Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
society/religion

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Common Era

Modern calendar era

Common Era

Modern calendar era

Common Era (CE) and Before the Common Era (BCE) are year notations for the Gregorian or Julian calendar, and are exactly equivalent to the Anno Domini (AD) and Before Christ (BC) notations. The expressions " CE" and "AD " each equally describe the current year; "400 BCE" and "400 BC" are the same year too. BCE/CE are primarily used to avoid religious connotations, by not referring to Jesus as Dominus ('Lord').

History

Anno Domini

Around the year 525, the Christian monk Dionysius Exiguus devised the principle of taking the moment that he believed to be the date of the incarnation of Jesus to be the point from which years are numbered (the epoch) of the Christian ecclesiastical calendar. Dionysius labeled the column of the table in which he introduced the new era as "Anni Domini Nostri Jesu Christi" ('the years of our Lord Jesus Christ'). He did this to replace the Era of the Martyrs system (then used for some Easter tables) because he did not wish to continue the memory of a tyrant who persecuted Christians.

This way of numbering years became more widespread in Europe, with Bede using it in England in 731. Bede also introduced the practice of dating years before 1 backwards, without a year zero though the name "BC" for this era did not happen until much later.

Vulgar Era

url=https://www.oxfordmusiconline.com/grovemusic/view/10.1093/gmo/9781561592630.001.0001/omo-9781561592630-e-0000014903 }} {{Grove Music subscription}}</ref>

The first use of the Latin term anno aerae nostrae vulgaris may be in a 1615 book by Johannes Kepler. The word "vulgar" originally meant "of the ordinary people", with no derogatory associations. Kepler used it again, as ab Anno vulgaris aerae, in a 1616 table of ephemerides, as well as in 1617 (albeit as ab anno vulgaris aerae). An English-language 1635 edition of that book, in its title page, may contain the earliest known use of "Vulgar Era". A 1701 book edited by John le Clerc includes the phrase "Before Christ according to the Vulgar Æra,6".

The Merriam-Webster Dictionary gives 1716 as the date of first use of the term "vulgar era" (which it defines as "Christian era").{{efn|The probable source is a 1716 book in English by Dean Humphrey Prideaux which refers to, "...the vulgar Æra of Christ's incarnation and not from the true time of it."{{cite book |title=The Old and New Testament Connected in the History of the Jews and Neighbouring Nations |author=Humphrey Prideaux, D.D.|author-link=Humphrey Prideaux |location=London

Common Era

The English phrase "Common Era" appears at least as early as 1708, and in a 1715 book on astronomy, it is used interchangeably with "Christian Era" and "Vulgar Era". A 1759 history book uses common æra in a generic sense to refer to "the common era of the Jews". The phrase "before the common era" may have first appeared in a 1770 work that also uses common era and vulgar era as synonyms in a translation of a book originally written in German. The 1797 edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica uses the terms vulgar era and common era synonymously. In 1835, in his book Living Oracles, Alexander Campbell wrote: "The vulgar Era, or Anno Domini; the fourth year of Jesus Christ, the first of which was but eight days". He refers to the common era as a synonym for vulgar era: "the fact that our Lord was born on the 4th year before the vulgar era, called Anno Domini, thus making (for example) the 42d year from his birth to correspond with the 38th of the common era". The Catholic Encyclopedia (1909), in at least one article, reports all three terms (Christian, Vulgar, Common Era) being commonly understood by the early 20th century.

The phrase "common era", in lower case, also appeared in the 19th century in a "generic" sense, not necessarily to refer to the Christian Era, but to any system of dates in everyday use throughout a civilization. Thus, "the common era of the Jews", "the common era of the Mahometans", "common era of the world", or "the common era of the foundation of Rome". When it did refer to the Christian Era, it was sometimes qualified (e.g., "common era of the Incarnation", "common era of the Nativity", or "common era of the birth of Christ").

An adapted translation of Common Era into Latin as Era Vulgaris was adopted in the 20th century by some followers of Aleister Crowley, and thus the abbreviation "e.v." or "EV" may sometimes be seen as a replacement for AD.

Judaism

Although Jews have the Hebrew calendar, they often use the Gregorian calendar without the AD prefix, as Judaism does not recognize Jesus as the Messiah. As early as 1825, the abbreviation VE (for Vulgar Era) was in use among Jews to denote years in the Western calendar. Common Era has been in use for Hebrew lessons since before 1905.

