From Surf Wiki (app.surf) — the open knowledge base
1962 Liechtenstein referendum
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| country | Liechtenstein |
| flag_year | 1937 |
| date | 25 February 1962 |
| part1_subject | Civic defence law |
| part1_choice1 | For |
| part1_percentage1 | 25.73 |
| part1_choice2 | Against |
| part1_percentage2 | 74.27 |
| part2_subject | Game hunting law |
| part2_choice1 | For |
| part2_percentage1 | 54.64 |
| part2_choice2 | Against |
| part2_percentage2 | 45.36 |
A double referendum was held in Liechtenstein on 25 February 1962. The first question was on the subject of the law on civic defence, and was rejected by 74.3% of voters. The second was on the game hunting law, and was approved by 54.6% of voters.
Results
Civic defence law
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 687 | 25.7 |
| Against | 1,983 | 74.3 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 201 | – |
| Total | 2,871 | 100 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,628 | 79.1 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
Game hunting law
| Choice | Votes | % |
|---|---|---|
| For | 1,424 | 54.6 |
| Against | 1,182 | 45.4 |
| Invalid/blank votes | 266 | – |
| Total | 2,872 | 100 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 3,628 | 79.2 |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver |
References
References
- [[Dieter Nohlen]] & Philip Stöver (2010) ''Elections in Europe: A data handbook'', p1173 {{ISBN. 978-3-8329-5609-7
This article was imported from Wikipedia and is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Content has been adapted to SurfDoc format. Original contributors can be found on the article history page.
Ask Mako anything about 1962 Liechtenstein referendum — get instant answers, deeper analysis, and related topics.
Research with MakoFree with your Surf account
Create a free account to save articles, ask Mako questions, and organize your research.
Sign up freeThis content may have been generated or modified by AI. CloudSurf Software LLC is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of AI-generated content. Always verify important information from primary sources.
Report