Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
general/kelly-cup-playoffs

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

2010 Kelly Cup playoffs


FieldValue
titleKelly Cup playoffs
year2010
datesApril 5–May 21, 2010
num_teams15
winnersCincinnati Cyclones
secondIdaho Steelheads
stat_leader_titleScoring leader(s)
stat_leader_playerMilan Gajic (Florida)
Ryan Cruthers (Reading)
stat_leader_value16 points
prev_season[2009](2009-kelly-cup-playoffs)
next_season[2011](2011-kelly-cup-playoffs)

Ryan Cruthers (Reading)

The 2010 Kelly Cup Playoffs of the ECHL began April 5, 2010. 15 teams qualified, eight from the American Conference and seven from the National Conference. In the American conference, the winners of each of the three divisions plus the five teams with the highest point totals from the teams remaining qualified. Due to the National Conference's membership being limited to only eight teams, the two division winners and the five teams with the highest point totals from the teams remaining qualified, with the division winner with the highest point total receiving a bye to the conference semifinals.

The conference quarterfinals will be a 2-3 format with the higher seed choosing if it wishes to host Games 1-2 or Games 3-5. Teams that are less than 350 miles apart may choose to play a 2-2-1 format.

The remaining rounds will be best-of-seven game series.

Due to a scheduling conflict with their home arena, the Alaska Aces were forced to play their home games in the National Conference quarterfinals against the Stockton Thunder at the Curtis D. Menard Memorial Sports Center in nearby Wasilla.

Playoff seeds

After the regular season, 15 teams qualified for the playoffs. The Idaho Steelheads were the National Conference regular season champions and the Brabham Cup winners with the best record at 103 points. The Charlotte Checkers earned the top seed in the American Conference after winning a tiebreaker with the Kalamazoo Wings and South Carolina Stingrays after each of the three teams finished the season with 94 points each.

American Conference

  1. Charlotte Checkers – South Division and American Conference regular season champions, 94 points (43 wins - South Division)
  2. Kalamazoo Wings – North Division champions, 94 points (42 wins)
  3. Elmira Jackals – East Division champions, 83 points
  4. South Carolina Stingrays – 94 points (41 wins - South Division)
  5. Cincinnati Cyclones – 91 points
  6. Florida Everblades – 85 points
  7. Reading Royals – 80 points
  8. Toledo Walleye – 77 points
  • NOTE: Tie-Breakers:
    • South Division - Charlotte defeats South Carolina on wins (43 wins to 41 wins)
    • Conference Seeding - Charlotte defeats Kalamazoo on wins (43 wins to 42 wins)

National Conference

  1. Idaho Steelheads – West Division and National Conference regular season champions; Brabham Cup winners, 103 points
  2. Bakersfield Condors – Pacific Division champions, 81 points
  3. Alaska Aces – 80 points
  4. Utah Grizzlies – 77 points
  5. Las Vegas Wranglers – 76 points (34 wins)
  6. Stockton Thunder – 76 points (33 wins)
  7. Victoria Salmon Kings – 74 points

Playoff bracket

| RD2-group1=National Conference | RD2-group2=American Conference | team-width=130px

| RD1-seed01=4 | RD1-team01=Utah | RD1-score01=3 | RD1-seed02=5 | RD1-team02=Las Vegas | RD1-score02=2

| RD1-seed03=2 | RD1-team03=Bakersfield | RD1-score03=3 | RD1-seed04=7 | RD1-team04=Victoria | RD1-score04=2

| RD1-seed05=3 | RD1-team05=Alaska | RD1-score05=1 | RD1-seed06=6 | RD1-team06=Stockton | RD1-score06=3

| RD1-seed07=1 | RD1-team07=Charlotte | RD1-score07=3 | RD1-seed08=8 | RD1-team08=Toledo | RD1-score08=1

| RD1-seed09=4 | RD1-team09=South Carolina | RD1-score09=2 | RD1-seed10=5 | RD1-team10=Cincinnati | RD1-score10=3

| RD1-seed11=2 | RD1-team11=Kalamazoo | RD1-score11=2 | RD1-seed12=7 | RD1-team12=Reading | RD1-score12=3

| RD1-seed13=3 | RD1-team13=Elmira | RD1-score13=2 | RD1-seed14=6 | RD1-team14=Florida | RD1-score14=3

| RD2-seed01=1 | RD2-team01=Idaho | RD2-score01=4 | RD2-seed02=4 | RD2-team02=Utah | RD2-score02=0

