From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1989 Brazilian presidential election
none
none
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| country | Brazil |
| flag_year | 1968 |
| type | presidential |
| previous_election | 1985 Brazilian presidential election |
| previous_year | 1985 |
| next_election | 1994 Brazilian general election |
| next_year | 1994 |
| election_date | 15 November 1989 (first round) |
| 17 December 1989 (second round) | |
| turnout | 88.08% (first round) |
| 85.61% (second round) | |
| image1 | Fernando Collor de Mello em 1989.jpg |
| candidate1 | **Fernando Collor** |
| running_mate1 | **Itamar Franco** |
| party1 | National Reconstruction Party |
| alliance1 | New Brazil |
| alliance_name | no |
| color1 | 0B6202 |
| popular_vote1 | **35,090,206** |
| percentage1 | **53.03%** |
| image2 | Paim_diap_(cropped_3x4).jpg |
| candidate2 | Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva |
| running_mate2 | José Paulo Bisol |
| party2 | Workers' Party (Brazil) |
| alliance2 | Popular Brazil Front |
| popular_vote2 | 31,075,803 |
| percentage2 | 46.97% |
| map | {{Switcher |
| default | 1 |
| title | President |
| before_election | José Sarney |
| before_party | Brazilian Democratic Movement Party |
| after_election | Fernando Collor |
| after_party | National Reconstruction Party |
17 December 1989 (second round) 85.61% (second round) | [[File:1989 Brazil Presidential Elections, Round 2.svg|300px]] | Second round, shaded accounding to vote share | [[File:1989 Brazil Presidential Elections, Round 1.svg|300px]] | First round, shaded accounding to vote share
Presidential elections were held in Brazil in 1989, with the first round on November 15 and a second round on December 17. They were the first direct presidential elections since 1960, the first to be held using a two-round system and the first to take place under the 1988 constitution, which followed two decades of authoritarian rule after the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état.
The collapse of the military-imposed two-party system that pitted the right-wing authoritarian National Renewal Alliance (ARENA) against the catch-all Brazilian Democratic Movement (MDB) resulted in a wide array of new parties seeking to fill the political vacuum. President José Sarney of the PMDB, the MDB's successor, was ineligible to run. Sarney, who was elected Vice President on Tancredo Neves's ticket in the 1985 elections, had taken office due to Neves's death before his scheduled inauguration.
Popular Governor of Alagoas Fernando Collor de Mello resigned from his position to mount a bid for the presidency.{{cite web | archive-date=17 March 2009 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090317181339/http://veja.abril.com.br/arquivo_veja/capa_23031988.shtml | url-status=dead | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150512045922/http://www.viomundo.com.br/politica/marcos-coimbra-a-sindrome-de-collor-engano-recorrente-dos-candidatos.html | archive-date=12 May 2015 | url-status=live | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210121205502/https://noticias.uol.com.br/especiais/eleicoes-1989/ultnot/2009/11/15/ult9005u10.jhtm | archive-date=2021-01-21 | url-status=live
Following the end of state repression of socialist parties, the Brazilian Left faced a fractured field defined by two primary candidates: Popular labour leader Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, known as Lula, of the industrial ABC Region of São Paulo, and Leonel Brizola, a longtime staple of the Brazilian Left who had served as Governor of Rio Grande do Sul prior to the 1964 military coup. Lula was widely known in Brazil for his role leading the highly publicized metalworkers' strike in the State of São Paulo during the late 1970s and had been elected a federal deputy in 1986 with the most votes nationwide. Lula ran as a member of the Workers' Party (PT), a left-wing party he helped found in 1980. For his running mate, Lula chose Senator José Paulo Bisol of Rio Grande do Sul, a member of the Brazilian Socialist Party (PSB), to unite the left. In the first round, Lula narrowly defeated Brizola, who was running as a member of the Democratic Labour Party (PDT), for a position in the runoff.
The general election was marked by negative campaigning, with Collor accusing Lula of supporting divisive class struggle. The role of Rede Globo, the largest and most-watched TV network in Brazil, in Collor's election remains controversial. Following a tumultuous election cycle, Collor defeated Lula to become the first directly elected President of Brazil in almost thirty years. Collor would later resign from office facing an impending impeachment trial.
