Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
sports

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

2012 Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas


FieldValue
game_nameMeineke Car Care Bowl of Texas
date_game_playedDecember 28
year_game_played2012
football_season2012
stadiumReliant Stadium
cityHouston, Texas
visitor_schoolUniversity of Minnesota
visitor_name_shortMinnesota
visitor_nicknameGolden Gophers
visitor_record6–6
visitor_coachJerry Kill
visitor_conferenceBig Ten
visitor_1q10
visitor_2q7
visitor_3q7
visitor_4q7
home_schoolTexas Tech University
home_name_shortTexas Tech
home_nicknameRed Raiders
home_record7–5
home_coachChris Thomsen
home_conferenceBig 12
home_1q14
home_2q10
home_3q0
home_4q10
oddsTexas Tech by 13½
refereeTom McCabe (MAC)
attendance50,386
us_networkESPN
us_announcersMark Jones, Brock Huard
game_linkTexas Bowl
different_next[2013](2013-texas-bowl)

The 2012 Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas, the seventh edition of the game, was a post-season American college football bowl game held on December 28, 2012 at Reliant Stadium in Houston, Texas as part of the 2012-13 NCAA football bowl season. The game, which was the final game of the 2012 NCAA Division I FBS football season for both teams, was broadcast at 8 p.m. CT on ESPN, and featured the Minnesota Golden Gophers from the Big Ten Conference against the Texas Tech Red Raiders from the Big 12 Conference. The Golden Gophers accepted their invitation after finishing the regular season at six-wins, six-losses, while the Red Raiders accepted their invitation following a campaign during which they totaled seven-wins, five-losses. This was not the first time the Golden Gophers and Red Raiders met in a bowl game; the two teams had previously met in the 2006 Insight Bowl, with the Red Raiders winning 44–41 in overtime.

Teams

Minnesota

The Golden Gophers finished at the bottom of the Big Ten's Legends Division, only posting a 2–6 mark in conference play. However, because of their 6–6 record, the Golden Gophers were bowl eligible for the first time since 2009, accepting a bid to the Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas their bid to the game, their first Meineke Car Care Bowl appearance.

Texas Tech

The Red Raiders finished in a tie for fifth place in the Big 12 at 4–5 in conference play, holding tiebreakers ahead of the TCU Horned Frogs and West Virginia Mountaineers but behind the Baylor Bears. Soon after Minnesota accepted their invitation, the Red Raiders did the same. Although this was also the Red Raiders' first appearance in the Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas, the Red Raiders played in three previous bowl games in Houston: the 1976 Bluebonnet Bowl, the 2000 Galleryfurniture.com Bowl, and the 2003 Houston Bowl.

The Red Raiders' passing attack was the second-best in the country, averaging 362 yards per game.

Game summary

Scoring summary

Statistics

StatisticsMINNTTU
First downs2323
Plays–yards73–36871–429
Rushes–yards54–22224–145
Passing yards146284
Passing: Comp–Att–Int8–19–132–47–2
Time of possession36:1823:04

Source:

References

References

  1. Bowl Schedule, ''Los Angeles Times'', December 4, 2012
  2. (December 2, 2012). "Minnesota, Texas Tech accept invitations to 2012 Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas". Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas.
  3. Bennett, Brian. (December 28, 2012). "Minnesota keys in Meineke Car Care Bowl". ESPN Internet Ventures.
  4. (December 28, 2012). "Minnesota vs. Texas Tech - Team Statistics".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 2012 Meineke Car Care Bowl of Texas — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report