/r08/predpis_ZAKO4018.html | title=Zakon o zaščiti živali (Uradno prečiščeno besedilo) (ZZZiv-UPB1) | access-date=2009-09-09 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100209090436/http://zakonodaja.gov.si/rpsi/r08/predpis_ZAKO4018.html | archive-date=2010-02-09 }} Slovene Animal Protection Act (in Slovene) | April 2007 | ||
| South Africa | Banned | June 2008 | ||||||
| Spain | Banned in autonomies of Catalonia and Andalucia | |||||||
| Sweden | Banned | 1989 | ||||||
| Switzerland | Banned | 1997 | ||||||
| Turkey | Banned | 2004 | ||||||
| United States | Unrestricted | 2003 | ||||||
| Virgin Islands | Banned | 2005 | ||||||
| Wales | Banned | 1899 |
Non-canine animals
Cropping of large portions of the pinnae of other animals is rare, although the clipping of identifying shapes in the pinnae of livestock, called earmarks, was common prior to the introduction of compulsory ear tags. Removal of portions of the ear of laboratory mice or neutered feral cats for identification, i.e. ear-notching or ear-tipping, is still used. The practice of cropping for cosmetic purposes is rare in non-canines, although some selectively bred animals have naturally small ears which can be mistaken for cropping.{{Refn|Some animals, such as the Lamancha goat, have ears which are naturally small as the result of selective breeding, and some people mistakenly believe their ears to be cropped.
In other animals, small ears may result from a genetic mutation or the emergence of a genetically recessive trait, such as in Highland cattle, where the appearance of small ears, appearing to have their pinnae cropped, is viewed as a defect.|name=Genetic|group=note}}
Notes
References
References
- 978-0-7216-8607-3, p.1746
- "Ear Cropping: Is it right for your dog?". Pet MD.
- (2016-06-27). "Tail Docking and Ear Cropping Dogs: Public Awareness and Perceptions". PLOS ONE.
- Fogle, Bruce. (2000). "KISS Guide to Living with a Dog". [[Dorling-Kindersley]].
- [http://www.doggiesparadise.com/earcropping-dogs.shtml Practice of Dogs Ear cropping] {{webarchive. link. (2011-09-25 [sic] Doggie's Paradise. Accessed September 2011)
- (March 13, 2013). "Literature Review on the Welfare Implications of Ear Cropping-Dogs". American Veterinary Medical Association.
- Broughton, Amy L.. (2003). "Cropping and Docking: A Discussion of the Controversy and the Role of Law in Preventing Unnecessary Cosmetic Surgery on Dogs". Michigan State University College of Law.
- breed standard]] for exhibition at [[Conformation show. link. (2011-09-09 The Canadian Federation of Humane Societies/Fédération des sociétés canadiennes d'assistance aux animaux (CFHS/FSCAA). Accessed September 2011.)
- Weise, Elizabeth. (30 July 2011). "Banfield pet hospitals ban tail docking, ear cropping on dogs".
- Fogle, Bruce. (2000). "KISS Guide to Living with a Dog". [[Dorling-Kindersley]].
- "Cropping and Docking: A Discussion of the Controversy and the Role of Law in Preventing Unnecessary Cosmetic Surgery on Dogs". Animallaw.info.
- [http://www.akc.org/canine_legislation/position_statements.cfm#earcropping Ear Cropping, Tail Docking and Dewclaw Removal] {{Webarchive. link. (2011-09-03 American Kennel Club Canine Legislation Position Statements)
- (9 June 2006). "New Call to Action for Amended NY State Crop/Dock Bill". [[American Kennel Club]].
- Abraham, S.. (1993). "Sad lesson learned". American Kennel Club Gazette, American Boxer Club.
- "Ear cropping and tail docking of dogs".
- 978-0-7432-0297-8 chap. 9 [pages unnumbered]
- "Ear cropping and tail docking". Canadian Federation of Humane Societies.
- Wynn, Susan. (2014-06-11). "World Small Animal Veterinary Association World Congress Proceedings, 2001".
- (April 2011). "Υπουργείο Αγροτικής Ανάπτυξης και Τροφίμων {{pipe}} Δικτυακός Τόπος Διαβουλεύσεων".
- "Zakon o zaštiti i dobrobiti životinja".
- "CVMA {{pipe}} Documents {{pipe}} Cosmetic Alteration – Position Statement".
- Cormier, Mitch. (November 4, 2015). "Animal Welfare Act outlaws animal ear cropping and tail docking".
- Nova Scotia (☨4),CBC News (March 25, 2010)[https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/n-s-veterinarians-ban-tail-docking-1.910936 N.S veterinarians ban tail docking] Accessed February 10, 2012.
- (6 February 2016). "Quebec's order of veterinarians bans pet cosmetic surgery". CBC News.
- (February 10, 2012). "Ear cropping of dogs banned in Manitoba".
- (28 October 2015). "Cosmetic ear cropping banned by B.C. veterinarians". CBC New - British Columbia.
- (September 17, 2015). "Bylaws Of the Saskatchewan Veterinary Medical Association".
- (13 November 2025). "Corte Constitucional prohibió cirugías estéticas en animales: no más mutilaciones de orejas o cola en las mascotas".
- (11 January 2008). "Rep sa sretnim završetkom". [[Jutarnji list]].
- Johnston, Beatrice L. (1970) [https://books.google.com/books?id=SRLuAAAAMAAJ ''For those who cannot speak: a history of the Canadian Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, 1869-1969''] City of Laval, P.Q.: Dev-Sco Publications p.13
- (8 November 2006). "Animal Welfare Act 2006".
- Oy, Edita Publishing. "FINLEX - Säädökset alkuperäisinä: Eläinsuojelulaki 91/1971 (Finnish Animal Protection Law)".
- "Sous-section 2: Dispositions relatives aux animaux de compagnie (Articles R214-19-1 à R214-34) - Légifrance".
- (25 February 2025). "DECRETO NÚMERO 5-2017".
- (25 February 2025). "Es dañino cortarles las orejas y la cola a los perros".
- [https://www.guatevision.com/guatemala/conozca-las-sanciones-que-puede-recibir-si-decide-cortarle-la-cola-y-orejas-a-su-perro Conozca las sanciones que puede recibir si decide cortarle la cola y orejas a su perro] {{webarchive. link
- Ajay Sura. (Apr 14, 2013). "Now, you can dock dogs' tail". The Times of India.
- (25 August 2023). "Minister McConalogue announces new legislation to protect dogs from ear cropping".
- (2005). "A review of the scientific aspects and veterinary opinions relating to tail docking in dogs".
- "Zakon o Dobrobiti Životinja".
- "Zakon o zaščiti živali (Uradno prečiščeno besedilo) (ZZZiv-UPB1)".
- "Djurskyddsbestämmelser - Hund".
- "5199 Animal Protection Law - Article 8".
- [http://www.manade-en-camargue.fr/manade-en-camargue-lexique.html Lexique Camarguais] {{Webarchive. link. (2011-10-15 (in French) Manade Devaux. "Lexicon of Camargue terms" Accessed September 2011)
- "Eartipping".
- (1978). "The American Lamancha, and its Ears". Dairy Goat Journal.
- "What did you do to its ears?".
- [http://www.cruachan.com.au/bairnsley.htm Crop Ear. what does it look like?] {{Webarchive. link. (2011-08-16 Cruachan Highland Cattle. Accessed September 2011.)
- (October 14, 2020). "Chart of signatures and ratifications of Treaty 125 - European Convention for the Protection of Pet Animals".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about Cropping (animal) — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report