Contemporary usage

Some academics in the fields of theology, education, archaeology and history have adopted CE and BCE notation despite some disagreement.See, for example, the Society for Historical Archaeology states in its more recent style guide "Do not use CE (common era), BP (before present), or BCE; convert these expressions to AD and BC." (In section I 5 the Society explains how to use "years BP" in connection with radiocarbon ages.) whereas the American Anthropological Association style guide takes a different approach, supporting the use of "CE" and "BCE." {{cite web |url=http://www.aaanet.org/publications/guidelines.cfm |title=AAA Style Guide |format=PDF |author=American Anthropological Society

Australia

In 2011, media reports suggested that the BC/AD notation in Australian school textbooks would be replaced by BCE/CE notation. The change drew opposition from some politicians and church leaders. Weeks after the story broke, the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority denied the rumours and stated that the BC/AD notation would remain, with CE and BCE as an optional suggested learning activity.

Canada

In 2013, the Canadian Museum of Civilization (now the Canadian Museum of History) in Gatineau (opposite Ottawa), which had previously switched to BCE/CE, decided to change back to BC/AD in material intended for the public while retaining BCE/CE in academic content.

Nepal

The notation is in particularly common use in Nepal in order to disambiguate dates from the local (Indian or Hindu) calendar, Bikram or Vikram Sambat. Disambiguation is needed because the era of the Hindu calendar is quite close to the Common Era.

United Kingdom

In 2002, an advisory panel for the religious education syllabus for England and Wales recommended introducing BCE/CE dates to schools, and by 2018 some local education authorities were using them.

In 2018, the National Trust said it would continue to use BC/AD as its house style. English Heritage explains its era policy thus: "It might seem strange to use a Christian calendar system when referring to British prehistory, but the BC/AD labels are widely used and understood." Some parts of the BBC use BCE/CE, but some presenters have said they will not. The style guide for The Guardian says, under the entry for CE/BCE: "some people prefer CE (common era, current era, or Christian era) and BCE (before common era, etc.) to AD and BC, which, however, remain our style".

United States

In the United States, the use of the BCE/CE notation in textbooks was reported in 2005 to be growing. and by the Norton Anthology of English Literature. Others have taken a different approach. The US-based History Channel uses BCE/CE notation in articles on non-Christian religious topics such as Jerusalem and Judaism. The 2006 style guide for the Episcopal Diocese Maryland Church News says that BCE and CE should be used. The US-based Society of Biblical Literature style guide for academic texts on religion prefers BCE/CE to BC/AD.

In June 2006, in the United States, the Kentucky State School Board reversed its decision to use BCE and CE in the state's new Program of Studies, leaving education of students about these concepts a matter of local discretion.

Rationales

Support

The use of CE in Jewish scholarship was historically motivated by the desire to avoid the implicit "Our Lord" in the abbreviation AD. Although other aspects of dating systems are based in Christian origins, AD is a direct reference to Jesus as Lord. Proponents of the Common Era notation assert that the use of BCE/CE shows sensitivity to those who use the same year numbering system as the one that originated with and is currently used by Christians, but who are not themselves Christian. Former Secretary-General of the United Nations Kofi Annan has argued:

Adena K. Berkowitz, in her application to argue before the United States Supreme Court, opted to use BCE and CE because, "Given the multicultural society that we live in, the traditional Jewish designations—B.C.E. and C.E.—cast a wider net of inclusion." In the World History Encyclopedia, Joshua J. Mark wrote "Non-Christian scholars, especially, embraced [CE and BCE] because they could now communicate more easily with the Christian community. Jewish, Islamic, Hindu and Buddhist scholars could retain their [own] calendar but refer to events using the Gregorian Calendar as BCE and CE without compromising their own beliefs about the divinity of Jesus of Nazareth." In History Today, Michael Ostling wrote: "BC/AD Dating: In the year of whose Lord? The continuing use of AD and BC is not only factually wrong but also offensive to many who are not Christians."

Opposition

Critics note that there is no difference in the epoch of the two systems—both chosen to be close to the date of birth of Jesus. Since the year numbers are the same, the use of BCE and CE dates should be equally offensive to adherents of religions other than Christianity as the use of BC and AD dates. Roman Catholic priest and writer on interfaith issues Raimon Panikkar argued that the BCE/CE usage is the less inclusive option since the notation still uses the Christian calendar numbers, forcing it on non-Christian nations and individuals. In 1993, the English-language expert Kenneth G. Wilson speculated a slippery slope scenario in his style guide: "If we do end by casting aside the AD/BC convention, almost certainly some will argue that we ought to cast aside as well the conventional numbering system [that is, the method of numbering years] itself, given its Christian basis."

Some Christians are offended by the removal of the explicit reference to Jesus (as in the AD/BC notation).

