Aurangzeb

Early life

Aurangzeb was born in Dahod on 3 November 1618. His father was Emperor Shah Jahan (), who hailed from the Mughal house of the Timurid dynasty, which in turn was part of the Barlas tribe of Turco-Mongol origins. The latter was descended from Emir Timur (), the founder of the Timurid Empire. Aurangzeb's mother Mumtaz Mahal was the daughter of the Persian nobleman Asaf Khan, who was the youngest son of vizier Mirza Ghiyas and grandson of vizier Mohammad-Sharif. Aurangzeb was born during the reign of his patrilineal grandfather Jahangir (), the fourth emperor of the Mughal Empire. In June 1626, after an unsuccessful rebellion by his father, eight-year-old Aurangzeb and his brother Dara Shikoh were sent to the Mughal court in Lahore as hostages of their grandfather Jahangir and his wife, Nur Jahan, as part of their father's pardon deal. After Jahangir died in 1627, Shah Jahan emerged victorious in the ensuing war of succession to the Mughal throne. Aurangzeb and his brother were consequently reunited with Shah Jahan in Agra in 1628. Aurangzeb's daily allowance was fixed at 500 rupees.

As a Mughal prince, Aurangzeb received an education covering subjects like combat, military strategy, and administration. His curriculum also included areas like Islamic studies, Turkic and Persian literature. Aurangzeb grew up fluent in the Hindustani language. He was also fluent in his ancestral language of Chagatai Turkic, but similar to his predecessors, he preferred to use Persian. He had mastered the Quran and the hadith.

On 28 May 1633, a war elephant stampeded through the Mughal imperial encampment. Aurangzeb rode against the elephant and threw his spear at its head. He was unhorsed but escaped death. For his courage, Aurangzeb's father conferred on him the title of Bahadur (brave) and presented him with gifts. When chided for his recklessness, Aurangzeb replied:

Historians have interpreted this as an unjust taunt with cowardice against his brothers. Shuja had also faced the elephant and wounded it with his spear. Dara had been too far away to come to their assistance.

Three days later Aurangzeb turned fifteen. Shah Jahan weighed him and presented him 5,000 Mohars, the elephant Sudhakar, along with other presents worth Rs. 200,000. His bravery against the elephant was documented in Persian and Urdu verses.

Ancestry

Career as prince

In December 1634, he was assigned to his first post with the rank of ten thousand horse and four thousand troopers, also was allowed to use the royal prerogative of red tent. Aurangzeb was nominally in charge of the force sent to Bundelkhand with the intent of subduing the rebellious ruler of Orchha, Jhujhar Singh, who had attacked another territory in defiance of Shah Jahan's policy and was refusing to atone for his actions. By arrangement, Aurangzeb stayed in the rear, away from the fighting, and took the advice of his generals as the Mughal Army gathered and commenced the siege of Orchha in 1635. The campaign was successful and Singh was removed from power.

First Deccan governorate (1636–1644)

Aurangzeb was appointed viceroy of the Deccan in 1636. After Shah Jahan's vassals had been devastated by the alarming expansion of Ahmednagar during the reign of the Nizam Shahi boy-prince Murtaza Shah III, the emperor dispatched Aurangzeb, who in 1636 brought the Nizam Shahi dynasty to an end. The Mughal provinces of Deccan at that time were Khandesh, Berar, Telangana and Daulatabad. The entire region with 64 forts, were in charge of Aurangzeb, while ten more forts had yet to be conquered by the Mughals. In 1637, Aurangzeb married the Safavid princess Dilras Banu, posthumously known as Rabia-ud-Daurani. She was his first wife and chief consort as well as his favourite. He also had an infatuation with a slave girl, Hira Bai, whose death at a young age greatly affected him. In his old age, he was under the charms of his concubine, Udaipuri Mahal. The latter had formerly been a companion to Dara Shukoh.

In the same year, 1637, Aurangzeb was placed in charge of annexing the small Rajput kingdom of Baglana, which he did with ease. In 1638, Aurangzeb married Nawab Bai, later known as Rahmat al-Nisa. That same year, Aurangzeb dispatched an army to subdue the Portuguese coastal fortress of Daman, however his forces met stubborn resistance and were eventually repulsed at the end of a long siege. At some point, Aurangzeb married Aurangabadi Mahal, who was a Circassian or Georgian.

Aurangzeb arrived in Agra on 2 May 1644 to see his sister Jahanara who was severely burnt in an accident two months prior. Shah Jahan was outraged to see Aurangzeb enter the interior palace compound in military attire and immediately dismissed him from his position of viceroy of the Deccan; Aurangzeb was also no longer allowed to use red tents or to associate himself with the official military standard of the Mughal emperor. Other sources state that Aurangzeb was dismissed from his position because Aurangzeb left the life of luxury and became a faqir.

Aurangzeb's first viceroyalty of the Deccan lasted eight years from 14 July 1636 to 28 May 1644 before his dismissal.

Governor of Gujarat (1645–1647)

In 1645, he was barred from the court for seven months. It is reported that he mentioned his grief about this to fellow Mughal commanders. Thereafter, Shah Jahan appointed him governor of Gujarat. His rule in Gujarat was marked with religious disputes but he was rewarded for bringing stability. In September 1646, Shah Jahan called Aurangzeb off from Gujrat assigning the charge to Shaista Khan. On 20 January 1647, he met the emperor at Lahore, where he was promoted to the chief commander of Balkh and Badakhshan.

Governor of Balkh (1647–1648)

Main article: Mughal Central Asia campaign

In 1647, Shah Jahan moved Aurangzeb from Gujarat to be governor of Balkh, replacing a younger son, Murad Baksh, who had proved ineffective there. The area was under attack from Uzbek and Turkmen tribes. The Mughal artillery and muskets were offset by the skirmishing skills of their opponents which led to a stalemate. Aurangzeb discovered that his army could not live off the land, which was devastated by war. It is recorded that during the battle against the Uzbeks during this campaign, Aurangzeb dismounted from his elephant ride to recite prayer to the surprise of the opposing force commander.

With the onset of winter, he and his father had to make an unsatisfactory deal with the Uzbeks. They had to give away territory in exchange for nominal recognition of Mughal sovereignty. The Mughal force suffered still further with attacks by Uzbeks and other tribesmen as it retreated through the snow to Kabul. By the end of this two-year campaign, into which Aurangzeb had been plunged at a late stage, a vast sum of money had been expended for little gain.

Governor of Multan and Sindh (1648–1652)

Further unsuccessful military involvements followed, as Aurangzeb was appointed governor of Multan and Sindh. His efforts in 1649 and 1652 to dislodge the Safavids at Kandahar which they had recently retaken after a decade of Mughal control, both ended in failure as winter approached. The logistical problems of supplying an army at the extremity of the empire, combined with the poor quality of armaments and the intransigence of the opposition have been cited by John Richards as the reasons for failure. A third attempt in 1653, led by Dara Shikoh, met with the same outcome.

Second Deccan governorate (1653–1658)

On 17 July 1652, Aurangzeb became viceroy of the Deccan again after he was replaced by Dara Shukoh in the attempt to recapture Kandahar. Aurangbad's two jagirs (land grants) were moved there as a consequence of his return. The Deccan was a relatively impoverished area, this caused him to lose out financially. The area required grants were required from Malwa and Gujarat in order to maintain the administration. The situation caused ill-feeling between him and his father Shah Jahan who insisted that things could be improved if Aurangzeb made efforts to develop cultivation.

Aurangzeb appointed Murshid Quli Khan to extend to the Deccan the zabt revenue system used in northern India. Murshid Quli Khan organised a survey of agricultural land and a tax assessment on what it produced. To increase revenue, Murshid Quli Khan granted loans for seed, livestock, and irrigation infrastructure. This led the Deccan region to return to prosperity.

File:Portrait of Awrangzib as a young prince (CBL In 41.3) (Detailed).jpg|Aurangzeb, File:Face detail (2), Aurangzeb Bahadur holding an iris (6124502565) (cropped).png|Aurangzeb, File:Aurangzeb.png|Aurangzeb,

Aurangzeb proposed to resolve financial difficulties by attacking the dynastic occupants of Golconda (the Qutb Shahis) and Bijapur (the Adil Shahis). This proposal would also extend Mughal influence by accruing more lands. Aurangzeb advanced against the Sultan of Bijapur and besieged Bidar. The Kiladar (governor or captain) of the fortified city, Sidi Marjan, was mortally wounded when a gunpowder magazine exploded. After twenty-seven days of fighting, Bidar was captured by the Mughals and Aurangzeb continued his advance. Aurangzeb suspected Dara had exerted influence on his father. He believed that he was on the verge of victory in both instances, and was frustrated that Shah Jahan chose then to settle for negotiations with the opposing forces rather than pushing for complete victory.

War of succession

Main article: Mughal war of succession (1658–1659)

The four sons of Shah Jahan all held governorships during their father's reign. The emperor favoured the eldest, Dara Shikoh. This had caused resentment among the younger three, who sought at various times to strengthen alliances between themselves and against Dara. There was no Mughal tradition of primogeniture, the systematic passing of rule, upon an emperor's death, to his eldest son. Instead it was customary for sons to overthrow their father and for brothers to war to the death among themselves.

Historian Satish Chandra says that "In the ultimate resort, connections among the powerful military leaders, and military strength and capacity [were] the real arbiters". The contest for power was primarily between Dara Shikoh and Aurangzeb because, although all four sons had demonstrated competence in their official roles, it was around these two that the supporting cast of officials and other influential people mostly circulated. There were ideological differences – Dara was an intellectual and a religious liberal in the mould of Akbar, while Aurangzeb was much more conservative – but, as historians Barbara D. Metcalf and Thomas R. Metcalf say, "To focus on divergent philosophies neglects the fact that Dara was a poor general and leader. It also ignores the fact that factional lines in the succession dispute were not, by and large, shaped by ideology."

Marc Gaborieau, professor of Indian studies at l'École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, explains that "The loyalties of [officials and their armed contingents] seem to have been motivated more by their own interests, the closeness of the family relation and above all the charisma of the pretenders than by ideological divides." Muslims and Hindus did not divide along religious lines in their support for one pretender or the other nor, according to Chandra, is there much evidence to support the belief that Jahanara and other members of the royal family were split in their support. Jahanara, certainly, interceded at various times on behalf of all of the princes and was well-regarded by Aurangzeb even though she shared the religious outlook of Dara.

In 1656, a general under Qutb Shahi dynasty named Musa Khan led an army of 12,000 musketeers to attack Aurangzeb, who was besieging Golconda Fort. Later in the same campaign, Aurangzeb, in turn, rode against an army consisting of 8,000 horsemen and 20,000 Karnataki musketeers.

After making clear his desire for his son Dara to take over after him, Shah Jahan fell ill with strangury in 1657. He was kept in seclusion and cared for by Dara in the newly built city of Shahjahanabad (Old Delhi). Rumours spread that Shah Jahan had died, which led to concerns among his younger sons. These younger sons took military actions seemingly in response, but it is not known whether these preparations were made in the mistaken belief that the rumours of death of Shah Jahan were true and that Dara might be hiding it for political gain, or whether the challengers were taking advantage of the situation.

Shah Shuja in Bengal, where he had been governor since 1637 crowned himself King at RajMahal. He brought his cavalry, artillery and river flotilla upriver towards Agra. Near Varanasi his forces confronted a defending army sent from Delhi under the command of Prince Sulaiman Shukoh, son of Dara Shukoh, and Raja Jai Singh.

