Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/clinical-research

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

Clinical trials publication

Publishing clinical trial research in peer-reviewed journal


Publishing clinical trial research in peer-reviewed journal

Clinical trials publication is having research published in a peer reviewed journal following clinical trials. Most investigators will want to have such a publication but the nature of clinical trials may create special considerations and obstacles.

Most agreements for a clinical trial between sponsor and investigator grants that the sponsor may control publication of results by requesting publication delays, deleting portions of a manuscript, or placing limits on the types of issues that can be discussed. These controls serve to prevent disclosure of information that would compromise the sponsor's ability to patent inventions; to prevent disclosure of confidential information shared with investigator; and to coordinate the disclosure of results when a clinical trial is being conducted at multiple sites. These are legitimate business concerns, but may not restrict the investigator from freely publishing research results in the end of the study and approval process.

Due to repeated accusations and findings that some clinical trials conducted or funded by pharmaceutical companies may report only positive results for the preferred medication, the industry has been looked at much more closely by independent groups and government agencies. Issues and responses have included guidelines to limit financial inducements to researchers, journal articles presented as academic research actually being 'ghost-written' by pharmaceutical companies, litigation to deter or suppress publication of negative findings, concerns, or cheaper alternatives. and laws in the United States requiring advanced clinical trials to be registered on a public government website.

References

References

  1. (2004-02-17). "Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials". Biofizika.
  2. (29 May 2003). "Who pays for the pizza? Redefining the relationships between doctors and drug companies. 2: Disentanglement". BMJ.
  3. Barnett, Antony. (2003-12-07). "Revealed: how drug firms 'hoodwink' medical journals". [[The Observer]].
  4. (2002-05-25). "How whistleblowing cost one doctor £550000". BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.).
  5. Lenzer, Jeanne. (2005-05-27). "What Can We Learn from Medical Whistleblowers?". PLOS Medicine.
  6. (2008-03-03). "Hogan & Hartson Update on Pharmaceutical Trial Registration".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about Clinical trials publication — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report