From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
2000 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina
none
none
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| election_name | 2000 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina |
| country | North Carolina |
| type | legislative |
| ongoing | no |
| previous_election | 1998 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina |
| previous_year | 1998 |
| next_election | 2002 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina |
| next_year | 2002 |
| seats_for_election | All 12 North Carolina seats in the United States House of Representatives |
| election_date | |
| party1 | Republican Party (United States) |
| last_election1 | **7** |
| seats1 | **7** |
| seat_change1 | |
| popular_vote1 | **1,514,806** |
| percentage1 | **54.53%** |
| swing1 | 1.27% |
| party2 | Democratic Party (United States) |
| last_election2 | 5 |
| seats2 | 5 |
| seat_change2 | |
| popular_vote2 | 1,193,600 |
| percentage2 | 42.97% |
| swing2 | 0.48% |
| map_image | |
| map_caption |
Republican Democratic The United States House of Representative elections of 2000 in North Carolina were held on 3 November 2000 as part of the biennial election to the United States House of Representatives. All twelve seats in North Carolina, and 435 nationwide, were elected.
As in 1998, no districts changed hands, with the Republicans winning seven and the Democrats winning five of the twelve seats. All incumbents ran for office again, with all winning, meaning that no new representatives were elected.
Redistricting
North Carolina drew a new map following Shaw v. Hunt, and the new maps were challenged in turn. A three-judge panel of the Eastern District of North Carolina granted summary judgment that the new boundaries were an illegal racial gerrymander. This was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in Hunt v. Cromartie on May 17, 1999, unanimously ruled that the Eastern District of North Carolina was in error to grant summary judgment and remanded the case for the court to hold a trial.
After the ensuing trial, the Eastern District of North Carolina ruled that the 12th district was an illegal racial gerrymander on March 7, 2000. This was again appealed, now as Easley v. Cromartie. The U.S. Supreme Court on April 18, 2001, reversed the Eastern District of North Carolina and ruled that the 12th district boundaries were not racially based but was a partisan gerrymander. They said this was a political question that the courts should not rule upon. Justice O'Connor, the author of Shaw v. Hunt, was the swing justice who switched sides to uphold the district boundaries.
Summary
|seats % = 58.33 |votes % = 54.53 |plus/minus = +1.27 |seats % = 41.67 |votes % = 42.97 |plus/minus = –0.48 |seats % = 0 |votes % = 2.50 |plus/minus = –0.79 |seats % = 0 |votes % = 0.04 |plus/minus = N/A |seats % = 0 |votes % = 0.02 |plus/minus = N/A
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
Footnotes
References
- "Cromartie v. Hunt, 34 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (E.D.N.C. 1998)".
- "Cromartie v. Hunt, 133 F. Supp. 2d 407 (E.D.N.C. 2000)".
- "US House of Representatives". North Carolina State Board of Elections.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 2000 United States House of Representatives elections in North Carolina — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report