Murad did the same in his governorship of Gujarat and Aurangzeb did so in the Deccan.

After regaining some of his health, Shah Jahan moved to Agra and Dara urged him to send forces to challenge Shah Shuja and Murad, who had declared themselves rulers in their respective territories. While Shah Shuja was defeated at Banares in February 1658, the army sent to deal with Murad discovered to their surprise that he and Aurangzeb had combined their forces, the two brothers having agreed to partition the empire once they had gained control of it.

The two armies clashed at Dharmat in April 1658, with Aurangzeb being the victor. Shuja was chased through Bihar. The victory of Aurangzeb proved this to be a poor decision by Dara Shikoh, who now had a defeated force on one front and a successful force unnecessarily pre-occupied on another. Realising that his recalled Bihar forces would not arrive at Agra in time to resist the emboldened Aurangzeb's advance, Dara scrambled to form alliances in order but found that Aurangzeb had already courted key potential candidates.

When Dara's disparate, hastily assembled army clashed with Aurangzeb's well-disciplined, battle-hardened force at the battle of Samugarh in late May, neither Dara's men nor his generalship were any match for Aurangzeb. Dara had also become over-confident in his own abilities and, by ignoring advice not to lead in battle while his father was alive, he cemented the idea that he had usurped the throne. "After the defeat of Dara, Shah Jahan was imprisoned in the fort of Agra where he spent eight long years under the care of his favourite daughter Jahanara."

Aurangzeb then broke his arrangement with Murad Baksh, which probably had been his intention all along. Instead of looking to partition the empire between himself and Murad, he had his brother arrested and imprisoned at Gwalior Fort. Murad was executed on 4 December 1661, ostensibly for the murder of the diwan of Gujarat. The allegation was encouraged by Aurangzeb, who caused the diwan's son to seek retribution for the death under the principles of Sharia law.

Meanwhile, Dara gathered his forces, and moved to the Punjab. The army sent against Shuja was trapped in the east, its generals Jai Singh and Dilir Khan submitted to Aurangzeb, but Dara's son, Suleiman Shikoh, escaped. Aurangzeb offered Shah Shuja the governorship of Bengal. This move had the effect of isolating Dara Shikoh and causing more troops to defect to Aurangzeb. Shah Shuja, who had declared himself emperor in Bengal began to annex more territory and this prompted Aurangzeb to march from Punjab with a new and large army that fought during the battle of Khajwa, where Shah Shuja and his chain-mail armoured war elephants were routed by the forces loyal to Aurangzeb. Shah Shuja then fled to Arakan (in present-day Burma), where he was executed by the local rulers.

With Shuja and Murad disposed of, and with his father immured in Agra, Aurangzeb pursued Dara Shikoh, chasing him across the north-western bounds of the empire. Aurangzeb claimed that Dara was no longer a Muslim and accused him of poisoning the Mughal Grand Vizier Saadullah Khan. After a series of battles, defeats and retreats, Dara was betrayed by one of his generals, who arrested and bound him. In 1658, Aurangzeb arranged his formal coronation in Delhi.

On 10 August 1659, Dara was executed on grounds of apostasy and his head was sent to Shah Jahan. This was the first prominent execution of Aurangzeb based on accusations of being influenced by Hinduism, however some sources argue it was done for political reasons. Aurangzeb had his allied brother Prince Murad Baksh held for murder, judged and then executed. Aurangzeb was accused of poisoning his imprisoned nephew Sulaiman Shikoh. Having secured his position, Aurangzeb confined his frail father at the Agra Fort but did not mistreat him. Shah Jahan was cared for by Jahanara and died in 1666.

Reign

Full title

The epithet Aurangzeb means 'Ornament of the Throne'. His chosen title Alamgir translates to Conqueror of the World.

Aurangzeb's full imperial title was:

Al-Sultan al-Azam wal Khaqan al-Mukarram Hazrat Abul Muzaffar Muhy-ud-Din Muhammad Aurangzeb Bahadur Alamgir I, Badshah Ghazi, Shahanshah-e-Sultanat-ul-Hindiya Wal Mughaliya.

Aurangzeb had also been attributed various other titles including Caliph of The Merciful, Monarch of Islam, and Living Custodian of God.

Bureaucracy

Aurangzeb's imperial bureaucracy employed significantly more Hindus than that of his predecessors.

Between 1679 and 1707, the number of Hindu officials in the Mughal administration rose by half to 31.6% due to an increased recruitment of Marathas for the purpose of Deccan campaign. In the second half of his rule, the Marathas outnumbered Rajputs in his administration. Nevertheless, he tried to decrease the number of non-Muslim nobles in his court and encouraged high ranking Hindu officials to convert to Islam.

Economy

Under his reign, the Mughal Empire contributed to the world's GDP by nearly 25%, surpassing Qing China, making it the world's largest economy and biggest manufacturing power, more than the entirety of Western Europe, and signalled proto-industrialisation.

Religious policy

Aurangzeb was an orthodox Muslim ruler. Subsequent to the policies of his three predecessors, he endeavoured to make Islam a dominant force in his reign. However these efforts brought him into conflict with the forces that were opposed to this revival. Aurangzeb was a follower of the Mujaddidi Order and a disciple of the son of the Punjabi saint, Ahmad Sirhindi. He sought to establish Islamic rule as instructed and inspired by him.

Sheikh Muhammad Ikram stated that after returning from Kashmir, Aurangzeb issued order in 1663, to ban the practice of Sati, a Hindu practice to burn a widow whenever her husband died. Ikram recorded that Aurangzeb issued the decree:

Although Aurangzeb's orders could be evaded with payment of bribes to officials, adds Ikram, later European travellers record that sati was not much practised in Mughal empire, and that sati was "very rare, except it be some Rajah's wives, that the Indian women burn at all" by the end of Aurangzeb's reign.

Historian Katherine Brown has noted that "The very name of Aurangzeb seems to act in the popular imagination as a signifier of politico-religious bigotry and repression, regardless of historical accuracy." The subject has also resonated in modern times with popularly accepted claims that he intended to destroy the Bamiyan Buddhas. As a political and religious conservative, Aurangzeb chose not to follow the secular-religious viewpoints of his predecessors after his ascension. He made no mention of the Persian concept of kinship, the Farr-i-Aizadi, and based his rule on the Quranic concept of kingship.

Shah Jahan had already moved away from the liberalism of Akbar, although in a token manner rather than with the intent of suppressing Hinduism, and Aurangzeb took the change still further. Though the approach to faith of Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan was more syncretic than Babur, the founder of the empire, Aurangzeb's position is not so obvious.

His emphasis on sharia competed, or was directly in conflict, with his insistence that zawabit or secular decrees could supersede sharia. The chief qazi refusing to crown him in 1659, Aurangzeb had a political need to present himself as a "defender of the sharia" due to popular opposition to his actions against his father and brothers. Despite claims of sweeping edicts and policies, contradictory accounts exist. Historian Katherine Brown has argued that Aurangzeb never imposed a complete ban on music. He sought to codify Hanafi law by the work of several hundred jurists, called Fatawa 'Alamgiri. It is possible the War of Succession and continued incursions combined with Shah Jahan's spending made cultural expenditure impossible.

He learnt that at Multan, Thatta, and particularly at Varanasi, Hindu Brahmins belonging to "established schools" were teaching "false books" and had attracted numerous Hindus and Muslims. He ordered the subahdars of these provinces to demolish the schools and the temples of non-Muslims. From this order Eaton notes the Mughal court was keen to stamp out "a certain kind of teaching" although it is unknown exactly what teachings or books the order references.

Aurangzeb ordered subahdars to punish Muslims who dressed like non-Muslims. The executions of the antinomian Sufi mystic Sarmad Kashani and the ninth Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur bear testimony to Aurangzeb's religious policy; the former was beheaded on multiple accounts of heresy, the latter, according to Sikhs, because he objected to Aurangzeb's forced conversions. Aurangzeb had also banned the celebration of the Zoroastrian festival of Nauroz along with other un-Islamic ceremonies, and encouraged conversions to Islam; instances of persecution against particular Muslim factions were also reported.

Yohanan Friedmann has reported that according to many modern historians and thinkers, the puritanical thought of Ahmad Sirhindi inspired the religious orthodoxy policy of Aurangzeb.

Taxation policy

Shortly after coming to power, Aurangzeb remitted more than 80 long-standing taxes affecting all of his subjects.

In 1679, Aurangzeb chose to reimpose jizya, a military tax on non-Muslim subjects in lieu of military service, after an abatement for a span of a hundred years, in what was critiqued by many Hindu rulers, family members of Aurangzeb, and Mughal court officials. The specific amount varied with the socioeconomic status of a subject and tax-collection was often waived for regions hit by calamities. Rajput and Maratha state officials, Brahmins, women, children, elders, the handicapped, the unemployed, the ill, and the insane were all perpetually exempted.

The collectors were mandated to be Muslims. A majority of modern scholars reject that religious bigotry influenced the imposition; rather, realpolitik – economic constraints as a result of multiple ongoing battles and establishment of credence with the orthodox ulemas – are held to be primary agents.

Aurangzeb enforced a higher tax burden on Hindu merchants at the rate of 5%, as against 2.5% on Muslim merchants, which led to considerable dislike of Aurangzeb's economic policies, a sharp turn from Akbar's uniform tax code. According to Marc Jason Gilbert, Aurangzeb ordered the jizya fees to be paid in person, in front of a tax collector, where the non Muslims were to recite a verse in the Quran that referred to their inferior status as non-Muslims. This decision led to protests and lamentations among the masses as well as Hindu court officials. In order to meet state expenditures, Aurangzeb had ordered increases in land taxes. The burden of which fell heavily upon the Hindu Jats. The reimposition of the jizya encouraged Hindus to flee to areas under East India Company jurisdiction, under which policies of religious sufferance and pretermissions of religious taxes prevailed.

Aurangzeb issued land grants and provided funds for the maintenance of shrines of worship but also often ordered their destruction. Modern historians reject the thought-school of colonial and nationalist historians about these destructions being guided by religious zealotry. Rather, the association of temples with sovereignty, power and authority is emphasised upon.

While constructing mosques was considered an act of royal duty to subjects, there are also several firmans in Aurangzeb's name supporting temples, maths, Chishti shrines, and gurudwaras, including the Mahakaleshwar temple of Ujjain, a gurudwara at Dehradun, Balaji temple of Chitrakoot, Umananda Temple of Guwahati and the Shatrunjaya Jain temples, among others.

Contemporary court chronicles mention hundreds of temples that were demolished by Aurangzeb or his chieftains upon his order. In September 1669, he ordered the destruction of Vishvanath Temple at Varanasi, which was established by Raja Man Singh, whose grandson Jai Singh was believed to have facilitated Shivaji's escape. After the Jat rebellion in Mathura (early 1670), which killed the patron of the town mosque, Aurangzeb suppressed the rebels and ordered for the city's Kesava Deo temple to be demolished, and replaced with an Eidgah.

In 1672–73, Aurangzeb ordered the resumption of all grants held by Hindus throughout the empire. This was not followed absolutely in regions such as Gujarat, where lands granted in in'am to Charans were not affected. In around 1679, he ordered the destruction of several prominent temples, including those of Khandela, Udaipur, Chittor, and Jodhpur, which were patronised by rebels.

