From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1962 Quebec general election
Canadian provincial election
Canadian provincial election
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| election_name | 1962 Quebec general election |
| country | Quebec |
| type | parliamentary |
| ongoing | no |
| party_colour | no |
| party_name | no |
| previous_election | 1960 Quebec general election |
| previous_year | 1960 |
| previous_mps | 26th Quebec Legislature |
| next_election | 1966 Quebec general election |
| next_year | 1966 |
| elected_members | 27th Quebec Legislature |
| seats_for_election | 95 seats in the [27th Legislative Assembly of Quebec](27th-legislative-assembly-of-quebec) |
| 48 seats were needed for a majority | |
| election_date | November 14, 1962 |
| image1 | Jean Lesage (premier of Quebec).jpg |
| image1_size | 180x180px |
| colour1 | |
| leader1 | Jean Lesage |
| leader_since1 | May 31, 1958 |
| party1 | |
| leaders_seat1 | Québec-Ouest |
| last_election1 | 51 seats, 51.38% |
| seats1 | **63** |
| seat_change1 | 12 |
| popular_vote1 | **1,205,253** |
| percentage1 | **56.40%** |
| swing1 | 5.02% |
| image2 | Daniel_Johnson_Sr._at_Expo_67.jpg |
| image2_size | 180x180px |
| colour2 | |
| leader2 | Daniel Johnson Sr. |
| leader_since2 | September 23, 1961 |
| party2 | |
| leaders_seat2 | Bagot |
| last_election2 | 43 seats, 46.61% |
| seats2 | 31 |
| seat_change2 | 12 |
| popular_vote2 | 900,817 |
| percentage2 | 42.15% |
| swing2 | 4.46% |
| title | Premier |
| before_election | Jean Lesage |
| before_party | |
| after_election | Jean Lesage |
| posttitle | Premier after election |
| after_party |
48 seats were needed for a majority
The 1962 Quebec general election was held on November 14, 1962, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Quebec, Canada. The incumbent Quebec Liberal Party, led by Jean Lesage, was re-elected, defeating the (UN) led by Daniel Johnson, Sr.
In an unusual move, the election was called just two years after the previous 1960 general election. Lesage sought a mandate for the nationalization of the electrical power industry, using the slogan , and declaring it to be the single issue on which he was ready to stake his political career.
A few days before the election, the 's chief organizer, André Lagarde, was arrested for fraud. The Liberals claimed this was proof of lingering corruption dating from the Maurice Duplessis era, but the UN cried foul. While the courts eventually acquitted Lagarde after the election, the incident may well have contributed to the UN's defeat.
The Liberal Party won an increased number of seats and a higher percentage of the popular vote compared to the previous election. Their majority government allowed them to pursue their campaign promise of electricity nationalization, spearheaded by future founder René Lévesque, who at the time served as a cabinet minister in the Lesage government.

, a new group founded by Hertel Larocque (a former secretary of Camillien Houde), fielded 11 candidates in the election but failed to gather a significant number of votes. Johnson opted not to have the UN join forces with it, keeping in mind the failure the Liberals had had in attempting the same manoeuvre with the in 1956. However, Social Credit was still a force to reckon with even while not campaigning on the provincial scene, and Johnson did not hesitate to use its vocabulary in his speeches while on the campaign trail.