Background
On January 15, 1985, following two decades of a US-backed right-wing military dictatorship, in power since the 1964 Brazilian coup d'état, Tancredo Neves of the Brazilian Democratic Movement, the opposition party in a military junta-imposed two-party system, was indirectly elected president by Congress. The government was an authoritarian illiberal democracy which directly elected representatives, but not the president. It was in a process of slow liberalization since the 1974 indirect election of Ernesto Geisel, who was more permissive of political dissent than his hard-liner predecessor, Emílio Garrastazu Médici. Neves was the first civilian to be elected president since 1960.
However, Neves was hospitalized of an untreated cancer on the eve of his inauguration, and finally died in 21 April, before taking office. José Sarney, the Vice-president-elect, was immediately sworn in. The legitimacy of Sarney's appointment was widely questioned, since Neves had died as president-elect without ever taking office. Sarney was seen with suspicion by the civilian population as a member of the military regime's party, the National Renewal Alliance. The support of General Leônidas Pires Gonçalves, slated to be Minister of the Army in Neves' future cabinet, was decisive for Sarney taking office.
Nevertheless, as promised by Neves, Sarney led a transitional government which allowed for liberalization of the authoritarian military government. In 1986, he called for elections to form a constituent assembly, which designed and promulgated the seventh and current constitution of Brazil on October 5, 1988. A markedly liberal democratic and social democratic constitution, it prescribed first-past-the-post two-round direct elections for executive and legislative seats at the federal, state, and municipal levels, and set the date for the 1989 election. It also provided for freedom of expression and legalized formerly clandestine parties such as the Brazilian Communist Party and the Brazilian Socialist Party.
Candidates
Candidates in the runoff
| Party | Presidential candidate | Running mate | Coalition |
|---|---|---|---|
| [[File:Logo_do_Partido_da_Renovação_Nacional_(1989-2000).png | 80px]] | ||
| **National Reconstruction Party** | [[File:Collor_boneco_EBFabr_88_(cropped_3x4).jpg | 100px]] | **Fernando Collor**Governor of Alagoas (1987–1989) |
| [[File:PT star real version.svg | 80px]] | ||
| **Workers' Party** | [[File:Dep. lula (cropped).jpg | 100px]] | **Lula da Silva**Federal Deputy |
Candidates not advanced to runoff
| Party | Presidential candidate | Running mate | Coalition |
|---|---|---|---|
| [[File:PCB-SBIC.svg | 80px]] | ||
| **Brazilian Communist Party** | [[File:Roberto Freire.jpeg | 100px]] | **Roberto Freire**Federal Deputy |
| [[File:PTB logo(1981-2019).png | 80px]] | ||
| **Brazilian Labour Party** | [[File:Affonso Camargo Neto senador Recortado.jpg | 100px]] | **Affonso Camargo Netto**Senator from Paraná |
| [[File:PMB_logo_(Brasil).png | 80px]] | ||
| **Brazilian Municipalist Party** | [[File:Armando_Correa.png | 100px]] | **Armando Corrêa**President of the party |
| [[File:Partido_do_Povo_Brasileiro.png | 80px]] | ||
| **Brazilian People's Party** | **Antônio Pedreira**President of the party | ||
| [[File:PSDB wordmark.svg | 80px]] | ||
| **Brazilian Social Democracy Party** | [[File:Mário Covas.jpg | 100px]] | São Paulo]] |
| [[File:PDT logo(1978-2018).png | 80px]] | ||
| **Democratic Labour Party** | [[File:Brizola (cropped).jpg | 100px]] | Rio de Janeiro]] (1983–1987) |
| [[File:Logotipo_oficial_do_Partido_Democrático_Social.png | 80px]] | ||
| **Democratic Social Party** | [[File:Paulo Maluf-João Figueiredo e Reynaldo de Barros (1982) (cropped).jpg | 100px]] | São Paulo]] (1979–1982) |
| [[File:PV_Logo.svg | 80px]] | ||
| **Green Party** | [[File:Fernando Nagle Gabeira (1969).tif | 100px]] | **Fernando Gabeira** |
| [[File:Logotipo_do_Partido_Liberal_(1985-2004).png | 80px]] | ||
| **Liberal Party** | [[File:Afif.jpg | 100px]] | **Guilherme Afif**Federal Deputy |
| [[File:PartidoComunitarioNacional.png | 80px]] | ||
| **National Communitarian Party** | **Zamir José Teixeira** | ||
| [[File:LogoPN.png | 80px]] | ||