In an order specific to Benaras, Aurangzeb invokes Sharia to declare that Hindus will be granted state protection and temples won't be razed (but prohibits construction of any new temple); other orders to similar effect can be located. Eaton notes numerous new temples were built in other areas of the empire during this time. Richard Eaton, upon a critical evaluation of primary sources, counts 15 temples to have been destroyed during Aurangzeb's reign.

Administrative reforms

Aurangzeb received tribute from all over the Indian subcontinent, using this wealth to establish bases and fortifications in India, particularly in the Carnatic, Deccan, Bengal and Lahore.

Revenue

Aurangzeb's exchequer raised a record £100 million in annual revenue through various sources like taxes, customs and land revenue, et al. from 24 provinces. He had an annual yearly revenue of $450 million, more than ten times that of his contemporary Louis XIV of France.

Coins

File:Half rupee coin of Aurangzeb (Detailed).png|A half rupee, Surat File:Silver Rupee of Aurangazeb AH1096 (Detailed).png|A rupee coin showing Aurangzeb's full name, Khambhat File:047aur13 (Detailed).png|A rupee with a square area, Junagadh File:Copper coin of Aurangazeb, issue from Surat (Detailed).png|A copper dam, Surat Aurangzeb felt that verses from the Quran should not be stamped on coins, as done in former times, because they were constantly touched by the hands and feet of people. His coins had the name of the mint city and the year of issue on one face, and, the following couplet on other:

Law

In 1689, the second Maratha Chhatrapati (King) Sambhaji was executed by Aurangzeb. In a sham trial, he was found guilty of murder and violence, atrocities against the Muslims of Burhanpur and Bahadurpur in Berar by Marathas under his command.

In 1675, the Sikh leader Guru Tegh Bahadur was arrested on orders by Aurangzeb, found guilty of blasphemy by a Qadi's court and executed.

The 32nd Da'i al-Mutlaq (Absolute Missionary) of the Dawoodi Bohra sect of Musta'lī Islam Syedna Qutubkhan Qutubuddin was executed by Aurangzeb, then governor of Gujarat, for heresy; on 27 Jumadil Akhir 1056 AH (1648 AD), Ahmedabad, India.

File:Tulapur arch.jpg|In 1689, according to Mughal accounts, Sambhaji was put on trial, found guilty of atrocities and executed. File:Aurangzeb sitting on his throne, receiving the news of the martyrdom of Guru Tegh Bahadur and the Guru’s companions, Bhai Mati Das and Bhai Dayala Das at Delhi’s Chandi Chowk.jpg|Guru Tegh Bahadur was publicly executed in 1675 on the orders of Aurangzeb in Delhi. File:Indian - Single Leaf of Shah Sarmad and Prince Dara Shikoh - Walters W912.jpg|Sarmad Kashani, a Jewish convert to Islam and Sufi mystic was accused of heresy and executed.

Military

It is reported that Aurangzeb inspected his cavalry contingents every day, during these inspections he used to test the cutlasses on sheep carcass, brought before him without the entrails and neatly bound up.

In 1663, during his visit to Ladakh, Aurangzeb established direct control over that part of the empire and loyal subjects such as Deldan Namgyal agreed to pledge tribute and loyalty. Deldan Namgyal is also known to have constructed a Grand Mosque in Leh, which he dedicated to Mughal rule.

In 1664, Aurangzeb appointed Shaista Khan subedar (governor) of Bengal. Shaista Khan eliminated Portuguese and Arakanese pirates from the region, and in 1666 recaptured the port of Chittagong from the Arakanese king, Sanda Thudhamma. Chittagong remained a key port throughout Mughal rule.

In 1685, Aurangzeb dispatched his son, Muhammad Azam Shah, with a force of nearly 50,000 men to capture Bijapur Fort and defeat Sikandar Adil Shah (the ruler of Bijapur) who refused to be a vassal. The Mughals could not make any advancements upon Bijapur Fort, mainly because of the superior usage of cannon batteries on both sides. Outraged by the stalemate Aurangzeb himself arrived on 4 September 1686 and commanded the siege of Bijapur; after eight days of fighting, the Mughals were victorious.

Only one remaining ruler, Abul Hasan Qutb Shah (the Qutbshahi ruler of Golconda), refused to surrender. He and his servicemen fortified themselves at Golconda and fiercely protected the Kollur Mine, which was then probably the world's most productive diamond mine, and an important economic asset. In 1687, Aurangzeb led his grand Mughal army against the Deccan Qutbshahi fortress during the siege of Golconda. The Qutbshahis had constructed massive fortifications throughout successive generations on a granite hill over 400 ft high with an enormous eight-mile long wall enclosing the city. The main gates of Golconda had the ability to repulse any war elephant attack.

Although the Qutbshahis maintained the impregnability of their walls, at night Aurangzeb and his infantry erected complex scaffolding that allowed them to scale the high walls. During the eight-month siege the Mughals faced many hardships including the death of their experienced commander Kilich Khan Bahadur. Eventually, Aurangzeb and his forces managed to penetrate the walls by capturing a gate, and their entry into the fort led Abul Hasan Qutb Shah to surrender. He died after twelve years of Mughal imprisonment.

Mughal cannon making skills advanced during the 17th century. One of the most impressive Mughal cannons is known as the Zafarbaksh, which is a very rare composite cannon, that required skills in both wrought-iron forge welding and bronze-casting technologies and the in-depth knowledge of the qualities of both metals. The Ibrahim Rauza was a famed cannon, which was well known for its multi-barrels. François Bernier, the personal physician to Aurangzeb, observed Mughal gun-carriages each drawn by two horses, an improvement over the bullock-drawn gun-carriages used elsewhere in India.

During the rule of Aurangzeb, in 1703, the Mughal commander at Coromandel, Daud Khan Panni spent 10,500 coins to purchase 30 to 50 war elephants from Ceylon.

Art and culture

Aurangzeb was noted for his religious piety; he memorised the entire Quran, studied hadiths and stringently observed the rituals of Islam, and "transcribe[d] copies of the Quran."

Aurangzeb had a more austere nature than his predecessors, and greatly reduced imperial patronage of the figurative Mughal miniature.

Calligraphy

The Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb is known to have patronised works of Islamic calligraphy; the demand for Quran manuscripts in the naskh style peaked during his reign. Having been instructed by Syed Ali Tabrizi, Aurangzeb was himself a talented calligrapher in naskh, evidenced by Quran manuscripts that he created.

Architecture

Aurangzeb was not as involved in architecture as his father. Under Aurangzeb's rule, the position of the Mughal Emperor as chief architectural patron began to diminish. However, Aurangzeb did endow some significant structures. Catherine Asher terms his architectural period as an "Islamisation" of Mughal architecture. One of the earliest constructions after his accession was a small marble mosque known as the Moti Masjid (Pearl Mosque), built for his personal use in the Red Fort complex of Delhi. He later ordered the construction of the Badshahi Mosque in Lahore, which is today one of the largest mosques in the Indian subcontinent. The mosque he constructed in Srinagar is still the largest in Kashmir. Aurangzeb had a palace constructed for himself in Aurangabad, which was extant till a few years ago.

Most of Aurangzeb's building activity revolved around mosques, but secular structures were not neglected. The Mubarak Manzil in Agra served as his riverside residence after his victory at Samugarh. The Bibi Ka Maqbara in Aurangabad, the mausoleum of Rabia-ud-Daurani, was constructed by his eldest son Azam Shah upon Aurangzeb's decree. Its architecture displays clear inspiration from the Taj Mahal. Aurangzeb also provided and repaired urban structures like fortifications (for example a wall around Aurangabad, many of whose gates still survive), bridges, caravanserais, and gardens.

Aurangzeb was more heavily involved in the repair and maintenance of previously existing structures. The most important of these were mosques, both Mughal and pre-Mughal, which he repaired more of than any of his predecessors. He patronised the dargahs of Sufi saints such as Bakhtiyar Kaki, and strived to maintain royal tombs.

File:Badshahi Mosque July 1 2005 pic32 by Ali Imran (1).jpg|Seventeenth-century Badshahi Masjid built by Aurangzeb in Lahore. File:Aurangabad, Bibi Ka Maqbara, mausoleo per la prima moglie di aurangzaeb Dilras Banu Begum, 1660-69 ca., corpo centrale e minareti 04.jpg|Bibi ka Maqbara.

Textiles

The textile industry in the Mughal Empire expanded greatly during the reign of the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb and was noted by travellers. Francois Bernier writes how Karkanahs, or workshops for the artisans, particularly in textiles flourished by "employing hundreds of embroiderers, who were superintended by a master". He further writes how "Artisans manufacture of silk, fine brocade, and other fine muslins, of which are made turbans, robes of gold flowers, and tunics worn by females, so delicately fine as to wear out in one night, and cost even more if they were well embroidered with fine needlework".

He also explains the different techniques employed to produce such complicated textiles as Himru (whose name is Persian for "brocade"), Paithani (whose pattern is identical on both sides), Mushru (satin weave) and how Kalamkari, in which fabrics are painted or block-printed, was a technique that originally came from Persia. Francois Bernier provided some of the first, impressive descriptions of the designs and the soft, delicate texture of Pashmina shawls also known as Kani, which were very valued for their warmth and comfort among the Mughals, and how these textiles and shawls eventually began to find their way to France and England.

File:Caspar David Friedrich - Frau mit Umschlagtuch (1804).jpg|Shawls manufactured in the Mughal Empire had highly influenced other cultures around the world. File:Muslim-shawl-makers-kashmir1867.jpg|Shawl makers in the Mughal Empire. File:Floorspread LACMA M.79.9.6 (1 of 3).jpg|Mughal imperial carpet

Foreign relations

Aurangzeb sent diplomatic missions to Mecca in 1659 and 1662, with money and gifts for the Sharif. He also sent alms in 1666 and 1672 to be distributed in Mecca and Medina. Historian Naimur Rahman Farooqi writes that, "By 1694, Aurangzeb's ardour for the Sharifs of Mecca had begun to wane; their greed and rapacity had thoroughly disillusioned the Emperor ... Aurangzeb expressed his disgust at the unethical behavior of the Sharif who appropriated all the money sent to the Hijaz for his own use, thus depriving the needy and the poor." According to English traveller named John Fryar, Aurangzeb considered that despite his enormous power on land, it was cheaper to establish a reciprocal relation with the naval forces of the Portuguese empire, to secure the sea interest of ships in Mughal territory, so he did not built large naval forces.

Relations with Aceh

For decades, the Malabari Mappila Muslims which representing the Mughal empire are already patronised Aceh Sultanate. Aurangzeb, and his brother, Dara Shikoh, participated with Aceh trade and Aurangzeb himself also exchanging presents with the Sultan of Aceh in 1641. In that year, it is recorded the daughter of Iskandar Muda, Sultanah Safiatuddin, has presented Aurangzeb with eight elephants.

When the VOC, or Dutch East India Company trying to disrupt the trade in Aceh to make their own Malaka trade lucrative, Aurangzeb threatened the Dutch with retaliation against any losses in Gujarat due to Dutch intervention. This effort were caused due to VOC realisation that Muslim tradings were damaging to the VOC. The Firman issued by Aurangzeb caused the VOC to back down and allowed Indian sailors to pass into Aceh, Perak, and Kedah, without any restrictions.

Relations with the Uzbek

Subhan Quli Khan, Balkh's Uzbek ruler was the first to recognise him in 1658 and requested for a general alliance, he worked alongside the new Mughal Emperor since 1647, when Aurangzeb was the Subedar of Balkh.