| Candidates | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| align="center" | **Lib** | align="center" | **UN** |
| 2 | 67 | ||
| 3 | 24 | ||
| 4 | 2 | ||
| 5 | 2 | ||
| Total | 95 |
Results
|-
! colspan=2 rowspan=2 | Political party
! rowspan=2 | Party leader
! colspan=4 | MPPs
! colspan=4 | Votes
|-
! Candidates
!1962
!±
!#
! ±
!%
! ± (pp)
| 95 || 52 || 63 || 11 || 1,205,253 || 128,118 || 56.40% || 5.02
| 95 || 42 || 31 || 11 || 900,817 || 76,490 || 42.15% || 4.46
| || 9 || 1 || 1 || || 13,581 || 8,606 || 0.64% || 0.42
| - |
|---|
| 10 |
| - |
| 1 |
| - |
| 11 |
| - |
| 2 |
| - |
| 1 |
| - |
| ! colspan="3" style="text-align:left;" |
| 224 |
| ! " colspan="2" |
| ! " colspan="2" |
| ! " colspan="2" |
| - |
| 29,509 |
| 4,012 |
| - |
| 2,166,476 |
| 36,369 |
| 79.59 |
| 2.07 |
| - |
| 2,721,933 |
| 113,494 |
| } |
Vote and seat summaries
|File:Ternary QC1960.svg |1960 |File:Ternary QC1962.svg |1962
| Party | Seats | Votes | Change (pp) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{bartable | 5.02 | |||
| {{bartable | -4.46 | |||
| {{bartable | -0.42 | |||
| {{bartable | -0.14 |
Synopsis of results
| Riding | Winning party | Turnout | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| including spoilt ballots | Votes | Name | **[1960](1960-quebec-general-election)** | Party | Votes | Share | Margin | |||||||||||
| # | Margin | |||||||||||||||||
| % | Lib | UN | Ind | I-Lib | AP | Other | Total | |||||||||||
| Abitibi-Est | Lib | Lib | 14,892 | 51.93% | 1,109 | 3.87% | 85.24% | 14,892 | 13,783 | – | – | – | – | 28,675 | ||||
| Abitibi-Ouest | Lib | Lib | 6,732 | 56.97% | 1,648 | 13.95% | 88.52% | 6,732 | 5,084 | – | – | – | – | 11,816 | ||||
| Argenteuil | UN | UN | 7,922 | 54.57% | 2,610 | 17.98% | 86.22% | 5,312 | 7,922 | – | 1,284 | – | – | 14,518 | ||||
| Arthabaska | Lib | Lib | 10,988 | 53.54% | 1,453 | 7.08% | 91.70% | 10,988 | 9,535 | – | – | – | – | 20,523 | ||||
| Bagot | UN | UN | 5,336 | 55.11% | 989 | 10.21% | 92.36% | 4,347 | 5,336 | – | – | – | – | 9,683 | ||||
| Beauce | Lib | UN | 12,583 | 51.96% | 947 | 3.91% | 87.25% | 11,636 | 12,583 | – | – | – | – | 24,219 | ||||
| Beauharnois | UN | Lib | 11,884 | 51.72% | 791 | 3.44% | 90.19% | 11,884 | 11,093 | – | – | – | – | 22,977 | ||||
| Bellechasse | Lib | UN | 5,176 | 51.35% | 273 | 2.71% | 80.81% | 4,903 | 5,176 | – | – | – | – | 10,079 | ||||
| Berthier | UN | Lib | 5,938 | 50.05% | 110 | 0.93% | 85.57% | 5,938 | 5,828 | – | – | 98 | – | 11,864 | ||||
| Bonaventure | Lib | Lib | 9,525 | 57.28% | 2,421 | 14.56% | 85.26% | 9,525 | 7,104 | – | – | – | – | 16,629 | ||||
| Bourget | Lib | Lib | 42,906 | 58.74% | 17,728 | 24.27% | 73.21% | 42,906 | 25,178 | 4,807 | – | 153 | – | 73,044 | ||||
| Brome | Lib | Lib | 3,417 | 55.82% | 713 | 11.65% | 81.43% | 3,417 | 2,704 | – | – | – | – | 6,121 | ||||