| **Nationalist Party** | **Lívia Maria Pio** | ||
| [[File:PMN_logo.svg | 80px]] | ||
| **National Mobilization Party** | **Celso Brant**President of the party | ||
| [[File:LogoPMDB81.png | 80px]] | ||
| **Brazilian Democratic Movement Party** | [[File:Ulysses_nas_Diretas_Já.jpg | 100px]] | **Ulysses Guimarães**Federal Deputy |
| [[File:PDC_DO_BRASIL_LOGO_57.jpg | 80px]] | ||
| **Christian Democracy Party of Brazil** | **Manoel Horta** | ||
| [[File:Partido_da_Frente_Liberal_Alt.png | 80px]] | ||
| **Liberal Front Party** | [[File:Aureliano_Chaves_(1982).jpg | 100px]] | Minister of Mines and Energy]] (1985–1988) |
| [[File:PRONA_2004_2006.png | 80px]] | ||
| **Party of the Reconstruction of the National Order** | [[File:Carneiro_cropped.jpg | 100px]] | **Enéas Carneiro**President of the party |
| **People's Party** | **Paulo Gontijo**President of the party | ||
| [[File:PLP1988.webp | 80px]] | ||
| **Progressive Liberal Party** | **Eudes Mattar** | ||
| [[File:PSD_1987.png | 80px]] | ||
| **Social Democratic Party** | [[File:Ronaldo Caiado.jpg | 100px]] | Ruralist Democratic Union]] |
| [[File:Logo_Partido_PSP_1987.png | 80px]] | ||
| **Social Progressive Party** | **Marronzinho**President of the party |
Campaign
Most political parties were relatively new but managed to actively mobilise the population, with the election coming five years after massive demonstrations for direct elections in the late 1980s Diretas Já movement had called for the end of the military regime. Sarney was barred by the 1988 constitution from running for immediate reelection as a vice president ascending to the office of president counts as a full term.
Twenty-two candidates entered the race, a record number of candidates in a single presidential election. The 1989 elections were the first in which the president and vice-president were jointly elected as running mates.
Among the twenty-two candidates, only Ulysses Guimarães and Paulo Maluf had previously run for the presidency, although Jânio Quadros planned to run but eventually dropped his candidacy. Aureliano Chaves had also previously served as vice-president. Orestes Quercia, a member of Sarney's Brazilian Democratic Movement, led the polls until he decided to drop out of the contest. TV host Silvio Santos announced he would run just 20 days before the election, but his candidacy was mired in uncertainty and eventually revoked by the Superior Electoral Court because of a technicality.
The first round took place on November 15, 1989, the 100th anniversary of the republican coup which deposed Pedro II of Brazil and proclaimed the First Brazilian Republic. Since no candidate managed to win a majority of votes, a second round was held on December 17, featuring the two top finishers: Fernando Collor de Mello of the economically liberal right-wing populist National Reconstruction Party and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva of the social democratic left-wing populist Workers' Party.
Both candidates had a reputation as outsiders. Despite being a charismatic leader, Lula failed to attract the majority of votes from poor, unskilled and semiskilled workers – who would, later on, form the basis of the Workers' Party electorate. These voters predominantly favored Collor, who was associated with the traditional economic elites of northeastern Brazil. Lula's support was greater among progressive intellectuals, Catholic activists, skilled industrial workers, and the college-educated middle class of the South and Southeast, despite himself being a poor immigrant from the Northeast.
Collor argued that Lula's plans of aggressive spending on inequality reduction programs would destroy Brazil's then-fragile economy, harming the poor people he claimed to champion. He also appealed to his young age and distanced himself from the previous military governments, as well as from the newer political elites who had supported the Sarney government and its Plano Cruzado, which had failed to stop hyperinflation.
After Leonel Brizola was defeated in the first round, he supported Lula, with his support being considered crucial to Lula's strong performance in Rio Grande do Sul in the second round.