Relations with the Safavid dynasty

Safavid Iran and the Mughal Empire had long clashed over Kandahar, an outpost on the distant frontier of their two empires. Control of the city swung back and forth. Aurangzeb led two unsuccessful campaigns to recapture it 1649 and 1652. Mughal attempts died down after 1653 amidst internal rivalries.

Upon ascending the throne, Aurangzeb was eager to obtain diplomatic recognition from the Safavids to bolster the legitimacy of his rule. Abbas II of Persia sent an embassy in 1661. Aurangzeb received the ambassador warmly and they exchanged gifts. A return embassy sent by Aurangzeb to Persia in 1664 was poorly treated. Tensions over Kandahar rose again. There were cross border raids, but hostilities subsided after Abbas II's death in 1666.

Aurangzeb's rebellious son, Prince Akbar, sought refuge with Suleiman I of Persia. Suleiman rescued him from the Imam of Musqat, but refused to assist him in any military adventures against Aurangzeb.

Relations with the French

In 1667, the French East India Company ambassadors Le Gouz and Bebert presented Louis XIV's letter which urged the protection of French merchants from various rebels in the Deccan. In response to the letter, Aurangzeb issued a firman allowing the French to open a factory in Surat.

File:Avreng-zebe, Roy Des Indes by Nicolas de Larmessin (Detailed) (2).png|Avreng-zebe, Roy Des Indes (Aurangzeb, King of the Indies) by File:Pomp and Ceremony of the March of the Great Mogol.jpg|March of the Great Moghul (Aurangzeb) File:Voyage de Francois Bernier by Paul Maret 1710.jpg|François Bernier, was a French physician and traveller, who for 12 years was the personal physician of Aurangzeb. He described his experiences in Travels in the Mughal Empire.

Relations with the Sultanate of Maldives

In the 1660s, the Sultan of the Maldives, Ibrahim Iskandar I, requested help from Aurangzeb's representative, the Faujdar of Balasore. The Sultan wished to gain his support in possible future expulsions of Dutch and English trading ships, as he was concerned with how they might impact the economy of the Maldives. However, as Aurangzeb did not possess a powerful navy and had no interest in providing support to Ibrahim in a possible future war with the Dutch or English, the request came to nothing.

Relations with the Ottoman Empire

Like his father, Aurangzeb was not willing to acknowledge the Ottoman claim to the caliphate. He often supported the Ottoman Empire's enemies, extending cordial welcome to two rebel Governors of Basra, and granting them and their families a high status in the imperial service. Sultan Suleiman II's friendly postures were ignored by Aurangzeb. The Sultan urged Aurangzeb to wage holy war against Christians. However, Aurangzeb were granted as patron of Sharif of Mecca, and sending the Sherif at that time with richly laden mission, which at that time were under the jurisdiction of Ottoman.

Relations with the English and the Anglo-Mughal War

In 1686, the East India Company, which had unsuccessfully tried to obtain a firman that would grant them regular trading privileges throughout the Mughal Empire, initiated the Anglo-Mughal War. This war ended in disaster for the English after Aurangzeb in 1689 dispatched a large fleet from Janjira that blockaded Bombay. The ships, commanded by Sidi Yaqub, were manned by Indians and Mappila. In 1690, realising the war was not going favourably for them, the Company sent envoys to Aurangzeb's camp to plead for a pardon. The company's envoys prostrated themselves before the emperor, agreed pay a large indemnity, and promise to refrain from such actions in the future.

In September 1695, English pirate Henry Every conducted one of the most profitable pirate raids in history with his capture of a Grand Mughal grab convoy near Surat. The Indian ships had been returning home from their annual pilgrimage to Mecca when the pirate struck, capturing the Ganj-i-Sawai, reportedly the largest ship in the Muslim fleet, and its escorts in the process. When news of the capture reached the mainland, a livid Aurangzeb nearly ordered an armed attack against the English-governed city of Bombay, though he finally agreed to compromise after the Company promised to pay financial reparations, estimated at £600,000 by the Mughal authorities.

Meanwhile, Aurangzeb shut down four of the English East India Company's factories, imprisoned the workers and captains (who were nearly lynched by a rioting mob), and threatened to put an end to all English trading in India until Every was captured. The Lords Justices of England offered a bounty for Every's apprehension, leading to the first worldwide manhunt in recorded history. However, Every successfully eluded capture.

In 1702, Aurangzeb sent Daud Khan Panni, the Mughal Empire's Subhedar of the Carnatic region, to besiege and blockade Fort St. George for more than three months. The governor of the fort Thomas Pitt was instructed by the East India Company to sue for peace.

Relations with the Ethiopian Empire

Ethiopian Emperor Fasilides dispatched an embassy to India in 1664–65 to congratulate Aurangzeb upon his accession to the throne of the Mughal Empire. The delegation reportedly presented several valuable offerings to the Mughal Emperor, such as slaves, ivory, horses, a set of intricately adorned silver pocket pistols, a zebra and various other exotic gifts. François Bernier, describes the presents as consisting of:

Relations with the Tibetans, Uyghurs, and Dzungars

After 1679, the Tibetans invaded Ladakh, which was in the Mughal sphere of influence. Aurangzeb intervened on Ladakh's behalf in 1683, but his troops retreated before Dzungar reinforcements arrived to bolster the Tibetan position. At the same time, however, a letter was sent from the governor of Kashmir claiming the Mughals had defeated the Dalai Lama and conquered all of Tibet, a cause for celebration in Aurangzeb's court.

Aurangzeb received an embassy from Muhammad Amin Khan of Chagatai Moghulistan in 1690, seeking assistance in driving out "Qirkhiz infidels" (meaning the Buddhist Dzungars), who "had acquired dominance over the country".

Relations with the Czardom of Russia

Russian Czar Peter the Great requested Aurangzeb to open Russo-Mughal trade relations in the late 17th century. In 1696 Aurangzeb received his envoy, Semyon Malenkiy, and allowed him to conduct free trade. After staying for six years in India, and visiting Surat, Burhanpur, Agra, Delhi and other cities, Russian merchants returned to Moscow with valuable Indian goods.

Rebellions

Traditional and newly coherent social groups in northern and western India, such as the Marathas, Rajputs, Hindu Jats, Pashtuns, and Sikhs, gained military and governing ambitions during Mughal rule, which, through collaboration or opposition, gave them both recognition and military experience.

• In 1669, the Hindu Jat peasants of Bharatpur around Mathura rebelled and created Bharatpur State but were defeated.
• In 1659, Maratha leader Shivaji, launched a surprise attack on the Mughal Viceroy Shaista Khan and, while waging war against Aurangzeb. Shivaji and his forces attacked the Deccan, Janjira and Surat and tried to gain control of vast territories. In 1689, Aurangzeb's armies captured Shivaji's son Sambhaji and executed him. But the Marathas continued the fight.
• In 1679, the Rathore clan under the command of Durgadas Rathore of Marwar rebelled when Aurangzeb did not give permission to make the young Rathore prince the king and took direct command of Jodhpur. This incident caused great unrest among the Hindu Rajput rulers under Aurangzeb and led to many rebellions in Rajputana, resulting in the loss of Mughal power in the region and religious bitterness over the destruction of temples.
• In 1672, the Satnami, a sect concentrated in an area near Delhi, under the leadership of Bhirbhan, took over the administration of Narnaul, but they were eventually crushed upon Aurangzeb's personal intervention with very few escaping alive.
• In 1671, the battle of Saraighat was fought in the easternmost regions of the Mughal Empire against the Ahom Kingdom. The Mughals led by Mir Jumla II and Shaista Khan attacked and were defeated by the Ahoms.
• Maharaja Chhatrasal was the warrior from Bundela Rajput clan, who fought against the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb, and established his own kingdom in Bundelkhand, becoming a Maharaja of Panna.

Jat rebellion

In 1669, Hindu Jats began to organise a rebellion that is believed to have been caused by the re-imposition of jizya and destruction of Hindu temples in Mathura. The Jats were led by Gokula, a rebel landholder from Tilpat. By the year 1670 20,000 Jat rebels were quelled and the Mughal Army took control of Tilpat, Gokula's personal fortune amounted to 93,000 gold coins and hundreds of thousands of silver coins.

Gokula was caught and executed. But the Jats once again attempted rebellion. Raja Ram Jat, in order to avenge his father Gokula's death, plundered Akbar's tomb of its gold, silver and fine carpets, opened Akbar's grave and dragged his bones and burned them in retaliation. Jats also shot off the tops of the minarets on the gateway to Akbar's Tomb and melted down two silver doors from the Taj Mahal. Aurangzeb appointed Mohammad Bidar Bakht as commander to crush the Jat rebellion. On 4 July 1688, Raja Ram Jat was captured and beheaded. His head was sent to Aurangzeb as proof of his beheading.

After Aurangeb's death, Jats under Badan Singh established their independent state of Bharatpur.

Due to the Jat rebellion, the temples of Pushtimarg, Gaudiya, and Radha vallabh Vaishnavs in Braj were abandoned and their icons were taken to different regions or into hiding.

Mughal–Maratha Wars

In 1657, while Aurangzeb attacked Golconda and Bijapur in the Deccan, the Hindu Maratha warrior, Shivaji, used guerrilla tactics to take control of three Adil Shahi forts formerly under his father's command. With these victories, Shivaji assumed de facto leadership of many independent Maratha clans. The Marathas harried the flanks of the warring Adil Shahis, gaining weapons, forts, and territory. Shivaji's small and ill-equipped army survived an all out Adil Shahi attack, and Shivaji personally killed the Adil Shahi general, Afzal Khan. With this event, the Marathas transformed into a powerful military force, capturing more and more Adil Shahi territories. Shivaji went on to neutralise Mughal power in the region.

In 1659, Aurangzeb sent his trusted general and maternal uncle Shaista Khan, the Wali in Golconda to recover forts lost to the Maratha rebels. Shaista Khan drove into Maratha territory and took up residence in Pune. But in a daring raid on the governor's palace in Pune during a midnight wedding celebration, led by Shivaji himself, the Marathas killed Shaista Khan's son and Shivaji maimed Shaista Khan by cutting off three fingers of his hand. Shaista Khan, however, survived and was re-appointed the administrator of Bengal going on to become a key commander in the war against the Ahoms.

Aurangzeb next sent general Raja Jai Singh to vanquish the Marathas. Jai Singh besieged the fort of Purandar and fought off all attempts to relieve it. Foreseeing defeat, Shivaji agreed to terms. Jai Singh persuaded Shivaji to visit Aurangzeb at Agra, giving him a personal guarantee of safety. Their meeting at the Mughal court did not go well, however. Shivaji felt slighted at the way he was received, and insulted Aurangzeb by refusing imperial service. For this affront he was detained, but managed to effect a daring escape.

After Shivaji's escape, hostilities with the Mughals ebbed. He wrote a letter in April 1667 offering his submission again, along with the induction of his son into imperial service.

Aurangzeb ignored this letter, forcing Shivaji to enlist the help of Jaswant Singh of Marwar to communicate with the emperor. After Muazzam and Jaswant Singh recommended Shivaji to Aurangzeb, his submission was accepted and he was conferred the title of “Raja". Although Aurangzeb did not restore his right over the forts.