| Chambly | Lib | Lib | 36,290 | 63.83% | 17,094 | 30.07% | 76.89% | 36,290 | 19,196 | 778 | 353 | – | 235 | 56,852 | ||||
| Champlain | UN | UN | 12,346 | 52.74% | 1,282 | 5.48% | 90.97% | 11,064 | 12,346 | – | – | – | – | 23,410 | ||||
| Charlevoix | UN | Lib | 6,942 | 52.23% | 594 | 4.47% | 87.21% | 6,942 | 6,348 | – | – | – | – | 13,290 | ||||
| Châteauguay | UN | Lib | 8,727 | 54.83% | 1,538 | 9.66% | 84.04% | 8,727 | 7,189 | – | – | – | – | 15,916 | ||||
| Chicoutimi | UN | UN | 16,910 | 50.29% | 192 | 0.57% | 88.05% | 16,718 | 16,910 | – | – | – | – | 33,628 | ||||
| Compton | UN | UN | 5,568 | 54.45% | 1,014 | 9.92% | 87.30% | 4,554 | 5,568 | – | – | 104 | – | 10,226 | ||||
| Deux-Montagnes | Lib | Lib | 8,518 | 57.31% | 2,174 | 14.63% | 86.94% | 8,518 | 6,344 | – | – | – | – | 14,862 | ||||
| Dorchester | UN | UN | 7,818 | 53.64% | 1,060 | 7.27% | 83.78% | 6,758 | 7,818 | – | – | – | – | 14,576 | ||||
| Drummond | Lib | Lib | 14,621 | 57.17% | 3,668 | 14.34% | 90.97% | 14,621 | 10,953 | – | – | – | – | 25,574 | ||||
| Duplessis | Lib | Lib | 7,345 | 59.84% | 2,416 | 19.68% | 79.19% | 7,345 | 4,929 | – | – | – | – | 12,274 | ||||
| Frontenac | UN | UN | 6,217 | 52.46% | 582 | 4.91% | 87.92% | 5,635 | 6,217 | – | – | – | – | 11,852 | ||||
| Gaspé-Nord | Lib | UN | 5,183 | 51.75% | 444 | 4.43% | 88.07% | 4,739 | 5,183 | 93 | – | – | – | 10,015 | ||||
| Gaspé-Sud | UN | Lib | 7,197 | 50.40% | 113 | 0.79% | 89.09% | 7,197 | 7,084 | – | – | – | – | 14,281 | ||||
| Gatineau | UN | Lib | 10,289 | 54.57% | 1,725 | 9.15% | 77.83% | 10,289 | 8,564 | – | – | – | – | 18,853 | ||||
| Hull | Lib | Lib | 14,854 | 63.36% | 6,266 | 26.73% | 78.05% | 14,854 | 8,588 | – | – | – | – | 23,442 | ||||
| Huntingdon | UN | UN | 3,449 | 54.14% | 528 | 8.29% | 85.15% | 2,921 | 3,449 | – | – | – | – | 6,370 | ||||
| Iberville | Lib | Lib | 4,452 | 55.87% | 936 | 11.75% | 91.07% | 4,452 | 3,516 | – | – | – | – | 7,968 | ||||
| Îles-de-la-Madeleine | UN | Lib | 2,674 | 51.86% | 192 | 3.72% | 92.10% | 2,674 | 2,482 | – | – | – | – | 5,156 | ||||
| Jacques-Cartier | Lib | Lib | 69,199 | 77.74% | 49,388 | 55.49% | 72.46% | 69,199 | 19,811 | – | – | – | – | 89,010 | ||||
| Joliette | UN | UN | 10,236 | 52.96% | 5,037 | 26.06% | 85.90% | 5,199 | 10,236 | – | 3,891 | – | – | 19,326 | ||||
| Jonquière-Kénogami | Lib | Lib | 16,100 | 60.38% | 5,536 | 20.76% | 86.48% | 16,100 | 10,564 | – | – | – | – | 26,664 | ||||
| Kamouraska | UN | Lib | 5,453 | 50.19% | 41 | 0.38% | 82.02% | 5,453 | 5,412 | – | – | – | – | 10,865 | ||||
| L'Assomption | Lib | Lib | 9,680 | 55.06% | 1,984 | 11.29% | 84.49% | 9,680 | 7,696 | – | 70 | 134 | – | 17,580 | ||||
| L'Islet | Lib | UN | 5,239 | 53.25% | 639 | 6.49% | 83.90% | 4,600 | 5,239 | – | – | – | – | 9,839 | ||||
| Labelle | UN | UN | 6,005 | 57.11% | 1,695 | 16.12% | 84.51% | 4,310 | 6,005 | 199 | – | – | – | 10,514 | ||||
