Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/background-asteroids

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

596 Scheila

Main-belt asteroid


Main-belt asteroid

FieldValue
minorplanetyes
background#D6D6D6
name596 Scheila
image596 Scheila, 5 minute exposure, Dec. 12, 2010.jpg
caption596 Scheila outbursting as seen in a 5 min photo with a 24" telescope
discovery_ref
discovererAugust Kopff
discovery_siteHeidelberg Observatory
discovered21 February 1906
mpc_name(596) Scheila
named_afterSheila
pronounced
mp_categorymain-belt
main-belt comet
orbit_ref
epoch4 September 2017 (JD 2458000.5)
uncertainty0
observation_arc111.19 yr (40,611 days)
aphelion3.4062 AU
perihelion2.4490 AU
semimajor2.9276 AU
eccentricity0.1635
period5.01 yr (1,830 days)
mean_anomaly21.266°
mean_motion/ day
inclination14.661°
asc_node70.606°
arg_peri175.16°
mean_radiuskm (IRAS)
density2.0 g/cm3 (assumed)
2.5 g/cm3 (assumed)
escape_velocity60 m/s (calculated)
75 m/s (calculated)
rotation15.8480 h
albedo
spectral_typePCD (Tholen)
T (SMASSII)
magnitude11.67 to 15.32
abs_magnitude8.90

main-belt comet 2.5 g/cm3 (assumed) 75 m/s (calculated) T (SMASSII)

596 Scheila is a main-belt asteroid and main-belt comet{{cite web |author-link=David C. Jewitt |access-date=2010-12-15}} orbiting the Sun. It was discovered on 21 February 1906 by August Kopff from Heidelberg. Kopff named the asteroid after a female English student with whom he was acquainted.

Overview

On 11 December 2010, Steve Larson of the Catalina Sky Survey detected a comet-like appearance to asteroid Scheila: it displayed a "coma" of about magnitude 13.5.{{cite web |name-list-style=amp |access-date=2010-12-12| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110107081344/http://remanzacco.blogspot.com/2010/12/comet-like-appearance-of-596-scheila.html| archive-date= 7 January 2011 | url-status= live}} Inspection of archival Catalina Sky Survey observations showed the activity was triggered between 11 November 2010 and 3 December.{{cite web |access-date=2010-12-12}} Imaging with the 2-meter Faulkes Telescope North revealed a linear tail in the anti-sunward direction and an orbital tail, indicative of larger slower particles.

When first detected it was unknown what drove the ejecta plumes. Scheila's gravity is too large for electrostatics to launch dust. Cometary outgassing could not be ruled out until detailed spectroscopic observations indicated the absence of gas in Scheila's plumes. Observations by the Hubble Space Telescope and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory's ultraviolet-optical telescope make it most likely that Scheila was impacted at ~5 km/s by a previously unknown asteroid ~35 meters in diameter.{{cite journal

As a consequence of the 2010 impact, the surface spectrum of Scheila changed, from a moderately red T-type spectrum to a more reddish D-type spectrum, showing how "fresh" material weathers over time in space. This is similar to laboratory experiments done on the Tagish Lake meteorite.

Scheila last came to perihelion on 2022 May 26.

References

|access-date=7 May 2016}}

References

  1. Schmadel, Lutz D.. (2003). "Dictionary of Minor Planet Names". Springer Science & Business Media.
  2. Richard Miles's [https://archive.today/20120719231322/http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/mpml/message/24810 posting on Yahoo minor planet mailing list (MPML)]
  3. (2022). "The Appearance of a "Fresh" Surface on 596 Scheila as a Consequence of the 2010 Impact Event". The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 596 Scheila — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report