Sambhaji was also restored as a Mughal mansabdar with 5,000 horses. At that time Shivaji sent Sambhaji and General Prataprao Gujar, to serve with Prince Mu'azzam, the Mughal viceroy in Aurangabad. Sambhaji was also granted territory in Berar for revenue collection. Aurangzeb also permitted Shivaji to attack Bijapur, ruled by the decaying Adil Shahi dynasty; the weakened Sultan Ali Adil Shah II sued for peace and granted the rights of sardeshmukhi and chauthai to Shivaji.

Aurangzeb's third son Akbar left the Mughal court along with a few Muslim Mansabdar supporters and joined Muslim rebels in the Deccan. Aurangzeb in response moved his court to Aurangabad and took over command of the Deccan campaign. The rebels were defeated and Akbar fled south to seek refuge with Sambhaji, Shivaji's successor. More battles ensued, and Akbar fled to Persia and never returned.

In 1689, Aurangzeb's forces captured and executed Sambhaji. His successor Rajaram, later Rajaram's widow Tarabai and their Maratha forces fought individual battles against the forces of the Mughal Empire. Territory changed hands repeatedly during the years (1689–1707) of interminable warfare. As there was no central authority among the Marathas, Aurangzeb was forced to contest every inch of territory, at great cost in lives and money.

Even as Aurangzeb drove west, deep into Maratha territory – notably conquering Satara – the Marathas expanded eastwards into Mughal lands – Malwa and Hyderabad. The Marathas also expanded further South into Southern India defeating the independent local rulers there capturing Jinji in Tamil Nadu. Aurangzeb waged continuous war in the Deccan for more than two decades with no resolution. He thus lost about a fifth of his army fighting rebellions led by the Marathas in Deccan India. He travelled a long distance to the Deccan to conquer the Marathas and eventually died at the age of 88, still fighting the Marathas.

Aurangzeb's shift from conventional warfare to anti-insurgency in the Deccan region shifted the paradigm of Mughal military thought. There were conflicts between Marathas and Mughals in Pune, Jinji, Malwa and Vadodara. The Mughal Empire's port city of Surat was sacked twice by the Marathas during the reign of Aurangzeb and the valuable port was in ruins.

File:A portrait probably made by a Mughal artist, in the Deccan, during Aurangzeb's military campaigns there.jpg|A Mughal trooper in the Deccan. File:Bhavanidas. The Emperor Aurangzeb Carried on a Palanquin ca. 1705–20 Metripolitan Museum of Art..jpg|Aurangzeb leads his final expedition in 1705, leading an army of 500,000 troops. File:Prince with rifle.jpg|A Mughal-era aristocrat armed with a matchlock musket. File:Khalili Collection Islamic Art mss 1067.1 crop.jpg|Aurangzeb, in later life, hunting with hounds and falconers

Ahom campaign

Main article: Mir Jumla's invasion of Assam

In 1660 Mir Jumla II, the viceroy of Bengal, was ordered to recover the lost territories.

The Mughals set out in November 1661. Within weeks they occupied the capital of Kuch Behar, which they annexed. Leaving a detachment to garrison it, the Mughal army began to retake their territories in Assam. Mir Jumla II advanced on Garhgaon, the capital of the Ahom kingdom, and reached it on 17 March 1662. The ruler, Raja Sutamla, had fled before his approach. The Mughals captured 82 elephants, 300,000 rupees in cash, 1000 ships, and 173 stores of rice.

On his way back to Dacca, in March 1663, Mir Jumla II died of natural causes.

The battle of Saraighat was the last battle in the last major attempt by the Mughals to extend their empire into Assam. Though the Mughals managed to regain Guwahati briefly after a later Borphukan deserted it, the Ahoms wrested control in the battle of Itakhuli in 1682 and maintained it till the end of their rule.

Satnami opposition

In May 1672, the Satnami sect, obeying the commands of an old toothless woman (according to Mughal accounts), organised a revolt in the agricultural heartlands of the Mughal Empire. The Satnamis were known to have shaved off their heads and even eyebrows and had temples in many regions of Northern India. They began a large-scale rebellion 75 miles southwest of Delhi.

The Satnamis believed they were invulnerable to Mughal bullets and believed they could multiply in any region they entered. The Satnamis initiated their march upon Delhi and overran small-scale Mughal infantry units.

Aurangzeb responded by organising a Mughal army of 10,000 troops, artillery, and a detachment of his imperial guards. Aurangzeb wrote Islamic prayers and drew designs that were sewn into the army's flags. His army crushed the Satnami rebellion.

Sikh opposition

The ninth Sikh Guru, Guru Tegh Bahadur, like his predecessors was opposed to forced conversion of the local population as he considered it wrong. Approached by Kashmiri Pandits to help them retain their faith and avoid forced religious conversions, Guru Tegh Bahadur sent a message to the emperor that if he could convert Teg Bagadur to Islam, every Hindu will become a Muslim. In 1789, Gurudwara Sis Ganj Sahib was built in Delhi at the place where Guru Tegh Bahadur was beheaded.

In response, Guru Tegh Bahadur's son and successor, Guru Gobind Singh, further militarised his followers, starting with the establishment of Khalsa in 1699, eight years before Aurangzeb's death. In 1705, Guru Gobind Singh sent a letter entitled Zafarnamah, which accused Aurangzeb of cruelty and betraying Islam. Guru Gobind Singh's formation of Khalsa in 1699 led to the establishment of the Sikh Confederacy and later Sikh Empire.

Pashtun opposition

The Pashtun revolt in 1672 under the leadership of the warrior poet Khushal Khan Khattak of Kabul, was triggered when soldiers under the orders of the Mughal Governor Amir Khan allegedly molested a Parachi woman affiliated with the Safi in modern-day Kunar Province of Afghanistan. The Safi tribes retaliated against the soldiers. This attack provoked a reprisal, which triggered a general revolt of most of tribes. Attempting to reassert his authority, Amir Khan led a large Mughal Army to the Khyber Pass, where the army was surrounded by tribesmen and routed, with only four men, including the Governor, managing to escape.[[File:Aurangzeb in a pavilion with three courtiers below (6124546713).jpg|thumb|Aurangzeb in a pavilion with three courtiers below.]]Aurangzeb's incursions into the Pashtun areas were described by Khushal Khan Khattak as "Black is the Mughal's heart towards all of us Pathans". Aurangzeb employed the scorched earth policy, sending soldiers who massacred, looted and burnt many villages. Aurangzeb also proceeded to use bribery to turn the Pashtun tribes against each other, with the aim that they would distract a unified Pashtun challenge to Mughal authority, and the impact of this was to leave a lasting legacy of mistrust among the tribes.

After that the revolt spread, with the Mughals suffering a near total collapse of their authority in the Pashtun belt. The closure of the important Attock-Kabul trade route along the Grand Trunk road was particularly disastrous. By 1674, the situation had deteriorated to a point where Aurangzeb camped at Attock to personally take charge. Switching to diplomacy and bribery along with force of arms, the Mughals eventually split the rebels and partially suppressed the revolt, although they never managed to wield effective authority outside the main trade route.

Rathore rebellion

Described as the Rathore rebellion (1679–1707), the conflict between Rajputs of Marwar and the Mughals started after the death of Jaswant Singh of Marwar, due to Aurangzeb's attempt to interfere in the succession of Marwar.

On 23 July 1679, Aurangzeb made attempts to divide Marwar into two Rathore principalities, one held by Inder Singh Rathore and other by Ajit Singh. Aurangzeb also proposed that Ajit Singh should be raised as a Muslim and offered Jodhpur in return. The resistance to Mughal interference was started by the Rajput nobles under Durgadas Rathore and erupted into an all-out war between the Mughal empire and Rajputs of Marwar supported by Mewar Rajputs. It lasted for almost thirty years. The rebellion reached a climax after the death of Aurangzeb on 3 March 1707 and the capture of Jodhpur by the Rathores on 12 March 1707.

Death

By 1689, the conquest of Golconda and Mughal victories in the south expanded the Mughal Empire to 4 million square kilometres, with a population estimated to be over 158 million. However, this supremacy was short-lived. Historian Jos Gommans says that "... the highpoint of imperial centralisation under emperor Aurangzeb coincided with the start of the imperial downfall."

Aurangzeb constructed a small marble mosque known as the Moti Masjid (Pearl Mosque) in the Red Fort complex in Delhi. However, his constant warfare, especially with the Marathas, drove his empire to the brink of bankruptcy just as much as the wasteful personal spending and opulence of his predecessors.

The Indologist Stanley Wolpert says that:

Even when ill and dying, Aurangzeb made sure that the populace knew he was still alive, for if they had thought otherwise then the turmoil of another war of succession was likely. He died at his military camp in Bhingar near Ahmednagar on 3 March 1707 at the age of 88, having outlived many of his children. He had only 300 rupees with him which were later given to charity as per his instructions and he prior to his death requested not to spend extravagantly on his funeral but to keep it simple. His modest open-air grave in Khuldabad, Aurangabad, Maharashtra expresses his deep devotion to his Islamic beliefs. It is sited in the courtyard of the shrine of the Sufi saint Shaikh Burhan-u'd-din Gharib, who was a disciple of Nizamuddin Auliya of Delhi.

Brown writes that after his death, "a string of weak emperors, wars of succession, and coups by noblemen heralded the irrevocable weakening of Mughal power". She notes that the populist but "fairly old-fashioned" explanation for the decline is that there was a reaction to Aurangzeb's oppression. Although Aurangzeb died without appointing a successor, he instructed his three sons to divide the empire among themselves. His sons failed to reach a satisfactory agreement and fought against each other in a war of succession. Aurangzeb's immediate successor was his third son Azam Shah, who was defeated and killed in June 1707 at the battle of Jajau by the army of Bahadur Shah I, the second son of Aurangzeb.

Both because of Aurangzeb's over-extension and because of Bahadur Shah's weak military and leadership qualities, entered a period of terminal decline. Immediately after Bahadur Shah occupied the throne, the Maratha Empire – which Aurangzeb had held at bay, inflicting high human and monetary costs even on his own empire – consolidated and launched effective invasions of Mughal territory, seizing power from the weak emperor. Within decades of Aurangzeb's death, the Mughal Emperor had little power beyond the walls of Delhi.

Assessments and legacy

Aurangzeb's rule has been the subject of both praise and controversy. During his lifetime, victories in the south expanded the Mughal Empire to 4 million square kilometres, and he ruled over a population estimated to be over 158 million subjects.

Multiple interpretations of Aurangzeb's life and reign over the years by critics have led to a very complicated legacy. Some argue that his policies abandoned his predecessors' legacy of pluralism and religious tolerance, citing his introduction of the jizya tax and other policies based on Islamic ethics; his demolition of Hindu temples; the executions of his elder brother Dara Shikoh, King Sambhaji of Maratha and Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur and the prohibition and supervision of behaviour and activities that are forbidden in Islam such as gambling, fornication, and consumption of alcohol and narcotics. At the same time, some historians question the historical authenticity of the claims of his critics, arguing that his destruction of temples has been exaggerated, he paid for temple maintenance, and in the latter half of his reign employed significantly more Hindus, especially Marathas, in his imperial bureaucracy than his predecessors and opposed bigotry against Hindus and Shia Muslims in imperial service.

