From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1978 Ecuadorian constitutional referendum
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| date | |
| country | Ecuador |
| title | Do you want a new constitution or a revised version of the existing constitution? |
| yes_text | New constitution |
| no_text | Revised constitution |
| yes | 807,574 |
| no | 582,556 |
| invalid | 421,510 |
| electorate | 2,088,874 |
A constitutional referendum was held in Ecuador on 15 January 1978. Voters were asked whether they wanted a new constitution or a revised version of the existing constitution. The former option was approved by 57% of voters, although around invalid votes accounted for a quarter of those cast, with many cast in protest at not having the option of returning to the 1945 constitution.
Background
Following a military coup in 1972, in 1976 the military government formed three commissions to assist with the transition back to civil rule. One group was to draft a new constitution, one was to revise the 1945 constitution, and one to create laws on political parties, local elections and the referendum.
Results
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| New constitution | 778,611 | 57.20 |
| Revised constitution | 582,556 | 42,80 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 450,473 | – |
| **Total** | **1,811,640** | **100** |
| Registered voters/turnout | 2,088,874 | 86.73 |
| Source: [Direct Democracy](http://www.sudd.ch/event.php?lang=en&id=ec011978) |
References
References
- de
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1978 Ecuadorian constitutional referendum — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report