61 Cygni

Name

61 Cygni is relatively dim, so it does not appear on ancient star maps, nor is it given a name in western or Chinese systems.

The name "61 Cygni" is part of the Flamsteed designation assigned to stars. According to this designation scheme, devised by John Flamsteed to catalog his observations, stars of a particular constellation are numbered in the order of their right ascension, not in Greek letters as the Bayer designation does. The star does not appear under that name in Flamsteed's Historia Coelestis Britannica, although it has been stated by him that 61 Cygni actually corresponds to what he referred to as 85 Cygni in the 1712 edition. It has also been called "Bessel's Star" or "Piazzi's Flying Star".

Observation history

Early observations

The first well recorded observation of the star system using optical instruments was made by James Bradley on 25 September 1753, when he noticed that it was a double star. William Herschel began systematic observations of 61 Cygni as part of a wider study of binary stars. His observations led to the conclusion that binary stars were separated enough that they would show different movements in parallax over the year, and hoped to use this as a way to measure the distance to the stars.

In 1792, Giuseppe Piazzi noticed the high proper motion when he compared his own observations of 61 Cygni with those of Bradley, made 40 years earlier. This led to considerable interest in 61 Cygni by contemporary astronomers, and its continual observation since that date. Piazzi's repeated measurements led to a definitive value of its motion, which he published in 1804.{{cite book

It was in this record he christened the system as the "Flying Star".

Piazzi noted that this motion meant that it was probably one of the closest stars, and suggested it would be a prime candidate for an attempt to determine its distance through parallax measurements, along with two other possibilities, Delta Eridani and Mu Cassiopeiae.

Parallax measurement

A number of astronomers soon took up the task, including attempts by François Arago and Claude-Louis Mathieu in 1812, who recorded the parallax at 500 milliarcseconds (mas), and Christian Heinrich Friedrich Peters used Arago's data to calculate a value of 550 mas. Peters calculated a better value based on observations made by Bernhard von Lindenau at Seeburg between 1812 and 1814; he calculated it to be 470 ±510 mas. Von Lindenau had already noted that he had seen no parallax, and as Friedrich Georg Wilhelm von Struve pointed out after his own test series between 1818 and 1821, all of these numbers are more accurate than the accuracy of the instrument used.

Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel made a notable contribution in 1812 when he used a different method to measure distance. Assuming the orbital period of the two stars in the binary to be 400 years, he estimated the distance between the two this would require, and then measured the angular distance between the stars. This led to a value of 460 mas. He then followed this up with direct parallax measurements in a series of observations between 1815 and 1816, comparing it with six other stars. The two sets of measurements produced values of 760 and 1320 mas. All of these estimates, like earlier attempts by others, retained inaccuracies greater than the measurements.

When Joseph von Fraunhofer invented a new type of heliometer, Bessel carried out another set of measurements using this device in 1837 and 1838 at Königsberg. He published his findings in 1838 with a value of 369.0 ±19.1 mas to A and 260.5 ±18.8 to B, and estimated the center point to be at 313.6 ±13.6. This corresponds to a distance of about 600,000 astronomical units, or about 10.4 light-years. This was the first direct and reliable measurement of the distance to a star other than the Sun.{{cite web |access-date = 3 April 2009 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120204150631/http://messier.seds.org/xtra/Bios/bessel.html |archive-date = 4 February 2012 | trans-title=Determining the distance of the 61st star of Cygnus. From Mr Geheimen, Rath and Ritter Bessel | access-date=2 July 2019 | archive-date=22 January 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122170129/https://zenodo.org/record/1424605 | url-status=live

Only a few years after Bessel's measurement, in 1842 Friedrich Wilhelm Argelander noted that Groombridge 1830 had an even larger proper motion, and 61 Cygni became the second highest known. It was later moved further down the list by Kapteyn's Star and Barnard's Star. 61 Cygni has the sixth highest proper motion of all stellar systems listed in the latest Gaia catalogues, but retains the title of highest proper motion among stars visible to the naked eye.

Binary observations

Due to the wide angular separation between 61 Cygni A and B, and the correspondingly slow orbital motion, it was initially unclear whether the two stars in the 61 Cygni system were a gravitationally bound system or simply a juxtaposition of stars.{{cite journal

However, by 1917 refined measured parallax differences demonstrated that the separation was significantly less.{{cite journal | trans-title=Second catalog of orbits of visual double stars

In 1911, Benjamin Boss published data indicating that the 61 Cygni system was a member of a comoving group of stars.{{cite journal

Observations taken by planet search programs show that both components have strong linear trends in the radial velocity measurements.

Amateur observation

An observer using 7×50 binoculars can find 61 Cygni two binocular fields southeast of the bright star Deneb. The angular separation of the two stars is slightly greater than the angular size of Saturn (16–20″). So, under ideal viewing conditions, the binary system can be resolved by a telescope with a 7 mm aperture.Per the Rayleigh criterion: \begin{matrix}\alpha_R\ =\ \frac{138}{D}\end{matrix} mm. This is well within the capability for aperture of typical binoculars, though to resolve the binary these need a steady mount and some 10x magnification. With a separation of 28 arc-seconds between the component stars, 10× magnification would give an apparent separation of 280 arc-seconds, above the generally regarded eye resolution limit of 4 arc-minutes or 240 arc-seconds.

