From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
2005 Italian fertility laws referendum
none
none
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| date | 12 June 2005 |
| country | Italy |
| flag_year | 2003 |
| part1_subject | Scrapping limitations on clinical and experimental research on embryos |
| part2_subject | Scrapping limits on access to research on embryos |
| part3_subject | Scrapping the legal definition of embryos as people |
| part4_subject | Allowing IVF treatment with donated eggs or sperm |
| part1_choice1 | Yes |
| part1_percentage1 | 88.0 |
| part1_choice2 | No |
| part1_percentage2 | 12.0 |
| part1_caption | Proposal failed as voter turnout was below 50% |
| part2_choice1 | Yes |
| part2_percentage1 | 88.8 |
| part2_choice2 | No |
| part2_percentage2 | 11.2 |
| part2_caption | Proposal failed as voter turnout was below 50% |
| part3_choice1 | Yes |
| part3_percentage1 | 87.7 |
| part3_choice2 | No |
| part3_percentage2 | 12.3 |
| part3_caption | Proposal failed as voter turnout was below 50% |
| part4_choice1 | Yes |
| part4_percentage1 | 78.2 |
| part4_choice2 | No |
| part4_percentage2 | 21.8 |
| part4_caption | Proposal failed as voter turnout was below 50% |
A four-part abrogative referendum on fertility laws was held in Italy on 12 June 2005. Voters were asked whether research and access to the research on embryos should no longer be limited, whether embryos should no longer be legally recognised as people and whether IVF treatment should no longer be limited to three embryos. Although all four proposals were approved by wide margins, the voter turnout of 26% was well below the 50% threshold and the results were invalidated.
Results
Scrapping limitations on clinical and experimental research on embryos
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 10,743,710 | 88.0 |
| No | 1,461,217 | 12.0 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 532,691 | – |
| **Total** | **12,737,618** | **100** |
| Registered voters/turnout | 49,648,425 | 25.7 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Scrapping limits on access to research on embryos
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 10,819,909 | 88.8 |
| No | 1,367,288 | 11.2 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 551,200 | – |
| **Total** | **12,738,397** | **100** |
| Registered voters/turnout | 49,648,425 | 25.7 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Scrapping the legal definition of embryos as people
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 10,663,125 | 87.7 |
| No | 1,492,042 | 12.3 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 579,766 | – |
| **Total** | **12,734,933** | **100** |
| Registered voters/turnout | 49,648,425 | 25.7 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Allowing IVF treatment with donated eggs or sperm
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | 9,391,161 | 78.2 |
| No | 2,744,895 | 21.8 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 590,080 | – |
| **Total** | **12,726,136** | **100** |
| Registered voters/turnout | 49,648,425 | 25.6 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
References
References
- [[Dieter Nohlen]] & Philip Stöver (2010) ''Elections in Europe: A data handbook'', p1049 {{ISBN. 978-3-8329-5609-7
- Nohlen & Stöver, pp1063-1064
- The referendum was called after the [[Italian Radicals]] collected the 500,000 signatures required.[http://www.bionews.org.uk/page_12394.asp Poor turnout for Italy's fertility referendum] BioNews, 13 June 2005
- [[Pope Benedict XVI]] had called for a boycott.[https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Pope-backs-boycott-of-Italy-s-referendum-on-2666602.php Pope backs boycott of Italy's referendum on assisted fertility] Los Angeles Times, 31 May 2005
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 2005 Italian fertility laws referendum — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report