| RD2-seed03=2 | RD2-team03=Bakersfield | RD2-score03=1 | RD2-seed04=6 | RD2-team04=Stockton | RD2-score04=4

| RD2-seed05=1 | RD2-team05=Charlotte | RD2-score05=3 | RD2-seed06=5 | RD2-team06=Cincinnati | RD2-score06=4

| RD2-seed07=7 | RD2-team07=Reading | RD2-score07=4 | RD2-seed08=6 | RD2-team08=Florida | RD2-score08=0

| RD3-seed01=1 | RD3-team01=Idaho | RD3-score01=4 | RD3-seed02=6 | RD3-team02=Stockton | RD3-score02=2

| RD3-seed03=5 | RD3-team03=Cincinnati | RD3-score03=4 | RD3-seed04=7 | RD3-team04=Reading | RD3-score04=3

| RD4-seed01=1 | RD4-team01=Idaho | RD4-score01=1 | RD4-seed02=5 | RD4-team02=Cincinnati | RD4-score02=4

Conference Quarterfinals

:Note: Home team is listed first.

American Conference

(1) Charlotte Checkers vs. (8) Toledo Walleye

(2) Kalamazoo Wings vs. (7) Reading Royals

(3) Elmira Jackals vs. (6) Florida Everblades

(4) South Carolina Stingrays vs. (5) Cincinnati Cyclones

National Conference

(2) Bakersfield Condors vs. (7) Victoria Salmon Kings

(3) Alaska Aces vs. (6) Stockton Thunder

(4) Utah Grizzlies vs. (5) Las Vegas Wranglers

Conference semifinals

:Note: Home team is listed first.

American Conference

(1) Charlotte Checkers vs. (5) Cincinnati Cyclones

(6) Florida Everblades vs. (7) Reading Royals

National Conference

(1) Idaho Steelheads vs. (4) Utah Grizzlies

(2) Bakersfield Condors vs. (6) Stockton Thunder

Conference Finals

American Conference finals: (5) Cincinnati Cyclones vs. (7) Reading Royals

National Conference finals: (1) Idaho Steelheads vs. (6) Stockton Thunder

Kelly Cup Finals

(1) Idaho Steelheads vs (5) Cincinnati Cyclones

Statistical leaders

Skaters

These are the top ten skaters based on points.

PlayerTeamGPGAPts+/–PIM
Milan GajicFlorida Everblades979**16**60
Ryan CruthersReading Royals9610**16**94
James SixsmithUtah Grizzlies8210**12**68
Olivier LabelleReading Royals974**11**714
Oren EizenmanStockton Thunder629**11**50
Ben GordonReading Royals928**10**64
Ryan KinasewichUtah Grizzlies863**9**08
Marc CavosieReading Royals954**9**14
Bryan MillerAlaska Aces436**9**-20
Matthew PistilliFlorida Everblades836**9**12

GP = Games played; G = Goals; A = Assists; Pts = Points; +/– = Plus/minus; PIM = Penalty minutes; Yellow shade = team still in playoffs

:All statistics as of: 04:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

NOTE: Please replace the date shown with ~~~~~ (five tildes) after updating these figures

--

Goaltending

These are the top five goaltenders based on both goals against average and save percentage with at least one game played (Note: list is sorted by goals against average).

PlayerTeamGPWLSAGAGAASV%SOTOI
Richard BachmanIdaho Steelheads330876**2.00**.9310180
Jeremy SmithCincinnati Cyclones74345817**2.23**.9191458
Riley GillKalamazoo Wings4121358**2.26**.9410212
Todd FordSouth Carolina Stingrays52313413**2.30**.9030339
Timo PielmeierBakersfield Condors312978**2.55**.9180189

GP = Games played; W = Wins; L = Losses; SA = Shots against; GA = Goals against; GAA = Goals against average; SV% = Save percentage; SO = Shutouts; TOI = Time on ice (in minutes); Yellow shade = team still in playoffs

:All statistics as of: 04:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

NOTE: Please replace the date shown with ~~~~~ (five tildes) after updating these figures

--

References

References

  1. Press Release. (June 29, 2009). "Annual ECHL Board of Governors Meeting Concludes". ECHL.
  2. Woody, Doyle. (March 11, 2010). "Schedule conflict puts Aces in Wasilla". [[Anchorage Daily News]].
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 2010 Kelly Cup playoffs — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report