Properties

Although it appears to be a single star to the naked eye, 61 Cygni is a widely-separated binary star system, composed of two K class (orange) main sequence stars, the brighter 61 Cygni A and fainter 61 Cygni B, which have apparent magnitudes of 5.2 and 6.1, respectively. Both appear to be old-disk stars,{{cite journal | doi-access=free 61 Cygni A's long-term stability led to it being selected as an "anchor star" in the Morgan–Keenan (MK) classification system in 1943, serving as the K5 V "anchor point" since that time. Starting in 1953, 61 Cygni B has been considered a K7 V standard star (Johnson & Morgan 1953, Keenan & McNeil 1989).

61 Cygni A is a typical BY Draconis variable star designated as V1803 Cyg while 61 Cygni B is a flare type variable star named HD 201092 with their magnitudes varying 5.21 V and 6.03, respectively. The two stars orbit their common barycenter in a period of 659 years, with a mean separation of about 84 AU—84 times the separation between the Earth and the Sun. The relatively large orbital eccentricity of 0.48 means that the two stars are separated by about 44 AU at periapsis and 124 AU at apoapsis.At periapsis: \begin{matrix}r_{per}\ =\ (1\ -\ e)\cdot a\ \approx\ 44\end{matrix} AU At apoapsis: \begin{matrix}r_{ap}\ =\ (1\ +\ e)\cdot a\ \approx\ 124\end{matrix} AU The leisurely orbit of the pair has made it difficult to pin down their respective masses, and the accuracy of these values remain somewhat controversial. In the future this issue may be resolved through the use of asteroseismology. 61 Cygni A has about 11% more mass than 61 Cygni B.

The system has an activity cycle that is much more pronounced than the solar sunspot cycle. This is a complex activity cycle that varies with a period of about 7.5±1.7 years.{{cite journal | doi-access=free

The outflow of the stellar wind from component A produces a bubble within the local interstellar cloud. Along the direction of the star's motion within the Milky Way, this extends out to a distance of 30 AU, or roughly the orbital distance of Neptune from the Sun. This is lower than the separation between the two components of 61 Cygni, and so the two most likely do not share a common atmosphere. The compactness of the astrosphere is likely due to the low mass outflow and the relatively high velocity through the local interstellar medium.{{cite journal

61 Cygni B displays a more chaotic pattern of variability than A, with significant short-term flares. There is an 11.7-year periodicity to the overall activity cycle of B. Both stars exhibit stellar flare activity, but the chromosphere of B is 25% more active than for 61 Cygni A.{{cite journal | doi-access=free

There is some disagreement over the evolutionary age of this system. Kinematic data gives an age estimate of about 10 Gyr. Gyrochronology, or the age determination of a star based on its rotation and color, results in an average age of 2.0 ±0.2 Gyr. The ages based on chromospheric activity for A and B are 2.36 Gyr and 3.75 Gyr, respectively. Finally the age estimates using the isochrone method, which involve fitting the stars to evolutionary models, yield upper limits of 0.44 Gyr and 0.68 Gyr.{{cite journal

Claims of a planetary system

On different occasions, it has been claimed that 61 Cygni might have unseen low-mass companions, planets or a brown dwarf. Kaj Strand of the Sproul Observatory, under the direction of Peter van de Kamp, made the first such claim in 1942 using observations to detect tiny but systematic variations in the orbital motions of 61 Cygni A and B. These perturbations suggested that a third body of about 16 Jupiter masses must be orbiting 61 Cygni A.{{cite journal

In 1978, Wulff-Dieter Heintz of the Sproul Observatory proved that these claims were spurious, as they were unable to detect any evidence of such motion down to six percent of the Sun's mass—equivalent to about 60 times the mass of Jupiter.{{cite journal

In 2018, analysis of the DR2 data gathered by the Gaia space telescope revealed significant proper motion anomalies in the orbits of the binary stars around each other; the stars were not quite orbiting around their centre of mass with 61 Cygni B also orbiting too slowly for its assumed mass. These anomalies taken together are indicative of the possible presence of a perturbing third object in orbit around 61 Cygni B. However, subsequent works found the astrometric data of the two stars to be consistent with a binary system with no third body.

The habitable zone for 61 Cygni A, defined as the locations where liquid water could be present on an Earth-like planet, is 0.26–0.58 AU. For 61 Cygni B, the habitable zone is 0.24–0.50 AU.