Muhammad Al-Munajjid has argued that the opinions from Islamic scholarly community towards Aurangzeb were positive because of the emperor's general attitude and actions, such as abolishing Bid'ah celebrations, musics, and the customs of bowing and kissing the ground which were done by his predecessors, practically adhering to the practice of Salafi while still held to Hanafite creed.{{#tag:ref|through IslamQA.info, Professor Muhammad al-Munajjid on his online correspondence has answered that he based his opinion Silk ad-Durar fi A'yaan al-Qarn ath-Thaani 'Ashar (4/113) and Aurangzeb biography by Professor 'Abd al-Mun'im an-Nimr in his book Tareekh al-Islam fi'l-Hind.

In Pakistan, author Haroon Khalid writes that, "Aurangzeb is presented as a hero who fought and expanded the frontiers of the Islamic empire" and "is imagined to be a true believer who removed corrupt practices from religion and the court, and once again purified the empire." The academic Munis Faruqui also opines that the "Pakistani state and its allies in the religious and political establishments include him in the pantheon of premodern Muslim heroes, especially lauding him for his militarism, personal piety, and seeming willingness to accommodate Islamic morality within state goals."

Muhammad Iqbal, considered the spiritual founder of Pakistan, admired Aurangzeb. Iqbal Singh Sevea, in his book on the political philosophy of the thinker, says that "Iqbal considered that the life and activities of Aurangzeb constituted the starting point of Muslim nationality in India". Maulana Shabbir Ahmad Usmani, in his funeral oration, hailed M.A. Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, to be the greatest Muslim since Aurangzeb. Pakistani-American academic Akbar Ahmed described President Zia-ul-Haq, known for his Islamisation drive, as "conceptually ... a spiritual descendent of Aurangzeb" because Zia had an orthodox, legalistic view of Islam.

Muhammad Sayyid Tantawy, a grand mufti of Egypt, once called Aurangzeb as "A remnant of the Rightly-Guided Rashidun Caliphs", as appreciation of Aurangzeb commitment to Islam teaching.

Beyond the individual appreciations, Aurangzeb is seminal to Pakistan's national self-consciousness, as historian Ayesha Jalal, while referring to the Pakistani textbooks controversy, mentions M. D. Zafar's A Text Book of Pakistan Studies where we can read that, under Aurangzeb, "Pakistan spirit gathered in strength", while his death "weakened the Pakistan spirit." Another historian from Pakistan, Mubarak Ali, also looking at the textbooks, and while noting that Akbar "is conveniently ignored and not mentioned in any school textbook from class one to matriculation", contrasts him with Aurangzeb, who "appears in different textbooks of Social Studies and Urdu language as an orthodox and pious Muslim copying the Holy Quran and sewing caps for his livelihood." This image of Aurangzeb is not limited to Pakistan's official historiography.

As of 2015, about 177 towns and villages of India have been named after Aurangzeb. Historian Audrey Truschke points out that Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP), Hindutva proponents and some others outside Hindutva ideology regard Aurangzeb as Muslim zealot in India. Jawaharlal Nehru wrote that, due to his reversal of the cultural and religious syncretism of the previous Mughal emperors, Aurangzeb acted "more as a Moslem than an Indian ruler". Mahatma Gandhi was of the view that there was greater degree of freedom under Mughal rule than the British rule and asks that "in Aurangzeb's time a Shivaji could flourish. Has one hundred and fifty years of the British rule produced any Pratap and Shivaji?"

Literatures

Aurangzeb has prominently featured in the following books

• 1675 – Aureng-zebe, play by John Dryden, written and performed on the London stage during the Emperor's lifetime.
• 1688 – Alamgirnama by Mirza Mohammed Qasim official biographer at Aurangzeb's court
• 1909 – Aurangzeb Alamgir par ek nazar
• 19?? – Hindi fiction novel by Acharya Chatursen Shastri
• 1970 – Shahenshah (), the Marathi fictional biography by N S Inamdar; translated into English in 2017 by Vikrant Pande as Shahenshah – The Life of Aurangzeb
• 2017 – 1636: Mission to the Mughals, by Eric Flint and Griffin Barber
• 2018 – Aurangzeb: The Man and the Myth, by Audrey Truschke