| Lac-Saint-Jean | Lib | Lib | 9,171 | 52.63% | 915 | 5.25% | 89.25% | 9,171 | 8,256 | – | – | – | – | 17,427 | ||||
| Laval | Lib | Lib | 67,316 | 66.31% | 33,807 | 33.30% | 76.57% | 67,316 | 33,509 | – | 461 | 237 | – | 101,523 | ||||
| Laviolette | UN | UN | 11,315 | 53.63% | 1,533 | 7.27% | 85.24% | 9,782 | 11,315 | – | – | – | – | 21,097 | ||||
| Lévis | Lib | Lib | 13,434 | 54.43% | 2,346 | 9.51% | 88.47% | 13,434 | 11,088 | 158 | – | – | – | 24,680 | ||||
| Lotbinière | UN | UN | 6,393 | 53.56% | 849 | 7.11% | 88.62% | 5,544 | 6,393 | – | – | – | – | 11,937 | ||||
| Maisonneuve | UN | Lib | 28,814 | 58.89% | 8,702 | 17.79% | 71.75% | 28,814 | 20,112 | – | – | – | – | 48,926 | ||||
| Maskinongé | UN | UN | 5,312 | 53.71% | 734 | 7.42% | 91.18% | 4,578 | 5,312 | – | – | – | – | 9,890 | ||||
| Matane | Lib | Lib | 8,204 | 50.40% | 130 | 0.80% | 83.20% | 8,204 | 8,074 | – | – | – | – | 16,278 | ||||
| Matapédia | Lib | Lib | 6,111 | 51.05% | 252 | 2.11% | 84.29% | 6,111 | 5,859 | – | – | – | – | 11,970 | ||||
| Mégantic | Lib | Lib | 13,182 | 55.05% | 2,420 | 10.11% | 88.95% | 13,182 | 10,762 | – | – | – | – | 23,944 | ||||
| Missisquoi | UN | UN | 7,630 | 57.38% | 1,962 | 14.75% | 84.84% | 5,668 | 7,630 | – | – | – | – | 13,298 | ||||
| Montcalm | UN | Lib | 4,662 | 55.41% | 911 | 10.83% | 88.54% | 4,662 | 3,751 | – | – | – | – | 8,413 | ||||
| Montmagny | Lib | UN | 5,747 | 50.49% | 111 | 0.98% | 86.57% | 5,636 | 5,747 | – | – | – | – | 11,383 | ||||
| Montmorency | UN | UN | 5,717 | 50.67% | 398 | 3.53% | 88.32% | 5,319 | 5,717 | – | – | 247 | – | 11,283 | ||||
| Montréal–Jeanne-Mance | UN | Lib | 40,899 | 59.64% | 13,740 | 20.04% | 68.18% | 40,899 | 27,159 | 519 | – | – | – | 68,577 | ||||
| Montréal-Laurier | Lib | Lib | 15,837 | 58.16% | 4,563 | 16.76% | 76.41% | 15,837 | 11,274 | – | – | 117 | – | 27,228 | ||||
| Montréal-Mercier | UN | Lib | 16,992 | 54.07% | 3,322 | 10.57% | 75.56% | 16,992 | 13,670 | – | 764 | – | – | 31,426 | ||||
| Montréal–Notre-Dame-de-Grâce | Lib | Lib | 37,100 | 78.55% | 29,357 | 62.15% | 59.89% | 37,100 | 7,743 | – | 2,389 | – | – | 47,232 | ||||
| Montréal-Outremont | Lib | Lib | 36,076 | 77.63% | 26,647 | 57.34% | 60.34% | 36,076 | 9,429 | 969 | – | – | – | 46,474 | ||||
| Montréal–Saint-Henri | Lib | Lib | 17,548 | 53.04% | 2,540 | 7.68% | 70.28% | 17,548 | 15,008 | – | 531 | – | – | 33,087 | ||||
| Montréal–Saint-Jacques | UN | UN | 7,854 | 52.10% | 705 | 4.68% | 65.65% | 7,149 | 7,854 | – | – | – | 71 | 15,074 | ||||
| Montréal–Saint-Louis | Lib | Lib | 14,082 | 58.15% | 3,949 | 16.31% | 60.95% | 14,082 | 10,133 | – | – | – | – | 24,215 | ||||
| Montréal–Sainte-Anne | Ind | Ind | 6,058 | 45.84% | 746 | 5.65% | 57.89% | 5,312 | 1,845 | 6,058 | – | – | – | 13,215 | ||||
| Montréal–Sainte-Marie | UN | UN | 12,977 | 52.47% | 1,321 | 5.34% | 67.43% | 11,656 | 12,977 | – | – | – | 101 | 24,734 | ||||
