From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1996 San Marino electoral law referendum
A referendum on the electoral law was held in San Marino on 22 September 1996. Voters were asked four questions on changes to the electoral law and electoral system, all of which were approved by voters.
Results
Question I
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 11,441 | 60.5 |
| Against | 7,456 | 39.5 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 360 | – |
| Total | 19,257 | 100 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 29,729 | 64.8 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Question II
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 11,811 | 62.8 |
| Against | 7,000 | 37.2 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 437 | – |
| Total | 19,248 | 100 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 29,729 | 64.7 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Question III
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 12,219 | 65.0 |
| Against | 6,571 | 35.0 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 457 | – |
| Total | 19,247 | 100 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 29,729 | 64.7 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Question IV
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 11,322 | 60.9 |
| Against | 7,257 | 39.1 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 669 | – |
| Total | 19,248 | 100 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 29,729 | 64.7 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
References
References
- (2010). "Elections in Europe: A Data Handbook". Nomos.
- Nohlen & Stöver, pp1682-1683
- Nohlen & Stöver, p1682
- Nohlen & Stöver, p1683
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1996 San Marino electoral law referendum — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report