Conventions in style guides

The abbreviation BCE, just as with BC, always follows the year number. Unlike AD, which still often precedes the year number, CE always follows the year number (if context requires that it be written at all). Thus, the current year is written as in both notations (or, if further clarity is needed, as CE, or as AD ), and the year that Socrates died is represented as 399 BCE (the same year that 399 BC represents in the BC/AD notation). The abbreviations are sometimes written with small capital letters, or with periods (e.g., "B.C.E." or "C.E.").

Similar conventions in other languages

  • In Germany, Jews in Berlin seem to have already been using words translating to "(before the) common era" in the 18th century, while others like Moses Mendelssohn opposed this usage as it would hinder the integration of Jews into German society. The formulation seems to have persisted among German Jews in the 19th century in forms like vor der gewöhnlichen Zeitrechnung (before the common chronology). In 1938 Nazi Germany, the use of this convention was also prescribed by the National Socialist Teachers League. However, it was soon discovered that many German Jews had been using the convention ever since the 18th century, and Time magazine found it ironic to see "Aryans following Jewish example nearly 200 years later".
  • In Spanish, common forms used for "BC" are a. C. and a. de C. (for "antes de Cristo", "before Christ"), with variations in punctuation and sometimes the use of J. C. (Jesucristo) instead of C. The Real Academia Española also acknowledges the use of a. n. e. () and d. n. e. (). In scholarly writing, a. e. c. is the equivalent of the English "BCE", "antes de la era común" or "Before the Common Era".
  • In Welsh, OC can be expanded to equivalents of both AD (Oed Crist) and CE (Oes Cyffredin); for dates before the Common Era, CC (traditionally, Cyn Crist) is used exclusively.
  • In Russian since the October Revolution (1917) до н.э. (до нашей эры, lit. before our era) and н.э. (нашей эры, lit. of our era) are used almost universally. Within Christian churches до Р.Х./от Р.Х. (до/от Рождества Христова, i.e. before/after the birth of Christ, equivalent to ) remains in use.
  • In Polish, "p.n.e." (przed naszą erą, lit. before our era) and "n.e." (naszej ery, lit. of our era) are commonly used in historical and scientific literature. Przed Chrystusem (before Christ) and po Chrystusie (after Christ) see sporadic usage, mostly in religious publications.
  • In China, upon the foundation of the Republic of China, the Government in Nanking adopted the Republic of China calendar with 1912 designated as year 1, but used the Western calendar for international purposes. The translated term was 西元 (xī yuán, "Western Era"), which is still used in Taiwan in formal documents. In 1949, the People's Republic of China adopted 公元 (gōngyuán, "Common Era") for both internal and external affairs in mainland China. This notation was extended to Hong Kong in 1997 and to Macau in 1999 (de facto extended in 1966) through Annex III of the Hong Kong Basic Law and the Macau Basic Law, thus eliminating the ROC calendar in these areas. BCE is translated into Chinese as 公元前 (gōngyuánqián, "Before the Common Era").
  • In Czech, the "n. l." (našeho letopočtu which translates as of our year count) and "př. n. l." or "před n. l." (před naším letopočtem meaning before our year count) is used, always after the year number. The direct translation of AD (léta Páně, abbreviated as L. P.) or BC (před Kristem, abbreviated as př. Kr.) is seen as archaic.
  • In Croatian the common form used for BC and AD are pr. Kr. (prije Krista, "before Christ") and p. Kr. (poslije Krista, after Christ). The abbreviations pr. n. e. (prije nove ere, before new era) and n. e. (nove ere, (of the) new era) have also recently been introduced.
  • In Danish, "f.v.t." (før vor tidsregning, before our time reckoning) and "e.v.t." (efter vor tidsregning, after our time reckoning) are used as BCE/CE are in English. Also commonly used are "f.Kr." (før Kristus, before Christ) and "e.Kr." (efter Kristus, after Christ), which are both placed after the year number in contrast with BC/AD in English.
  • In Macedonian, the terms "п.н.е." (пред нашата ера "before our era") and "н.е." (наша ера "our era") are used in every aspect.
  • In Estonian, "e.m.a." (enne meie ajaarvamist, before our time reckoning) and "m.a.j." (meie ajaarvamise järgi, according to our time reckoning) are used as BCE and CE, respectively. Also in use are terms "eKr" (enne Kristust, before Christ) and "pKr" (pärast Kristust, after Christ). In all cases, the abbreviation is written after the year number.
  • In Finnish, "eaa." (ennen ajanlaskun alkua, before time reckoning) and "jaa." (jälkeen ajanlaskun alun, after the start of time reckoning) are used as BCE and CE, respectively. Also (decreasingly) in use are terms "eKr" (ennen Kristusta, before Christ) and "jKr". (jälkeen Kristuksen, after Christ). In all cases, the abbreviation is written after the year number.