| Montréal-Verdun | Lib | Lib | 21,208 | 65.98% | 10,274 | 31.96% | 72.80% | 21,208 | 10,934 | – | – | – | – | 32,142 | ||||
| Napierville-Laprairie | UN | Lib | 9,865 | 56.53% | 2,278 | 13.05% | 86.33% | 9,865 | 7,587 | – | – | – | – | 17,452 | ||||
| Nicolet | UN | Lib | 7,209 | 51.74% | 484 | 3.47% | 85.96% | 7,209 | 6,725 | – | – | – | – | 13,934 | ||||
| Papineau | UN | UN | 12,304 | 55.28% | 2,351 | 10.56% | 85.66% | 9,953 | 12,304 | – | – | – | – | 22,257 | ||||
| Pontiac | UN | UN | 5,108 | 59.81% | 1,675 | 19.61% | 75.86% | 3,433 | 5,108 | – | – | – | – | 8,541 | ||||
| Portneuf | Lib | Lib | 11,059 | 51.34% | 702 | 3.26% | 85.36% | 11,059 | 10,357 | – | – | 124 | – | 21,540 | ||||
| Québec-Centre | UN | Lib | 9,750 | 55.13% | 1,813 | 10.25% | 84.08% | 9,750 | 7,937 | – | – | – | – | 17,687 | ||||
| Québec-Comté | Lib | Lib | 34,090 | 57.80% | 9,196 | 15.59% | 87.07% | 34,090 | 24,894 | – | – | – | – | 58,984 | ||||
| Québec-Est | UN | Lib | 21,001 | 52.20% | 1,767 | 4.39% | 88.59% | 21,001 | 19,234 | – | – | – | – | 40,235 | ||||
| Québec-Ouest | Lib | Lib | 14,582 | 67.91% | 7,692 | 35.82% | 88.24% | 14,582 | 6,890 | – | – | – | – | 21,472 | ||||
| Richelieu | Lib | Lib | 10,598 | 55.61% | 2,137 | 11.21% | 90.11% | 10,598 | 8,461 | – | – | – | – | 19,059 | ||||
| Richmond | Lib | Lib | 9,932 | 57.88% | 2,703 | 15.75% | 85.16% | 9,932 | 7,229 | – | – | – | – | 17,161 | ||||
| Rimouski | Lib | Lib | 10,720 | 52.22% | 911 | 4.44% | 82.70% | 10,720 | 9,809 | – | – | – | – | 20,529 | ||||
| Rivière-du-Loup | Lib | Lib | 8,493 | 51.22% | 403 | 2.43% | 85.70% | 8,493 | 8,090 | – | – | – | – | 16,583 | ||||
| Roberval | Lib | UN | 11,172 | 51.23% | 537 | 2.46% | 85.07% | 10,635 | 11,172 | – | – | – | – | 21,807 | ||||
| Rouville | UN | Lib | 6,575 | 56.08% | 1,426 | 12.16% | 86.80% | 6,575 | 5,149 | – | – | – | – | 11,724 | ||||
| Rouyn-Noranda | Lib | Lib | 9,386 | 60.06% | 3,144 | 20.12% | 85.50% | 9,386 | 6,242 | – | – | – | – | 15,628 | ||||
| Saguenay | Lib | Lib | 12,116 | 57.35% | 3,106 | 14.70% | 78.97% | 12,116 | 9,010 | – | – | – | – | 21,126 | ||||
| Saint-Hyacinthe | Lib | Lib | 12,070 | 56.30% | 2,701 | 12.60% | 84.85% | 12,070 | 9,369 | – | – | – | – | 21,439 | ||||
| Saint-Jean | Lib | Lib | 8,869 | 50.55% | 866 | 4.94% | 89.57% | 8,869 | 8,003 | – | 672 | – | – | 17,544 | ||||
| Saint-Maurice | Lib | Lib | 15,684 | 55.73% | 3,224 | 11.46% | 88.19% | 15,684 | 12,460 | – | – | – | – | 28,144 | ||||
| Saint-Sauveur | UN | UN | 12,641 | 51.43% | 702 | 2.86% | 89.13% | 11,939 | 12,641 | – | – | – | – | 24,580 | ||||
| Shefford | UN | UN | 12,026 | 50.01% | 800 | 3.33% | 85.22% | 11,226 | 12,026 | – | 794 | – | – | 24,046 | ||||
| Sherbrooke | Lib | Lib | 18,539 | 52.46% | 1,825 | 5.16% | 81.29% | 18,539 | 16,714 | – | – | 86 | – | 35,339 | ||||