Ultimately, Collor was elected with a six-point lead. His initial widespread support, based on his strong rhetoric against corruption, quickly vanished in the wake of his 1992 impeachment for corruption charges, leading to Collor resigning from office in an unsuccessful attempt to stop the proceedings. Lula would go on to be elected president for the first time in the 2002 elections, win a second term in the 2006 contest and be elected president for the second time in the 2022 elections. The Workers' Party also won the presidency twice more with Dilma Rousseff, a protégé of Lula, in the 2010 and 2014 elections. The party would remain in power until her impeachment in 2016 and the 2018 election of right-wing populist Jair Bolsonaro.
Debates
First round
Following the first round, Rede Globo aired a debate between Lula and Collor live. During the broadcast of primetime news program Jornal Nacional on the following day, an edited-down highlight reel of the debate was aired. Critics argued that it highlighted Collor's best moments and Lula's worst ones, and that coverage was sympathetical to Collor, who was supposedly close to Globo's CEO Roberto Marinho. The event was explored on the British Channel 4 documentary Beyond Citizen Kane, which features an interview with then head of journalism at Globo, Armando Nogueira, where he says his edit of the debate was edited so as to favor Collor and claims that after complaining to Marinho about the edit, he was dismissed from the company.
Some attribute Collor's electoral victory to this particular event and other media coverage, such as a Jornal do Brasil article claiming Lula had fathered an illegitimate daughter. Later, Collor's campaign contacted Lula's ex-girlfriend, the mother of the child in question, and claimed that Lula had asked her to perform an abortion. This is said to be compounded by a prohibition on electoral advertising immediately preceding an election, which prevented Lula from responding to the accusations.
The kidnapping of wealthy businessman Abilio Diniz on the day of the election by alleged supporters of PT is believed to have harmed Lula, who was legally forbidden from speaking to the press on election day to disavow the crime due to Brazilian election rules.
A 2023 study found that Rede Globo's media coverage on the eve of the election led Lula to lose millions of votes.
| 1989 Brazilian presidential election debates | No. | Date | Hosts | Moderators | colspan=11 scope=col | Participants | Key: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present Absent Invited to other debate Not invited | [](national-reconstruction-party) | [](workers-party-brazil) | [](democratic-labour-party-brazil) | [](brazilian-social-democracy-party) | [](democratic-social-party) | [](liberal-party-brazil-1985) | [](brazilian-democratic-movement) | [](brazilian-communist-party) | [](democrats-brazil) | [](brazilian-labour-party-1981) | Collor | Lula | Brizola | Covas | Maluf | Afif | Ulysses | Freire | Chaves | Caiado | Camargo | 1 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| Monday, 17 July 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Marília Gabriela | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monday, 14 August 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Marília Gabriela | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 15 August 1989 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monday, 16 October 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Marília Gabriela | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunday, 5 November 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Marília Gabriela | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sunday, 12 November 1989 | SBT | Boris Casoy |
Second round
| 1989 Brazilian presidential election debates | No. | Date | Hosts | Moderators | colspan=2 scope=col | Participants | Key: | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present Absent | [](national-reconstruction-party) | [](workers-party-brazil) | Collor | Lula | 1 | 2 | |||||
| Sunday, 3 December 1989 | Rede Manchete | Alexandre Garcia | |||||||||
| Boris Casoy | |||||||||||