Explanatory notes

References

References

  1. (2003). "Anno Domini". Merriam-Webster.
  2. "Controversy over the use of the "CE/BCE" and "AD/BC" dating notation/". Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance.
  3. Espenak, Fred. (25 February 2008). "Year dating conventions". [[NASA]].
  4. Herrmann. (27 May 2006). "BCE date designation called more sensitive". Chicago Sun-Times.
  5. McKim, Donald K. (1996). "Westminster dictionary of theological terms". Westminster John Knox Press.
  6. Doggett, L.E., (1992), [http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEhelp/calendars.html "Calendars"] in Seidelmann, P.K., ''The Explanatory Supplement to the Astronomical Almanac'', Sausalito CA: University Science Books, 2.1
  7. Bromiley, Geoffrey W.. (1995). "The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia". Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
  8. Jeans, Susi. (2013). "Kepler [Keppler], Johannes". [[Oxford University Press]].
  9. "Keeping Time: The Origin of B.C. & A.D.".
  10. Weatherall, Claire. (18 May 2023). "Library: Archival Skills: Historical dates".
  11. Kepler, Johann. (1616 <!--). "Ephemerides novae motuum caelestium, ab Ānno vulgaris aerae MDCXVII en observationibus potissimum Tychonis Brahei hypothesibus physicis, et tabulis Rudolphinis...". Plancus.
  12. (1617). "Ephemerides novae motuum coelestium, ab anno vulgaris aerae MDCXVII[-XXXVI]...". Johannes Plancus.
  13. (1635). "Ephemerides of the Celestiall Motions, for the Yeers of the Vulgar Era 1633 ...".
  14. (1701). "The Harmony of the Evangelists". Sam Buckley.
  15. "Merriam Webster Online entry for ''Vulgar Era''".
  16. (1933). "Oxford English Dictionary".
  17. (January 1708). "The History of the Works of the Learned".
  18. Gregory, David. (1715). "The Elements of Astronomy, Physical and Geometrical". J. Nicholson.
  19. Sale, George. (1759). "An Universal History: From the Earliest Accounts to the Present Time". C. Bathurst [etc.].
  20. Hooper, William. (1770). "The Elements of Universal Erudition: Containing an Analytical Abridgment of the Sciences, Polite Arts, and Belles Lettres". J Robson and B. Law.
  21. {{cite encyclopedia. (1797). A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar
  22. {{cite encyclopedia. (1797). A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar
  23. Alexander Campbell. (1835). "The Living Oracles, Fourth Edition".
  24. Alexander Campbell. (1835). "The Living Oracles, Fourth Edition".
  25. "Catholic Encyclopedia".
  26. (1874). "Popular Encyclopedia or Conversations Lexicon". Oxford University Press.
  27. (1858). "The first and second Advent: or, The past and the future with reference to the Jew, the gentile, and the Church of God". Wertheim, MacIntosh & Hunt.
  28. (1856). "Practical tables for the reduction of Mahometan dates to the Christian calendar". Oxford University Press.
  29. Jones, William. (1801). "The Theological, Philosophical and Miscellaneous Works of the Rev. William Jones". Rivington.
  30. [[Alexander Fraser Tytler]]. (1854). "Universal History: From the Creation of the World to the Beginning of the Eighteenth Century". Fetridge and Company.
  31. Baynes, Thomas Spencer. (1833). "The Encyclopædia Britannica: A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and General Literature". Henry G. Allen and Company.
  32. Todd, James Henthorn. (1864). "St. Patrick, Apostle of Ireland, A Memoir of his Life and Mission". Hodges, Smith & Co.
  33. Heneage Elsley. (1812). "Annotations on the Four Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles". T. Payne.
  34. [[Félix Gaffiot]]. (1934). "[[Dictionnaire Illustré Latin-Français]]". [[Hachette (publisher).
  35. Kaczynski, Richard. (1 April 2009). "The Weiser Concise Guide to Aleister Crowley". Weiser Books.
  36. Tracey R Rich. "Jewish Calendar".
  37. (2003). "Plymouth Hoe Old Jewish Cemetery Tombstone Inscriptions 3". Jewish Communities & Records, Susser Archive.
  38. BBC Team. (8 February 2005). "History of Judaism 63 BCE – 1086 CE". British Broadcasting Corporation.
  39. Cavacini, A.. (2015). "Is the CE/BCE notation becoming a standard in scholarly literature?". Scientometrics.
  40. Malkin, Bonnie. (2 September 2011). "Anger in Australia as school books 'write Christ out of history'". The Telegraph.
