CRIME

Details

The vulnerability exploited is a combination of chosen plaintext attack and inadvertent information leakage through data compression, similar to that described in 2002 by the cryptographer John Kelsey. It relies on the attacker being able to observe the size of the ciphertext sent by the browser while at the same time inducing the browser to make multiple carefully crafted web connections to the target site. The attacker then observes the change in size of the compressed request payload, which contains both the secret cookie that is sent by the browser only to the target site, and variable content created by the attacker, as the variable content is altered. When the size of the compressed content is reduced, it can be inferred that it is probable that some part of the injected content matches some part of the source, which includes the secret content that the attacker desires to discover. Divide and conquer techniques can then be used to home in on the true secret content in a relatively small number of probe attempts that is a small multiple of the number of secret bytes to be recovered.

The CRIME exploit was hypothesized by Adam Langley, and first demonstrated by the security researchers Juliano Rizzo and Thai Duong, who also created the BEAST exploit. Rizzo and Duong presented CRIME as a general attack that works effectively against a large number of protocols, including but not limited to SPDY (which always compresses request headers), TLS (which may compress records) and HTTP (which may compress responses).

Prevention

CRIME can be defeated by preventing the use of compression, either at the client end, by the browser disabling the compression of SPDY requests, or by the website preventing the use of data compression on such transactions using the protocol negotiation features of the TLS protocol. As detailed in The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2, the client sends a list of compression algorithms in its ClientHello message, and the server picks one of them and sends it back in its ServerHello message. The server can only choose a compression method the client has offered, so if the client only offers 'none' (no compression), the data will not be compressed. Similarly, since 'no compression' must be allowed by all TLS clients, a server can always refuse to use compression.

Mitigation

, the CRIME exploit against SPDY and TLS-level compression was described as mitigated in the then-latest versions of the Chrome and Firefox web browsers. Some websites have applied countermeasures at their end. The nginx web-server was not vulnerable to CRIME since 1.0.9/1.1.6 (October/November 2011) using OpenSSL 1.0.0+, and since 1.2.2/1.3.2 (June / July 2012) using all versions of OpenSSL.

Note that as of December 2013 the CRIME exploit against HTTP compression has not been mitigated at all. Rizzo and Duong have warned that this vulnerability might be even more widespread than SPDY and TLS compression combined.

BREACH

Main article: BREACH (security exploit)

At the August 2013 Black Hat conference, researchers Gluck, Harris and Prado announced a variant of the CRIME exploit against HTTP compression called BREACH (short for Browser Reconnaissance and Exfiltration via Adaptive Compression of Hypertext). It uncovers HTTPS secrets by attacking the inbuilt HTTP data compression used by webservers to reduce network traffic.

References

References

1. "CVE-2012-4929". [[Mitre Corporation]].
2. (2002). "Fast Software Encryption".
3. Fisher, Dennis. (September 13, 2012). "CRIME Attack Uses Compression Ratio of TLS Requests as Side Channel to Hijack Secure Sessions". ThreatPost.
4. (September 8, 2012). "CRIME - How to beat the BEAST successor?". StackExchange.com.
5. Langley, Adam. (August 16, 2011). "Re: Compression contexts and privacy considerations".
6. "The CRIME attack". Ekoparty.
7. (August 2008). "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2 - Appendix A.4.1 (Hello messages)". [[IETF]].
8. Goodin, Dan. (September 13, 2012). "Crack in Internet's foundation of trust allows HTTPS session hijacking". Ars Technica.
9. Leyden, John. (September 14, 2012). "The perfect CRIME? New HTTPS web hijack attack explained". The Register.
10. Sysoev, Igor. (September 26, 2012). "Nginx mailing list: crime tls attack". nginx.org.
11. Goodin, Dan. (August 1, 2013). "Gone in 30 seconds: New attack plucks secrets from HTTPS-protected pages".