| Eliakim Araújo | |||||||||||
| Marília Gabriela | |||||||||||
| Thursday, 14 December 1989 | Rede Bandeirantes | Alexandre Garcia | |||||||||
| Boris Casoy | |||||||||||
| Eliakim Araújo | |||||||||||
| Marília Gabriela |
Opinion polls
First round
| Abstentions/Undecided |
|---|
| Pollster/client(s) | Date(s) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| conducted | Sample | |||||||||||
| size | Collor | |||||||||||
| PRN | Lula | |||||||||||
| PT | Brizola | |||||||||||
| PDT | Covas | |||||||||||
| PSDB | Maluf | |||||||||||
| PDS | Afif | |||||||||||
| PL | Guimarães | |||||||||||
| PMDB | Others | Abst. | ||||||||||
| Undec. | Lead | |||||||||||
| **1989 election** | 15 Nov | – | **30.48%** | **17.19%** | **16.51%** | **11.52%** | **8.85%** | **4.84%** | **4.74%** | **5.87%** | **6.45%** | 13.29% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 15 Nov | 10,645 | **30%** | 18% | 14% | 10% | 8% | 4% | 4% | – | 6% | 12% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 14 Nov | – | **26%** | 15% | 14% | 11% | 9% | 5% | 5% | 4% | 11% | 11% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 10 Nov | – | **27%** | 15% | 14% | 11% | 9% | 5% | 4% | 5% | 10% | 12% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 6–7 Nov | – | **25%** | 15% | 14% | 9% | 7% | 4% | 4% | 13% | 9% | 10% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 1–3 Nov | – | **21%** | 14% | 13% | 9% | 7% | 4% | 4% | 17% | 13% | 7% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 25–26 Oct | 5,251 | **26%** | 14% | 15% | 9% | 9% | 5% | 4% | 5% | 13% | 11% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 18–19 Oct | 5,261 | **26%** | 14% | 15% | 8% | 9% | 7% | 3% | 5% | 13% | 11% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 7–8 Oct | 4,893 | **29%** | 10% | 13% | 7% | 8% | 8% | 3% | 4% | 17% | 16% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 23–24 Sep | 5,057 | **33%** | 7% | 15% | 6% | 7% | 7% | 3% | 5% | 17% | 18% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 2–3 Sep | 4,981 | **40%** | 6% | 14% | 5% | 8% | 5% | 2% | 4% | 16% | 26% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 19–20 Aug | 5,079 | **41%** | 5% | 14% | 5% | 7% | 3% | 3% | 4% | 18% | 27% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 22–23 Jul | 5,156 | **38%** | 6% | 12% | 6% | 7% | 2% | 4% | 4% | 21% | 26% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 1–2 Jul | 10,212 | **40%** | 7% | 12% | 6% | 5% | 2% | 5% | 5% | 18% | 28% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 3–4 Jun | 10,447 | **42%** | 7% | 11% | 5% | 4% | 1% | 5% | 4% | 21% | 31% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 23–24 Apr | 10,421 | 14% | 12% | 13% | 6% | 5% | 1% | – | **24%** | 21% | 4% |
Second round
| Abstentions/Undecided |
|---|
| Pollster/client(s) | Date(s) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| conducted | Sample | |||||
| size | Collor | |||||
| PRN | Lula | |||||
| PT | Abst. | |||||
| Undec. | Lead | |||||
| **1989 election** | 17 Dec | – | **53.03%** | **46.97%** | **5.42%** | 6.06% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 17 Dec | 11,995 | **51.5%** | 48.5% | – | 3.0% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 16 Dec | 11,995 | **47%** | 44% | 10% | 3% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 12–13 Dec | 5,250 | **46%** | 45% | 9% | 1% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 8 Dec | 5,250 | **47%** | 44% | 9% | 3% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 4 Dec | 5,250 | **49%** | 41% | 10% | 9% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 30 Nov | 5,250 | **50%** | 40% | 10% | 10% |
| [Datafolha](http://media.folha.uol.com.br/datafolha/2018/04/27/4c6893d510a761911d2dddfe97b4a41d.pdf) | 22 Nov | 5,716 | **48%** | 39% | 13% | 9% |
Results
Fernando Collor received the most votes in most states, except for the Federal District, where Lula came first, and Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul, won by Leonel Brizola. In the second round, Lula won in Rio Grande do Sul, Rio de Janeiro, the Federal District, and his home state of Pernambuco, whilst Collor carried every other state.
