Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/2012-davis-cup-europe-africa-zone

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

2012 Davis Cup Europe/Africa Zone Group I

Main article: 2012 Davis Cup Europe/Africa Zone

The Europe and Africa Zone is one of the three zones of regional Davis Cup competition in 2012.

In the Europe and Africa Zone there are four different groups in which teams compete against each other to advance to the next group.

Draw

Seeds: 1. 1. 1. 1. Remaining Nations:

Draw

| team-width = 175

| RD2-date= 14–16 Sep / 19–21 Oct | RD3-date= 14–16 September | RD4-date= 10–12 February | RD5-date= 6–8 April

| RD4-text1= | RD4-seed1=1 | RD4-team1= | RD4-score1= | RD4-seed2= | RD4-team2= bye| RD4-score2= | RD4-text2= | RD4-seed3= | RD4-team3= | RD4-score3= | RD4-seed4= | RD4-team4= bye | RD4-score4= | RD4-text3= | RD4-seed5=3 | RD4-team5= | RD4-score5= | RD4-seed6= | RD4-team6= bye| RD4-score6= | RD4-text4=Great Britain | RD4-seed7= | RD4-team7= | RD4-score7=3 | RD4-seed8= | RD4-team8= | RD4-score8=2 | RD4-text5=Netherlands | RD4-seed9= | RD4-team9= | RD4-score9=0 | RD4-seed10= | RD4-team10= | RD4-score10=5 | RD4-text6= | RD4-seed11= | RD4-team11= bye| RD4-score11= | RD4-seed12=4 | RD4-team12= | RD4-score12= | RD4-text7=Slovenia | RD4-seed13= | RD4-team13= | RD4-score13=0 | RD4-seed14= | RD4-team14= | RD4-score14=5 | RD4-text8= | RD4-seed15= | RD4-team15= bye| RD4-score15= | RD4-seed16=2 | RD4-team16= | RD4-score16= | RD3-text1= | RD3-seed1= | RD3-team1=bye | RD3-score1= | RD3-seed2= | RD3-team2= | RD3-score2= | RD3-text2= | RD3-seed3= | RD3-team3=bye | RD3-score3= | RD3-seed4= | RD3-team4= | RD3-score4= | RD3-text3= Cluj-Napoca, Romania (indoor) | RD3-seed5= | RD3-team5= | RD3-score5=2 | RD3-seed6=4 | RD3-team6= | RD3-score6=3 | RD3-text4= | RD3-seed7= | RD3-team7= | RD3-score7= | RD3-seed8= | RD3-team8=bye | RD3-score8= | RD5-text1=Israel | RD5-seed1=1 | RD5-team1= | RD5-score1=3 | RD5-seed2= | RD5-team2= | RD5-score2=2 | RD5-text2=Great Britain | RD5-seed3=3 | RD5-team3= | RD5-score3=4 | RD5-seed4= | RD5-team4= | RD5-score4=1 | RD5-text3=Netherlands | RD5-seed5= | RD5-team5= | RD5-score5=5 | RD5-seed6=4 | RD5-team6= | RD5-score6=0 | RD5-text4=South Africa | RD5-seed7= | RD5-team7= | RD5-score7=1 | RD5-seed8=2 | RD5-team8= | RD5-score8=4 | RD2-text1=Slovak Republic | RD2-seed1= | RD2-team1= | RD2-score1=1 | RD2-seed2= | RD2-team2= | RD2-score2=3 | RD2-text2=Finland | RD2-seed3= | RD2-team3= | RD2-score3=1 | RD2-seed4= | RD2-team4= | RD2-score4=4

  • and relegated to Group II in 2013.
  • , , , and advance to World Group play-off.

First round

Great Britain vs. Slovakia

Finland vs. Netherlands

Denmark vs. Slovenia

Second round

Israel vs. Portugal

Belgium vs. Great Britain

Netherlands vs. Romania

Slovenia vs. South Africa

First-round play-off

Romania vs. Finland

Second-round play-off

Portugal vs. Slovak Republic

Finland vs. Denmark

References

References

  1. "Great Britain v Slovakia". daviscup.com.
  2. "Finland v Netherlands". daviscup.com.
  3. "Denmark v Slovenia". daviscup.com.
  4. "Israel v Portugal". daviscup.com.
  5. "Belgium v Great Britain". daviscup.com.
  6. "Netherlands v Romania". daviscup.com.
  7. "Slovenia v South Africa". daviscup.com.
  8. "Romania v Finland". daviscup.com.
  9. "Slovak Republic v Portugal". daviscup.com.
  10. "Finland v Denmark". daviscup.com.
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

2012-davis-cup-europe/africa-zone davis-cup-europe/africa-zone
Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 2012 Davis Cup Europe/Africa Zone Group I — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report