Issue

Notes

Citations

Bibliography

References

1. "Tomb of Aurangzeb". ASI Aurangabad.
2. (2011). "Encyclopaedia Of Manipur (3 Vol.)". Gyan Publishing House.
3. (2021). "Silver Coins Hoard of the Late Mughals from Kohat". Department of Archaeology, [[University of Peshawar]].
4. (1893). "Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy Volume 3". Harvard University; Royal Irish Academy.
5. (2014). "Morality and Justice in Islamic Economics and Finance". Edward Elgar Publishing.
6. (1990). "Indian society and the making of the British Empire". Cambridge University Press.
7. (December 2006). "East-West Orientation of Historical Empires". Journal of World-Systems Research.
8. József Böröcz. (2009). "The European Union and Global Social Change". [[Routledge]].
9. (2016). "The Different aspects of Islamic culture: Islam in the World today; Retrospective of the evolution of Islam and the Muslim world". UNESCO Publishing.
10. (2019). "Framing the Apocalypse: Visions of the End-of-Times". Brill.
11. "Aurangzeb".
12. (2012). "Events that formed the modern world: from the European Renaissance through the War on Terror". ABC-CLIO.
13. (2003). "On Becoming an Indian Muslim: French Essays on Aspects of Syncretism". Oxford University Press.
14. Eaton, Richard M.. (2019). "India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765". University of California Press.
15. Gandhi, Supriya. (2020). "The emperor who never was: Dara Shukoh in Mughal India". Belknap Press.
16. Gandhi, Supriya. (2020). "The emperor who never was: Dara Shukoh in Mughal India". Belknap Press.
17. Streusand, Douglas E.. (2011). "Islamic gunpowder empires: Ottomans, Safavids, and Mughals". Westview Press.
18. Truschke, Audrey. (2017). "Aurangzeb: the life and legacy of India's most controversial king". Stanford University Press.
19. "Prince Awrangzeb facing a maddened elephant named Sudhakar (7 June 1633)".
20. {{Harvard citation no brackets. Sarkar. 1925. Sarkar. 1925
21. Hansen, Waldemar. (1996). "The Peacock Throne: The Drama of Mogul India". Motilal Banarsidass.
22. Sarker, Kobita. (2007). "Shah Jahan and his paradise on earth: the story of Shah Jahan's creations in Agra and Shahjahanabad in the golden days of the Mughals".
23. Mehta, J.l.. (1986). "Advanced Study in the History of Medieval India".
24. (2012). "Events That Formed the Modern World".
25. {{harvtxt. Mehta. 1986
26. Mukherjee, Soma. (2001). "Royal Mughal Ladies and Their Contributions". Gyan Books.
27. Subhash Parihar, ''Some Aspects of Indo-Islamic Architecture'' (1999), p. 149
28. (1967). "The Life and Times of Noor Jahan". Caravan Book House.
29. (1924). "The Taj and Its Environments: With 8 Illus. from Photos., 1 Map, and 4 Plans". R. G. Bansal.
30. {{Harvard citation no brackets. Sarkar. 1925
31. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
32. (2004). "A History of Modern India, 1480–1950". Anthem Press.
33. George Michell and Mark Zebrowski, ''Architecture and Art of the Deccan Sultanates'', (Cambridge University Press, 1999), 12.
34. Eraly, Abraham. (2007). "The Mughal World: Life in India's Last Golden Age". Penguin Books India.
35. Chandra, Satish. (2002). "Parties and politics at the Mughal Court, 1707–1740". Oxford University Press.
36. (2005). "Captive princess: Zebunissa, daughter of Emperor Aurangzeb". Oxford University Press.
37. Brown, Katherine Butler. (January 2007). "Did Aurangzeb Ban Music? Questions for the Historiography of his Reign". Modern Asian Studies.
38. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
39. The Calcutta Review, Volume 75, 1882, p. 87.
40. Sir Charles Fawcett: The Travels of the Abbarrn India and the Near East, 1672 to 1674 Hakluyt Society, London, 1947, p. 167.
41. M. S. Commissariat: Mandelslo's Travels In Western India, Asian Educational Services, 1995, p. 57.
42. Krieger-Krynicki, Annie. (2005). "Captive Princess: Zebunissa, Daughter of Emperor Aurangzeb". Oxford University Press.
43. Ahmad, Fazl. Heroes of Islam. Lahore: Sh. Muhammad Ashraff, 1993. Print.
44. (1896). "History of Gujarát". Government Central Press.
45. Subramanian, Archana. (2015-07-30). "Way to the throne". The Hindu.
46. {{Harvard citation no brackets. Sarkar. 1925
47. (2012). "The Princes of the Mughal Empire, 1504–1719". Cambridge University Press.
48. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
49. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
50. {{Harvard citation no brackets. Sarkar. 1925
51. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
52. Prasad, Ishwari. (1974). "The Mughal Empire". Chugh Publications.
53. Mukhoty, Ira. (17 May 2018). "Aurangzeb and Dara Shikoh's fight for the throne was entwined with the rivalry of their two sisters". Scroll.in.
54. (2004). "A History of Modern India, 1480–1950". Anthem Press.
55. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
56. (2006). "A Concise History of Modern India". Cambridge University Press.
57. (6 July 2016). "Marc Gaborieau". Centre d'Études de l'Inde et de l'Asie du Sud.
58. (1977). "Aurangzeb in Muntakhab-al Lubab". Somaiya Publications.
59. (2002). "Naukar, Rajput, and Sepoy: The Ethnohistory of the Military Labour Market of Hindustan, 1450–1850". Cambridge University Press.
60. Chandra, Satish. (2005). "Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals". Har-Anand Publications.
61. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
62. Chandra, Satish. (2005). "Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals". Har-Anand Publications.
63. Sen, Sailendra. (2013). "A Textbook of Medieval Indian History". Primus Books.
64. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
65. ''The Cambridge History of India'' (1922), vol. IV, p. 481.
66. Larson, Gerald James. (1995). "India's Agony Over Religion". State University of New York Press.
67. (1934). "The Cambridge Shorter History of India". Cambridge University Press.
68. Smith, Vincent Arthur. (1920). "The Oxford History of India: From the Earliest Times to the End of 1911". Clarendon Press.
69. Chandra, Satish. (2005). "Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals". Har-Anand Publications.
70. (2013). "Dictionary of Wars". Taylor and Francis.
71. "Tomb of Aurangzeb". ASI Aurangabad.
72. (2002). "Structure of Politics Under Aurangzeb 1658–1707". Kanishka Publishers Distributors.
73. 978-81-7391-537-6
74. Truschke, Audrey. (2017). "Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King". Stanford University Press.
75. Malik, Jamal. (2008). "Islam in South Asia: A Short History". Brill.
76. Truschke, Audrey. (2017). "Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King". Stanford University Press.
77. Sachi Patel. (2021). "Politics and Religion in Eighteenth-Century India". Taylor & Francis.
78. Laine, James W.. (2015). "Meta-Religion: Religion and Power in World History". Univ of California Press.
79. [[Angus Maddison. 92-64-10414-3, pp. 259–261
80. Ahmed Sayeed. (2020). "Negate Fighting Faith". Oxford University Press.
81. (1977). "The Cambridge History of Islam".
82. (2022). "History of Indian Nation: Medieval India". K. K. Publications.
83. (1964). "Muslim Civilization in India". Columbia University Press.
84. Brown, Katherine Butler. (January 2007). "Did Aurangzeb Ban Music? Questions for the Historiography of his Reign". Modern Asian Studies.
85. (2001). "Indian Archives: Volume 50". National Archives of India..
86. Chandra, Satish. (2005). "Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals". Har-Anand Publications.
87. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
88. Chandra, Satish. (2006). "Medieval India: From Sultanate To The Mughals: Mughal Empire (1526–1748)". Har-Anand Publications Pvt Ltd.
89. Satish Chandra. (2005). "Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals Part – II". Har-Anand Publications.
90. Brown, Katherine Butler. (January 2007). "Did Aurangzeb Ban Music? Questions for the Historiography of his Reign". Modern Asian Studies.
91. Zaman, Taymiya R.. (2007). "Inscribing Empire: Sovereignty and Subjectivity in Mughal Memoirs". University of Michigan.
92. Mukhia, Harbans. (2004). "The Mughals of India". Wiley.
93. (1 October 2009). "Religions – Sikhism: Guru Tegh Bahadur". BBC.
94. Sadiq Ali. (1918). "A Vindication of Aurangzeb: In Two Parts".
95. Vipul Singh. "The Pearson Indian History Manual for the UPSC Civil Services Preliminary Examination". Pearson Education India.
96. (2009). "Islam and the Secular State". Harvard University Press.
97. Richards, John F.. (1993). "The Mughal Empire". Cambridge University Press.
98. (2013). "The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought". Princeton University Press.
99. Pirbhai, M. Reza. (2009). "Reconsidering Islam in a South Asian Context". Brill.
100. Chandra, Satish. (September 1969). "Jizyah and the State in India during the 17th Century". Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient.
101. Truschke, Audrey. (2017). "Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King". [[Stanford University Press]].
102. Lal, Vinay. "Aurangzeb's Fatwa on Jizya".
103. Khan, Iqtidar Alam. (January–February 2001). "State in the Mughal India: Re-Examining the Myths of a Counter-Vision". Social Scientist.
104. Truschke, Audrey. (2017). "Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King". [[Stanford University Press]].
105. Aggarwal, Dhruv Chand. (Spring 2017). "The Afterlives of Aurangzeb: Jizya, Social Domination and the Meaning of Constitutional Secularism". Rutgers Journal of Law & Religion.
106. Husain, S.M. Azizuddin. (2000-07-01). "Jizya – Its Reimposition During the Reign of Aurangzeb: An Examination". Indian Historical Review.
107. Lal. "Aurangzeb, Akbar, and the Communalization of History".
108. Kulke, Tilmann. (2020). "Routledge Handbook of South Asian Religions". Routledge.
109. Husain, S. M. Azizuddin. (2002). "Structure of Politics Under Aurangzeb, 1658–1707". Kanishka Publishers, Distributors.
110. Gilbert, Marc Jason. (2017). "South Asia in World History". Oxford University Press.
111. Smith, Haig Z.. (2022). "Religion and Governance in England's Emerging Colonial Empire, 1601–1698". Springer Nature.
112. Puniyani, Ram. (2003). "Communal politics: facts versus myths". Sage Publications.
113. Mukhia, Harbans. (2004). "For Conquest and Governance: Legitimacy, Religion and Political Culture". John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
114. Subodh, Sanjay. (2001). "Temples Rulers and Historians' Dilemma: Understanding the Medieval Mind". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress.
115. (July 2018). "Aurangzeb as Iconoclast? Vaishnava Accounts of the Krishna images' Exodus from Braj". Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society.
116. Truschke, Audrey. (23 February 2017). "What Aurangzeb did to preserve Hindu temples (and protect non-Muslim religious leaders)". Scroll.in.
117. Shafqat, Arshia. (2008). "Administration Of Gujarat Under The Mughals (A.D. 1572–1737)". Aligarh University.
118. Eaton, Richard. (2000). "Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States". Journal of Islamic Studies.
119. (1992). "Precedents for Mughal architecture". Cambridge University Press.
120. Eaton, Richard M.. (2000). "Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States". [[The Hindu]].
121. Hunter, Sir William Wilson. (2005). "The Indian Empire: Its People, History, and Products". Asian Educational Services.
122. (2006). "Developing cultures: case studies". [[Routledge]].
123. Khan, Sāqi Must'ad. (1947). "Maāsir-i-'Ālamgiri: A History of the Emperor Aurangzib 'Ālamgir (reign 1658–1707 A.D.)". Royal Asiatic Society of Bengal.
124. Stein, Burton. (2010). "A History of India". Blackwell Publishers.
125. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
126. Syan, Hardip Singh. (2012). "Sikh Militancy in the Seventeenth Century: Religious Violence in Mughal and Early Modern India". I.B. Tauris.
127. Blank, Jonah. (2001). "Mullahs on the Mainframe: Islam and Modernity Among the Daudi Bohras". University of Chicago Press.
128. Mehta, J. L.. (2005). "Advanced Study in the History of Modern India: Volume One: 1707{{snd}}1813". Sterling Publishers.
129. Stein, Burton. (2010). "A History of India". Blackwell Publishers.
130. "A Gateway to Sikhism {{!}} Sri Guru Tegh Bhadur Sahib".
131. Cook, David. (2007). "Martyrdom in Islam". Cambridge University Press.
132. (2007). "Military Sports and the History of the Martial Body in India". Brill.
133. Kaul, H. N.. (1998). "Rediscovery of Ladakh". Indus Publishing.
134. (2004). "A History of Modern India, 1480–1950". Anthem Press.
135. (2011). "A Comprehensive History of Medieval India: Twelfth to the Mid-Eighteenth Century". Pearson Education India.
136. (1911). "1911 Encyclopædia Britannica, Volume 3". Encyclopædia Britannica.
137. (2022). "The Rise and fall of Persian to the Muslims of South Asia". University of Sindh.
138. Singh, Abhay Kumar. (2006). "Modern World System and Indian Proto-industrialization: Bengal 1650–1800". Northern Book Centre.
139. (2007). "''Zafarbaksh'' – The Composite Mughal Cannon of Aurangzeb at Fort William in Kolkata". Indian Journal of History of Science.
140. Douglas, James. (1893). "Bombay and western India: a series of stray papers". Sampson Low, Marston & Company.
141. (2006). "Gunpowder, Explosives And the State: A Technological History". Ashgate Publishing.
142. "Mughal Warfare: Indian Frontiers and Highroads to Empire, 1500–1700".
143. (2017). "Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King". Stanford University Press.
144. Dasgupta, K.. (1975). "How Learned Were the Mughals: Reflections on Muslim Libraries in India". The Journal of Library History.
145. Qadir, K.B.S.S.A.. (1936). "The Cultural Influences of Islam in India". Journal of the Royal Society of Arts.
146. ''Imperial Mughal Painting'', [[Stuart Cary Welch]], (New York: George Braziller, 1978), pp. 112–113. "In spite of his later austerity, which turned him against music, dance, and painting, a few of the best Mughal paintings were made for [Aurangzeb] 'Alamgir. Perhaps the painters realized that he might close the workshops and therefore exceeded themselves in his behalf".
147. Taher, M.. (1994). "Librarianship and Library Science in India: An Outline of Historical Perspectives". Concept Publishing Company.
148. Blair, Sheila. (2006). "Islamic calligraphy". Edinburgh University Press.
149. Schimmel, Annemarie. (1990). "Calligraphy and Islamic culture". Tauris.
150. Asher, Catherine B.. (1992). "Architecture of Mughal India". Cambridge University Press.
151. (2004). "A History of Modern India, 1480–1950". Anthem Press.
152. "Aali Masjid".
153. Sohoni, Pushkar. (2016-12-20). "A Tale of Two Imperial Residences: Aurangzeb's Architectural Patronage". Journal of Islamic Architecture.
154. (3 January 2025). "Agra: 17th-Century Mubarak Manzil, Built by Aurangzeb, Reduced to Rubble".
155. Asher, Catherine B.. (1992). "Architecture of Mughal India". Cambridge University Press.
156. "World Heritage Sites. Bibi-Ka-Maqbar".
157. Asher, Catherine B.. (1992). "Architecture of Mughal India". Cambridge University Press.
158. Asher, Catherine B.. (1992). "Architecture of Mughal India". Cambridge University Press.
159. Werner, Louis. (July–August 2011). "Mughal Maal".
160. Hansen, Eric. (July–August 2002). "Pashmina: Kashmir's Best Cashmere".
161. (2004). "The Empire of the Great Mughals: History, Art and Culture". Reaktion Books.
162. (2012). "Power Over Peoples Technology, Environments, and Western Imperialism, 1400 to the Present". Princeton University Press.
163. (22 January 2008). "Leaves of the Same Tree Trade and Ethnicity in the Straits of Melaka". University of Hawaii Press.
164. (2016). "The Indian Ocean in the Making of Early Modern India". Taylor & Francis.
165. (13 September 2016). "The Indian Ocean in the Making of Early Modern India". Taylor & Francis.
166. (11 October 2013). "Reading Asia New Research in Asian Studies". Taylor & Francis.
167. (1 January 1998). "Royal Persian Paintings : The Qajar Epoch 1785 - 1925". Brooklyn Museum of Art with I.B. Tauris Publishers.
168. Tripathy, Rasananda. (1986). "Crafts and commerce in Orissa in the sixteenth-seventeenth centuries". Mittal Publications.
169. John F. Richards. (1993). "The Mughal Empire Part 1, Volume 5". Cambridge University Press.
170. "Asia Facts, information, pictures | Encyclopedia.com articles about Asia | Europe, 1450 to 1789: Encyclopedia of the Early Modern World". encyclopedia.com.
171. Faruki, Zahiruddin. (1972). "Aurangzeb & His Times". Idarah-i Adabiyāt-i Delli.
172. (2009). "Piracy in the Public Sphere: The Henry Every Trials and the Battle for Meaning in Seventeenth-Century Print Culture". Journal of British Studies.
173. Burgess, Douglas R.. (2009). "The Pirates' Pact: The Secret Alliances Between History's Most Notorious Buccaneers and Colonial America". McGraw-Hill.
174. Blackburn, Terence R.. (2007). "A Miscellany of Mutinies And Massacres in India". APH Publishing.
175. Bernier, François. (1671). "Travels in the Mogul Empire: A.D. 1656–1668".
176. "MAASIR-I-'ALAMGIRI".
177. (9 September 2016). "Russia and India: A civilisational friendship".
178. (2006). "A Concise History of Modern India". Cambridge University Press.
179. Schmidt, Karl J.. (1995). "An Atlas and Survey of South Asian History". M.E. Sharpe.
180. (2015). "Meta-Religion: Religion and Power in World History". Univ of California Press.
181. (1937). "The Cambridge History of India".
182. Bhagavānadāsa Gupta, ''Contemporary Sources of the Mediaeval and Modern History of Bundelkhand (1531–1857)'', vol. 1 (1999). {{ISBN. 81-85396-23-X.
183. [https://www.google.com/books/edition/A_History_of_the_Indian_People/ag4BAAAAMAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22In%201669%20the%20demolition%20of%20Hindu%20temples%20and%20building%20of%20mosques%20in%20Mathura%20led%20to%20a%20Jat%20uprising%20under%20Gokla%22 The History of Indian people by Damodar P Singhal pg 196] Quote: "In 1669 the demolition of Hindu temples and building of mosques in Mathura led to a Jat uprising under Gokla"
184. Chandra, S.. (2005). "Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals Part – II". Har-Anand Publications.
185. Vīrasiṃha, 2006, [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=8188629529 "The Jats: Their Role & Contribution to the Socio-economic Life and Polity of North & North-west India, Volume 2"], Delhi: Originals, pp. 100–102.
186. Edward James Rap;son, Sir Wolseley Haig and Sir Richard, 1937, [https://books.google.com/books?id=yoI8AAAAIAAJ "The Cambridge History of India"], Cambridge University Press, Volume 4, pp. 305.
187. Waldemar Hansen, 1986, [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=812080225X "The Peacock Throne: The Drama of Mogul India"], p. 454.
188. Reddy, 2005, [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0070604479 "General Studies History for UPSC"], [[Tata McGraw-Hill]], p. B-46.
189. Catherine Ella Blanshard Asher, 1992, [https://books.google.com/books?isbn=0521267285 "Architecture of Mughal India – Part 1"], Cambridge university Press, Vol. 4, p. 108.
190. Peck, Lucy. (2008). "Agra: The Architectural Heritage". Roli Books.
191. Sir Harry Hamilton Johnston, Leslie Haden Guest, 1937, [https://books.google.com/books?id=SvkqAAAAIAAJ The World of To-day: The Marvels of Nature and the Creations of Man], Vol. 2, p. 510
192. Havell, Ernest Binfield. (1904). "A Handbook to Agra and the Taj, Sikandra, Fatehpur-Sikri and the Neighbourhood". Longmans, Green, and Company.
193. Penfield, Frederic Courtland. (1907). "East to Suez Ceylon, India, China, and Japan".
194. (1947). "Maasir – I – Alamgiri".
195. Saha, Shandip. (2004). "Creating a Community of Grace: A History of the Puṣṭi Mārga in Northern and Western India". University of Ottawa.
196. Kincaid, Dennis. (1937). "The Grand Rebel: An Impression of Shivaji, Founder of the Maratha Empire". Collins.
197. Kincaid, Dennis. (1937). "The Grand Rebel: An Impression of Shivaji Maharaj, Founder of the Maratha Empire". Collins.
198. Kincaid, Dennis. (1937). "The Grand Rebel: An Impression of Shivaji, Founder of the Maratha Empire". Collins.
199. (2004). "A History of Modern India, 1480–1950". Anthem Press.
200. Chandra, Satish. (1999). "Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals". Har-Anand Publications.
201. Chandra, Satish. (1999). "Medieval India: From Sultanat to the Mughals". Har-Anand Publications.
202. Sarkar, Jadunath. (1992). "Shivaji and His Times". Orient Blackswan.
203. Sarkar, Jadunath. (1992). "Shivaji and His Times". Orient Blackswan.
204. Joshi, P.S.. (1980). "Chhatrapati Sambhaji, 1657-1689 A.D.". S. Chand.
205. Sarkar, Jadunath. (1920). "Shivaji and His Times". Longmans, Green.
206. (1971). "The Great Moghuls". Cape.
207. (1971). "The Great Moghuls". Cape.
208. Kulkarni, G. T. "Some Observations on the Medieval History of the Deccan." Bulletin of the Deccan College Post-Graduate and Research Institute, vol. 34, no. 1/4, 1974, pp. 101–102. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/42931021. Retrieved 10 May 2024.
209. (1993). "The Marathas 1600–1818". Cambridge University.
210. (2010). "A History of India". Wiley.
211. (1973). "The History of Bengal". Academica Asiatica.
212. (1973). "The History of Bengal". Academica Asiatica.
213. (1973). "The History of Bengal". Academica Asiatica.
214. Sarkar, J. N. (1992), "Chapter VIII Assam-Mughal Relations", in Barpujari, H. K., The Comprehensive History of Assam 2, Guwahati: Assam Publication Board, pp. 148–256
215. (1986). "The Peacock Throne: The Drama of Mogul India". Motilal Banarsidass.
216. (1930). "Mughal Rule in India". Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.
217. Sehgal, Narender. (1994). "Converted Kashmir: Memorial of Mistakes". Utpal Publications.
218. "Guru Tegh Bahadur". BBC.
219. (1 May 2021). "PM Modi visits Gurdwara Sis Ganj Sahib in Delhi on 400th Prakash Parab of Guru Teg Bahadur". [[Hindustan Times]].
220. (2013). "Sikh Religion, Culture and Ethnicity". Routledge.
221. (26 October 2009). "BBC Religions – Sikhism". BBC.
222. P Dhavan. (2011). "When Sparrows Became Hawks: The Making of the Sikh Warrior Tradition, 1699–1799". Oxford University Press.
223. Chaitanya, Krishna. (1994). "A History of Indian Painting: The Modern Period". Abhinav Publications.
224. (1960). "Khushhal Khan – the national poet of the Afghans". Journal of the Royal Central Asian Society.
225. Banting, Erinn. (2003). "Afghanistan: The Culture ''Lands, Peoples, & Cultures''". Crabtree Publishing Company.
226. (2018). "Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy". Routledge.
227. (July 2009). "The Durand Line: History and Problems of the Afghan-Pakistan Border". Asian Affairs.
228. Hooja, Rima. (2006). "A History of Rajasthan". Rupa.
229. (1950). "An advanced history of India". Macmillan & Co..
230. Sarkar, Jadunath. (1994). "A History of Jaipur". Orient Longman.
231. Rein Taagepera. (September 1997). "Expansion and Contraction Patterns of Large Polities: Context for Russia". [[International Studies Quarterly]].
232. {{harvtxt. Richards. 1996
233. Gommans, Jos J. L.. (2002). "Mughal Warfare: Indian Frontiers and Highroads to Empire 1500–1700". Routledge.
234. Murray, John. (1911). "A handbook for travelers in India, Burma and Ceylon". Thacker, Spink, & Co..
235. (1981). "Mughal State Finance and the Premodern World Economy". Comparative Studies in Society and History.
236. Wolpert, Stanley A.. (2004). "New History of India". Oxford University Press.
237. Braudel, Fernand. (1992). "Civilization and Capitalism: 15th–18th Century: The Perspective of the World". University of California Press.
238. Sohoni, P., 2016. A Tale of Two Imperial Residences: Aurangzeb's Architectural Patronage. Journal of Islamic Architecture, 4(2), pp. 63–69.[https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/72668-EN-a-tale-of-two-imperial-residences-aurang.pdf]
239. Brown, Katherine Butler. (January 2007). "Did Aurangzeb Ban Music? Questions for the Historiography of his Reign". Modern Asian Studies.
240. (2005). "Advanced Study in the History of Modern India 1707–1813". New Dawn Press.
241. Truschke, Audrey. (2017). "Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King". [[Stanford University Press]].
242. (2015). "Imperial Identity in the Mughal Empire: Memory and Dynastic Politics in Early Modern South and Central Asia". I.B. Tauris.
243. (December 2020}} --> His critics argue that his ruthlessness and religious bigotry made him unsuitable to rule the mixed population of his empire. Some critics assert that the persecution of [[Shia]]s, [[Sufi]]s and non-Muslims to impose practices of orthodox Islamic state, such as imposition of sharia and ''[[jizya]]'' religious tax on non-Muslims, doubling of custom duties on Hindus while abolishing it for Muslims, executions of Muslims and non-Muslims alike, and destruction of temples eventually led to numerous rebellions.{{cite book). "The History of India". Britannica Educational Publishing.
244. (2016). "The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives". Sage Publications.
245. (2008). "Dalit Literature: Our Response". Sarup & Sons.
246. (1989). "Religion State And Politics in India". Ajanta Publications (India).
247. (2011). "Cengage Advantage Books: World History". Cengage Learning.
248. Chua, Amy. (2009). "Day of Empire: How Hyperpowers Rise to Global Dominance – and Why They Fall". [[Random House.
249. Agrawal, Ashvini. (1983). "Studies in Mughal History". Motilal Banarsidass Publ..
250. (2005). "Advanced Study in the History of Modern India: Volume One: 1707–1813". Sterling Publishers.
251. (2009). "Encyclopaedia of Indian Events & Dates". Sterling Publishers.
252. Abraham Eraly (2000), ''Emperors of the Peacock Throne: The Saga of the Great Mughals'', Penguin Books, {{ISBN. 978-0-14-100143-2, pp. 398–399. According to Abraham Eraly, "in 1670, all temples around Ujjain were destroyed" and later "300 temples were destroyed in and around Chitor, Udaipur and Jaipur" among other Hindu temples destroyed elsewhere in campaigns through 1705.
     