By federative unit
First round
| Federative unit | Collor | Lula | Brizola | Covas | Maluf | Afif | Ulysses | Other candidates | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acre | **49,862** | **38.95%** | 22,954 | 17.93% | 8,582 | 6.70% | 3,716 | 2.90% | 12,882 | 10.06% | 7,149 | 5.58% | 14,580 | 11.39% | 8,285 | 6.47% | ||||||||
| Alagoas | **554,612** | **64.38%** | 76,227 | 8.85% | 63,071 | 7.32% | 67,240 | 7.81% | 9,253 | 1.07% | 26,869 | 3.12% | 9,138 | 1.06% | 55,060 | 6.39% | ||||||||
| Amapá | **42,255** | **48.42%** | 21,026 | 24.09% | 4,935 | 5.65% | 3,695 | 4.23% | 1,960 | 2.25% | 4,323 | 4.95% | 3,883 | 4.45% | 5,194 | 5.95% | ||||||||
| Amazonas | **300,848** | **50.49%** | 125,406 | 21.05% | 26,129 | 4.39% | 36,380 | 6.11% | 24,832 | 4.17% | 36,544 | 6.13% | 17,303 | 2.90% | 28,427 | 4.77% | ||||||||
| Bahia | **1,408,614** | **34.77%** | 1,050,444 | 25.93% | 229,186 | 5.66% | 248,803 | 6.14% | 72,200 | 1.78% | 100,970 | 2.49% | 638,007 | 15.75% | 302,851 | 7.48% | ||||||||
| Ceará | **861,030** | **33.09%** | 321,526 | 12.36% | 505,440 | 19.43% | 477,286 | 18.34% | 108,877 | 4.18% | 60,228 | 2.31% | 85,406 | 3.28% | 182,063 | 7.00% | ||||||||
| Espírito Santo | **468,910** | **39.62%** | 264,983 | 22.39% | 105,093 | 8.88% | 118,048 | 9.97% | 32,221 | 2.72% | 45,644 | 3.86% | 71,408 | 6.03% | 77,263 | 6.53% | ||||||||
| Federal District | 172,818 | 22.75% | **220,720** | **29.06%** | 71,719 | 9.44% | 135,227 | 17.81% | 31,364 | 4.13% | 48,068 | 6.33% | 26,167 | 3.45% | 53,397 | 7.03% | ||||||||
| Goiás | **803,199** | **45.39%** | 298,261 | 16.86% | 70,146 | 3.96% | 101,514 | 5.74% | 80,376 | 4.54% | 111,808 | 6.32% | 157,355 | 8.89% | 146,852 | 8.30% | ||||||||
| Maranhão | **609,758** | **46.93%** | 255,586 | 19.67% | 116,539 | 8.97% | 44,154 | 3.40% | 35,939 | 2.77% | 54,021 | 4.16% | 72,794 | 5.60% | 110,471 | 8.50% | ||||||||
| Mato Grosso | **344,973** | **46.60%** | 76,700 | 10.36% | 75,194 | 10.16% | 33,472 | 4.52% | 43,679 | 5.90% | 66,916 | 9.04% | 56,209 | 7.59% | 43,132 | 5.83% | ||||||||
| Mato Grosso do Sul | **436,539** | **53.23%** | 73,697 | 8.99% | 63,721 | 7.77% | 50,465 | 6.15% | 47,237 | 5.76% | 60,061 | 7.32% | 44,130 | 5.38% | 44.313 | 5.40% | ||||||||
| Minas Gerais | **2,801,422** | **36.12%** | 1,792,789 | 23.11% | 418,935 | 5.40% | 799,227 | 10.30% | 275,669 | 3.55% | 503,027 | 6.48% | 459,308 | 5.92% | 706,515 | 9.11% | ||||||||
| Pará | **793,384** | **52.01%** | 294,981 | 19.34% | 52,361 | 3.43% | 101,282 | 6.64% | 62,848 | 4.12% | 65,419 | 4.29% | 66,384 | 4.35% | 88,667 | 5.81% | ||||||||
| Paraíba | **457,129** | **35.16%** | 313,895 | 24.14% | 186,076 | 14.31% | 94,774 | 7.29% | 33,777 | 2.60% | 25,659 | 1.97% | 97,634 | 7.51% | 91,247 | 7.02% | ||||||||
| Paraná | **1,738,216** | **40.64%** | 353,907 | 8.27% | 616,170 | 14.41% | 325,652 | 7.61% | 319,932 | 7.48% | 494,608 | 11.56% | 144,687 | 3.38% | 284,052 | 6.64% | ||||||||
| Pernambuco | **1,066,986** | **37.74%** | 950,189 | 33.61% | 265,548 | 9.39% | 101,093 | 3.58% | 43,518 | 1.54% | 70,093 | 2.48% | 89,991 | 3.18% | 239,410 | 8.47% | ||||||||
