From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1991 Liechtenstein referendum
none
none
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| country | Liechtenstein |
| barwidth | 180px |
| date | 22 September 1991 |
| part1_subject | Amendments to a law on noise protection |
| part1_choice1 | For |
| part1_percentage1 | 20.34 |
| part1_choice2 | Against |
| part1_percentage2 | 79.66 |
| part2_subject | Introducing a five-day week for schools |
| part2_choice1 | For |
| part2_percentage1 | 34.71 |
| part2_choice2 | Against |
| part2_percentage2 | 65.29 |
Two referendums were held in Liechtenstein on 22 September 1991. Voters were asked whether they approved of amendments to a law on noise protection, as well as introducing a five-day week at schools. Both proposals were rejected, by around 80% and 65% of the voters, respectively.
Results
Noise protection law
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 1,903 | 20.3 |
| Against | 7,455 | 79.7 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 198 | – |
| Total | 9,556 | 100 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 13,816 | 69.2 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Five-day week for schools
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 3,226 | 34.7 |
| Against | 6,068 | 65.3 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 262 | – |
| Total | 9,556 | 100 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 13,816 | 69.2 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
References
References
- [[Dieter Nohlen]] & Philip Stöver (2010) ''Elections in Europe: A data handbook'', p1176 {{ISBN. 978-3-8329-5609-7
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1991 Liechtenstein referendum — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report