     Avari writes, "Aurangzeb's religious policy caused friction between him and the ninth Sikh guru, Tegh Bahadur. In both Punjab and Kashmir the Sikh leader was roused to action by Aurangzeb's excessively zealous Islamic policies. Seized and taken to Delhi, he was called upon by Aurangzeb to embrace Islam and, on refusal, was tortured for five days and then beheaded in November 1675. Two of the ten Sikh gurus thus died as martyrs at the hands of the Mughals. (Avari (2013), p. 115)
253. Haroon, Asif. (2004). "Muhammad Bin Qasim to General Pervez Musharraf: Triumphs, Tribulations". Sang-e-Meel.
254. "Mughal dynasty {{!}} History, Map, & Facts". Encyclopædia Britannica.
255. Truschke, Audrey. (2017). "Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King". Stanford University Press.
256. Truschke, Audrey. (2017). "Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King". Stanford University Press.
257. (18 April 2015). "Biography of the Moghul ruler Aurangzeb; was he Salafi in his 'aqeedah?".
258. (1997). "سلك الدرر في أعيان القرن الثاني عشر". Dar al Kutub al 'Alamiyya.
259. (1981). "Tarikh al-Islam fi al-Hind". Beirut : Al-Mu'ssasah al-Jam'iyah al-Dirasat wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzi.
260. (3 September 2014). "Shaikh Inayat-Allah Kamboh". Kamboj Society.
261. (2010). "World Heritage & Records of Sufism Volume – II". World Spiritual Assembly.
262. Haroon Khalid (1 October 2018), "In India and Pakistan, religion makes one country's hero the other's villain", ''Quartz India''. Retrieved 21 April 2019.
263. Munis D. Faruqui "Book review of ''Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King''" in ''Journal of the American Academy of Religion'', Volume 87, Issue 1, March 2019, p. 300
264. (2012). "The Political Philosophy of Muhammad Iqbal: Islam and Nationalism in Late Colonial India". Cambridge University Press.
265. (2015). "Creating a New Medina: State Power, Islam, and the Quest for Pakistan in Late Colonial North India". Cambridge University Press.
266. (2002). "Discovering Islam: Making Sense of Muslim History and Society". Routledge.
267. Irfani, Suroosh. (July–December 1996). "Review Article: Discovering Islam: Making Sense of Muslim History and Society". Pakistan Journal of History and Culture.
268. (October 2016). "التاريخ كما كان". كتوبيا للنشر والتوزيع.
269. Jalal, Ayesha. (February 1995). "Conjuring Pakistan: History as Official Imagining". International Journal of Middle East Studies.
270. Ali, Mubarak. (September–October 1992). "Akbar in Pakistani Textbooks". Social Scientist.
271. Shaikh, Zeeshan. (2015-09-05). "A capital road gone, Mughal king Aurangzeb lives in 177 towns and villages". The Indian Express.
272. Truschke, Audrey. (2017). "Aurangzeb: The Life and Legacy of India's Most Controversial King". Stanford University Press.
273. Hasan, Farhat. (2019-05-16). "Nationalist representations of the Mughal state: The views of Tilak and Gandhi". Sage Publications.
274. (2013). "The History of India, as Told by its Own Historians". Cambridge University Press.
275. Lokapally, Vijay. (21 June 2016). "Understanding Aurangzeb". The Hindu.