From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
2009 Friends Provident Trophy
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| administrator | England and Wales Cricket Board |
| cricket format | Limited overs cricket (50 overs) |
| tournament format | Group stage and knockout |
| champions | Hampshire Hawks |
| count | 3 |
| participants | 20 |
| matches | 71 (+16 no results) |
| most runs | 546 Ed Joyce (Sussex Sharks) |
| most wickets | 20 Chris Schofield (Surrey Brown Caps) |
| 20 Dominic Cork (Hampshire Hawks) | |
| 20 Alfonso Thomas (Somerset Sabres) | |
| website | Friends Provident cricket |
| previous_year | 2008 |
| previous_tournament | 2008 Friends Provident Trophy |
| next_year | 2010 |
| next_tournament | 2010 Clydesdale Bank 40 |
20 Dominic Cork (Hampshire Hawks) 20 Alfonso Thomas (Somerset Sabres)
The 2009 Friends Provident Trophy was an English county cricket tournament held between 19 April and 25 July 2009. The competition was won by Hampshire Hawks who beat the Sussex Sharks by 6 wickets at Lord's.
Format
The eighteen first-class counties, joined by the Scottish and Irish national teams were divided into four groups. Each team plays each other twice, with the top two teams from each group progressing to the quarter-final stage. Group winners gain a home draw for the quarter-final. During the group stage, teams are awarded two points for a win, one point for a tie, abandonment or a no result, with no points awarded for a defeat. Teams level on points at the end of the group stage were separated by most wins, followed by results between the two teams, net run rate, followed by most wickets taken per balls bowled in matches achieving a result. Teams that were victorious in the quarter-finals then proceeded to the semi-finals and winners from the semi-finals progressed to the final which was held on 25 July, at Lord's.
Fixtures
Group A
| Team | Pld | W | T | L | NR | Pts | NRR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hampshire Hawks | 8 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | +0.339 |
| Nottinghamshire Outlaws | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 10 | +0.420 |
| Worcestershire Royals | 8 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | +0.289 |
| Leicestershire Foxes | 8 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | −0.640 |
| Ireland | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 4 | −0.746 |
Group B
| Team | Pld | W | T | L | NR | Pts | NRR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Somerset Sabres | 8 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 15 | +2.001 |
| Middlesex Panthers | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 | +0.137 |
| Warwickshire Bears | 8 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 8 | +0.468 |
| Kent Spitfires | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 7 | −0.409 |
| Scottish Saltires | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 | −1.783 |
Group C
| Team | Pld | W | T | L | NR | Pts | NRR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gloucestershire Gladiators | 8 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | +0.449 |
| Sussex Sharks | 8 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 9 | +0.120 |
| Yorkshire Carnegie | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 8 | +0.150 |
| Surrey Brown Caps | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 | +0.302 |
| Durham Dynamos | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 6 | −0.633 |
Group D
| Team | Pld | W | T | L | NR | Pts | NRR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lancashire Lightning | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 12 | +0.635 |
| Essex Eagles | 8 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 11 | +0.413 |
| Derbyshire Phantoms | 8 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 | −0.298 |
| Glamorgan Dragons | 8 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 5 | −0.779 |
| Northamptonshire Steelbacks | 8 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 | −0.160 |
Knockout stage
Quarter finals
Semi finals
Final
References
References
- "Friends Provident Trophy, 2009 – Fixtures". [[ESPNcricinfo]].
- "Points system for Friends Provident Trophy Groups". ESPNcricinfo.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 2009 Friends Provident Trophy — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report