From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1984 Palauan Compact of Free Association referendum
A second referendum on the Compact of Free Association was held in Palau on 4 September 1984, after the previous referendum had failed to achieve the 75% in favour necessary. Voters were asked two questions:
- Whether they approved of the proposed Compact of Free Association between Palau and the United States
- What their preference for a future political status was if the Free Association (question one) was rejected. They were offered the choice of a closer relationship than Trusteeship, or independence.
The first question was approved by 67.1% of voters, making the outcome of the second question (in which 3,378 blank ballots had been cast, more than either of the choices given) irrelevant. Voter turnout was 71.3%.
Results
Question 1
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 4,290 | 67.1 |
| Against | 2,103 | 32.9 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 65 | - |
| Total | 6,458 | 100 |
| Source: Nohlen et al. |
Question 2
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| Closer relationship | 2,127 | 69.4 |
| Independence | 936 | 30.6 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 3,395 | - |
| Total | 6,458 | 100 |
| Source: Nohlen et al. |
References
References
- [[Dieter Nohlen]], Florian Grotz & Christof Hartmann (2001) ''Elections in Asia: A data handbook, Volume II'', p751 {{ISBN. 0-19-924959-8
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1984 Palauan Compact of Free Association referendum — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report