  41. (21 October 2011). "AD/BC rock solid in curriculum". The Age.
  42. [https://nationalpost.com/holy-post/museum-of-civilization-putting-the-christ-back-in-history-as-bc-and-ad-return "Museum of Civilization putting the 'Christ' back in history as BC and AD return"], by Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press, ''National Post'', 27 February 2013
  43. (9 February 2002). "AD and BC become CE/BCE". This is London.
  44. [https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/11/12/national-trust-tells-properties-stick-anno-domini-historic-site/ "National Trust tells properties to stop dropping BC and AD out of fear it might offend non-Christians"], ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', by Henry Bodkin, 12 November 2018
  45. [https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/stonehenge/history-and-stories/history/stonehenge-glossary/ Stonehenge glossary, "BC and AD"] English Heritage
  46. "BBC News style guide".
  47. "Guardian style guide".
  48. "Jerusalem Timeline". History Channel.
  49. (1 April 2005). "Maryland Church News Submission Guide & Style Manual". Maryland Church News.
  50. ''SBL Handbook of Style'' [[Society of Biblical Literature]] 1999 "8.1.2 ERAS – The preferred style is B.C.E. and C.E. (with periods). If you use A.D. and B.C., remember that A.D. precedes the date and B.C. follows it. (For the use of these abbreviations in titles, see § 7.1.3.2.)"
  51. "State School Board reverses itself on B.C./A.D. controversy". Family Foundation of Kentucky.
  52. Joe Biesk. (15 June 2006). "School board keeps traditional historic designations". Louisville Courier-Journal.
  53. (10 June 2006). "Kentucky Board of Education Report". Kentucky Board of Education Report.
  54. (1910). "The American and English Encyclopedia of Law and Practice".
  55. (2009). "World Religions At Your Fingertips". Penguin.
  56. Ostling, Michael. (October 2009). "BC/AD Dating: In the year of whose Lord?".
  57. Lefevere, Patricia. (11 December 1998). "Annan: 'Peace is never a perfect achievement' – United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan". National Catholic Reporter.
  58. Annan, Kofi A.. (28 June 1999). "Common values for a common era: Even as we cherish our diversity, we need to discover our shared values". Civilization: The Magazine of the Library of Congress.
  59. Safire, William. (17 August 1997). "B.C./A.D. or B.C.E./C.E.?". New York Times.
  60. Mark, Joshua J.. (27 March 2017). "World History Encyclopedia".
  61. Pollick, Michael. (23 May 2024). "What is the Difference Between AD, BC, BCE, and CE in Identifying Historical Dates?".
  62. Panikkar, Raimon. (2004). "Christophany: The Fullness of Man". Orbis Books.
  63. (2017). "Chicago Manual of Style". University of Chicago Press.
  64. (2003). "Major Rule Changes in The Chicago Manual of Style, Fifteenth Edition". University of Chicago Press.
  65. {{lang. de
  66. {{aut. [[Julius Fürst]], {{lang. de. Geschichte des Karäerthums von 900 bis 1575 der gewöhnlichen Zeitrechnung (Leipzig 1862–1869).
  67. von und zu Guttenberg, Karl Ludwig Freiherr. (May 1938). "Weiße Blätter: Monatschrift für Geschichte, Tradition u. Staat".
  68. (7 March 1938). "GERMANY: Jewish Joke".
  69. (2010). "Ortografía de la lengua española". Real Academia Española y Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española.
  70. "Writing Dates in Spanish".
  71. "Jazyková příručka Ústavu pro jazyk český".
  72. "pr. Kr.".
  73. "p. Kr.".
  74. "pr. n. e.".
  75. "n. e.".
  76. Johannes Kepler. (1615). "Joannis Keppleri Eclogae chronicae: (etc)". Tampach.
  77. (2001). "History of the World Christian Movement". Continuum International Publishing Group.
  78. Pedersen, O.. (1983). "Gregorian Reform of the Calendar: Proceedings of the Vatican Conference to commemorate its 400th anniversary". Vatican Observatory.
  79. Gormley, Michael. (24 April 2005). "Use of B.C. and A.D. faces changing times". [[Houston Chronicle]].
  80. "Comments on the use of CE and BCE to identify dates in history". ReligiousTolerance.com.
  81. Wilson, Kenneth G.. (16 December 1993). "The Columbia Guide to Standard American English – A.D., B.C., (A.)C.E., B.C.E.". Columbia University Press.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Common Era — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report