| Stanstead | Lib | Lib | 8,918 | 56.32% | 2,101 | 13.27% | 84.29% | 8,918 | 6,817 | – | – | 99 | – | 15,834 | ||||
| Témiscamingue | UN | Lib | 4,102 | 52.98% | 462 | 5.97% | 87.18% | 4,102 | 3,640 | – | – | – | – | 7,742 | ||||
| Témiscouata | UN | UN | 5,931 | 60.69% | 2,089 | 21.38% | 82.38% | 3,842 | 5,931 | – | – | – | – | 9,773 | ||||
| Terrebonne | Lib | Lib | 26,901 | 58.98% | 8,188 | 17.95% | 85.00% | 26,901 | 18,713 | – | – | – | – | 45,614 | ||||
| Trois-Rivières | UN | UN | 15,323 | 51.75% | 1,036 | 3.50% | 89.96% | 14,287 | 15,323 | – | – | – | – | 29,610 | ||||
| Vaudreuil-Soulanges | Lib | Lib | 10,780 | 57.49% | 2,809 | 14.98% | 90.45% | 10,780 | 7,971 | – | – | – | – | 18,751 | ||||
| Verchères | Lib | Lib | 6,827 | 58.51% | 1,985 | 17.01% | 87.62% | 6,827 | 4,842 | – | – | – | – | 11,669 | ||||
| Westmount–Saint-Georges | Lib | Lib | 13,114 | 69.03% | 11,486 | 60.46% | 59.04% | 13,114 | 1,628 | – | – | – | 4,255 | 18,997 | ||||
| Wolfe | Lib | UN | 3,939 | 52.92% | 481 | 6.46% | 90.26% | 3,458 | 3,939 | – | – | 46 | – | 7,443 | ||||
| Yamaska | UN | UN | 4,078 | 60.16% | 1,377 | 20.31% | 84.60% | 2,701 | 4,078 | – | – | – | – | 6,779 |
: = open seat : = turnout is above provincial average : = winning candidate was in previous Legislature : = incumbent had switched allegiance : = not incumbent; was previously elected to the Legislature : = incumbency arose from byelection gain : = other incumbents renominated : = multiple candidates
Analysis
| Party in 1st place | Party in 2nd place | Total | Lib | UN | Con |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | 1 | 63 | |||
| 31 | 31 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| Total | 32 | 62 | 1 | 95 |
| Parties | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 63 | 62 | 2 | |||
| 31 | 52 | 1 | |||
| 1 | 7 | 1 | |||
| 1 | |||||
| 9 | 1 | 1 | |||
| 8 | 2 | ||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||
| 1 |
| Source | Party | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| align="center" | **Lib** | align="center" | **UN** | align="center" | **Ind** |
| Seats retained | Incumbents returned | 43 | |||
| Open seats held | 2 | 2 | |||
| Byelection loss reversed | 1 | ||||
| Seats changing hands | Incumbents defeated | 17 | |||
| Incumbents defeated - previous incumbents returned | 1 | ||||
| Open seats gained | 1 | ||||
| Byelection gain held | 1 | ||||
| **Total** | 63 | 31 |
References
Works cited
References
- Drouilly, Pierre. (November 7, 2017). "Élections québécoises de 1962". Atlas des élections au Québec.
- . ["Les membres de l'Assemblée nationale par circonscription"](https://www.assnat.qc.ca/fr/patrimoine/depcir/index.html). *[[National Assembly of Quebec]]*.
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1962 Quebec general election — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report