Skip to content
Surf Wiki
Save to docs
politics

From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base

1994 Rotherham by-election

UK parliamentary by-election


UK parliamentary by-election

FieldValue
election_name1994 Rotherham by-election
typeparliamentary
election_date5 May 1994
ongoingNo
<!-- Labour -->image1[[File:DenisMacShane (3x4 crop).jpgx160px]]
party1Labour Party (UK)
candidate1**Denis MacShane**
popular_vote1**14,912**
percentage1**55.6%**
swing1**8.3%**
<!-- LD -->image2**LD**
party2Liberal Democrats (UK)
candidate2David Wildgoose
popular_vote27,958
percentage229.7%
swing217.4%
<!-- Con -->image3[[File:Nick Gibb Minister (3x4 crop).jpgx160px]]
party3Conservative Party (UK)
candidate3Nick Gibb
popular_vote32,649
percentage39.9%
swing313.8%
<!-- INFOBOX -->titleMP
after_electionDenis MacShane
before_partyLabour Party (UK)
before_electionJimmy Boyce
countryUnited Kingdom
next_election1997 United Kingdom general election
previous_year1992
previous_election1992 United Kingdom general election
next_year1997
after_partyLabour Party (UK)

The 1994 Rotherham by-election was held on 5 May 1994, following the death of Labour Party Member of Parliament for Rotherham Jimmy Boyce.

Boyce had won the seat only at the 1992 general election, but it had been continuously held by Labour since 1933, usually with a large majority. As a result, Labour were clear favourites to hold at the by-election.

Labour decided to stand Denis MacShane, the director of the European Policy Institute. A former journalist and trade union employee, he had unsuccessfully contested Solihull at the October 1974 general election.

The Conservative Party had taken a distant second place in 1992, and having lost the previous two by-elections of the term to the Liberal Democrats, they were not hopeful of gaining ground. They chose to stand Nick Gibb, a chartered accountant working for KPMG. The Liberal Democrats had taken less than one eighth of the votes cast in 1992, a significant decrease from the previous election. Despite this, they stood the same candidate, David Wildgoose.

Two other candidates stood: Screaming Lord Sutch of the Official Monster Raving Loony Party, and Keith Laycock of the Natural Law Party.

Result

As expected, MacShane easily won the seat, although, disappointingly for the main opposition party, his vote was more than eight percent down on Boyce's. Wildgoose improved his fortunes, more than doubling his vote, and taking second place. Gibb took less than ten percent of the votes, falling to a distant third place. Sutch was able to record his best ever result, taking 1,114 votes and a 4.2% share - within a percentage point of the Loonies retaining a deposit for the first time.

At the 1997 general election, MacShane retained the seat, with an increased majority. Wildgoose also stood, but proved unable to equal his performance in 1994, and by 2001 moved to contest Wentworth. At the Rotherham by-election of 2012, Wildgoose contested the seat again, though on this occasion as an English Democrat, ironically polling more votes than the Liberal Democrat candidate. Gibb became one of the few new Conservatives to enter Parliament in 1997, winning Bognor Regis and Littlehampton. Sutch stood in several subsequent by-elections, but was never able to beat his total in Rotherham.

Previous result

References

References

  1. Boothroyd, David. "Results of Byelections in the 1992-97 Parliament".
Info: Wikipedia Source

This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.

Want to explore this topic further?

Ask Mako anything about 1994 Rotherham by-election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.

Research with Mako

Free with your Surf account

Content sourced from Wikipedia, available under CC BY-SA 4.0.

This content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.

Report