| Piauí | **383,632** | **39.75%** | 219,406 | 22.73% | 93,507 | 9.69% | 48,763 | 5.05% | 38,236 | 3.96% | 36,829 | 3.82% | 61,037 | 6.32% | 83,662 | 8.67% | ||||||||
| Rio de Janeiro | 1,189,385 | 16.07% | 904,223 | 12.22% | **3,855,561** | **52.09%** | 643,786 | 8.70% | 115,656 | 1.56% | 191,751 | 2.59% | 124,752 | 1.69% | 376,389 | 5.09% | ||||||||
| Rio Grande do Norte | **326,878** | **33.37%** | 239,010 | 24.40% | 78,259 | 7.99% | 56,768 | 5.80% | 52,546 | 5.36% | 20,846 | 2.13% | 139,093 | 14.20% | 66,084 | 6.75% | ||||||||
| Rio Grande do Sul | 480,842 | 9.23% | 350,062 | 6.72% | **3,262,925** | **62.66%** | 249,384 | 4.79% | 309,406 | 5.94% | 178,311 | 3.42% | 185,433 | 3.56% | 190,826 | 3.66% | ||||||||
| Rondônia | **165,607** | **42.82%** | 75,532 | 19.53% | 39,650 | 10.25% | 13,718 | 3.55% | 24,934 | 6.45% | 26,123 | 6.75% | 19,370 | 5.01% | 21,800 | 5.64% | ||||||||
| Roraima | **32,130** | **59.72%** | 5,417 | 10.07% | 5,092 | 9.47% | 2,944 | 5.47% | 1,377 | 2.56% | 2,252 | 4.19% | 1,589 | 2.95% | 2,996 | 5.57% | ||||||||
| Santa Catarina | 566,990 | 23.52% | 255,015 | 10.58% | **632,170** | **26.22%** | 177,980 | 7.38% | 236,151 | 9.79% | 206,957 | 8.58% | 242,757 | 10.07% | 93,042 | 3.86% | ||||||||
| São Paulo | **4,085,223** | **24.40%** | 2,921,970 | 17.45% | 252,651 | 1.51% | 3,802,330 | 22.71% | 3,934,334 | 23.50% | 807,944 | 4.83% | 331,576 | 1.98% | 605,316 | 3.62% | ||||||||
| Sergipe | **301,730** | **50.81%** | 108,002 | 18.19% | 55,751 | 9.39% | 39,499 | 6.65% | 23,550 | 3.97% | 9,744 | 1.64% | 12,161 | 2.05% | 43,442 | 7.31% | ||||||||
| Tocantins | **164,964** | **57.08%** | 27,888 | 9.65% | 11,605 | 4.02% | 9,739 | 3.37% | 13,258 | 4.59% | 9,822 | 3.40% | 32,701 | 11.32% | 19,023 | 6.58% | ||||||||
| *Abroad* | 3,094 | 24.66% | 2,505 | 19.96% | 1,649 | 13.14% | **3,442** | **27.43%** | 573 | 4.57% | 534 | 4.26% | 143 | 1.14% | 609 | 4.85% | ||||||||
| Source: [Superior Electoral Court](https://www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/eleicoes-anteriores/eleicoes-1989/resultados) |
Second round
| Federative unit | Collor | Lula | Votes | % | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acre | **89,103** | **69.18%** | 39,695 | 30.82% | ||
| Alagoas | **683,920** | **76.07%** | 215,177 | 23.93% | ||
| Amapá | **53,780** | **64.25%** | 29,926 | 35.75% | ||
| Amazonas | **397,103** | **66.79%** | 197,431 | 33.21% | ||
| Bahia | **2,118,307** | **51.68%** | 1,980,907 | 48.32% | ||
| Ceará | **1,478,288** | **56.91%** | 1,119,367 | 43.09% | ||
| Espírito Santo | **689,981** | **59.30%** | 473,597 | 40.70% | ||
| Federal District | 268,963 | 37.32% | **451,780** | **62.68%** | ||
| Goiás | **1,160,446** | **68.44%** | 535,142 | 31.56% | ||
| Maranhão | **867,188** | **62.44%** | 521,753 | 37.56% | ||
| Mato Grosso | **475,046** | **66.39%** | 240,486 | 33.61% | ||
| Mato Grosso do Sul | **579,064** | **72.85%** | 215,859 | 27.15% | ||
| Minas Gerais | **4,186,658** | **55.51%** | 3,355,125 | 44.49% | ||
| Pará | **1,105,646** | **72.49%** | 419,643 | 27.51% | ||