Refining planetary boundaries

Since no certain planetary object has been detected around either star so far, McDonald Observatory team has set limits to the presence of one or more planets around 61 Cygni A and 61 Cygni B with masses between 0.07 and 2.1 Jupiter masses and average separations spanning between 0.05 and 5.2 AU.{{cite journal

Because of the proximity of this system to the Sun, it is a frequent target of interest for astronomers. Both stars were selected by NASA as "Tier 1" targets for the proposed optical Space Interferometry Mission.{{cite web |access-date = 23 July 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070804210039/http://tauceti.sfsu.edu/~chris/SIM/t1.html |archive-date = 4 August 2007

Measurements of this system appeared to have detected an excess of far infrared radiation, beyond what is emitted by the stars. Such an excess is sometimes associated with a disk of dust, but in this case it lies sufficiently close to one or both of the stars that it has not been resolved with a telescope.{{cite journal

Object for biosignature research

The two stars are among five (all nearby star) paradigms listed among those K-type stars of a type in a 'sweet spot' between Sun-analog stars and M stars for the likelihood of evolved life, per analysis of Giada Arney from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center.

Notes

References

References

1. Hopkins, Mary Murray. (1 November 1916). "The Parallax of 61 Cygni". Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada.
2. Hirshfeld, Alan. (2001). "Parallax: The Race to Measure the Cosmos". Macmillan.
3. Bessel, F. W.. (1838). "On the parallax of 61 Cygni". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
4. Bessel, F. W.. (1838). "Bestimmung der Entfernung des 61sten Sterns des Schwans". Astronomische Nachrichten.
5. Hughes, Stefan. (2012). "Catchers of the Light". ArtDeCiel Publishing.
6. Sol Company. "System Summary Pi Mensae". Sol Company.
7. Espenak, Fred. (25 July 1996). "Twelve Year Planetary Ephemeris: 1995–2006". NASA.
8. Adler, Alan. (26 July 2006). "More Pretty Double Stars". Sky and Telescope.
9. Nave, Rod. "61 Cygni". [[HyperPhysics]].
10. (1953). "Fundamental stellar photometry for standards of spectral type on the revised system of the Yerkes spectral atlas". Astrophysical Journal.
11. (October 1989). "The Perkins Catalog of Revised MK Types for the Cooler Stars". Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
12. "SIMBAD Query Result: HD 201092". Centre de Données astronomiques de Strasbourg.
13. (2009). "Science Fiction Voices #1". Wildside Press LLC.
14. (2019). "Stellar and substellar companions of nearby stars from Gaia DR2". Astronomy & Astrophysics.
15. (October 2013). "The Solar Neighborhood XXIX: The Habitable Real Estate of Our Nearest Stellar Neighbors". The Astronomical Journal.
16. (June 2011). "Exozodiacal Dust Levels for Nearby Main-sequence Stars: A Survey with the Keck Interferometer". The Astrophysical Journal.
17. {{Cite Gaia DR3. 1872046609345556480
18. {{Cite Gaia DR3. 1872046574983497216
19. de Bruijne, Jos. (2025-05-13). "Gaia DR3 sources with high proper motions - Image of the Week - COSMOS IoW_20250513".
20. Fischer, Mark. (9 February 2019). "61 Cygni". Mark Fisher.
21. (4 April 2011). "61 Cygni". The Internet Stellar Database.
22. Allen, Richard Hinckley. (2003). "Star Names and Their Meanings". Kessinger.
23. (1997). "The Chinese Sky During the Han: Constellating Stars and Society". Brill.
24. "Naming Objects Outside the Solar System-Stars". IAU.
25. Kaler, Jim. (8 July 2009). "61 Cygni".
26. Flamsteed, John. (1725). "Historia Coelestis Britannica". Meere.
27. Dibon-Smith, Richard. (1998). "The Flamsteed Collection". Clear Skies.
28. "61 Cyg (Piazzi's Flying Star)".
29. Covington, Michael. (26 September 2002). "Celestial Objects for Modern Telescopes: Practical Amateur Astronomy". Cambridge University Press.
30. Fodera-Serio, G.. (1990). "Giuseppe Piazzi and the Discovery of the Proper Motion of 61-Cygni". Journal for the History of Astronomy.
31. Staff. (7 August 2007). "RECONS Mission Statement". Research Consortium on Nearby Stars, Georgia State University.
32. (September 2008). "The radii of the nearby K5V and K7V stars 61 Cygni A & B. CHARA/FLUOR interferometry and CESAM2k modeling". Astronomy and Astrophysics.
33. Böhm-Vitense, Erika. (March 2007). "Chromospheric Activity in G and K Main-Sequence Stars, and What It Tells Us about Stellar Dynamos". The Astrophysical Journal.
34. (December 1993). "Anchor Points for the MK System of Spectral Classification". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society.
35. (2016). "Limits on Planetary Companions from Doppler Surveys of Nearby Stars". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
36. (2025-05-18). "The NEID Earth Twin Survey. II. Dynamical Masses in Seven High-acceleration Star Systems". The Astronomical Journal.
37. (October 2018). "Estimating activity cycles with probabilistic methods. II. The Mount Wilson Ca H&K data". [[Astronomy & Astrophysics]].
38. (2024-02-01). "Gaia FGK benchmark stars: Fundamental Teff and log g of the third version". Astronomy and Astrophysics.