| Paraíba | **740,208** | **54.97%** | 606,446 | 45.03% | ||
| Paraná | **2,793,218** | **67.29%** | 1,357,754 | 32.71% | ||
| Pernambuco | 1,455,747 | 49.10% | **1,509,102** | **50.90%** | ||
| Piauí | **590,594** | **58.92%** | 411,814 | 41.08% | ||
| Rio de Janeiro | 1,941,499 | 27.08% | **5,227,886** | **72.92%** | ||
| Rio Grande do Norte | **535,195** | **52.59%** | 482,463 | 47.41% | ||
| Rio Grande do Sul | 1,532,824 | 31.28% | **3,366,795** | **68.72%** | ||
| Rondônia | **234,272** | **63.25%** | 136,123 | 36.75% | ||
| Roraima | **39,916** | **76.35%** | 12,364 | 23.65% | ||
| Santa Catarina | **1,167,689** | **50.32%** | 1,152,730 | 49.68% | ||
| São Paulo | **9,270,501** | **57.90%** | 6,739,403 | 42.10% | ||
| Sergipe | **403,480** | **65.89%** | 208,829 | 34.11% | ||
| Tocantins | **227,029** | **78.39%** | 62,576 | 21.61% | ||
| *Abroad* | 4,541 | 44.65% | **5,630** | **55.35%** | ||
| Source: [Superior Electoral Court](https://www.tse.jus.br/eleicoes/eleicoes-anteriores/eleicoes-1989/resultados) |
Notes
References
References
- "Bipartidarismo: Sistema vigorou durante a ditadura militar".
- Globo, Acervo-Jornal O.. "Sequestro do empresário Abilio Diniz agitou campanha presidencial em 1989".
- Brooke, James. (1992-11-08). "Looting Brazil (Published 1992)". The New York Times.
- (2018-08-20). "Roadmap to Brazil's presidency: win in Minas Gerais".
- "Fernando Collor De Mello {{!}} Encyclopedia.com".
- (August 2018). "Sindicalismo do ABC e a Era Lula: Contradições e Resistências". Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política.
- Elizangela. (2018-01-21). "Brizola 1989: eleições livres ou golpe?".
- Richard Bourne. (19 October 2009). "Lula of Brazil: The Story So Far". University of California Press.
- "Eleições 2006 – Com votação recorde, Lula chega ao segundo mandato". [[Grupo Globo]].
- Jacky Picard, ed. ''Le Brésil de Lula: Les défis d'un socialisme démocratique à la périphérie du capitalisme''. Paris: Khartala, 2003, page 81
- Brooke, James. (1989-12-13). "Polls Show Brazilian Leftist Candidate Closing Gap as Election Day Nears (Published 1989)". The New York Times.
- (2023). "Media Manipulation in Young Democracies: Evidence From the 1989 Brazilian Presidential Election". Comparative Political Studies.
- (1992-12-30). "Brazil President Resigns in Wake of Impeachment".
- "A eleição de 2018 será como a de 1989? Sim e não, segundo o UBS | EXAME".
- "Há 25 anos, Silvio Santos tentou presidência; você votaria?".
- Wendy Hunter, ''The Transformation of the Workers' Party in Brazil, 1989–2009''. Cambridge University Press, 2010, {{ISBN. 978-0-521-51455-2, page 111
- Globo, Acervo-Jornal O.. "Sequestro do empresário Abilio Diniz agitou campanha presidencial em 1989".
- [http://www.electoralgeography.com/new/en/countries/b/brazil/brazil-presidential-election-1989.html Brazil. Presidential Election 1989] {{Webarchive. link. (2014-07-07 Electoral Geography)
- "Partido Municipalista Brasileiro (PMB)".
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1989 Brazilian presidential election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report